In Great Britain, the traditional words “father” and “mother” have been replaced by the official terms Parent 1 and Parent 2. The terms are used in official documents. The authorities decided to make such a “politically correct” move to accommodate same-sex couples. The decision is another step towards the destruction of traditional families.
The words ‘father’ and ‘mother’ have been removed from British passport applications at the end of 2011. This became an achievement of Stonewall group, which defends the rights of sex minorities. The US State Department tried to do the same before, but it was eventually decided not to remove the two words from US passport applications.
The subject about novelties in the field of gender relations has been getting more and more popular recently. Not so long ago, the press wrote about the kindergarten in Sweden, which became world-famous after its administration decided to simply abolish the use of ‘he’ and ‘she’ pronouns.
In 2010, the European Parliament published a brochure, which recommended not to use the words ”Miss”, ”Mademoiselle”, ”Seniora” and ”Seniorita”. From the point of view of the European parliament, the use of such words was discriminating against women because they directly indicated their sexual identity.
One does not have to be an expert to realize that such novelties in various countries are not just a coincidence. It is a trend, the goal of which is to change the public perception of the role of the sexes in the society. Activists from the civic associations for the protection of families’ rights also share this point of view.
“Indeed, this is a serious international trend. It started back in the seventies and eighties as a powerful movement to defend the rights of sexual minorities. There were organizations that tried to defend even the rights of pedophiles, who, as they believed, also had the rights for their own sexual preferences. The organizations publicly said that their goal was to destroy family.
Afterwards, under the pressure of public opinion, many activists decided to refuse to openly acknowledge their sexual inclinations. They proceeded towards the protection of human rights. This is how they approach children’s rights today. They think that children must be protected from the despotism of their parents – from any forms of traditional upbringing. In order to accomplish that, one has to destroy the traditional family first
”, experts say.
In order to be more efficient, representatives of such movements began to cooperate with large international organizations such as the UN and the Council of Europe. This led to the creation of a small, albeit a very strong lobby for the protection of the rights of sexual minorities on the international level. The lobby intends to distort the perception of traditional family in the modern society.
As a result, European officials already try to avoid the use of the word ‘family’ in top-level international documents. Instead, they use “family in all of its forms” expression, which implies all forms of cohabitation. As a matter of fact, they deliberately erode and expand the notion of family. The family as we know it has virtually disappeared from the new term.
The lobby prefers to move in small steps. At first they say that one should not discriminate human beings on their gender rights and sexual orientation. It is hard to argue with this indeed. In most European countries there is no discrimination of real human rights on the base of sexual preferences. At the same time, they created special, previously unseen “rights” and preferences for homosexuals on the international level. As a result, they attach special importance to sexual orientation, which distinguishes a person and makes them stand higher than others. The words indicating the sexual identity of people gradually disappear from official speech and documents.
A family is much more than a marital union of two people. It is a reproduction mechanism for the whole society. The movements for the protection of rights of sexual minorities are trying to undermine the traditional or natural family, as we call it. They want to take it beyond the established and accepted values of civilized society along its historical evolution. More importantly, they want to separate the process of procreation and childcare from marriage and family.
According to them, children and parents are two different entities that must exist separately from each other. They cast doubts on the special role of parents in raising children. The majority of the European population, including that of Britain claim that the above-mentioned ”novelties” undermine the foundation of family and society and is a dangerous experiment for humankind.Yogaesoteric