![\"\"](\"https:\/\/yogaesoteric.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/pons1.webp\")
<\/p>\nA previously unreported email exchange in the published federal Epstein file shows how Jeffrey Epstein personally boasts about having ended Stanley Pons’ cold fusion research \u2013 and describes the specific political mechanism by which he claims to have done so.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
The Documents<\/strong><\/p>\n Three federal exhibits released as part of the DOJ\u2019s January 30, 2026 Epstein document disclosure \u2013 EFTA02437662<\/a>, EFTA00740161<\/a>, and EFTA00740600<\/a> \u2013 contain an email exchange between Jeffrey Epstein and Al Seckel dated October 1-14, 2009. Seckel was a perceptual scientist, TED<\/em> speaker, and board member of Milken\u2019s Knowledge Universe, a private education company.<\/p>\n The exchange took place approximately one year after Epstein\u2019s June 2008 guilty plea to soliciting a minor in Florida and his registration as a sex offender.<\/p>\n On the morning of October 1, 2009, Epstein wrote to Seckel:<\/p>\n \u201cRegarding cold fusion, I killed Pons years ago.<\/em>\u201d<\/p>\n Seckel responded the same day:<\/p>\n \u201cHow did you kill him? There is still a group of these guys going strong<\/em>.\u201d<\/p>\n Seckel then pressed further:<\/p>\n \u201cDon\u2019t leave me hanging Jeff. I want to know your relationship to Pons and cold fusion… \ud83d\ude42<\/em>\u201d<\/p>\n Epstein replied with specifics:<\/p>\n \u201cThe original Senate funding came out of Congress, and Wayne Owens, senator from Utah. I was there and argued against it, had to meet with the head of the Mormon church<\/em>.\u201d<\/p>\n Who Was Stanley Pons?<\/strong><\/p>\n Stanley Pons was an electrochemist at the University of Utah who, together with Martin Fleischmann, announced in March 1989 that they had achieved nuclear fusion at room temperature \u2013 \u201ccold fusion<\/em>.\u201d The announcement generated global headlines and, briefly, the prospect of virtually unlimited clean energy.<\/p>\n What followed was one of the most aggressive scientific takedowns in modern history. Within months, mainstream physics institutions and federal agencies moved to discredit the findings. Funding dried up. Pons and Fleischmann were made into cautionary tales. Pons eventually left the United States, relocating to a laboratory in France funded by Toyota, where he lived and worked in relative obscurity until his death in 2012.<\/p>\n The congressional dimension of the cold fusion controversy is well-documented. In 1989, the University of Utah and the state of Utah aggressively pursued federal funding for cold fusion research. The university sought $25 million from Congress. The state legislature appropriated $5 million of its own funds. Brigham Young University \u2013 a private institution governed by the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints \u2013 was also involved in the cold fusion dispute, as BYU physicist Steven Jones had been conducting parallel (and competing) research.<\/p>\n Wayne Owens, the figure Epstein names, was a Democratic congressman representing Utah\u2019s 2nd district from 1987 to 1993. Epstein refers to him as a \u201csenator<\/em>,\u201d but Owens served in the House. He would have been the relevant member of Congress during the period when Utah\u2019s cold fusion funding was before the federal legislature.<\/p>\n What Epstein Claimed<\/strong><\/p>\n Epstein\u2019s account, across his two responses to Seckel, describes:<\/p>\n This is, to our knowledge, the first time Epstein has been connected to the cold fusion defunding controversy in any public record.<\/p>\n What Seckel\u2019s Emails Add<\/strong><\/p>\n The Epstein-Seckel exchange does not occur in isolation. In the same thread and in a follow-up email two weeks later (October 14, 2009, EFTA00740600<\/a>), Seckel provided Epstein with detailed updates on his own activities. Three elements are significant.<\/p>\n Science gatekeeping for billionaires<\/em><\/strong>.<\/strong> Seckel described evaluating a cold fusion device \u201cfor our billionaire engineer pals on the west coast<\/em>\u201d \u2013 elsewhere identified as \u201cone of the Google guys<\/em>\u201d \u2013 who were about to invest millions. Seckel debunked the device and was paid for the work. His role in the network was as the person who determined which science was legitimate and which was \u201cjunk science<\/em>\u201d \u2013 and his clients included founders of one of the world\u2019s most powerful technology companies.<\/p>\n The \u201cAge of Misinformation\u201d panel<\/em><\/strong>.<\/strong> Seckel informed Epstein that he was moderating a panel at the Kodak Theatre titled \u201cAre We Transitioning from an Age of Information into an Age of Misinformation? And, what Can We Do About It?<\/em>\u201d Panellists included Jon Klein (President of CNN<\/em>), Arianna Huffington, Caprice Young (CEO of Milken\u2019s Knowledge Universe, on whose board Seckel served), Jeff Pulver, and Peter Hirshberg.<\/p>\n In his emails, Seckel articulated the argument in detail: that the \u201cdemocratization of information, where anybody can be anything or say anything<\/em>\u201d was dangerous; that people who \u201cwant to issue health care advice, start a website<\/em>\u201d or \u201cwant to be a journalist, start a blog<\/em>\u201d represented a civilizational threat; that \u201cfilters at the top of information pipelines<\/em>\u201d \u2013 peer-reviewed journals, professional journalism \u2013 needed to be restored; and that the result would otherwise be a \u201cGreat Shallowness overcoming and destroying this planet<\/em>.\u201d<\/p>\n Casual normalization of Epstein\u2019s conviction.<\/strong> In the October 14 email, Seckel opened with: \u201cCongratulations on your labelling! \ud83d\ude42 I had that badge of distinction given to me by every female I have wanted to be with. Ha<\/em>.\u201d The \u201clabelling<\/em>\u201d was Epstein\u2019s registration as a sex offender. One year after conviction, within the network, it was a punchline.<\/p>\n 2016: The Gatekeeper Returns<\/strong><\/p>\n The Seckel emails are not the only place in the federal record where Epstein\u2019s relationship to suppressed science surfaces. Five additional exhibits \u2013 EFTA01799438<\/a>, EFTA00654803<\/a>, EFTA00827221<\/a>, EFTA00325084<\/a>, and EFTA02463658<\/a> \u2013 contain an email exchange between Epstein and Rupert Sheldrake, the Cambridge-trained biologist and author known for his research into phenomena at the margins of conventional science. The correspondence runs from April 3 to May 18, 2016.<\/p>\n On April 3, 2016, Epstein wrote to Sheldrake:<\/p>\n \u201cAt MIT we are beginning a \u2018taboo\u2019 science review. crispr, gene drives. etc. What new surprises have you decided to focus on?<\/em>\u201d<\/p>\n Sheldrake corrected him. CRISPR and gene drives are not taboo \u2013 they are as mainstream as science gets. Then he pointed Epstein toward the real taboo:<\/p>\n \u201cOne taboo topic I am interested in is the area of LENR \u2013 so called above unity devices that produce more energy than they should according to conventional physics<\/em>.\u201d<\/p>\n LENR \u2013 Low Energy Nuclear Reactions \u2013 is the term that replaced \u201ccold fusion<\/em>\u201d after Pons and Fleischmann\u2019s work was discredited. It describes the same category of energy phenomena. Sheldrake sent Epstein links to an Edge.org<\/em> summary, the results of a one-year trial of Andrea Rossi\u2019s 1MW E-Cat reactor, and a special issue of the Indian Journal of Current Science<\/em> dedicated to LENR research. He also mentioned a British company working on \u201ca very promising device, currently being tested in some UK government laboratories<\/em>.\u201d<\/p>\n Then Sheldrake asked the question directly:<\/p>\n \u201cDid you discuss alternative energy possibilities like LENR at the meeting at MIT when you were discussing \u2018taboo\u2019 science?<\/em>\u201d<\/p>\n The federal record does not contain Epstein\u2019s answer.<\/p>\n But the question itself illuminates the structure. The man who privately boasted of killing Pons\u2019s cold fusion career through congressional defunding in the late 1980s was, twenty-seven years later, convening meetings at MIT to determine which suppressed sciences would be reviewed<\/strong> \u2013 and a participant was asking whether cold fusion\u2019s direct successor had made the list. Epstein was no longer just the man who killed the science. He was the man who controlled whether it could be reconsidered.<\/p>\n The correspondence also reveals the recruitment pattern documented throughout the Epstein files. Over six weeks, Epstein offered to pay all of Sheldrake\u2019s expenses to Paris, then to Harvard (\u201cHarvard institute will pick up all costs<\/em>\u201d), tried Skype<\/em>, then settled for a phone call. Sheldrake was cordial but did not visit. The mutual connection was John Brockman \u2013 the literary agent behind Edge.org<\/em>, the elite science salon that functioned as an intellectual clearinghouse for the world\u2019s most prominent scientists, and whose extensive ties to Epstein have been separately documented. Sheldrake confirmed he was Brockman\u2019s first British client.<\/p>\n Epstein then forwarded the Sheldrake correspondence to a redacted recipient \u2013 someone else in the network was being briefed on this recruitment.<\/p>\n The arc is now visible across three decades. In 1989, Epstein claims to have destroyed cold fusion through congressional lobbying. In 2009, he boasts about it privately. In 2016, he is convening the institutional venues where suppressed science might be reconsidered \u2013 with the power to decide what gets discussed and what doesn\u2019t. The gatekeeper never left the gate.<\/p>\n What This Establishes<\/strong><\/p>\n The documentary record establishes the following:<\/p>\n Epstein claimed a specific, verifiable role in the destruction of a scientist\u2019s career through political channels<\/em><\/strong>.<\/strong> He did not claim to have debunked Pons\u2019s science through peer review or academic debate. He described lobbying Congress against the funding and engaging the leadership of a major religious institution. This is a description of covert political intervention in the direction of scientific research.<\/p>\n The claim is testable<\/em><\/strong>.<\/strong> Wayne Owens is a real historical figure. The congressional cold fusion funding battle is well-documented. The LDS Church\u2019s governance of BYU is a matter of public record. Congressional testimony, appropriations records, and contemporaneous reporting from 1989-1991 could corroborate or refute Epstein\u2019s account. If Epstein\u2019s name appears in any congressional record, lobbying disclosure, or witness list related to the cold fusion funding fight, the claim moves from \u201cEpstein said<\/em>\u201d to \u201cEpstein did<\/em>.\u201d<\/p>\n Epstein\u2019s network included people who functioned as science gatekeepers for the world\u2019s wealthiest technology investors<\/em><\/strong>.<\/strong> Seckel decided which science Google\u2019s founders should fund. Epstein claimed to have decided which science Congress should fund. Both operated outside the formal structures of scientific review.<\/p>\n![\"\"](\"https:\/\/yogaesoteric.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/pons2-e1772917498491.webp\")
<\/p>\n![\"\"](\"https:\/\/yogaesoteric.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/pons3-e1772917530284.webp\")
<\/p>\n![\"\"](\"https:\/\/yogaesoteric.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/pons4.jpg\")
\n
![\"\"](\"https:\/\/yogaesoteric.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/pons5.webp\")
<\/p>\n