Edit this page
Modify this page
Edit this string
         
Economist: The New World Order Begins with Single Currency in 2018. NWO prediction for one World Bank next year
 

The Rise of the Phoenix world currency from the ashes of national fiat currencies ie. destruction of fiat currencies via hyperinflation. “Phoenix” is of course an occult metaphor. Out of the destruction, the ashes of the old world order, the Luciferian New World Order will rise like a Phoenix!

The financial publication The Economist predicted a one world bank with single global currency to usher in the New World Order Agenda, to be complete by the year 2018. In a 1988 edition, they predicted that “30 years from now”, world leaders would unite and create an international form of money known as “The Phoenix”.

The idea was to rid the world of national currencies and create an eventual monetary union. A single world currency has long been pushed by globalist as a way of weakening international borders and giving more power to the World Bank. This eerie prediction of a dystopian future was entitled Get Ready for the Phoenix: Climate Invest reports that “thirty years from now, Americans, Japanese, Europeans, and people in many other rich countries, and some relatively poor ones will probably be paying for their shopping with the same currency. Prices will be quoted not in dollars, yen or D-marks but in, let’s say, the Phoenix. The Phoenix will be favored by companies and shoppers because it will be more convenient than today’s national currencies, which by then will seem a quaint cause of much disruption to economic life in the last twentieth century”.

At the beginning of 1988, this appears an outlandish prediction. Proposals for eventual monetary union proliferated five and ten years ago, but they hardly envisaged the setbacks of 1987. The governments of the big economies tried to move an inch or two towards a more managed system of exchange rates – a logical preliminary, it might seem, to radical monetary reform. For lack of co-operation in their underlying economic policies, they bungled it horribly and provoked the rise in interest rates that brought on the stock market crash of October. These events have chastened exchange-rate reformers. The market crash taught them that the pretense of policy co-operation can be worse than nothing and that until real co-operation is feasible (i.e., until governments surrender some economic sovereignty) further attempts to peg currencies will flounder.

The new world economy

The biggest change in the world economy since the early 1970’s is that flows of money have replaced trade in goods as the force that drives exchange rates, as a result of the relentless integration of the world’s financial markets, differences in national economic policies can disturb interest rates (or expectations of future interest rates) only slightly, yet still call forth huge transfers of financial assets from one country to another. These transfers swamp the flow of trade revenues in their effect on the demand and supply for different currencies, and hence in their effect on exchange rates. As telecommunications technology continues to advance, these transactions will be cheaper and faster still. With uncoordinated economic policies, currencies can get only more volatile.

In all these ways national economic boundaries are slowly dissolving. As the trend continues, the appeal of a currency union across at least the main industrial countries will seem irresistible to everybody except foreign-exchange traders and governments. In the Phoenix zone, economic adjustment to shifts in relative prices would happen smoothly and automatically, rather as it does today between different regions within large economies (a brief on pages 74-75 explains how.) The absence of all currency risk would spur trade, investment, and employment.

The phoenix zone would impose tight constraints on national governments. There would be no such thing, for instance, as a national monetary policy. The world phoenix supply would be fixed by a new central bank, descended perhaps from the IMF. The world inflation rate – and hence, within narrow margins, each national inflation rate – would be in its charge. Each country could use taxes and public spending to offset temporary falls in demand, but it would have to borrow rather than print money to finance its budget deficit.

With no recourse to the inflation tax, governments and their creditors would be forced to judge their borrowing and lending plans more carefully than they do today. This means a big loss of economic sovereignty, but the trends that make the phoenix so appealing are taking that sovereignty away in any case. Even in a world of more-or-less floating exchange rates, individual governments have seen their policy independence checked by an unfriendly outside world.

As the next century approaches, the natural forces that are pushing the world towards economic integration will offer governments a broad choice. They can go with the flow, or they can build barricades. Preparing the way for the phoenix will mean fewer pretended agreements on policy and more real ones. It will mean allowing and then actively promoting the private-sector use of an international money alongside existing national monies. That would let people vote with their wallets for the eventual move to full currency union.

The phoenix would probably start as a cocktail of national currencies, just as the Special Drawing Right is today. In time, though, its value against national currencies would cease to matter, because people would choose it for its convenience and the stability of its purchasing power.

The alternative – to preserve policymaking autonomy – would involve a new proliferation of truly draconian controls on trade and capital flows. This course offers governments a splendid time. They could manage exchange-rate movements, deploy monetary and fiscal policy without inhibition, and tackle the resulting bursts of inflation with prices and incomes polices. It is a growth-crippling prospect. Pencil in the phoenix for around 2018, and welcome it when it comes.”
Just to be clear: This is NOT fake news. It is an article from The Economist published 29 years ago, on September 1, 1988. We are counting down the minutes.
 
Only ten years later, in 1998, The Economist was once again engaging the public in an effort to forward the globalist agenda, with an article entitled One world, one money.
 
Very much in line with the 1988 piece, the publication attempts to explain why a much more centralized and controlled system would be beneficial to the global economy, while wholly ignoring the fact that such a centralized global currency would be a massive coup for the international banking cartel, and the Rothschild banking empire’s financial bottom line.
 
Additionally, it must be noted that the creation of a global currency would give an inordinate amount of geopolitical capital to unelected international bankers, and subsequently take power away from the citizens of each nation and their respective governmental representatives.
 
Does anyone really want international bankers to have such a vast amount of political power on top of the massive financial influence and sway they already hold in the halls of power?
People want more say in their own lives, not having policy dictated to them by international banksters and bureaucrats.
 
Control over a nation’s money supply is, for all intents and purposes, the lifeblood of a state’s sovereignty – without this independence, the state only exists in name but is subservient to supranational powers whose interests lie outside of domestic and national political/economic concerns.
 
"Give me control of a Nation’s money supply, and I care not who makes it's laws" said Mayer Amschel Rothschild, founder of the Rothschild banking dynasty.
Although the Rothschild family now generally keep a very low public profile, they still have significant business operations across a wide spectrum of sectors.
 
While you may not find any one particular Rothschild on the Forbes’ most rich list, the family is estimated to control trillions of dollars in assets across the globe, thus having a strong voice across the geopolitical spectrum that many perceive as a hidden hand manipulating events silently from behind a veil of secrecy and silence.
Are you starting to get the picture? 
 
 
 
yogaesoteric
September 19, 2017
 
 

Articles published recently

> 27 MayBenjamin Fulford 5-7-18: ‘Purge at highest levels of secret government spells doom for the Satanists’

> 26 MayIncriminating documents reveal Monsanto knew they were poisoning the environment with their PCBs

> 26 MayConflict of interest: Coca-Cola funded more than 40 studies on childhood obesity – and they all failed to disclose the firm’s financial influence

> 25 MayThe purpose of mainstream media is thought control and suppression: How to find the facts between the propaganda

> 25 MayGoogle spy: Background noise can activate the voice assistant, which keeps recordings of your conversations

> 24 MayChinese Factories Employ ‘Brain Scanners’ To Stop Workers’ Mistakes Before They Happen

> 24 MaySyrian Children Start Dying After Massive UN Vaccination Campaign

> 24 MayPentagon Does Not Have Evidence of Chlorine, Sarin Use in Syria’s Douma - Mattis

> 24 MayTrump Lashed Out At FBI And H.R. Mcmaster In Tweets

> 23 MayFox News controlled by Pharma? Sean Hannity cuts off guest when psychiatric drugs are mentioned

> 23 MayBritain admits OPCW did not confirm ‘essential evidence’ on origin of Skripal poison

> 23 MayRemember when geoengineering was labeled a ‘conspiracy theory’?

> 23 MayCDC director’s resignation confirms a long pattern of CDC corruption and corporate science cover-ups that enrich the politically powerful

> 23 MayDeep State: The Nebulous Shadow Government Explained

> 22 MayHow Most Popular Music Keeps You In An Unconscious Egoic State

> 22 MayThe ‘god’ of Freemasonry Exposed

> 21 MaySKRIPAL AFFAIR: Nikki Haley Already Back-Tracking on Russian ‘Novichok’ Case

> 20 MayEdward Snowden: The ‘Deep State’ Has Infiltrated The White House

> 20 MayLavrov Brilliantly Dissects Western Lies And Manipulations On The False Flag And Skripals

> 20 May9/11 Was A False Flag Operation To Provoke US Into Waging Wars Against Muslim Nations: Experts

> 19 MayFacebook Advertising Vp Says ‘Russian Meddling’ Didn’t Aim To Sway The Election

> 19 MayFreemasons are blocking reform, says Police Federation leader

> 18 MayMK ULTRA Survivor Shares How Her Multiple Personalities Were Used By The Global Elite

> 18 MayWATCH: Pink Floyd Frontman Stops Concert To Explain False Flag Chemical Attack in Syria

> 17 May5G & Transhumanism – Your Life Will Never Be Your Own Again

> 17 MayScientist Debunks US Claims – Releases Video Evidence US Bombed Syrian Cancer Research Facility

> 17 MayFormer Canadian Defense Minister Speaks Out About the Secret Cabal that Rules the World

> 17 MaySaudi Arabia used chemical weapons in Yemen – who’s going to bomb them?

> 16 MayHarvard Professor: Geoengineering Could Kill ‘Many Tens of Thousands of People A Year’

> 16 MayThe anger trap

> 16 MayUS Presented Missile Strike on Syria as Act of Retaliation – Russian Envoy

> 16 MayOverthrowing Other People’s Governments: The Master List Of U.S. ‘Regime Changes’

> 15 MayBenjamin Fulford 4-16-18: ‘Revolution may start in France as crazy Zionists try yet again to start WW3’

> 15 MayTo understand the world today, study the past

> 14 MayHow The Company Of British PM’s Husband Benefits From Syria Strikes

> 14 MayMainstream paradigms that drive people into addiction

> 14 MayGlobal black market body parts trade is real

> 14 MayHow the 1984 ‘Orwellian state’ has been growing for a long time