![\"\"](\"https:\/\/yogaesoteric.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/eID1.jpg\")
<\/p>\nUnelected globalists like Bill Gates or the Rockefeller clan supposedly want to build a convenient and fast digital world \u2013 in reality a digital open-air prison \u2013 \u201cfor us\u201d, but in reality against us.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Electronic identity verification (eID) may have some advantages such as convenience, speed, and the reduction of bureaucracy and associated costs. However, the disadvantages far outweigh the advantages.<\/p>\n
Global efforts towards a digital identity<\/strong><\/p>\n The United Kingdom is about to introduce mandatory digital identification for all British citizens, as well as residents, students, and workers from the European Union. SkyNews<\/em> reported that British Prime Minister Keir Starmer recently announced that all British citizens will be required to have a digital identity document to prove their right to reside and work in the country, stored in a wallet similar to an Apple or Google Wallet.<\/p>\n However, this is only the first step. It has since emerged that digital identity will not only be mandatory for all workers, but that the use of this control mechanism will go beyond this. People may even have to show their digital ID when making shopping in the future, meaning that a system originally intended for the labour market is now set to invade private life. It should be clear to any independent thinker that autocrats like Keir Starmer want to use insidious tactics to extend their control of citizens to all areas of life \u2013 and will do so if people don’t stop these totalitarians.<\/p>\n The \u201c50 in 5<\/em>\u201d campaign<\/a>, launched in November 2023 by the United Nations, the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, and their partners to accelerate the adoption of digital IDs, fast payment systems, and data sharing in 50 countries by 2028, has now attracted 30 countries. The goal is to have at least one component of the Digital Public Infrastructure (DPI) rolled out in 50 countries by 2028. The DPI civil technology platform consists of the main components: digital ID, fast payment systems, massive data sharing between public and private entities, and digital registries.<\/p>\n The 30 countries are Bangladesh, Brazil, the Dominican Republic, Estonia, Ethiopia, France, Guatemala, Jamaica, Cambodia, Kazakhstan, Lesotho, Malawi, Mexico, Moldova, Nigeria, Norway, Zambia, Senegal, Sierra Leone, Singapore, Sri Lanka, South Africa, South Sudan, Somalia, Togo, Trinidad and Tobago, Uganda, Ukraine, Uruguay, and Uzbekistan.<\/p>\n The digital economy ministers of Nigeria and Togo called for an interoperable digital identity system for the entire African continent during a side event of the UN General Assembly in New York on September 22, 2025.<\/p>\n The European Digital Identity Wallet (EUDI Wallet) is intended to provide all citizens with the means of proof of identity starting in 2026. These wallets are to be nationally based but interoperable across the EU. The European Commission’s website stated<\/a> on June 30, 2023:<\/p>\n \u201cThe Commission welcomes the provisional political agreement reached by the European Parliament and the Council of the EU on the key elements of the proposal for a legal framework for a European digital identity.<\/em><\/p>\n The central innovative element of this framework is a personal digital wallet in the form of a secure and convenient mobile app. This will provide all EU citizens, residents, and businesses with trusted access to public and private online services across Europe.<\/em><\/p>\n The EU Digital Identity Wallet will revolutionize digital identification by giving Europeans control over their personal data with the full convenience of mobile apps. They will be able to use online services and provide proof of identity with full control over their personal data<\/em>.\u201d<\/p>\n Nine months later, in March 2024, the Council of the EU adopted a legal framework for a \u201csecure, trustworthy<\/em>\u201d EU wallet. The European Digital Identity Regulation <\/em>thus entered into force, and full implementation in all member states is scheduled for 2026.<\/p>\n The functions of this app include proof of identity, managing and sharing digital documents such as driver’s licenses and certificates, and even electronic signatures. The developers and proponents of this digital wallet assure that data protection and user control are central principles, and that only the minimum necessary data will be shared. But let\u2019s remember that the coronavirus vaccinations were also cited by these same people as being 100% safe, yet they have led to many times more side effects than all other vaccinations since side effects were recorded combined. Can we still trust these persons who knowingly and willingly endangered the health of citizens during the coronavirus pandemic?<\/p>\n The EU recently launched a new push for age verification through electronic ID verification. Mandatory age verification via digital ID is to be introduced for the use of internet services from tech giants like Google, Apple, and YouTube \u2013 but also from smaller providers \u2013 as part of the Digital Services Act<\/em>. The tech platforms were asked how they prevent minors from accessing content that the EU classifies as harmful or illegal.<\/p>\n Once again, it’s blackmail like in the coronavirus era: With electronic ID verification, you’re allowed online, without it, you’re left out. Electronic ID verification is intended to become our ticket to the internet. The real intention of this campaign by tech autocrats disguised as philanthropists is total control! What with safety, convenience, and security \u2013 these are just carrots dangled in front of donkeys to get them to move in the desired direction. Unfortunately, there are a lot of donkeys.<\/p>\n The plans of the commissioners in Brussels envisage massively restricting the freedom of movement of all EU citizens starting in 2026, so that they will no longer be able to move without a digital identity. This is a clear attack on citizens’ freedom of movement. Disobedience is to be punished, and obedience is to be rewarded \u2013 modern slavery!<\/p>\n The EUDI wallet is to be gradually implemented in Germany by 2027 and will be available with expanded functionality. The Federal Ministry of the Interior wrote on September 30, 2024:<\/p>\n \u201cThe German government will develop a state-run digital wallet for smartphones, which will allow citizens to digitally identify themselves throughout the EU. The government has now made this decision<\/em>.\u201d<\/p>\n \u201cThe European Digital Identity Wallet (EUDI Wallet) will enable citizens to digitally identify themselves using their smartphones and to digitally store and present their identity data and official documents, as well as sign them with a qualified electronic signature (QES). At the same time, the necessary conditions will be created for non-governmental providers to have their own EUDI Wallets recognized.<\/em>\u201d<\/p>\n Federal Interior Minister Nancy Faeser: \u201cWe want citizens to be able to prove their identity quickly, securely, and easily directly via their smartphone \u2013 without an additional card or reader. Whether in everyday life, when applying for a job, using online banking, or when dealing with authorities, this will make identity verification much easier. The EUDI Wallet will guarantee the highest security standards and protect the privacy of users. The EUDI Wallet will be available free of charge and will contribute to digital inclusion, as everyone \u2013 regardless of their financial situation \u2013 will have access to digital services<\/em>.\u201d<\/p>\n The former Interior Minister sought disproportionately strong control over citizens, a form of government that contradicts the principles of democracy. She spoke suspiciously often of \u201cour democracy<\/em>\u201d \u2013 a term other anti-democrats also use at every opportunity to emphasize this form of government, which they do not take seriously.<\/p>\n \u201cWhen fascism returns, it will not say, \u2018I am fascism.\u2019 No, it will say, \u2018I am anti-fascism\u2019<\/em>.\u201d \u2013 <\/em>Ignazio Silone<\/p>\n Security and data protection are explicitly emphasized by the EU and the German government. And that’s precisely where the problem lies: virtually all systems and technologies supposedly developed solely for the benefit of humanity have ultimately been used against it. Dark forces have always scrutinized existing systems for their potential for misuse and employed them against humankind: all over the planet.<\/p>\n U.S. Conservatives are being tempted to build their own prison<\/strong><\/p>\n Lawyer Tom Renz revealed that through hidden legislation and public-private partnerships, the U.S. digital ID system is already active \u2013 and that it was never put to a vote.<\/p>\n Every tap, scan, and \u201cAgree<\/em>\u201d adds another stone to the walls of a prison we are building with our own hands.<\/p>\n The bitter truth? The same conservatives who swore to defend freedom are now helping to build the system that is destroying it.<\/p>\n Lawyer Tom Renz has published a comprehensive thread in which he shows how the digital ID has already been introduced \u2013 quietly and discreetly integrated into a series of carefully crafted laws and regulations. He explains that its implementation will not be driven by a comprehensive law, but by subtle updates to existing guidelines based on the Patriot Act<\/em>.<\/p>\n He explained that Americans would never accept a direct law on digital ID, which is why the elites had found a workaround to implement it \u201cin a sneaky and underhanded way<\/em>\u201d through public-private partnerships.<\/p>\n In this way, Tom explained, they had managed to circumvent constitutional review and quietly establish a control system. Once the digital currency is linked to it, he warned, \u201call control mechanisms will be in place<\/em>.\u201d<\/p>\n His message could not have been clearer: The question is not whether digital IDs exist, but what we will do about them. Tom then drew a connection between covid and digital surveillance, describing the pandemic as a \u201ctest run<\/em>.\u201d He said that the same public-private loopholes that enabled censorship on virtual communication networks are now being used to introduce digital ID.<\/p>\n \u201cThe government can\u2019t censor you, but Facebook can<\/em>,\u201d he explained, describing how compliance with the regulations would be enforced without any official government intervention.<\/p>\n Tom warned that Real ID would evolve into a universal \u201ctrack and trace<\/em>\u201d system linked to banking, travel, and almost every aspect of daily life. And the catch, as he put it, is quite simple: \u201cIt’s not mandatory \u2013 you just can’t live without it anymore<\/em>.\u201d<\/p>\n Tom went even further and warned that the seemingly harmless \u201cfacial recognition<\/em>\u201d was in reality a gateway to total biometric surveillance. Once your face becomes your ID, he said, it transforms into a commodity that is \u201cbought and sold<\/em>\u201d by companies that require your consent just to participate in daily life.<\/p>\n He predicted that tech giants like Google and Twitter will soon require their users to link their Real ID accounts, turning every online activity into trackable data. \u201cYou will have no choice<\/em>,\u201d he said. \u201cYour data will be bought and sold on the internet<\/em>.\u201d<\/p>\n The lawyer further said Trump’s own advisors were unwittingly helping globalists advance their agenda. While Tom clarified that he continues to support the president, he accused members of Trump’s inner circle of \u201cinitiating Agenda 2030 and the Great Reset<\/em>.\u201d<\/p>\n He warned that the same surveillance systems currently being expanded under Trump would ultimately be used by global elites to consolidate their power. \u201cEither he is complicit or he is being manipulated. But it is moving forward at full speed \u2013 and it is already here<\/em>.\u201d<\/p>\n Tom also described a frightening precedent that could redefine the future: Artificial intelligence is granted constitutional rights. He referred to Citizens United, which granted companies \u201cpersonhood<\/em>\u201d under U.S. law, and warned that the same logic could soon be applied to AI systems, drones and robots.<\/p>\n \u201cThat sounds like science fiction<\/em>,\u201d he said, \u201cbut it\u2019s coming<\/em>.\u201d<\/p>\n And the consequences, Tom warned, would be devastating \u2013 as soon as technology gains legal status, citizens lose their power and accountability disappears.<\/p>\n Tom ended the interview by warning that too many conservatives have fallen silent because they are too close to power \u2013 too afraid of losing \u201caccess\u201d to the president to denounce corruption within their own ranks. \u201cYou have to ask yourself if this access is worth your soul<\/em>,\u201d he said.<\/p>\n He argued that digital ID and mRNA technology are two sides of the same coin \u2013 a coordinated control structure. It was partly a confession, partly a call to arms, and a clear reminder that freedom is lost not through resistance, but through silence. The full interview is available here<\/a>.<\/p>\n Pros and cons of digital identity<\/strong><\/p>\n The following are common arguments for and against a digital identity to give you an overview of the pros and cons of this topic.<\/p>\n The advantages of a digital identity<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n Efficiency and convenience are usually cited first. Administrative and government procedures can be completed more quickly, regardless of time and location, because, for example, forms can be used online or documents can be sent without further proof of identity. For example, one can register one’s car digitally and apply for parental allowance or student financial aid digitally.<\/p>\n These are relatively strong arguments because the proponents know how lazy citizens have become. However, these arguments don’t appeal to better-informed and independent-thinking people who have long since sensed the real intention \u2013 the surveillance of citizens.<\/p>\n Another frequently cited justification for electronic identity verification is more secure authentication and protection against forgery. The revised EU regulation explicitly stipulates that:<\/p>\n \u201cAccess to the European digital identity wallet must be secured by strong, multi-factor authentication.<\/em>\u201d (Source: EU Regulation on European Digital Identity, <\/em>Article 6a, paragraph 5, 2024)<\/p>\n This means that every national \u201cEUDI wallet\u201d must require at least two factors for access \u2013 one factor being possession of a smartphone or wallet app, and the second factor being knowledge of the PIN or biometric data such as fingerprint or facial recognition.<\/p>\n Another popular argument is that citizens trust the government more than private providers when it comes to identity verification. The Bundesdruckerei<\/em> website states<\/a>:<\/p>\n \u201cA 2020 survey by Bundesdruckerei GmbH also suggests that people in Germany could certainly embrace a sovereign identity solution. When asked who should issue digital identities, 49 percent named the government. 8 percent would prefer to receive their digital identity directly from the European Union. Private providers from Europe accounted for just 1 percent of the votes. US companies ranked in the per mile range<\/em>.\u201d<\/p>\n Well, a few decades ago, many people trusted the state more than private providers. That’s not the case now, at least since the coronavirus lies of the state’s protagonists. Greedy people are and have been the main reason for humanity’s avoidable crises in the past, present, and the not-so-rosy future.<\/p>\n The \u201cidentity proliferation<\/em>\u201d \u2013 the multitude of passwords now required for all sorts of services when logging into online accounts \u2013 needs to be curbed. Many people are annoyed by the double-digit number of PINs they are now expected to remember. Quite a few people hope to use an electronic identity card (eID) to access the widest possible range of private and government services.<\/p>\n In particular, \u201cIT silo structures<\/em>\u201d prevail in public authorities, with their own, i.e., unconnected IT solutions. For example, the tax office has its own IT system for tax data, the registration office has a different system for address data, and the driver’s license office uses yet another IT system for its own purposes. There are virtually no common digital interfaces or standards that enable data exchange and thus facilitate communication and collaboration. The interoperability and digitalization of public services is to be improved with the help of an eID.<\/p>\n Of course, an eID also promises innovation potential that can and should arise in line with user needs. The introduction of a digital wallet is hoped to open up new services and business models. This requires government-specified minimum requirements and framework conditions. The German Banking Association writes on this<\/a>:<\/p>\n \u201cTo put it more concretely: The online ID function provides citizens with a sovereign digital identity, but there is still a lack of application opportunities in digital administration and the private sector. The latter could be overcome by increasing the attractiveness of the eID for private service providers, including banks, insurance companies, and mobile phone providers, ideally through a cost-effective and easy connection to the government eID infrastructure<\/em>.\u201d<\/p>\n What speaks against a digital identity?<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n Perhaps the most compelling argument against digital identity is the surveillance of citizens, who are thus made transparent, at every turn. This argument alone outweighs all the pros.<\/p>\n According to taz.de<\/em><\/a>, the law promoting electronic identity verification (eID law) stipulates that \u201cnumerous bodies will have automated access to the central database of the passport authorities \u2013 including the biometric data of millions of citizens<\/em>.\u201d<\/p>\n This opens the door to the danger of surveillance and misuse. Even the globalist-co-financed Der Spiegel<\/em> criticized in May 2017 \u2013 in connection with biometric photos in identity cards \u2013 that the Bundestag allows authorities to read ID photos by default, thereby \u201csignificantly expanding the security authorities’ access rights to ID photos<\/em>.\u201d Intelligence agencies, tax and customs investigators, and the like can also access the photos and the associated data. Mass surveillance, in other words.<\/p>\n![\"\"](\"https:\/\/yogaesoteric.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/eID2.jpg\")
<\/p>\n![\"\"](\"https:\/\/yogaesoteric.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/eID3.avif\")
<\/p>\n![\"\"](\"https:\/\/yogaesoteric.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/eID4.avif\")
<\/p>\n
![\"\"](\"https:\/\/yogaesoteric.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/eID5-e1762548050428.webp\")
<\/p>\n