{"id":132471,"date":"2023-09-27T20:38:18","date_gmt":"2023-09-27T20:38:18","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/yogaesoteric.net\/?p=132471"},"modified":"2023-10-01T16:21:42","modified_gmt":"2023-10-01T16:21:42","slug":"the-importance-of-truth-2","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/yogaesoteric.net\/en\/the-importance-of-truth-2\/","title":{"rendered":"The Importance of Truth (2)"},"content":{"rendered":"

Read the first part<\/a> of the article<\/p>\n

Was the Universe Really Created by a \u2018Big Bang\u2019?<\/strong><\/p>\n

\u201cQuestion is: Can you tell me anything you know about evolution, any something that is true? I tried this question on geology staff at the Field Museum of Natural History and the only answer I got was silence. Then I woke up and realized that all my life I had been duped into taking evolutionism as revealed truth in some way<\/em>.\u201d \u2013 Dr. Colin Patterson, Evolution and Creationism, Speech at the American Museum of Natural History<\/em>, New York (November 5, 1981)<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/p>\n

The Fossil Record Proves Darwin\u2019s\u2019 Theory Is Completely Incorrect<\/strong><\/p>\n

The fossil record does not support Darwin\u2019s theory of evolution, or the mainstream theoretical evolutionary timeline that we were taught in school. Billions of organisms have been fossilized providing a record of life over millions of years yet instead of demonstrating gradual transition from one species to another, the fossil record clearly indicates a pattern in which species suddenly emerge fully formed, then exist virtually unchanged until they disappear from the fossil layers upon extinction.<\/p>\n

And while there may be rare instances of species that seem part ape, part human, there is no evidence the one came from the other. To overcome this problem, Darwin argued, with no proof whatsoever, that the fossil record is extremely inaccurate and littered with gaps. He argued that future generations of paleontologists would fill these gaps via their research. (Paleontologists study the history and process of evolution by examining fossils). After 150 years has the diligent research of modern paleontologists fulfilled Darwin\u2019s prediction?<\/p>\n

The Search for Speciation \u2013 There Are No Intermediate Fossils<\/strong><\/p>\n

As the following scientific extracts demonstrate, the answer to the above question is a resounding \u201cNO<\/em>\u201d. Over the past 150 years hundreds of thousands of fossils of extinct species have been found, but the entire fossil record shows no example of a transition from one species to another species anywhere.<\/p>\n

\u201cOne hundred and twenty years of paleontological research later, it has become abundantly clear that the fossil record will not confirm this part of Darwin\u2019s predictions. Nor is the problem a miserably poor record. The fossil record simply shows that this prediction is wrong. The observation that species are amazingly conservative and static entities throughout long periods of time has all the qualities of the emperor\u2019s new clothes: everyone knew it but preferred to ignore it. Paleontologists, faced with a recalcitrant record obstinately refusing to yield Darwin\u2019s predicted pattern, simply looked the other way<\/em>.\u201d \u2013 Eldredge, N. and Tattersall, I., The Myths of Human Evolution<\/em>, 1982, p.45-46.<\/p>\n

\u201cBut fossil species remain unchanged throughout most of their history and the record fails to contain a single example of a significant transition<\/em>.\u201d \u2013 Woodroof, D.S., Science<\/em>, vol.208, 1980, pg.716.<\/p>\n

\u201cWhat is curious is that there is a consistency about the fossil gaps; the fossils are missing in all the important places<\/em>.\u201d \u2013 Hitching, Francis, Where Darwin Went Wrong<\/em>, Penguin Books, 1982, pg, 19.<\/p>\n

\u201cThe fossil material is now so complete that the lack of transitional species cannot be explained as due to scarcity of material. The deficiencies are real; they will never be filled<\/em>.\u201d \u2013 Professor Nils Heribert-Nilsson, Lund University, Sweden, 1954<\/p>\n

Darwin himself even admits the absence of intermediate species \u201cpresses hard<\/em>\u201d on his theory. See the quotes below from his Origin of Species<\/em> book:<\/p>\n

\u201cThe number of intermediate species, which have formerly existed on the Earth, should be truly enormous. Why then is not every geological record and every stratum full of such intermediate links? Geology assuredly does not reveal any such finely graduated organic chain; and this, perhaps, is the most obvious and gravest objection which can be urged against my theory<\/em>.\u201d<\/p>\n

\u201cBut I do not pretend that I should ever have suspected how poor was the record in the best preserved geological sections, had not the absence of innumerable transitional links between the species which lived at the commencement and close of each formation, pressed so hardly on my theory<\/em>.\u201d<\/p>\n

Thus, there is no satisfactory mechanism to account for how new species appeared. Furthermore, speciation (the forming of new species) has never been observed. Variations within a species were observed in Darwin\u2019s day as they are now. However, \u2018evolution\u2019 beyond variations within one species to create an entirely new different species remains completely hypothetical, and lacks an evidential confirmation to this day. This conclusion is supported by quotations from evolutionary biologists listed below.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/p>\n

\u201cThroughout 150 years of bacteriology, there is no evidence that one species of bacteria has transformed into another since there is no evidence for species transformation between the simplest forms of unicellular life, it is not surprising that there is no evidence for evolution from prokaryotic to eukaryotic cells, let alone throughout the whole array of higher multicellular organisms<\/em>.\u201d \u2013 Alan H. Linton, bacteriologist<\/p>\n

\u201cSpeciation [the forming of a new species] whether in the remote Galapagos, in the laboratory cages of the drosophilosopers, or in the crowded sediments of the palaeontologists, still has never been traced<\/em>.\u201d \u2013 Lynn Margulis and Dorion Sagan, evolutionary biologists<\/p>\n

The book Godless Fake Science<\/em> contains two comprehensive chapters examining the flaws in Darwin\u2019s theory of evolution, with reference to the research work of scientists and authors, such as Lief A. Jensen, who have exposed these flaws over the past decades. These chapters also detail the following topics:<\/p>\n