![\"\"](\"https:\/\/yogaesoteric.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/11\/f1-3.jpg\")
<\/p>\nEverybody run! It\u2019s MEASLES! Noooooooooooooooooooooooo! The horror! An epidemic! Forcibly vaccinate these fools who are a danger to us all\u2014walking timebombs of disease! This is biological terrorism!<\/p>\n
Yes, except\u2013not so much, when you really look at it. As usual, the conventional wisdom that is so condescendingly purveyed by those who trust \u201cthe experts\u201d is deeply flawed at best, and outright wrong at worst.<\/p>\n
In this article we offer a sampling of some thought-provoking commentary on the vaccinsanity.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
First, regarding those \u201cexperts,\u201d who deliver only 14-karat gold truth in oh so respectable peer-reviewed journals:<\/p>\n
\u201cIt is simply no longer possible to believe much of the clinical research that is published, or to rely on the judgment of trusted physicians or authoritative medical guidelines.<\/em><\/p>\n I take no pleasure in this conclusion, which I reached slowly and reluctantly over my two decades as an editor of The New England Journal of Medicine<\/em>.\u201d \u2014Marcia Angell, MD (\u201cDrug Companies and Doctors: A story of Corruption.<\/em>\u201d NY Review of Books<\/em>, Jan. 15, 2009.)<\/p>\n The article where we found this quote\u2014by Jon Rappoport\u2013explains what is going on quite well (\u201cConscience-control media: Brian Williams, fake science, and the reality egg<\/em>,\u201d No More Fake News<\/em>):<\/p>\n \u201cObjectivity. What more could you want? What could be more objective than science? What could be less open to dispute? Who could be more authoritative than a scientist? What could influence public opinion more thoroughly than a whole group of scientists, an establishment of scientists, backed by the government?<\/em><\/p>\n Notice that when a news anchor takes an unimpeachable statement from a scientist, they both sound like scientists. The double whammy.<\/em><\/p>\n It impresses the rubes and yokels and even the well-educated viewers.<\/em><\/p>\n This is no accident.<\/em><\/p>\n It\u2019s a system of persuasion<\/em>.\u201d<\/p>\n But as this article (\u201cHow vaccine hysteria could spark totalitarian nightmare<\/em>,\u201d World Net Daily<\/em>, February 4, 2015) by Dr. Lee Hieb points out, \u201cscience\u201d is always evolving, always taking in new and better information while rejecting the old, so that at any given point in time, \u201cthe science\u201d is only the best guess at that time, not forever and ever:<\/p>\n \u201cScience is never \u2018concluded.\u2019 Mr. Obama and other ideologues may think the truth is finalized (\u2018The science is indisputable\u2019), but the reality is our understanding of disease and treatment are constantly being updated.<\/em><\/p>\n Just like Newton\u2019s mechanical paradigm of the universe was supplanted by Einsteinian physics, and physicists today modify that view, medical \u2018truth\u2019 is not the truth for long.<\/em><\/p>\n In an attempt to quantify change in medicine, years ago a cardiology journal discussed \u2018The Half-life of Truth\u2019. Cardiologists looked back in their journal at 20-year-old articles to see how much of what was believed then was still believed to be true. The answer? 50 percent<\/em>.\u201d<\/p>\n So why have so many concluded that vaccines are the ultimate answer and that anyone who refuses them is not only a wrongheaded twit but also a careless, cold criminal?\u00a0 They fell for it\u2014they were browbeaten again and again with Rappoport\u2019s \u201csystem of persuasion<\/em>.\u201d<\/p>\n It\u2019s extremely hard not to fall for it.<\/p>\n The persuasion system is useful to the establishment because its inoculations apparently give \u201cherd immunity\u201d against independent, critical thinking. \u00a0Because critical thinking might make one wonder whether or not the vaccines really work, a question on which Dr. Hieb provides some statistics:<\/p>\n \u201cIn 2006 an epidemic of mumps broke out in my state of Iowa. Ultimately, 11 states reported 2,597 cases of mumps. The majority of mumps cases (1,487) were reported from Iowa. As reported in Mumps Epidemic \u2013 Iowa, 2006:<\/em><\/p>\n Despite control efforts and a highly vaccinated population, this epidemic has spread across Iowa and potentially to neighboring states. According to the CDC, \u2018During the prevaccine era, nearly everyone in the United States experienced mumps, and 90 percent of cases occurred among children, although 97 percent of children entering school in Iowa had received two doses of MMR vaccine.\u2019<\/em><\/p>\n Of note, this outbreak mostly occurred in young adults of college age who had received the vaccine. Only 6 percent of those affected were known to be unvaccinated, 12 percent received one dose of MMR vaccine, 51 percent had two doses of MMR vaccine, and 31 percent (mostly adults) were not sure of their immunization history.<\/em><\/p>\n In 2008-2009, Australia had epidemics of whooping cough and measles. Health authorities there must reveal the vaccination status of children in epidemics. Eighty-four percent of Australian children who got whooping cough were fully vaccinated, and 78 percent who got measles had record of measles vaccination.<\/em><\/p>\n![\"\"](\"https:\/\/yogaesoteric.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/11\/f2-3.jpg\")
<\/em><\/p>\n