<\/p>\n
There has never been a greater opportunity to deploy
\none vaccine against so many people. So it’s certainly not out of line to consider
\na “dual use.”<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Are Researchers Interested In Marrying Here is a quote from Frontiers in Immunology, <\/p>\n “A new generation of vaccines based on <\/p>\n “This is due to recent advances in chemical <\/p>\n “This short review provides an overview of <\/p>\n Here is another quote, also from Frontiers in <\/p>\n “In the last several years, the use of <\/p>\n “Nanocarriers composed of lipids, proteins, <\/p>\n There can be no doubt that nanotechnology is, indeed, <\/p>\n Now let’s shift into another use of <\/p>\n Here are astonishing quotes from the journal Nano <\/p>\n Aside from research into prosthetics and, perhaps, the <\/p>\n Modulation… such as control of basic thought- ONE:<\/strong> Nano-sensors, implanted in the TWO:<\/strong> And from those ops centers, data <\/p>\n If this seems impossible, consider nanotech research <\/p>\n What lies behind it, in secret research, is a matter <\/p>\n Utilizing the Internet of Things, an attempt would be <\/p>\n Who would be interested in such a program? Think <\/p>\n SUPPOSE, THROUGH A COVID VACCINE, NANOTECH COULD BE <\/p>\n Here is an interesting quote from a 3\/11\/20 <\/p>\n “One of the most pressing global healthcare “Moderna’s nanoparticle-driven science <\/p>\n If Moderna’s COVID vaccine is indeed using <\/p>\n The S&P Global article states, <\/p>\n Does Moderna’s COVID vaccine use nanoparticles? <\/p>\n There are two backgrounders. They involve the flood of <\/p>\n BACKGROUNDER ONE: Behind The Explosive Charles <\/p>\n Once upon a time, they called it espionage. Then they <\/p>\n As just one example, tiny sensors would, up the road, <\/p>\n HOWEVER the standard definitions of diseases and <\/p>\n What is the technology that is on the way to producing <\/p>\n From lexico.com: nanotechnology: <\/p>\n One of the leading nanoscience researchers in the <\/p>\n Bloomberg News, February 12, 2020: <\/p>\n He hasn’t been charged with any type of <\/p>\n “…by targeting Lieber, the chairman of <\/p>\n “According to a government affidavit, signed <\/p>\n “These included a contract with the state- <\/p>\n “The government offered no evidence that <\/p>\n “Whatever extracurricular arrangements <\/p>\n “He relied on a pipeline of China’s “Dozens of Lieber’s 100 or so former <\/p>\n That’s a pretty big technology-transfer WOW <\/p>\n “The new paradigm was globalization, China <\/p>\n Another WOW. Not a leak of information. A flood. <\/p>\n How Big A Star Is Lieber?<\/strong><\/p>\n <\/p>\n Wikpedia: “Charles M. Lieber (born 1959) is <\/p>\n Chemistry and Engineering News, January 28, <\/p>\n Another “technology transfer” of great <\/p>\n “After interviewing Lieber, Harvard <\/p>\n NIH has strict regulations about its researchers <\/p>\n Lieber was operating a robust center at Harvard: <\/p>\n So it’s natural to ask, what kind of research <\/p>\n Hence, the picture of the future of this <\/p>\n Of course, the ominous technological innovations apply <\/p>\n All hail, Globalism and technocracy.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n BACKGROUNDER TWO: Nano-Technology: One World, <\/p>\n The arrest of Harvard pioneer in the field of <\/p>\n These relationships include, above all, the open <\/p>\n Here are quotes from the journal Nano Today, Aside from research into prosthetics and, perhaps, the <\/p>\n Who would be interested in such a thing? Think Chinese <\/p>\n Over the past few decades, the flow of all sorts of <\/p>\n “– Look, I’m certainly willing <\/p>\n How did US-China relations get to this point? At one <\/p>\n Here’s what Rockefeller blithely wrote in 1973, <\/p>\n Millions of people dead, freedom crushed, a whole <\/p>\n Flash forward 47 years. Scientists from both countries <\/p>\n Of course, remember, when political push comes to <\/p>\n yogaesoteric<\/strong><\/p>\n July 21, 2020<\/strong><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" There has never been a greater opportunity to deploy one vaccine against so many people. So it’s certainly not out of line to consider a “dual use.” Are Researchers Interested In Marrying Nanotechnology And Vaccines? Here is a quote from Frontiers in Immunology, January 24, 2019, “Nanoparticle-Based Vaccines Against Respiratory Viruses”: “A new […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_uf_show_specific_survey":0,"_uf_disable_surveys":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[1362],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-23899","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-covid-19-crisis-1602-en"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/yogaesoteric.net\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/23899","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/yogaesoteric.net\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/yogaesoteric.net\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/yogaesoteric.net\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/yogaesoteric.net\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=23899"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/yogaesoteric.net\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/23899\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/yogaesoteric.net\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=23899"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/yogaesoteric.net\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=23899"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/yogaesoteric.net\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=23899"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}
\nNanotechnology And Vaccines?<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/p>\n
\nJanuary 24, 2019, “Nanoparticle-Based Vaccines Against Respiratory
\nViruses”:<\/p>\n
\nnanoparticles has shown great potential to address most of the limitations of
\nconventional and subunit vaccines.”<\/p>\n
\nand biological engineering, which allow the design of nanoparticles with a precise
\ncontrol over the size, shape, functionality and surface properties, leading to enhanced
\nantigen presentation and strong immunogenicity.”<\/p>\n
\nthe advantages associated with the use of nanoparticles as vaccine delivery platforms to
\nimmunize against respiratory viruses…” [such as the purported COVID-19
\nvirus?]<\/p>\n
\nImmunology, October 4, 2018, “Nanoparticle Vaccines Against Infectious
\nDiseases”:<\/p>\n
\nnanoparticle-based vaccines has received a great attention to improve vaccine efficacy,
\nimmunization strategies, and targeted delivery to achieve desired immune responses at
\nthe cellular level…”<\/p>\n
\nmetals or polymers have already been used… This review article focuses on the
\napplications of nanocarrier-based vaccine formulations and the strategies used for the
\nfunctionalization of nanoparticles to accomplish efficient delivery of vaccines in order
\nto induce desired host immunity against infectious diseases.”<\/p>\n
\nvery much involved in cutting-edge vaccine research.<\/p>\n
\nnanotech.<\/p>\n
\nToday, from a 2019 paper titled: “Nanowire probes could drive high-
\nresolution brain-machine interfaces.” Its authors are Chinese and
\nAmerican:
\n “…advances can enable investigations
\nof dynamics in the brain [through nano-sensor-implants] and drive the development of new
\nbrain-machine interfaces with unprecedented resolution and precision.”
\n “…output electrical signals of brain
\nactivity or input electrical stimuli to modulate brain activity in concert with external
\nmachines, including computer processors and prosthetics, for human
\nenhancement…”<\/p>\n
\nreversal of certain paralyses, this avenue of investigation also suggests
\n“modulation” of the brain remotely connected to machines, for the purpose of
\ncontrol.<\/p>\n
\nimpulses, sensations, emotions?<\/p>\n
\nbody and brain, would issue real time data-reports on body\/brain functioning to ops
\ncenters.<\/p>\n
\n\u2014 including instructions \u2014 would be sent back to the nano-sensors, which
\nwould impose those instructions on the brain and body.<\/p>\n
\naimed at improving the use of prosthetics. In that field, imposing instructions on the
\nbody\/brain appears to be the whole point. The question is: how far along the road of
\ndevelopment is this technology? We are seeing the public published face of
\nnanotech.<\/p>\n
\nfor estimation and speculation.
\n One speculation: the “promotion” of the
\nsocial agenda of collectivist thought, through nanotech.<\/p>\n
\nmade to hook up and “harmonize” many, many brains with one another. Same
\nbasic feelings, same impulses \u2014 shared.<\/p>\n
\nChinese government, DARPA (the technology arm of the Pentagon), and numerous other
\ninternational actors. Think Rockefeller medical researchers. Think technocracy and Brave
\nNew World.<\/p>\n
\nINSERTED INTO BODIES AND BRAINS OF THE GLOBAL POPULATION? As a grand control
\n“experiment.” Is that too far-out an idea?<\/p>\n
\nS&P Global article, “Early-stage nanotechnology poised for
\n‘inflection point’”:<\/p>\n
\nchallenges in 2020 is the coronavirus outbreak and Moderna Inc… is on the front
\nline of vaccine development for this new biological threat.”<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
\nuses genetic engineering to trigger cells to create proteins that prevent certain
\ninfections. Its vaccines for Zika virus and influenza have already progressed to early
\nclinical stages…”<\/p>\n
\nnanoparticles, it’s not to be seen this mentioned in current press reports.<\/p>\n
\n “One of the leaders in the field of
\nbiological nanotech engineering is Massachusetts Institute of Technology professor
\nRobert Langer, who has helped found about 40 companies based on technology created and
\ndeveloped in his Langer Lab… Moderna Inc., one of the companies Langer helped
\nfound…”<\/p>\n
\nIf so, what can these particles actually do? These are pressing questions that need to
\nbe answered.<\/p>\n
\nhighly significant scientific research across borders.<\/p>\n
\nLieber Nanotech Scandal<\/strong><\/p>\n
\ncalled it “illegal technology transfer.” Then they casually and admiringly
\ncalled it Globalism.
\n Imagine this. A cutting-edge technology, which has
\napplications for weaponry, transportation, medicine, artificial intelligence,
\nsurveillance, mind control… is being openly shared between the US and China. And
\nby implication, who knows how many other nations?<\/p>\n
\nbe placed inside the human body. These sensors would automatically monitor and report
\nthousands of changes, in real time, in the body\u2014as a way of diagnosing diseases.
\nThe sensors will transmit all this information, through the emerging Internet of Things
\n\u2014 using the 5G pipeline \u2014 to medical centers \u2014 where AI corporate and
\ngovernment analysts will make the disease diagnoses and prescribe treatments.
\nEventually, a few billion people (patients) would, through these sensors in their
\nbodies, be hooked up to the 5G Internet of Things.<\/p>\n
\ndisorders are often incorrect, or even invented. But because the future system is
\nautomated, the patient is enclosed in a fake and dangerous bubble. Among other problems,
\nthe disease treatments, the drugs and vaccines, are toxic. <\/p>\n
\nthese body sensors?
\n Nanoscience. Nano-engineering.<\/p>\n
\n “The branch of technology that deals with
\ndimensions and tolerances of less than 100 nanometers, especially the manipulation of
\nindividual atoms and molecules.”<\/p>\n
\nworld was recently arrested on a charge of concealing his connections to China. Major US
\nscience star busted by the feds. Charles Lieber, now suspended by Harvard, is the
\nUniversity’s chairman of the chemistry department. There were two articles that
\nsaid that Lieber stole and smuggled the “new coronavirus” from the US to
\nChina. In both cases, the text of the articles mentioned nothing about such a theft. But
\nbecause Lieber does apparently have big-time connections to China. Sharing research on
\nhis specialty, nanoscience, with China would be one more case of “technology
\ntransfer.”<\/p>\n
\n“Lieber’s arrest on Jan. 28 came in connection with his dealings in
\nChina.<\/p>\n
\neconomic espionage, intellectual-property theft, or export violations. Instead,
\nhe’s accused of lying to U.S. Department of Defense investigators about his work
\nwith the People’s Republic…”<\/p>\n
\nHarvard’s chemistry department and a veritable ivory tower blue blood, prosecutors
\nstruck at the crimson heart of the academic elite, raising fears that globalism, when it
\ncomes to doing science with China, is being criminalized.”<\/p>\n
\nby a Federal Bureau of Investigation agent named Robert Plumb, Lieber signed at least
\nthree agreements with Wuhan Technology University, or WUT, in central
\nChina.”<\/p>\n
\nsponsored Thousand Talents Plan \u2014 an effort by Beijing to attract mostly
\nexpatriate [Chinese] researchers and their know-how back home \u2014 worth a total of
\nabout $653,000 a year in pay [to Lieber] and living expenses for three years, plus $1.74
\nmillion [to Lieber] to support a new ‘Harvard-WUT Nano Key Lab’ in
\nWuhan.”<\/p>\n
\nLieber actually received those sums… Lieber also deceived Harvard about his China
\ncontracts, the [federal] affidavit said.”<\/p>\n
\nLieber may have had in China, his Harvard lab was a paragon of U.S.-China
\ncollaboration.”<\/p>\n
\nbrightest Ph.D. students and postdocs, often more than a dozen at a time, to produce
\nprize-winning research on the revolutionary potential of so-called nanowires in
\nbiomedical implants.”<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
\nlab members from China have chosen to stay in the U.S. Many now lead their own
\nnanoscience labs at top universities, including Duke, Georgia Tech, MIT, Stanford,
\nUniversity of California at Berkeley, and UCLA.”<\/p>\n
\nright there.
\n “In the 1990s and 2000s, as Lieber’s
\nachievements and stature were taking off, U.S. research institutions and grant makers
\npumped money and moral support into expanding the burgeoning collaborations between
\nscientists in the U.S. and other countries, particularly China.”<\/p>\n
\nwas an emerging economic power, and Lieber’s lab became an exemplar of pan-Pacific
\ncollaboration.”<\/p>\n
\n “A more controversial Lieber
\nprotégé is Liqiang Mai, the international dean and chair of materials science
\nat WUT, the little-known school in Wuhan that prosecutors allege recruited Lieber to be
\na ‘strategic scientist’ in 2011, for $50,000 a month. Mai, who hasn’t
\nbeen named in any U.S. filings against Lieber, earned a doctorate at WUT in 2004 and
\nworked as a postdoc in Lieber’s lab from 2008 to 2011, according to Mai’s
\nWUT online bio….”<\/p>\n
\nan American chemist and pioneer in the field of nanoscience and
\nnanotechnology.”
\n “In 2011, Lieber was recognized by Thomson
\nReuters as the leading chemist in the world for the decade 2000-2010 based on the impact
\nof his scientific publications.”
\n “Lieber has published over 400 papers in
\npeer-reviewed scientific journals and has edited and contributed to many books on
\nnanoscience. He is the principal inventor on over fifty issued US patents and
\napplications, and founded the nanotechnology company Nanosys in 2001 and Vista
\nTherapeutics in 2007.”
\n “He is known for his contributions to the
\nsynthesis, assembly and characterization of nanoscale materials and nanodevices, the
\napplication of nanoelectronic devices in biology, and as a mentor to numerous leaders in
\nnanoscience. In 2012, Lieber was awarded Israel’s Wolf Prize in
\nChemistry.”<\/p>\n
\n2020:
\n “In addition, Lieber allegedly signed a
\ncontract that obligated Harvard to become part of a cooperative research program that
\nallowed WUT [Chinese] scientists to visit the university up to two months each
\nyear.”
\n “The [federal] complaint says he did not
\ninform university officials of the agreement, which was for ‘advanced research and
\ndevelopment of nano wire-based lithium-ion batteries with high performance for electric
\nvehicles’.”<\/p>\n
\nvalue.
\n “…the NIH [US National Institutes of
\nHealth, a federal agency] asked Harvard about whether the university or Lieber failed to
\ndisclose his financial relationship with China. Lieber has been a principal investigator
\non at least three NIH grants totaling $10 million since 2008.”<\/p>\n
\n[incorrectly, supposedly based on Lieber’s statements] responded to the NIH that
\nhe [Lieber] had ‘no formal association with WUT [Wuhan Institute of Technology]
\n’ and ‘is not and has never been a participant in’ the [Chinese]
\nThousand Talents program.”<\/p>\n
\ndisclosing their conflict-of-interest connections. The feds obviously believe Lieber has
\nfailed to report his China connections to NIH. This would become a factor in his
\nprosecution.<\/p>\n
\nLieber Research Group. Its focus is nanoscience and nanotechnology.<\/p>\n
\nfindings would be shared with China?
\n On the Group’s website, there is this, right off
\nthe bat: “We are pioneering the interface between nanoelectronics and the life
\nsciences… sensors for real-time disease detection…”<\/p>\n
\nbackgrounder.<\/p>\n
\nto both China and the US, and the rest of the world… The Chinese government has
\nthe clout, will, force, and intent to impose, without hesitation, every sort of possible
\ncontrol on its 1.4 billion citizens. It is in the process of building many new
\n“smart cities.” These centers will be models of wall-to-wall surveillance.
\nAI, Internet of Things, 5G, the works. If nanoscience can achieve much more intimate
\naccess to people, through implanted sensors, why wouldn’t the Chinese government
\njump at the chance to deploy it?
\n The rationale and the cover story are obvious:
\n WE MUST HAVE EARLY KNOWLEDGE OF NEW VIRUS EPIDEMICS.
\nWE WILL DETECT THEM DIRECTLY FROM THE BODIES OF OUR PEOPLE IN REAL TIME.<\/p>\n
\nOne Brain<\/strong><\/p>\n
\nnanotechnology, Charles Lieber \u2014 on charges of lying to federal authorities about
\nhis business connections to China \u2014 has exposed wide-ranging relationships among
\nAmerican and Chinese researchers.<\/p>\n
\nsharing of sensitive technologies that, once upon a time, would have been considered
\nclosely guarded state secrets.<\/p>\n
\nfrom a 2019 paper titled: “Nanowire probes could drive high-resolution brain-
\nmachine interfaces”. Its authors are Chinese and American:
\n “…advances can enable investigations
\nof dynamics in the brain [through tiny sensor-implants] and drive the development of new
\nbrain-machine interfaces with unprecedented resolution and precision.”
\n “…output electrical signals of brain
\nactivity or input electrical stimuli to modulate brain activity in concert with external
\nmachines, including computer processors and prosthetics, for human
\nenhancement…”<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
\nreversal of certain paralyses, this avenue of investigation also suggests
\n“modulation” of the brain, hooked to machines, for the purpose of control.
\nControl of basic thoughts, sensations, emotions. And along with the Internet of Things,
\nwhy couldn’t that control eventually be extended, in order to
\n“harmonize” many, many brains with one another?<\/p>\n
\ngovernment, DARPA (the technology arm of the Pentagon), and numerous other international
\nactors. Think Rockefeller medical researchers. Think technocracy and Brave New
\nWorld.<\/p>\n
\nultra-sensitive scientific information, between the US and China, hasn’t consisted
\nof rare leaks. It’s a flood, out in the open, in labs and universities. All part
\nof the new share-and-care Globalist agenda.
\n Nanotechnology, to choose one branch of such
\nresearch-exchange, has applications in weaponry, transportation, surveillance, medicine,
\netc. And of course, mind control.<\/p>\n
\nto share my latest research on nano-brain implants. But I need your, ahem, assurance
\nthat your government won’t use this for dark purposes.”
\n “– I understand completely. My
\ngovernment would no more do that than your government would.”
\n “– All right. Then we’re
\ngood.”
\n “– Yes. Good.”<\/p>\n
\ntime, it appeared the two governments were involved in a cold war.
\n Oh, that’s right, President Nixon opened up
\nChina to trade, in 1972, after 25 years of no diplomatic relations. Nixon was the agent
\nof David Rockefeller, who, years earlier, had rescued him from a broken career as a
\npolitician. David Rockefeller, arch Globalist.<\/p>\n
\na year after Nixon had worked his China miracle:
\n “Whatever the price of the Chinese
\nRevolution, it has obviously succeeded not only in producing more efficient and
\ndedicated administration, but also in fostering high morale and community of
\npurpose.”
\n “The social experiment in China under
\nChairman Mao’s leadership is one of the most important and successful in human
\nhistory.” (“From a China Traveler”. NY Times.
\nAugust 10, 1973.)<\/p>\n
\npopulation under the boot of the Communist regime, but somehow that’s not what
\nDavid Rockefeller saw, or pretended to see. He, like other of his elite Globalist
\ncolleagues, admired the Chinese government for the capacity to control its own people,
\nto such a high degree.<\/p>\n
\nare blowing each other kisses, as they collaborate on developing a technology that has
\nthe potential to gain intimate influence inside the human brain itself. <\/p>\n
\nshove, and it always does, China is the friend of China.
\n In the case of American corporate and government big
\nshots, hometown loyalty tends to be conditional, depending on which sources and
\ncountries are putting money on the table.<\/p>\n