{"id":194320,"date":"2025-04-06T14:39:16","date_gmt":"2025-04-06T14:39:16","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/yogaesoteric.net\/?p=194320"},"modified":"2025-04-06T14:39:16","modified_gmt":"2025-04-06T14:39:16","slug":"missives-from-satan-memoranda-of-george-soros","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/yogaesoteric.net\/en\/missives-from-satan-memoranda-of-george-soros\/","title":{"rendered":"Missives from Satan: Memoranda of George Soros"},"content":{"rendered":"

One aspect few do enough of is the systematic examination of the public statements \u2014 especially when solidified in written form \u2014 of one\u2019s enemies. Depending on whom you view as your enemy, therefore, a careful examination of such texts as The Russian Revolution<\/em> by Leon Trotsky (real name, Lev Bronstein), Mein Kampf<\/em> by Adolf Hitler, plus Hitler\u2019s second book, drafts of which were found by the U.S. Army after World War II, or Saul Alinsky\u2019s Rules for Radicals<\/em> (1971) would have been in order.<\/p>\n

\"\"
George Soros<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

In today\u2019s world, a Hungarian-Jewish immigrant named George Soros has clearly become an enemy of ordered society \u2014 at least, as such a society would be defined by most sane people. For that reason, the humble author of this piece thinks it might be wise to peruse some of the writings of this person. I was an early reader of George\u2019s first book Alchemy of Finance<\/em>; however, that was a more or less anodyne description of the irrationality of securities markets with which even the mainstream Charlie Munger would agree. However, his later works, most of which are set forth on his website, are the ones most relevant to his views on public policy.<\/p>\n

I call them \u201cMissives from Satan<\/em>\u201d. And when one is fighting Satan, it might be wise to understand some of his ways. So here it goes.<\/p>\n

George\u2019s big interest is famously his espousal of an \u201copen society\u201d everywhere, which, if he is to be believed, is the cure for all ills. But a clear understanding of what he means by \u201copen society\u201d in fact lays bare his actual goals. Which are anything but open, and prognosticates a \u201csociety\u201d in which few sane people would like to live.<\/p>\n

Below is Soros\u2019 1993 sorry attempt to define an \u201copen society\u201d:<\/p>\n

\u201cOpen and Closed Societies:<\/strong><\/em><\/p>\n

This brings me to the second part of my conceptual framework. To understand the curre<\/em>nt situation, I contend that it is very useful to draw a distinction between open and closed societies. The distinction is based on the same philosophical foundations as my theory of history, namely, that participants act on the basis of imperfect understa<\/em>nding. Open society is based on the recognition of this principle and closed society on its denial. In a closed society, there is an authority which is the dispenser of the ultimate truth; open society does not recognize such authority even if it recognize<\/em>s the rule of law and the sovereignty of the state. The state is not based on a dogma and society is not dominated by the state. The government is elected by the people and it can be changed. Above all, there is respect for minorities and minority opinions<\/em>.\u201d Soros, Toward a New World Order: The Future of NATO<\/em>, November 1, 1993<\/p>\n

Clearly there is a contradiction. What if the \u201cpeople\u201d that \u201celects\u201d the government doesn\u2019t like certain or any minorities? This is a problem, because, in addition, in an \u201copen society\u201d, \u201cabove all, there is a<\/em>\u00a0respect for minorities and minority opinions<\/em>\u201d! There is an inherent conflict. This is no accident \u2014 either for Soros or his intellectual progenitor, Karl Popper.<\/p>\n

By 2023, George had apparently determined to avoid this linguistic conflict. In his various ex cathedra<\/em> missives in these later years, there is no mention of \u201celections\u201d or \u201cdemocracy\u201d. The definition he gives of an \u201copen society\u201d is simply that it is a free-market society that elevates minorities, sort of like an international business convention.<\/p>\n

So he has dispensed with tiresome old democracy.<\/p>\n

But note that his definition of an \u201copen\u201d society as developed over the years is not even \u201copen\u201d as a normal human would define it. In actuality, there is no respect for opinions other than those of the group \u2014 presumably a minority \u2014 that have grasped control. In the West, sadly, this means that it is a society that has respect for Soros\u2019 opinions and those of his allies. Opinions of all others be damned.<\/p>\n

Since the people who run the EU, in contrast to their predecessor statesmen, are not very smart or educated, they simply slap on the word \u201cdemocracy\u201d on the assumption it is synonymous with \u201copen society\u201d. However, it is clear from their actions that they promote not \u201cdemocracy\u201d, but only George Soros\u2019 view of an open society.<\/p>\n

Accordingly, every time the EU uses the word \u201cdemocracy\u201d we should translate from \u201cEU speak\u201d to \u201cSoros speak\u201d and substitute the words \u201copen society\u201d. Doing so, their statements start to make sense. So they claim that Hungary is not a \u201cdemocracy\u201d, but really mean it is not an \u201copen society\u201d because it does not worship the views that Soros holds as mandatory. But if we then translate one more time from Soros speak to plain English and substitute the words \u201canti-White society\u201d for \u201copen society\u201d, we finally realize that the EU statements make sense.<\/p>\n

\"\"
A government billboard shows Alex Soros, son of Hungarian-American financier George Soros and European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen in Budapest, Hungary, November 20, 2023. The billboard reads, “Let’s not dance to their tunes”.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

So the real claim is \u201cHungary is not an anti-White society dominated by Soros opinions on immigration and multiculturalism.<\/em>\u201d True. So far.<\/p>\n

EU speak: \u201cPoland before Tusk and Hungary under Orban are not democratic<\/em>.\u201d This is patently ridiculous. The people of those countries elected those governments in open elections.<\/p>\n

Translation from EU speak to Soros speak, however, \u201cneither are \u2018open societies\u2019.<\/em>\u201d<\/p>\n

Translation from Soros speak to plain English: \u201cneither are anti-White societies dominated by Soros\u2019 opinions on immigration and multiculturalism.<\/em>\u201d Aha! Now that makes perfect sense! Score one for the European Union.<\/p>\n

Of course, the failure of Poland and Hungary to be anti-White societies is why the EU is trying to crucify both those nations. So the full statement would read \u201cPoland before Tusk and Hungary under Orban are not anti-White societies dominated by Soros\u2019 opinions on immigration and multiculturalism.<\/em>\u201d True. Can\u2019t argue with that!<\/p>\n

More disturbingly, Soros, even in 1993, saw the world in a crisis that demanded international intervention to promote \u201copen societies\u201d, a.k.a, \u201canti-White societies dominated by Soros\u2019 opinions on immigration and multiculturalism<\/em>\u201d, since it seemed in the post-Soviet period that many countries were continuing to be or reverting to non-open, i.e., \u201cnon-Anti-White societies dominated by Soros\u2019 opinions on immigration and multiculturalism<\/em>\u201d. Apparently people didn\u2019t like Soros, even back then. So here it is:<\/p>\n

\u201cThe Need for Collective Security<\/strong><\/em><\/p>\n

We did not oppose the So<\/em>viet Union because it was a closed society, but because it posed a threat to our existence. That threat has now disappeared and it is difficult to justify any kind of intervention\u2014whether it is political, economic or military\u2014on the grounds of national sel<\/em>f- interest. It is true that the danger of some kind of nuclear disaster remains, but it concerns the rest of the world at least as much as it concerns us. Therefore, the only basis for action is collective security. And that is where the problem lies. The<\/em> collapse of the Soviet empire has created a collective security problem of the utmost gravity. Without a new world order, there will be disorder; that much is clear. But who will act as the world\u2019s policeman? That is the question that needs to be answered<\/em>.\u201d Ibid.<\/em><\/p>\n

What is the \u201cdisorder\u201d of which he speaks? And why is it necessarily a threat to anyone? Presumably \u201cdisorder\u201d means a number of small nations that want to maintain their homogeneity rather than become cosmopolitan market places characterized by policies such as open immigration, multiculturalism pornography, selling drugs, financialization, and promotion of deviant sexual practices. In order to prevent such \u201cdisorder\u201d, something like NATO is needed!<\/p>\n

Here is the purported \u201csecurity\u201d threat that \u201cclosed societies\u201d \u2014 i.e., democratic, homogeneous nations \u2014 pose to NATO:<\/p>\n

\u201cClosed societies based on nationalist principles constitute a threat to security because they need an enemy, either outside or within. But the threat is very different in character from the one NATO was constructed <\/em>to confront, and a very different approach is required to combat this threat. It involves the building of democratic states and open societies and embedding them in a structure which precludes certain kinds of behavior. Only in case of failure does the pro<\/em>spect of military intervention arise. The constructive, open society building part of the mission is all the more important because the prospect of NATO members intervening militarily in this troubled part of the world is very remote. Bosnia is ample proof<\/em>.\u201d Ibid.<\/em><\/p>\n

Note the completely unsupported premise that \u201cclosed societies based on nationalistic principles<\/em>\u201d are \u201ca threat to national security because they need an enemy, either outside or within<\/em>\u201d \u2014 i.e., otherwise homogeneous societies which reject, for example, homosexual minorities dictating their morals or life are a security threat that requires NATO intervention! By the rules of logic, the conclusions drawn from this are incorrect, even if valid, because the premise is unproven and in fact contradicted by history. A country\u2019s treatment of minorities is not a threat to NATO. To make it plainer, both the premise and the validity of the conclusion from that premise are wrong. The premise that closed (read \u201cnormal\u201d) societies \u201cneed an enemy\u201d is not true (in fact, it is when previously homogeneous societies are forced into becoming \u201copen\u201d \u2014 i.e., multi-racial\/cultural that internal divisions and violence can arise, of against White majorities); thus the key premise to Soros\u2019 syllogism is false. Moreover, the conclusion that if a nation does have an internal enemy (let\u2019s assume for a moment this premise is factually true), it poses a threat to all other nations is not a justified conclusion from the premise \u2014 i.e., the reasoning from the premise to the conclusion is invalid. So Soros has concocted a syllogism that is both false and invalid \u2014 a neat trick \u2014 committing the two cardinal sins of reasoning in one little statement.<\/p>\n

The whole Davos \/ WEF project is based on this extraordinarily weak reasoning.\"\"<\/p>\n

By creating a crisis where none existed, Soros was (and is) attempting to justify, in effect, a world government. Note, he does not say that the US will necessarily be the one running this new order \u2014 only, presumably, a bunch of international organizations and NGOs like Soros\u2019 own Open Society foundation. This also implies that any risk there is to grab onto another event \u2014 whether it be a bad flu season, covid, climate change (or, paradoxically perhaps if that fails, peak oil) to remove power from states to international bodies that will then use their power not so much against the cited threats, but to enforce further, by another turn of the ratchet, Soros\u2019 influence over nations \u2014 and everything else.<\/p>\n

Viewing the WEF as effectively driven by Soros\u2019 vision, one can better understand the motives of the WEF: a world run (perhaps indirectly) by his small elite gang and their allies\u2014essentially an international superpower of nasty quangos (quasi-NGOs funded by the government), enforcing certain policies upon every nation on Earth (i.e., policies such as enforcing replacement-level immigration, encouragement of homosexuality and transsexuality; prohibition of certain types of historical research related to the holocaust; prohibition of free speech on issues related to diversity).<\/p>\n

Note that, apparently, Soros and the WEF (though not the US\u2019s incompetent national security establishment) has concluded that the \u201cclosed society is a risk to other nations<\/em>\u201d argument has not been compelling to anyone outside of the West. So every year, they create another crisis to permit the international control that Soros (and the WEF) desires, not to fight the \u201ccrisis du jour\u201d but to force \u201copen societies\u201d on all of us. But the \u201cnew\u201d crises are really just an excuse. The driving goal is exactly the same goal that Soros identified in 1993 \u2014 the goal of \u201copen societies\u201d everywhere.<\/p>\n

An example of Soros\u2019 current thinking \u2014 so insane it would be comical if not for his power \u2014 is this, written in anticipation of Ukraine\u2019s much vaunted and, ultimately, failed \u201ccounter offensive\u201d in June of 2023:<\/p>\n

\u201cThe countries of the former Soviet empire, eager to assert their independence, can hardly wait for the defeat of the Russian army in Ukraine <\/em>[presumably, in the counter-offensive, in which, earlier in the article, he predicts Ukrainian victory]. At that point, Vladimir Putin\u2019s dream of a renewed Russian empire will disintegrate and cease to pose a threat to Europe \u2026\u2026. and it will allow the world to concentrate on its biggest problem, climate change<\/em>.\u201d Soros, Updating My Munich Predictions<\/em>, March 16, 2023<\/p>\n

First, the Ukraine war was (until NATO got involved) a localized crisis brought on by NATO\u2019s aggression, not Russia\u2019s. Second, of course, Soros was totally wrong on the military front. His memo was written undoubtedly in chop-licking expectation of a successful Ukrainian offensive. Wiser heads at the same time as Soros\u2019 article was published were instead (correctly) predicting Ukraine\u2019s total defeat in this counter offensive. They were right. Ukraine\u2019s army utilized in that effort was destroyed. Third, once Putin is defeated in Ukraine he will \u201ccease to pose a threat to Europe<\/em>\u201d. Ha! First, he was not defeated. Second, even if he had been, Russian history tells us Russia\u2019s response would not be to create Soros\u2019 anti-White \u201copen society\u201d, but to close further and build the military to such massive levels that such a defeat could never occur again.<\/p>\n

And then Soros finishes with his biggest howler: once Russia \u201cceases to be a threat<\/em>\u201d, then \u201cthe world will be able to focus on its biggest problem:<\/em>\u00a0climate change<\/em>\u201d.<\/p>\n

Nothing more needs to be said.\"\"<\/p>\n

Here is his July 31, 2022 missive:<\/p>\n

\u201cWe need to acknowledge that black people in the U.S. are five times as likely to be sent to jail as white people. That is an injustice that undermines our democracy<\/em>.\u201d Soros, Why I support Reform Prosecutors<\/em>, July 31, 2022.<\/p>\n

This failed point of view \u2014 rejected by every serious evolutionary biologist or geneticist in the world \u2014 is a classic example of Donald Rumsfeld\u2019s admonition that, when formulating public policy, \u201cDistinguish between problems and facts. A problem is solvable; a fact cannot be \u2018solved\u2019; instead it needs to be taken into account in formulating public policy<\/em>.\u201d<\/p>\n

The poor choices they make due to being marginalized in ghettos for decades with little access to higher education, and ultra-high testosterone levels among Blacks is the cause of their ultra-high violence \u2014 10-20 times the White level. This, in turn \u2014 not racism \u2014 is the cause of their high incarceration rates.<\/p>\n

This contra-factual assertion is not Soros\u2019 creation. It has been used for a long time to create massive race trouble in White, Christian societies, and, sadly, it has also been a favorite of leading upper-class White Anglo-Saxon (WASP) policy makers. An example is the eminent and aristocratic WASP Cyrus R. Vance. After his service as Deputy Secretary of Defense under Lyndon Johnson (remember Vietnam?), he led countless fruitless and deceptive commissions authorized by the Association of the Bar of the City of New York, pointing out that Blacks went to jail more than Whites and of course immediately jumping to the conclusion that the law needed to be changed as necessary in order that the incarceration rates of Blacks equal that of Whites in the NYC metropolitan area. Of course, had Strom Thurmond headed the commission, he might have pointed out that the higher incarceration rate was not a \u201cproblem\u201d, but a \u201cfact\u201d with which we had to deal, due to the \u201cfact\u201d of higher Black propensity to crime.<\/p>\n

Cyrus Vance of course held a lucrative senior partnership of Wall Street law firm \u2014 a virtual money-making machine \u2014 and was, better yet, married to an heiress of a major industrial fortune. He lived with the heiress in their very own town house in one of the best sections of the upper east side of Manhattan, sending their children to expensive private schools such as Buckley and Groton, thence to Yale \u2014 certainly not to what the Vances undoubtedly viewed as the proletarian abyss of the New York City public school system. Oh no. To that system, the children of his domestic servants and lower-paid associates and mailroom boys at his law firm would go.<\/p>\n

Sadly, it is the Cyrus Vances of the WASP world who have become a secondary support network for the Soros types. This creates, to say the least, an extraordinarily powerful coalition against the public interest.<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

yogaesoteric
\nApril 6, 2025<\/strong><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

One aspect few do enough of is the systematic examination of the public statements \u2014 especially when solidified in written form \u2014 of one\u2019s enemies. Depending on whom you view as your enemy, therefore, a careful examination of such texts as The Russian Revolution by Leon Trotsky (real name, Lev Bronstein), Mein Kampf by Adolf […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_uf_show_specific_survey":0,"_uf_disable_surveys":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[382],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-194320","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-opinions-1602-en"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/yogaesoteric.net\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/194320","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/yogaesoteric.net\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/yogaesoteric.net\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/yogaesoteric.net\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/yogaesoteric.net\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=194320"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/yogaesoteric.net\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/194320\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":194333,"href":"https:\/\/yogaesoteric.net\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/194320\/revisions\/194333"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/yogaesoteric.net\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=194320"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/yogaesoteric.net\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=194320"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/yogaesoteric.net\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=194320"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}