{"id":159148,"date":"2024-05-24T21:02:17","date_gmt":"2024-05-24T21:02:17","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/yogaesoteric.net\/?p=159148"},"modified":"2024-05-24T21:03:38","modified_gmt":"2024-05-24T21:03:38","slug":"military-operations-in-civilian-disguise-bio-nano-governance-and-terms-of-use-for-humans-2-0-2","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/yogaesoteric.net\/en\/military-operations-in-civilian-disguise-bio-nano-governance-and-terms-of-use-for-humans-2-0-2\/","title":{"rendered":"Military Operations in Civilian Disguise: Bio-Nano Governance and Terms of Use for Humans 2.0 (2)"},"content":{"rendered":"

Read the first part<\/a> of the article<\/p>\n

The Military and Covid Injections<\/strong><\/p>\n

In the United States, Operation Warp Speed<\/em> (OWS), the U.S. project to develop, produce, and distribute 300 million doses of a \u201ccoronavirus vaccine\u201d by January 2021, was compared to the Manhattan Project<\/em> by President Trump when he unveiled it on May 16, 2020, a clear allusion to top-secret military technology.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/p>\n

OWS was led not by scientists and healthcare specialists, but by the military. An organisational chart<\/a> shows that 61 of the 90 leadership positions in OWS were occupied by DoD officials, including four generals. The military\u2019s role was not merely to assist with logistics; rather, the DoD was in full control of the \u201cvaccination\u201d programme from its inception, including \u201cdevelopment, manufacturing, clinical trials, quality assurance, distribution and administration<\/em>\u201d. The White House Coronavirus Response Coordinator was Deborah Birx, whose colourful scarves created a civilian appearance while media reports touted her as the next head of the HHS, a civilian agency; Birx, however, holds the rank of Colonel. The \u201ccovid vaccine\u201d rollout in the United States, as in Europe and Australia it seems, was a camouflaged military operation from start to finish.<\/p>\n

Under Operation Warp Speed<\/em>, contracts were clandestinely awarded to \u201cvaccine\u201d companies via Advanced Technology International, which has close ties to the CIA. The use of a non-governmental intermediary meant that regulatory oversight and transparency conferred by regular federal contracting mechanisms could be bypassed.<\/p>\n

In a biopolitical era where control is exercised directly over human bodies (Agamben, 1998), \u2013 with military-grade bio-nano technologies deployed through \u201cTrojan Horse \u2018civilian\u2019 systems<\/em>\u201d and so-called \u201cvaccines\u201d doubling as transhumanist delivery mechanisms, in a transhumanist war on humanity \u2013 injections provide the perfect weapon to penetrate behind enemy lines.<\/p>\n

Military Operations in Civilian Disguise?<\/strong><\/p>\n

In addition to its assumption of dominion over civilian bodies, documents such as the DEVCOM report<\/a> illustrate that Proteus<\/em> is not the only high-level military-intelligence actor advising senior decision makers to prepare for societies stratified along transhumanist class lines.<\/p>\n

Similarly, and consistent with the notion of obligatory \u2018enhancement\u2019, a 2009 research report<\/a> from the Air War College of the US Air Force titled Cognition 2035: Surviving a Complex Environment through Unprecedented Intelligence<\/em> talks about \u201cEnhanced Human Intelligence<\/em>\u201d being compulsory in some scenarios by 2035, for instance as a condition of employment. The report concludes that, \u201cdespite the potential pitfalls of cognitive technologies, they must be pursued<\/em>\u201d. But why? Is \u201cenhanced human intelligence<\/em>\u201d even a real possibility?<\/p>\n

On the level of R&D policy, in a 2013 statement by the DARPA Director to the United States Senate Subcommittee on Emerging Threats and Capabilities, the Director pledged DARPA\u2019s commitment to working with the civilian sector to advance technologies such as synthetic biology, brain-computer interfaces and robotics. She presciently added that DARPA was at the time working to \u201caccelerate the timeline<\/em>\u201d for \u201cnovel techniques that will enable the human body to directly manufacture its own vaccines<\/em>\u201d. One of DARPA\u2019s objectives for those vaccines, the Director told the Senate Subcommittee was, \u201cbypassing traditional vaccine manufacturing processes that can take months<\/em>\u201d. In other words, accelerating the novel \u2018vaccines\u2019 to market. Such acceleration of novel vaccination technology later came to pass in the form of a Moderna-DARPA collaboration on the synthetic mRNA platform of 2020, rolled out at Warp Speed<\/em>.<\/p>\n

With equal prescience, in that same year, a 2013 follow-up report<\/a> to the foundational NBIC document of 2002, this time focussed on the societal rollout of nano-bio-info-cogno technologies, predicted, in keeping with NASA\u2019s timeline for a BioNANO Age, that from 2020 onwards the \u201cconvergence<\/em>\u201d of bio-nano technology and society would be \u201csystemic<\/em>\u201d, and driven by a \u201chigher level purpose<\/em>\u201d. (A higher level purpose, we wonder, such as combating a \u201cnovel threat<\/em>\u201d as noted by the UK MoD, in the form of a \u201cnovel<\/em>\u201d virus, creating an \u201cobligation<\/em>\u201d to use DARPA\u2019s novel auto-immunisation technology?) The 2013 paper was sponsored by NASA and the Office of Naval Research among others, with contributors and reviewers including Moderna co-founder Robert Langer, and personnel from Johnson & Johnson, IBM, Hewlett Packard, Microsoft and the US Army. It was titled Convergence of knowledge, technology, and society (CKTS): Beyond Convergence of Nano-Bio-Info-Cognitive Technologies<\/em>. The report moved a step beyond fostering the convergence of technology and biology, which underpins transhumanism, to advocating the convergence of technology and governance, which underpins technocracy.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/p>\n

To this end, the document sought \u201cradical paradigm transformations in human endeavors<\/em>\u201d to \u201caccelerate progress in the foundational NBIC technologies<\/em>\u201d. The document advocated a \u201cnew governance model<\/em>\u201d that would involve \u201cpublic-private partnerships<\/em>\u201d and a \u201cglobal convergence network<\/em>\u201d. By 2020, with the \u201chigher level purpose<\/em>\u201d of a war on a virus, the WEF\u2019s network of public-private partnerships and its push for \u201cconvergence<\/em>\u201d of our physical, digital and biological identities (under the Fourth Industrial Revolution moniker) seemed to fit the bill. The 2013 CKTS document also advocated drawing on artificially augmented and inter-connected brains (which it referred to as \u201cconvergent cognitive technologies<\/em>\u201d) for future decision-making, particularly in the area of public health, and \u201cat all levels of society<\/em>\u201d. We analyze the viability of such proposals, and their likely true intention, below.<\/p>\n

By 2020, as public-private partnerships, including with CKTS report contributors Moderna, Johnson & Johnson and Microsoft, were gearing up for their military-style, lockdown-driven, bio-nano, injection-based \u201chigher level purpose<\/em>\u201d war on a virus, a NASA-Langley report<\/a> titled Disruptive Technologies and Their Impacts Upon Society<\/em> included a section titled \u201cIncreasing Cyborgism<\/em>\u201d. The report observed that \u201chumans are developing Humanity 2.0<\/em>\u201d. It declared society to be \u201centering the Virtual Age with major shifts to direct brain to machine interaction, humans merging with machines, immersive digital reality, autonomous robotics, tele-everything, a global sensor grid and a shared global consciousness<\/em>\u201d. The report added, almost as an aside, \u201cThe major existential issue will then become \u2018Whither Humans\u2019?<\/em>\u201d<\/p>\n

Who needs \u201cheavy\u201d, \u201ctender\u201d, \u201cslow\u201d, carbon-emitting, climate-changing humans on an \u2018over-populated\u2019 planet anyway?<\/p>\n

Dual-Use Technologies and Bio-Nano Power<\/strong><\/p>\n

Approximately twenty years before NASA-Langley declared society\u2019s entry into the Virtual Age in 2020, at the turn of the millennium when the course towards Humanity 2.0 was being charted in the 424-page DoD-backed NBIC report, advancements in brain-machine interfaces were being viewed as \u201can important next step in human evolution, potentially as important as the evolution of the first language spoken between our ancestors<\/em>\u201d. Via brain-to-brain and brain-to-web connections, it was hoped that \u201clinked enhanced persons<\/em>\u201d of the future would form \u201ca networked society of billions of human beings<\/em>\u201d, together creating a \u201cglobal collective intelligence<\/em>\u201d, or hive consciousness<\/a>. In other words, officialdom\u2019s vision for its \u201cenhanced\u201d citizenry of the future was as nodes on a vast network.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/p>\n

Such a development, needless to say, irrespective of whether it \u2018enhances\u2019 the lives of the people concerned, would significantly enhance the exercise of power, particularly with respect to issues such as information operations and population control. Consistent with this theme, in 2004 the US Army War College Center for Strategic Leadership said of 2020 scenario planning, \u201cacross all of the worlds, it is clear that instruments of power and sources of threat will come in smaller and smaller packages. Classic tools of state power (e.g., weapons and surveillance systems) will be dramatically miniaturized as a result of both bio- and nanotechnology<\/em>\u201d.<\/p>\n

The observations were made as part of a presentation to The 9th International Command and Control Research and Technology Symposium, an annual event headed by a former DOD official, which continues today. Interestingly, on the same page of the same Powerpoint presentation<\/a>, looking towards the year 2020, the War College noted that, \u201cbiological viruses are good examples of both instruments of power and source of threa<\/em>t\u201d.<\/p>\n

Which was a curious statement for its time. Why was the Army War College Center for Strategic Leadership describing viruses as instruments of power in 2004? The statement was made 16 years before the Army had partnered with the US president under Operation Warp Speed<\/em> to coercively deploy bio-nano vaccines as intravenous weapons, purportedly against a virus. The statement was also made 16 years before citizens were placed under effective house arrest to flatten an over-hyped viral curve. And 16 years before emergency governance and emergency medicine merged, to create a brave new era of politico-medical rule, empowered to suspend fundamental rights such as freedom of movement and bodily autonomy, all in the name of a virus.<\/p>\n

Meanwhile, besides viruses, what kinds of miniaturized instruments of power might the US Army Center for Strategic Leadership have been referring to?<\/p>\n

While there are numerous candidates, \u201cnano-taggants\u201d, including smart dust, are openly discussed as tools of power in military-intelligence literatures. Smart dust, which dates to the 1990s, consists of miniature microelectronic particles, as small as 20 microns by 2020, which are fashioned from nano-components, and which can be sprayed, scattered, implanted, or inhaled, forming wireless networks capable of transmitting information, \u201cabout anything nearly anywhere<\/em>\u201d (such as temperature, location, light, movement, sound and so-on), to a cloud or other base for processing.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/p>\n

In a paper<\/a> from the US Air War College, Center for Strategy and Technology titled Enabling Battlespace Persistent Surveillance: The Form, Function, and Future of Smart Dust<\/em>, the technology\u2019s ability to enable \u201cdispersal of a wireless sensor network on the actual bodies<\/em>\u201d of adversaries is described, with the capability to provide \u201cvital tactical information, such as location and numbers, to support counterinsurgency operations<\/em>\u201d. The paper adds that \u201cSmart Dust offers a low observable ISR [intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance] asset providing detailed information on insurgents and the US populace<\/em>\u201d.<\/p>\n

Having shrunk from the size of a grain of sand in the 1990s to microscopic dimensions by 2020, smart dust appears to embody what the US Army War College might have meant when it said that sources of power would be coming in smaller and smaller packages. The inclusion of the US populace as smart dust surveillance targets in US Air Force reports, moreover, is consistent with a recurring theme around counterinsurgency in defense science and technology papers, such as one from the Air War College Center for Strategy and Technology in 2009, titled Disaster-Proofing Senior Leadership<\/em>. The paper<\/a>, again from the US Air Force, warns leaders that the \u201cnano-enabled battlefield<\/em>\u201d of the future will create adversaries \u201cacross the spectrum from state actors to empowered persons<\/em>\u201d.<\/p>\n

To be ready for the nano-enabled battlefield and the empowered persons of the future, the 2007 smart dust paper<\/a> stresses that, \u201cthe US military needs to invest their energy and money today to develop persistent surveillance applications such as Smart Dust<\/em>\u201d, making clear that such \u201cpersistent surveillance<\/em>\u201d should be society-wide. It counsels: \u201cthe United States needs to mount an effective information operations campaign now, and in the future, to educate the public on the benefits of Smart Dust to their way of life<\/em>\u201d.<\/p>\n

Should a leader wish to domestically surveil their populations in this way, in 2007, the same year the Smart Dust paper was published, an enabling legislative and practical framework was established under the auspices of 9\/11. In August of \u201807, President Bush signed into law an Act titled Implementing Recommendations of the 9\/11 Commission Act of 2007<\/em>. As part of that Act, a National Biosurveillance Integration Center was established, in order to track any future \u201cbiological event of national concern<\/em>\u201d. Such an event was defined as either an act of bioterrorism or an outbreak of any infectious disease that \u201cmay<\/em>\u201d (or may not) result in an epidemic. Faced with such an infectious disease, the Integration Center, \u201cin consultation with the Director of National Intelligence [and] the Under Secretary for Intelligence and Analysis<\/em>\u201d was tasked with aggregating the nation\u2019s surveillance data from government sources, as well from \u201cprivate sources of surveillance, both foreign and domestic<\/em>\u201d. In other words, since 2007, US intelligence has had the legal authority to gather surveillance data on its citizens, from public and private sources nationally and internationally, under the auspices of disease control. According to the Act, the Center (essentially a legislatively empowered transnational public-private surveillance partnership) has the responsibility to avail itself of the \u201cbest available<\/em>\u201d information technology, in order to track bio-events \u201cin as close to real-time as is practicable<\/em>\u201d.<\/p>\n

Looking back, we can\u2019t help but wonder whether the Implementing Recommendations of the 9\/11 Commission Act<\/em> was triggered in 2020, as the world was swept 9\/11-style into emergency mode by a \u201cbiological event of [inter]national concern<\/em>\u201d. Could smart dust, with its ability to be dispersed upon populations in the gust of a breeze \u2013 or on the end of a nasal swab \u2014 have fit the bill as the \u201cbest available<\/em>\u201d technology?<\/p>\n

While covid \u2018vaccines\u2019 have gained the most attention as potential sources of covert nanotechnology deployment, the simple PCR nasal swab has also been examined by microscopists for undeclared inclusions since its mass roll-out in 2020. In 2023 Gatti and colleagues studied nine different PCR swabs for their morphology and chemical composition, using Optical Microscopy and a Field Emission Gun Environmental Scanning Electron Microscope with Energy Dispersive System. The scientists reported<\/a> a number of substances on the swabs that had not been declared in the manufacturers\u2019 data sheets. Those substances included black fibres that were present \u201cin an almost systematic way<\/em>\u201d, silver nanoparticles, coatings on the swab fibres involving different combinations of Silicate, Zirconia, Titanium, Aluminium and Sulphur, and \u201cextremely high<\/em>\u201d levels of what the authors described as \u201cdust\u201d. The dust on the nasal swabs was composed of Silicon, Carbon, Aluminium, Potassium, Oxygen, Magnesium, Titanium, Iron and Sulphur.<\/p>\n

Did these elements reflect a \u201cdirty environment<\/em>\u201d, as the authors proposed, or was it a reflection of other kinds of dust, such as Silicon-based ferromagnetic smart dust, or Silica-Alumina neural dust, for creating \u201ca neural dust brain-machine interface (BMI)<\/em>\u201d? Either way, the authors warned that delivering undeclared nano-components such as these on the ends of nasal swabs \u201cdeeply inside nasal cavity<\/em>\u201d can not only damage the olfactory epithelium, but \u201cfinally reach the brain<\/em>\u201d.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/p>\n

All of which harkens back to NASA-Langley\u2019s 2001 prognostication that a Bio-NANO Era (circa 2020) would see the surreptitious nano-tagging of everything and everyone, with microwave interrogation, for status and identification purposes. Followed by Yuval Noah Harari\u2019s insistence in early 2020 that surveillance had gone under the skin with the arrival of The Pandemic\u2122 (and its PCR tests). Was it smart dust they were referring to?<\/p>\n

Alongside surveillance applications, in the commercial sphere, smart dust has been described as \u201cthe pinnacle of the Internet of Things<\/em>\u201d, with \u201cthe capacity to multiply IoT technologies up to a billion times<\/em>\u201d. Driven by IoT demand and related medical sensing applications, therefore, a report<\/a> titled Technology Convergence 2035<\/em>, from the US Army War College predicts that smart dust \u201cwill achieve mainstream commercial usage by 2028<\/em>\u201d.<\/p>\n

Dual-Use Technologies and Bio-Nano Governance<\/strong><\/p>\n

Importantly, this simultaneous utility of smart dust to military and commercial \/ medical applications exemplifies the \u2018dual use\u2019 nature of nanomaterials and nanotechnologies. Dual use technologies are those with both civilian and military applications, and\/or harmful as well as beneficial purposes, where harm can be perpetrated on a mass scale. A common ingredient in cosmetics, for instance, can be used to create mustard gas. Smart dust, similarly, may be used by medical personnel to monitor and treat disease, or, surreptitiously, by those in power to surveil and wirelessly network their citizens, or as a bio-nano weapon to \u201cidentify, and\/or destroy certain cell types in the body<\/em>\u201d.<\/p>\n

On this theme, in the book Nanoweapons: A Threat to Humanity<\/em>, a physicist and former IBM and Honeywell executive, who led advancements in microelectronics and sensors (such as smart dust), warns of existential threats from weaponisable nanotechnologies \u201cpreviously relegated to fantasy<\/em>\u201d. The technologies he describes include \u201cself-replicating smart nanorobots<\/em>\u201d, which \u201csearch for and destroy targets without human input, and self-replicate with materi\u00adals found in the environment<\/em>\u201d. Similarly, in 2001, along with smart dust, NASA Langley described, \u201cMicro Dust Weaponry<\/em>\u201d or \u201cMicron sized mechanized \u2018dust\u2019 which is distributed as an aerosol and inhaled into the lungs. Dust mechanically bores into lung tissue and executes various \u2018Pathological Missions.\u2019 A Wholly \u2018New\u2019 class of Weaponry which is legal<\/em>\u201d.<\/p>\n

The upshot of the dual uses for many, if not most, bio-nanotechnologies is that their covert deployment as weapons is as simple as calling them by some benign name, for instance a medical intervention. Which reminds us of NASA Langley\u2019s commentary on the \u201cattack capabilities<\/em>\u201d of \u201cTrojan Horse \u2018civilian\u2019 systems<\/em>\u201d. Combined with the increasing designation of Western domestic populations as adversaries, (cf 2021 reports on domestic \u201cterrorism\u201d, \u201cextremism\u201d, \u201cradicalism\u201d and \u201cconspiracy theorists\u201d by the European Commission and the US Department of Homeland security), citizens would be wise to remain vigilant to the potential dual use and abuse of bio-nano power.<\/p>\n

Yet, the question remains: Are there any indications that those in power seek to translate bio-nano\/transhumanist policy advice into practice, for instance by pushing ahead with microelectronic (\u2019smart\u2019) dust? Are they even interested in bio-nano power?<\/p>\n

If the proof is in the policy pudding, it seems that they are indeed. To name just a few trans-administration examples, the Clinton Administration launched the National Nanotechnology Initiative (NNI) in 2000 on the advice of the lead author of the landmark DoD-backed NBIC report. The NNI continues to this day. Shortly thereafter, in December 2003, President George W. Bush signed the 21st Century Nanotechnology Research and Development Act<\/em>, or Public Law 108-153, to create a National Nanotechnology Institute. Internationally, similar activity has been taking place around the world, in Europe, China, Iran, India, South Korea and Saudi Arabia, to name just the most active regions. Also spawned by the NBIC initiative was the European Union 2014-2020 Horizon 2020<\/em> research and innovation program, which saw the 2018 launch of the \u201cHorizon 2020 Graphene Flagship<\/em>\u201d project, Europe\u2019s largest ever research initiative, aimed, according to its website, at integrating the expertise of 170 academic and industry partners to \u201cbring graphene innovation out of the lab and into commercial applications<\/em>\u201d, \u201caccelerating the timeline for industry acceptance of graphene technologies<\/em>\u201d.<\/p>\n

Building upon this growing international nanotechnology base, in 2013 the Obama Administration launched its Brain Research through Advancing Innovative Neurotechnologies (BRAIN) initiative, a public-private partnership that runs to 2025, involving DARPA, IARPA, the NIH, the FDA, and the Military Services among other government agencies. Its projects include those in nanoscience, brain-machine interfaces and bioengineering. A few years later, in 2016 under the Trump Administration, Congress established an Under Secretary of Defense for Research and Engineering (USD R&E) as part of the 2017 National Defense Authorization Act<\/em>. The new Under Secretary \u201cwould take risks, press the technology envelope, test and experiment, and have the latitude to fail, as appropriate<\/em>\u201d. The following year, on December 18, 2017, the Trump Administration released its National Security Strategy, declaring that \u201cthe United States will prioritize emerging technologies critical to economic growth and security, such as data science, encryption, autonomous technologies, gene editing, new materials, nanotechnology, advanced computing technologies, and artificial intelligence<\/em>\u201d.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/p>\n

More recently, in February 2022, during the Biden Administration, the Under Secretary of Defense for Research and Engineering announced that her office would \u201cspearhead a National Defense Science and Technology strategy for the Department of Defense (DoD)<\/em>\u201d which sought \u201csuccess through policies that encourage innovation and risk taking<\/em>\u201d. The \u201cCritical Technology Areas<\/em>\u201d of interest included human machine interfaces, advanced materials, future generation wireless, and AI. Next, in September 2022 Biden\u2019s Whitehouse issued an executive order announcing the funding of a new \u201cbioeconomy<\/em>\u201d, under which the United States would invest in and \u201cdevelop engineering technologies and techniques to be able to write circuitry for cells and predictably program biology in the same way we write software and program computers<\/em>\u201d.<\/p>\n

With its problematic casting of biology as technology, to be manipulated like a computer program in the name of the economy, Biden\u2019s Executive Order is noteworthy in that the order was undertaken in lockstep with the US military. Days after the Biden Executive Order was issued, the same DoD Research and Engineering Under Secretary, who is also the Pentagon\u2019s Chief Technology officer and oversees the activities of DARPA, said \u201cThis Executive Order will advance and synchronize our efforts \u2014 across the DoD and across the Federal Government<\/em>\u201d. Prior to her political and military appointments, the Under Secretary spent much of her career at Raytheon.<\/p>\n

And so it is that while populations have been dazzled, decoyed and distracted by the theatre of electoral politics, governments and the US military have quietly laid the conceptual, structural and technological foundations for transhumanist societies \u2014 administration after administration. Behind the spectacle of Clinton\u2019s sexual exploits, Bush\u2019s blunders, Obama\u2019s wars, Russiagate, and the January 6th concoction, a military operation in transhumanism has been marching steadily on, largely unreported and unchallenged. No election outcome appears to have ever altered that trajectory. The 2024 election, we wager, will be no exception.<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

yogaesoteric
\nMay 24, 2024<\/strong><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Read the first part of the article The Military and Covid Injections In the United States, Operation Warp Speed (OWS), the U.S. project to develop, produce, and distribute 300 million doses of a \u201ccoronavirus vaccine\u201d by January 2021, was compared to the Manhattan Project by President Trump when he unveiled it on May 16, 2020, […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":4,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_uf_show_specific_survey":0,"_uf_disable_surveys":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[1374],"tags":[1516],"class_list":["post-159148","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-the-threat-of-artificial-intelligence-3480-en","tag-article_of_the_week"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/yogaesoteric.net\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/159148","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/yogaesoteric.net\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/yogaesoteric.net\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/yogaesoteric.net\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/4"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/yogaesoteric.net\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=159148"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/yogaesoteric.net\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/159148\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":159170,"href":"https:\/\/yogaesoteric.net\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/159148\/revisions\/159170"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/yogaesoteric.net\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=159148"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/yogaesoteric.net\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=159148"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/yogaesoteric.net\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=159148"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}