How curious that Lloyds of London has excluded from their
\npolicies any negative health effects caused by wi-fi technologies. Now, WHY would Lloyds leave
\nall that money on the table if these technologies are so safe? And, why are other insurance
\ncompanies following Lloyds’ lead?<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
If you think that following-the-money provides insights,
\nyou’ll probably conclude that something very big is embedded in this decision.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
The FCC and other government regulatory bodies, in collusion
\nwith the big telecomm industries, are ferociously pushing smart meters, 5G and the Internet of
\nThings.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
This roll-out is not only happening in the US, but all over
\nthe world. The giant telecomms gush enthusiastically about how everything will be
\nconnected.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
We’re gonna have incredibly high-speed connectivity so
\nlittle girls and teens can, at supersonic speed, upload pics of their latest nail-polish jobs or
\ncute puppy videos to Facebook, Pinterest, etc., for their friends to gasp and giggle… and,
\nof course, click “like” and forward these to their friends… again, all at warp
\nspeed.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
It’s pretty clear that this whole “play” by
\nthe giant telecomms is seen by them as a financial windfall – for them. And, via their
\nlobby groups, it’s seen as a windfall for all the politicians who support this agenda.
\nPoliticians will be rewarded in the usual manner – pricey junkets to exotic places,
\nelegant dinners, campaign contributions and, of course, cushy “golden parachute”
\njobs for those wi-fi supportive ex-politicians within the telecomm industries, or within their
\nlobby groups. In short, crony business as usual.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
There’s a tiny but growing wrinkle in this rosy
\nscenario of sugar plums dancing in the heads of these telecomm leaders. Specifically, Lloyds of
\nLondon, one of the world’s premier insurance groups, is refusing to insure health claims
\nmade against wireless technologies. And, other insurance companies are following Lloyd’s
\nlead in this.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
If you follow the money, this is huge. After all, if these
\nwi-fi techno-toys are so safe, why is Lloyds leaving all this additional money on the table?<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Well, Lloyd’s November 2010 Risk Assessment
\nTeam’s Report gives us a solid clue: the report compares these wireless technologies
\nwith asbestos, in that the early research on asbestos was “inconclusive” and only
\nlater did it become obvious to anyone paying attention that asbestos causes cancer.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Keep in mind that Lloyd’s Risk Assessment study of
\nwi-fi was published over 9 years ago. Even back then, however, their Risk Assessment Team
\nwas smart enough to realize that new evidence just might emerge showing that the various wi-fi
\nfrequencies do cause illness. The result? Lloyds opted to exclude coverage for wi-fi related
\nillnesses.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
And then, PG&E followed close on, slipping in its own
\nlegal clauses (just as it was rolling out smart meters) that claim no liability for wi-fi
\nrelated health damage. The schools who opt to put in wi-fi are responsible, according to
\nPG&E, and any other organizations that opt to have PG&E put wi-fi in their buildings are
\nthe responsible parties.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Today, many more recent peer-reviewed scientific studies show
\na range of serious damage caused by these wi-fi frequencies. 5G brings a quantum leap in damage
\n– to DNA, to cell mitochondria, and much more.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Fortunately the global public is waking up. Conversations are <\/p>\n After all, what’s going on is a tiny handful of people <\/p>\n Pay close attention. This whole issue is about to become a <\/p>\n
\nin the air about a global class-action lawsuit vs. the specific individuals worldwide who are
\nrecklessly ignoring the Precautionary Principle<\/a> in their promotion of advanced wi-fi technologies.
\nIn part – goes the growing conversation – the lawsuit will be based on the Nuremburg
\nPrinciple of “informed consent.”<\/p>\n
\nare pushing a huge experiment on what will be billions of people, all without have gotten their
\ninformed consent and without insurance for those who are electromagnetically sensitive – a
\ngrowing group to watch. These unfortunate individuals are our “canaries” in the coal
\nmine.<\/p>\n
\nwhole lot more interesting.<\/p>\n