{"id":122149,"date":"2023-06-04T13:32:57","date_gmt":"2023-06-04T13:32:57","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/yogaesoteric.net\/?p=122149"},"modified":"2023-06-07T19:22:14","modified_gmt":"2023-06-07T19:22:14","slug":"40-facts-you-need-to-know-the-real-story-of-covid-3","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/yogaesoteric.net\/en\/40-facts-you-need-to-know-the-real-story-of-covid-3\/","title":{"rendered":"40 Facts You Need to Know: The Real Story of \u201cCovid\u201d (3)"},"content":{"rendered":"

Read the second part<\/a> of the article<\/p>\n

Part VI: Masks<\/strong><\/p>\n

Masks don\u2019t work<\/strong><\/p>\n

At least a dozen scientific studies have shown that masks do nothing to stop the spread of respiratory viruses.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/p>\n

One meta-analysis<\/a> published by the CDC in May 2020 found \u201cno significant reduction in influenza transmission with the use of face masks<\/em>\u201d.<\/p>\n

A Canadian review<\/a> from July 2020 found \u201climited evidence that the use of masks might reduce the risk of viral respiratory infections<\/em>\u201d.<\/p>\n

Another study<\/a> with over 8000 subjects found masks \u201cdid not seem to be effective against laboratory-confirmed viral respiratory infections nor against clinical respiratory infection<\/em>.\u201d<\/p>\n

There are literally too many to quote them all, but you can read a summary here<\/a>.<\/p>\n

While some studies have been done claiming to show mask do work for covid, they are all seriously flawed. One relied on self-reported surveys<\/a> as data. Another was so badly designed<\/a> that a panel of experts demanded it be withdrawn. A third was withdrawn after its predictions proved entirely incorrect<\/a>.<\/p>\n

The WHO commissioned its own meta-analysis in the Lancet<\/em>, but that study looked only at N95 masks and only in hospitals. [For a full rundown on the bad data in this study read here<\/a>.]<\/p>\n

Aside from scientific evidence, there\u2019s plenty of real-world evidence that masks do nothing to halt the spread of disease.<\/p>\n

For example, North Dakota and South Dakota had near-identical \u201ccase\u201d figures, despite one having a mask mandate and the other not:<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/p>\n

In Kansas, counties without mask mandates actually had fewer covid cases than counties with mask mandates. And despite masks being very common in Japan, they had their worst flu outbreak in decades in 2019.<\/p>\n

Not only do masks not work, but it was widely known they did not work before 2020. A 2016 literature review published in the Journal of Oral Health<\/em> found:<\/p>\n

\u201cThere are no convincing scientific data that support the effectiveness of masks for respiratory protection.\u201d<\/p>\n

(This study was quietly removed<\/a> from the journal\u2019s website in June 2020, because it was \u201cno longer relevant in the current climate<\/em>\u201d.)<\/p>\n

Another study<\/a>, published in 2020 but carried out in 2019, found \u201cno significant effect of face masks on transmission of laboratory-confirmed influenza<\/em>.\u201d<\/p>\n

In his 2020 review<\/a>, Masks Don\u2019t Work<\/em>, Dr. Denis Rancourt cites studies from 2009, 2010, 2012, 2016, 2017 and 2019, none of which found any significant benefit at all from wearing a mask.<\/p>\n

And, most tellingly, in their own report on influenza from 2019, the WHO itself noted that \u201cthere is no evidence that [masks are] effective in reducing transmission<\/em>\u201d.<\/p>\n

Masks are bad for your health<\/strong><\/p>\n

Wearing a mask for long periods, wearing the same mask more than once, and other aspects of cloth masks can be bad for your health. A long study<\/a> on the detrimental effects of mask-wearing was recently published by the International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health.<\/em><\/p>\n

Dr. James Meehan reported<\/a> in August 2020 he was seeing increases in bacterial pneumonia, fungal infections, and facial rashes.<\/p>\n

Masks are also known to contain plastic microfibers, which damage the lungs when inhaled and may be potentially carcinogenic.<\/p>\n

Children wearing masks encourages mouth-breathing, which results in facial deformities.<\/p>\n

People around the world have passed out due to CO2<\/sub> poisoning while wearing their masks, and some children in China even suffered sudden cardiac arrest.<\/p>\n

Moreover, masks may actually increase the likelihood of respiratory disease, a trial<\/a> of cloth masks from 2015 found that: \u201cMoisture retention, reuse of cloth masks and poor filtration may result in an increased risk of infection<\/em>.\u201d<\/p>\n

While a study<\/a> published in July 2022 found that masks, especially those worn more than once, were breeding grounds for both bacteria and fungal microbes.<\/p>\n

Another peer-reviewed paper<\/a> on mask effectiveness, from April 2022, found:<\/p>\n

\u201cWhile no cause-effect conclusions could be inferred from this observational analysis, the lack of negative correlations between mask usage and covid-19 cases and deaths suggest that the widespread use of masks was not able to reduce covid-19 transmission. Moreover, the moderate positive correlation between mask usage and deaths in Western Europe also suggests that the universal use of masks may have had harmful unintended consequences<\/em>.\u201d<\/p>\n

Masks are bad for the planet<\/strong><\/p>\n

Millions upon millions of disposable masks have been used per month for over a year. A report<\/a> from the UN found the covid-19 pandemic will likely result in plastic waste more than doubling in the next few years, and the vast majority of that is face masks.<\/p>\n

The report goes on to warn these masks (and other medical waste) will clog sewage and irrigation systems, which will have knock-on effects on public health, irrigation and agriculture.<\/p>\n

A study<\/a> from the University of Swansea found \u201cheavy metals and plastic fibres were released when throw-away masks were submerged in water<\/em>.\u201d These materials are toxic to both people and wildlife.<\/p>\n

Another study<\/a>, published in 2022, found that \u201cdisposable face masks and plastic gloves could pose an ongoing risk to wildlife for tens if not hundreds of years<\/em>.\u201d<\/p>\n

Part VII: Vaccines<\/strong><\/p>\n

Covid \u201cvaccines\u201d are totally unprecedented<\/strong><\/p>\n

Before 2020 no successful vaccine against a human coronavirus had ever been developed. Following the advent of \u201ccovid\u201d, we allegedly made over 20 of them in 18 months.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/p>\n

Scientists have been trying to develop a SARS and MERS vaccine for years with little success. Some of the failed SARS vaccines actually caused hypersensitivity to the SARS virus. Meaning that vaccinated mice could potentially get the disease more severely than unvaccinated mice. Another attempt caused liver damage in ferrets.<\/p>\n

Whereas the theory behind traditional vaccines is that exposing the body to a weakened strain of a microorganism will trigger an immune response, many of these new covid \u201cvaccines\u201d are mRNA vaccines.<\/p>\n

The mRNA (messenger ribonucleic acid) vaccines theoretically work by injecting viral mRNA into the body, where it replicates inside your cells and encourages your body to recognise, and make antigens for, the \u201cspike proteins\u201d of the virus.<\/p>\n

The mRNA vaccines have been the subject of research since the 1990s, but before 2020 no mRNA vaccine was ever approved for use on humans.<\/p>\n

Yet, following the advent of covid, two different companies made two supposedly \u201csafe and effective<\/em>\u201d mRNA vaccines within weeks of each other.<\/p>\n

\u201cCovid vaccines\u201d do not confer immunity or prevent transmission<\/strong><\/p>\n

It is readily admitted that covid \u201cvaccines\u201d do not confer immunity from infection and do not prevent you from passing the disease onto others. Indeed, an article<\/a> in the British Medical Journal <\/em>highlighted that the vaccine trials were not designed to even try and assess if the \u201cvaccines\u201d limited transmission.<\/p>\n

The vaccine manufacturers themselves, upon releasing the untested mRNA gene therapies, were quite clear their product\u2019s \u201cefficacy<\/em>\u201d was based on \u201creducing the severity of symptoms<\/em>\u201d.<\/p>\n

In October 2022 Pfizer executive Janine Small, testifying<\/a> in front of the EU parliament, admitted that Pfizer never even tested if their vaccine prevented transmission of \u201ccovid\u201d prior to its release to the public.<\/p>\n

The vaccines were rushed and have unknown long-term effects<\/strong><\/p>\n

Vaccine development is a slow, laborious process. Usually, from development through testing and finally being approved for public use takes many years. The various vaccines for covid were all developed and approved in less than a year.<\/p>\n

Moderna\u2019s own website admits \u201cit normally takes 10-15 years to develop a vaccine<\/em>\u201d, but boasts of producing their SpikeVax \u201cwithin 2 months<\/em>\u201d.<\/p>\n

Obviously, there can be no long-term safety data on chemicals that are less than a year old.<\/p>\n

Pfizer even admits this is true in the leaked supply contract<\/a> between the pharmaceutical giant, and the government of Albania: \u201cThe long-term effects and efficacy of the vaccine are not currently known and that there may be adverse effects of the vaccine that are not currently known<\/em>.\u201d<\/p>\n

Further, none of the vaccines have been subject to proper trials<\/a>. Many of them skipped early-stage trials entirely, and the late-stage human trials have either not been peer-reviewed, have not released their data, will not finish until 2023 or were abandoned<\/a> after \u201csevere adverse effects<\/em>\u201d.<\/p>\n

Vaccine manufacturers have been granted legal indemnity should they cause harm<\/strong><\/p>\n

The USA\u2019s Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness Act (PREP) grants immunity until at least 2024.<\/p>\n

The EU\u2019s product licensing law does the same, and there are reports of confidential liability clauses in the contracts the EU signed with vaccine manufacturers.<\/p>\n

The UK went even further, granting permanent legal indemnity to the government, and any employees thereof, for any harm done when a patient is being treated for covid-19 or \u201csuspected covid-19<\/em>\u201d.<\/p>\n

Again, the leaked Albanian contract suggests that Pfizer, at least, made this indemnity a standard demand of supplying covid vaccines:<\/p>\n

\u201cPurchaser hereby agrees to indemnify, defend and hold harmless Pfizer from and against any and all suits, claims, actions, demands, losses, damages, liabilities, settlements, penalties, fines, costs and expenses<\/em>.\u201d<\/p>\n

Covid \u201cvaccines\u201d carry a significant risk of adverse side effects<\/strong><\/p>\n

The experimental covid vaccines have potentially caused dozens of severe conditions in millions of people. These include myocarditis (especially in young boys), blood clots, allergic reactions, skin conditions, Bell\u2019s Palsy, menstrual irregularities and more. [For a detailed breakdown of these conditions, read here<\/a>]<\/p>\n

The US CDC\u2019s Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) has received twice as many reports since the covid vaccine rollout than all previous years combined.<\/p>\n

\"\"
Source: OpenVAERS<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

Part VIII: Mortality Data<\/strong><\/p>\n

The survival rate of \u201ccovid\u201d is over 99%<\/strong><\/p>\n

Government medical experts went out of their way to underline, from the beginning of the pandemic, that the vast majority of the population are not in any danger from covid.<\/p>\n