What Did They Find?<\/strong><\/p>\n ![\"\"](\"\/all_uploads\/uploads5\/martie)
<\/p>\n
The first vaccine that was tested was the Infanrix
\nHexa vaccine. It’s a six-in-one vaccine that’s manufactured by
\nGlaxoSmithKline (GSK) that’s supposed to contain the following antigens:
\ntetanus, diphtheria, and pertussis toxoids; inactivated poliomyelitis viral strains
\n1-2-3; and hepatitis B surface antigen.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Corvelva discovered that none of these antigens
\nwere actually in the vaccine, which means it had zero antibodies to the intended
\nantigens to be created. This was a huge shock, and in addition to that they also
\nfound the following:<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Traces of 65 chemical cross-contaminants from
\nother manufacturing lines:
\n • chemical toxins;
\n • unrecognizable macromolecules;
\n • various free bacterial peptides that are
\npotential allergens and are capable of inducing autoimmune reactions.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
According to Corvelva,
\n \u201fTetanus, diphtheria and pertussis
\ntoxoids, D antigens of Poliomyelitis 1-2-3, hepatitis B proteins obtained with
\ngenetic engineering and Haemophylus polysaccharides chemically linked to tetanus
\ntoxoid as carrier. Toxoids are created by treatments with formaldehyde and
\nglutaraldehyde that should remove toxicity keeping intact their ability to stimulate
\nprotective antibodies against original toxins.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
We were expecting to find the three toxoids
\nand the other antigens not modified by treatment with formaldehyde and
\nglutaraldehyde, to separate the antigens from each other and to be digestible by the
\nenzyme specific for proteins (trypsin).
\n We have found instead a real
\npolymer, insoluble and indigestible, that we supposed to be the set of antigens
\nchemically bound together (has to be defined if this is present as an aggregate of
\nthe individual antigens or a single macromolecule), on which we can find in
\nliterature partial information regarding the single antigens.<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/p>\n
This macromolecule could not be recognized in
\nany way by the protein databases, and in fact it turned out to be a solid compound
\nof an unknown chemical structure.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Proteins solubility and their digestion (i.e.
\nthe capacity to divide them into small peptide fragments) are two typical proteins
\ncharacteristics that not only makes it possible to study them through some specific
\nanalysis methods
\n but are also fundamental for the interaction with the
\nimmune system to create protective antibodies<\/strong>, because if the protein
\nstructure is heavily altered from the original one, the new antibodies result
\ncompletely different from those that are able to attack the original antibodies
\ncausing illnesses.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
Since this polymer we have encountered,
\nderived from the antigenic mix, is not only different for its spatial conformation
\nbut it’s chemically different, so we can state that we are not
\nfacing antigens similar to the original ones but in the form of a compound with an
\nunknown and unpredictable toxicity and efficacy.<\/strong>\u02ee<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
The fact that the vaccine antigens were not
\ndetected is seriously concerning, and so is the fact that, of the 65 signs of
\nchemical contaminants, only 35% are known. This was only the first phase of this
\nsafety testing, as a second analytical study with standard controls will be
\nreleased.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
7 chemical toxins were also identified, and the
\ngroup states that these toxins have a structure that could probably be partially
\nderived from the formaldehyde, glutaraldehyde and cyanogen bromide reactions with
\nother chemical contaminants in the vaccine.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
\u201fWe’d like to point out that the
\ntoxicity of many of these toxins have been confirmed andpublished in
\nPubchem or Toxnet andthis poses important safety problems, issues and
\nconcerns<\/strong>.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
From the protein and peptide fraction study,
\nvarious free peptides of bacterial origin have been obtained probably coming from
\nthe bacterial culture cells used for the antigen extraction.
\n Literature
\nreports bacterial peptides as potential allergens 5 and also as capable of inducing
\nautoimmune reactions 6 and these too put a safety issue that needs to be further
\nclarified with the regulatory bodies.<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/p>\n
Coming back to the two basic principles that
\nhave been our topic on this analysis path, we reaffirm what we have said in the
\nrecent interview on the scientific journal Nature: we are inquiring the vaccines
\nefficacy and safety and we can’t quite understand how it is possible to claim
\nthat this vaccine is even able to generate the 6 protective antibodies –
\nreason why it is designed for – and furthermore to understand how this cluster
\nmade of neurotoxic antigens bound together can be claimed as not toxic for
\nnewborns.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Infanrix Hexa hexavalent, as for the method
\nwe have commissioned, casts major doubts on both its effectiveness and on its
\nsafety…<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
One thing is for sure: we will not stop to
\nproceed.\u02ee<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
More Vaccine Controversy From
\nItaly<\/strong><\/p>\n <\/p>\n
In the 90s, Dr. Antonietta Gatti discovered the
\nrelationship between micro- and nano-particles as well as a great number of
\npathologies: cardiovascular diseases, many forms of cancer, multiple neurological
\ndiseases, and autoimmune diseases. She’s taken part in many international
\nresearch projects, including the pathologies induced by depleted uranium, waste
\nincineration, food polluted with inorganic particles, and more.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Currently, she is the coordinator of the Italian
\nInstitute of Technology’s Project of Nanoecotoxicology, called INESE.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
She is also a selected expert of the FAO\/WHO for
\nthe safety in nanotechnological food, a Member of the NANOTOX Cluster of the
\nEuropean Commission, the author of the book “Nanopathology: the health
\nimpact of nanoparticles,” on the Editorial Board of the Journal of
\nBiomaterials Applications, and a Member of the CPCM of the Italian Ministry of
\nDefense.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Furthermore, her and her husband Dr. Stefano
\nMontanari founded a laboratory called Nano-diagnostics for the evaluation of the
\npathological tissues of patients. It’s presently at the University of Modena
\nand Reggio Emilia, Italy.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Last year, the Italian police raided their home,
\nand the police took all digital assets that were owned by the the two
\nnanopathologists including their laptops, computers, and flash-drives; basically
\nyears of work and research.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
James Grundvig via the World Mercury
\nProject describes what happened quite well:
\n “Because Gatti and Montanari had taken
\ntheir research of nanodust and nanoparticles, from in-vivo (performed in a living
\norganism) and in-vitro (performed in a test tube) to what unseen contamination might
\nreside in vaccines in 2016, they came under the microscope of the United States,
\nEuropean, and Italian authorities. <\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
They had touched the third rail of medicine.
\nThey had crossed the no-go zone with the purported crime being scientific research
\nand discovery. By finding nano-contamination in random vaccines, Gatti and Montanari
\nrevealed, for the first time, what no one knew: Vaccines had more than aluminum
\nsalts adjuvants, Polysorbate-80, and other inorganic chemicals in them, they also
\nharbored stainless steel, tungsten, copper, and other metals and rare elements that
\ndon’t belong in shots given to fetuses, pregnant women, newborns, babies and
\ntoddlers developing their lungs, immune and nervous systems.”<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
The scientists published their work in January of
\n2017, titled, New Quality\u2010Control Investigations on Vaccines: Micro\u2010
\nand Nanocontamination<\/a>. If science wasn’t plagued by corruption, an
\ninvestigation would have started, healthcare agencies would be involved, and vaccine
\nsafety policies would have come under intense scrutiny, but that never
\nhappened.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
The Takeaway<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/p>\n
There are numerous vaccine safety issues. The
\nbioaccumulation of various vaccine ingredients, for example, are one. Ingredients
\nlike aluminum have been added to vaccines for more than 100 years under the
\nassumption that they are safe. It’s only within the last couple years that
\nscientists decided to look to see where these ingredients go after being
\ninjected.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
They found that aluminum, when injected,
\ndoesn’t exit the body, it actually travels to distant organs and the brain.
\nYou can access those studies and read more about that here. You can also watch a
\nshort video from Dr. Christopher Shaw from the University of British Colombia
\nexplaining the difference between injectable aluminum and the aluminum our body
\ntakes in from food. Here is another related study you can read that goes into
\nfurther detail.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
The main point should be that no parent should
\never be made to feel guilty for not vaccinating their children. Vaccines are clearly
\nnot as safe as they’re marketed to be, and it’s important that we ask
\nourselves why this type of information goes virtually unacknowledged by the
\nmasses.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
yogaesoteric<\/strong><\/p>\n March 16, 2020<\/strong><\/p>\n <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
The National Order of Biologists made a \u20ac10,000 donation to a group that questions the safety of vaccines. The Infanrix Hexa vaccine was the first one tested, and results showed no trance of antigens and a high level of contamination. Why is this not big news? Why does the vaccine not contain any of […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_uf_show_specific_survey":0,"_uf_disable_surveys":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[1102],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-23311","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-risks-for-your-health-4260-en-health-en"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/yogaesoteric.net\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/23311","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/yogaesoteric.net\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/yogaesoteric.net\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/yogaesoteric.net\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/yogaesoteric.net\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=23311"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/yogaesoteric.net\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/23311\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/yogaesoteric.net\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=23311"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/yogaesoteric.net\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=23311"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/yogaesoteric.net\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=23311"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}