\nstreets.<\/strong><\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
This is how the media portrayed Covid-19 at the
\nbeginning: a disease so dangerous that people walking along the street suddenly dropped
\ndown dead. Virtually all the UK media carried photos about this. It’s very odd that in
\nthe first two pictures, and variants of them in other papers, those emergency workers
\nhave no equipment with them, and appear to be just standing around doing nothing. Are
\nthese faked photos?<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
There have been no reports of people dropping dead in
\nthe street anywhere since then. And if it had been true in China, the virus would have
\nbeen noticed very quickly. We now know that the symptoms are indistinguishable from
\ncolds, flu or pneumonia. These photos were the start of the Coronapanic lies.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
2. Three Percent Will Die.<\/strong><\/p>\n <\/p>\n The WHO put out this 3% death rate figure early on. <\/p>\n 3. Herd Immunity is a Dangerous <\/p>\n This is one of the most serious corruptions of <\/p>\n 4. We Need a Vaccine to Give us Herd <\/p>\n Vaccines work by creating artificial herd immunity, <\/p>\n 5. Lockdowns Work.<\/strong><\/p>\n <\/p>\n The evidence here is very, very weak. It is common <\/p>\n a. Vitamin D plays a huge role in the immune <\/p>\n b. Flu vaccines also play a role in causing <\/p>\n c. Obesity is a negative indicator, which <\/p>\n One could tease out many other factors, but not one <\/p>\n As the infection travelled through populations, <\/p>\n The countries surrounding China, which have a great <\/p>\n After a tight and effective lockdown preventing <\/p>\n 6. Lockdown Does Not Cause More Deaths than <\/p>\n The leaked figure of 150,000 lockdown-caused deaths <\/p>\n 7. Being Infected May Not (or Does Not) Make This is a truly bizarre assumption to make about any <\/p>\n 8. Having Covid Means Having Serious <\/p>\n In the beginning of this sorry saga, the most serious <\/p>\n 9. Masks Work.<\/strong><\/p>\n <\/p>\n If they do, why can’t we all wear them and get back <\/p>\n 10. Two Meter Social Distancing is <\/p>\n There is no good science behind this. In Norway, with <\/p>\n 11. Money has Nothing to do with Any of <\/p>\n The influence and mega-bucks of Bill Gates and Big <\/p>\n 12. The Destruction of Basic Human Rights is <\/p>\n People being under virtual House Arrest, with Freedom <\/p>\n History shows that Rights are generally hard won, and <\/p>\n In those wonderful days before Covid-19, we all knew <\/p>\n Is it not odd that all of those three extreme <\/p>\n yogaesoteric<\/strong><\/p>\n July 14, 2020<\/strong><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Many lies have been told about this virus. These are just the top 12 we have selected. 1. People dropping dead in the streets. This is how the media portrayed Covid-19 at the beginning: a disease so dangerous that people walking along the street suddenly dropped down dead. Virtually all the UK media carried […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_uf_show_specific_survey":0,"_uf_disable_surveys":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[782],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-23881","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-descoperiti-manevrele-francmasoneriei-3480-ro"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/yogaesoteric.net\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/23881","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/yogaesoteric.net\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/yogaesoteric.net\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/yogaesoteric.net\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/yogaesoteric.net\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=23881"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/yogaesoteric.net\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/23881\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/yogaesoteric.net\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=23881"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/yogaesoteric.net\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=23881"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/yogaesoteric.net\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=23881"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}
\nYou don’t need to be a maths wizard to know that’s one person in thirty. That’s a
\nserious reason to panic. We now know that the death rate is around 0.1%. That’s about
\none in a thousand, and comparable to seasonal flu. But just as important, the figures
\nare massively skewed towards people around eighty who have at least two existing serious
\nconditions, and are already in a care home: people who have minimal quality of life, and
\nlittle remaining expectation of life. For younger, healthy people, and younger here can
\nmean under seventy, never mind twenty or thirty, the risk of death is vanishingly
\nsmall.<\/p>\n
\nIdea.<\/strong><\/p>\n
\nscience ever. You don’t need a degree in epidemiology to know that epidemics come and
\ngo. The very definition of the word implies that. (Conversely, a disease which stays
\naround for many years is called endemic.) You do need to know just a smidgen of
\nepidemiology to understand why epidemics come and go. It’s not rocket science. When the
\nnew disease arrives, everybody is susceptible to it, because it is new and therefore
\nnobody has any immunity. The disease can race through the population, but as it does so
\nit leaves immune people in its wake. As the number of immune people grows, the disease
\nfinds it harder and harder to spread. When the number of immune people reaches a certain
\npoint (which varies with different diseases) the bug can find no new people to infect,
\nso the bug itself effectively dies. That point is called herd immunity. It is the only
\nway to defeat a new virus. But see number 4.<\/p>\n
\nImmunity.<\/strong><\/p>\n
\nbut that’s no better than natural herd immunity. And the simple fact is, as everyone
\nknows, we don’t have a vaccine. How long will it take to make one, test it properly, and
\nroll it out? Eighteen months? Three years? Never? In any event, even if we use a vaccine
\nbefore proper safety testing, it will still take longer than it does to reach herd
\nimmunity naturally. (And note that the Common Cold is also often caused by some other
\nCoronaviruses. Still no sign of a vaccine for any of those.)<\/p>\n
\nsense that they must have some effect. But we have New York, with a hard lockdown and
\nmassive deaths, while Tokyo with a minimal lockdown has hardly any. Or Sweden with a
\nvery mild lockdown having a lower death rate than Britain with a draconian one. Or Spain
\nand Portugal, which together make up the Iberian Peninsula, having massively different
\ndeath rates. There is another factor, or factors, involved here, and the mass media seem
\nto have no concern as to what they might be. Happily there are some scientists who do
\nseek to explain the differences. Several factors have been put forward with good
\nevidence:<\/p>\n
\nsystem, and variations in deficiency certainly play a part, at least in individual
\ncases. In fact, it is negligent of the Government not to have promoted Vitamin D
\nsupplementation on a large scale.<\/p>\n
\nworse outcome with Coronaviruses. The mechanism is called vaccine-induced viral
\ninterference. Naturally those who make vaccines are not keen for you to know about such
\nundesirable side-effects.<\/p>\n
\nwill partly explain New York’s high death rate. One of the oddest Covid statistics to
\ndate is that out of the small number of deaths in Japan, no less than seven are Sumo
\nWrestlers!<\/p>\n
\ncomes close to the Grand Deal-Breaker in Epidemiology, which is immunity. Immunity is
\nthe principal reason people do not get sick with any disease. Hence the primary factor
\nin differential death rates must be how long different countries had the virus before
\nthey realised.<\/p>\n
\nconfused with colds and flu, it was steadily building immunity. China has a truly
\nminiscule number of deaths given its huge population. The virus there was on the rampage
\nright through Winter Flu Season, before they realised there was something new. When they
\ndid, they locked down, and the lockdown appeared to be very effective; but only because
\nthey were already close to herd immunity.<\/p>\n
\ndeal of intercourse with it, have similarly low death rates (Vietnam, nobody at all!)
\nHow and when the virus got into other countries is difficult to unravel now; but one
\nshould be aware that Wuhan Airport is a major hub, with flights all over the world. We
\ncan reasonably infer that Norway, for example, was infected early, yielding the much
\nlower recorded deaths later. Such a conclusion is borne out by the fact that, having now
\neased its lockdown, cases are still going down. In other words, there is no sign of a
\n‘Second Wave’.<\/p>\n
\ntransmission, and also therefore preventing the growth of immunity, there should indeed
\nbe a second wave. The lack of one points very strongly to previously acquired
\nimmunity.<\/p>\n
\nit Saves.<\/strong><\/p>\n
\nhas never been refuted by the UK Government. It is only common sense that with the NHS
\nshut down to almost everyone, there will be more deaths from other causes. Also more
\nsuicides, more domestic violence, and the array of problems that increase mortality when
\npoverty increases. The economic crash is going to have a big effect there. And do we
\nregard the suicide of a healthy 20-year-old as equivalent to the death of an ailing 85-
\nyear old? Lockdown is not a One-Way Street when it comes to saving lives; more likely a
\nWrong-Way Street.<\/p>\n
\nYou Immune.<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/p>\n
\nspecific infection. (Note that the common cold, which is endemic, is caused by a number
\nof different viruses.) This ‘fact’ was allegedly based on some people who
\nseemed to be infected twice.
\n But the extreme difficulty of distinguishing between
\nColds, Flu, Covid-19 and Pneumonia means this was always a ridiculous conclusion to
\nreach. And if it were true it would be a one shot kill of the Race for a Vaccine.
\nVaccines only work because they stimulate the immune system in the way a natural
\ninfection does. If Covid-19 did not provoke a normal immune response, any vaccine would
\nbe useless.<\/p>\n
\nSymptoms.<\/strong><\/p>\n
\nsymptom, as noted in Lie 1 above, was instant death. Now we know that it mostly has no
\nsymptoms at all, or presents like a Common Cold. All the World’s highly-paid and
\nendlessly-promoted “experts” somehow didn’t notice this.<\/p>\n
\nto normal? If they don’t, why are we ever recommended to use them? The effectiveness or
\notherwise of masks has been a controversial matter for months. Some Doctors have said
\nthat healthy people wearing them outside of a clinical setting is definitely a bad idea.
\nIs the mask controversy just another way to ramp up fear and confusion?<\/p>\n
\nNecessary.<\/strong><\/p>\n
\nits incredibly low death rate, they use one metre. And there is never a reference to
\nwhether you are indoors or out. If you breathe out virus indoors, it has little choice
\nbut to hang around in the room for a while. If you are outside in fairly still air,
\nwhich has a speed of about 2 metres per second, the virus you breathed out 2 seconds ago
\nis already 4 metres away. And because the air you breathe out is always warmer than the
\nsurrounding air, and warm air rises, that potentially virus-laden air will rise up
\noutside with no ceiling to stop it. So two metres is not necessary in Norway, but it is
\nin England, whether you are in a small room or on a breezy beach. Is this fear-mongering
\nnonsense, or science? It is certainly not the latter.<\/p>\n
\nThis.<\/strong><\/p>\n
\nPharma is supposedly not skewing the debate. Bill Gates’s donations to Prof Lockdown
\nFerguson’s Imperial College, or to the WHO, make no difference, and Bill Gates’s desire
\nto produce seven billion doses of vaccine does not give him a financial interest. Bill
\nGates is a nice guy who knows a lot about computer viruses, so we should all look to him
\nas our Saviour from this virus. There’s more logic in Alice in Wonderland.<\/p>\n
\na Price Worth Paying.<\/strong><\/p>\n
\nof Movement, Freedom of Association, Freedom of Speech, Freedom to Work, Freedom to
\nattend School, all curtailed, is OK? The introduction of mass personal surveillance is a
\ngood thing? If a foreign invader threatened our Rights like that we would fight for
\nthem, and accept casualties in the process. Why are we suddenly turning that logic on
\nits head, and deciding to give up Rights to (possibly) save lives? Do we all fondly
\nimagine that we will soon have our Rights back?<\/p>\n
\nonce lost they are very hard to get back. And if you think you still have Freedom of
\nSpeech, try as many have, to put across a view that is different to the Government. Yes,
\nyou can get it across to a few. But if it reaches many more, Google, or YouTube, or
\nFacebook will soon censor it. If you are reading this article, it is because you are one
\nof a small number, meaning the article is still below the censor’s radar, or the
\npopularity level that triggers censorship.<\/p>\n
\nthat Politicians, Journalists and Salesmen are inveterate Purveyors of Porky Pies. Now
\nthese same people are regarded as Saints and Saviours, with absolutely nothing but our
\nbest interests and well-being in their hearts. It is a fact, meaning a real one, not a
\nfake one, that anyone can think of no topic ever that has had so many utterly bizarre
\nlies told about it. It is also a fact that it is hard not to think of any matter where
\npoliticians around the World all suddenly started braying like donkeys with the same
\nawful hoo-ha. And also a fact that of any occurrence which has simultaneously destroyed
\nhuman rights and wrecked the economy across the entire Globe it’s
\nunthinkable.<\/p>\n
\nobservations should apply to the very same little virus? If anyone can’t see a problem
\nhere, it can only be that Coronapanic has totally obliterated their thought
\nprocesses.<\/p>\n