<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Time Magazine cover from 1984, demonizing eggs to promote
\nthe cholesterol theory of heart disease and fuel a multi-billion dollar statin drug
\nindustry.<\/p>\n
Ever since the cholesterol theory of heart disease was created
\nduring the 1970s and 1980s, eggs have been vilified as a potential threat for not only heart
\ndisease, but more recently even diabetes.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Official institutional warnings of egg consumption continue,
\neven as the cholesterol theory of heart disease is crumbling with the emerging unbiased science
\nproving otherwise.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Diabetes type 2 has become epidemic in cultures that have
\nembraced western processed food diets. There have been some epidemiological surveys that have
\nmanaged to associate egg consumption with an increased risk of diabetes.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Those seem to be publicized more than studies that have the
\ndifferent conclusions. Finland has recently shown other conclusions with both a large, unbiased
\nepidemiological study and a follow-up study that analyzed metabolic features among egg
\neaters.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Both concluded that those who enjoy eggs in their diet have
\nless risk of diabetes.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
The Epidemiological Finnish Study That Went Against <\/p>\n An epidemiological survey study inspires the often repeated <\/p>\n The following two studies illustrate this very dynamic, both <\/p>\n In 2015, researchers of the University of Eastern Finland <\/p>\n The title of their report that was published by the The <\/p>\n Records of medical examinations taken at the four and 11-year <\/p>\n After already using this cohort to determined that egg <\/p>\n Those who were scrutinized for metabolic disorders, insulin <\/p>\n From the study’s text: <\/p>\n We previously showed that egg consumption was not <\/p>\n In secondary analyses we also investigated the association <\/p>\n Somehow, an association between high cholesterol serum <\/p>\n The mounting evidence that cholesterol is vital for health and <\/p>\n Because egg yolks are high in cholesterol, eggs remain a wrong <\/p>\n To now admit that the science does not support the cholesterol <\/p>\n Combining the cholesterol\/saturated fat theory of heart <\/p>\n
\nOfficial Nutritional Recommendations<\/strong><\/p>\n
\nadage “association does not mean causation.” But association serves as an
\nimpetus for “further studies” that become laboratory and clinical in nature.<\/p>\n
\nwithin the same Kuopio Ischaemic Heart Disease (KIHD) Risk Factor Study cohort.<\/p>\n
\nconcluded their tracking of 2,342 men, aged 42-60, from the KIHD cohort assembled during the
\nearly 1980s to analyze dietary effects on chronic diseases and heart health.<\/p>\n
\nAmerican Journal of Clinical Nutrition in April of 2015 is Egg consumption
\nand risk of incident type 2 diabetes in men: the Kuopio Ischaemic Heart Disease Risk Factor
\nStudy<\/a>.<\/p>\n
\npoints, and at this cohort’s 20-year endpoint (2006-2008), were made available for
\nresearchers worldwide. So far the KIHD project has been used for 500 international
\nstudies.<\/p>\n
\nconsumption did not create cardiovascular disease, the Eastern Finland University researchers
\ndecided to analyze the glucose measurements and insulin resistance markers taken from
\nexaminations every few years until the cohort’s endpoint 20 years later.<\/p>\n
\nresistance, and serum glucose levels, all markers of pre-diabetes<\/a> and diabetes 2, consumed one egg a day on average.
\nThis is a higher egg count than many other similar studies.<\/p>\n
\n “… because the evidence on the impact of egg
\nconsumption on the risk of T2D [type 2 diabetes] is limited and mixed, we investigated the
\nassociation between egg consumption and risk of incident T2D in middle-aged and older men from
\neastern Finland.<\/p>\n
\nassociated with carotid atherosclerosis or risk of myocardial infarction in this study
\npopulation.<\/p>\n
\nof egg consumption with plasma glucose, serum insulin, and serum C-reactive protein (CRP) at
\nbaseline and in a subgroup after 4 y [years] of follow-up.”
\n
\n If you go to the full study text available
\nhere<\/a>, you’ll discover the details that led to these researchers concluding:
\n Higher egg intake was associated with a lower risk of T2D
\n[type 2 diabetes] in this cohort of middle-aged and older men.<\/p>\n
\nreadings and diabetes had been made in the past by the “cholesterol creates cardiovascular
\ndisease” crowd.<\/p>\n
\nthat people with low cholesterol have more health issues and shorter lives than those with high
\ncholesterol is largely ignored when it comes to corporate-sponsored “mainstream”
\nmedia coverage.<\/p>\n
\ntarget with the mainstream media and official nutritional institutions who are in lockstep with
\nthe cholesterol con.<\/p>\n
\ntheory of heart disease would be akin to destroying Big Pharma’s most profitable line of
\ndrugs: statins.<\/p>\n
\ndisease with obesity and metabolic disorders leading to diabetes was probably created and
\nexploited as a distraction from the real dietary issues creating these unhealthy conditions:
\nProcessed trans-fatty acid processed vegetable oils used to replace healthy saturated fats and
\nheavy sugar consumption.<\/p>\n