{"id":247251,"date":"2026-10-19T13:04:03","date_gmt":"2026-10-19T13:04:03","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/yogaesoteric.net\/?p=247251"},"modified":"2026-10-19T13:04:03","modified_gmt":"2026-10-19T13:04:03","slug":"initially-rejected-now-approved-new-twist-in-the-proceedings-against-bill-gates-in-leeuwarden","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/yogaesoteric.net\/en\/initially-rejected-now-approved-new-twist-in-the-proceedings-against-bill-gates-in-leeuwarden\/","title":{"rendered":"Initially rejected, now approved: New twist in the proceedings against Bill Gates in Leeuwarden"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>The <a href=\"https:\/\/thenetherlandscase.com\/\">civil case<\/a> against Bill Gates in Leeuwarden, Netherlands, has taken a remarkable turn. Following two legally substantiated objections by lawyer Peter Stassen, the Noord-Nederland court ruled on October 14th that more than three hours of sworn expert testimony should be admitted as evidence. This gives the extraordinary case a new dynamic just days before the next hearing.<\/p>\n<p><strong><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"aligncenter wp-image-247252\" src=\"https:\/\/yogaesoteric.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/10\/1-26-e1792415005613-300x197.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"560\" height=\"367\" srcset=\"https:\/\/yogaesoteric.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/10\/1-26-e1792415005613-300x197.png 300w, https:\/\/yogaesoteric.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/10\/1-26-e1792415005613.png 605w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 560px) 100vw, 560px\" \/><\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>Seven plaintiffs against Bill Gates and other prominent defendants<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>The case centres on seven people who claim to have suffered serious health problems as a result of covid-19 vaccinations. They are holding a number of prominent figures and institutions personally liable, including Microsoft co-founder Bill Gates, Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla, former Dutch Prime Minister Mark Rutte, the Dutch state, and thirteen other defendants from politics, business, media, and academia.<\/p>\n<p>This lawsuit is not a class action, but a civil case concerning an alleged tort. Therefore, the personal assets of the defendants are theoretically at stake.<\/p>\n<p>The plaintiffs&#8217; arguments go far beyond potential vaccine injuries. They maintain that covid-19 was not a genuine pandemic, but a staged project. In their legal submissions, they refer to the mRNA vaccines as biological weapons.<\/p>\n<p>The first substantive hearing, at which the opposing side needs to formally take a position, is scheduled for October 22nd in Leeuwarden.<\/p>\n<p>Fiona Rose Diamond explained the court&#8217;s change of course in a post on X.<\/p>\n<blockquote class=\"twitter-tweet\">\n<p dir=\"ltr\" lang=\"de\">Niederlande: Gericht l\u00e4sst Expertenaussagen als Beweismittel zu<\/p>\n<p>Niederlande: Gericht l\u00e4sst Expertenaussagen als Beweismittel zu<\/p>\n<p>Laut dem Beitrag werden in einem niederl\u00e4ndischen Verfahren drei Stunden und 19 Minuten m\u00fcndlicher Expertenaussagen als Beweismittel aufgenommen. https:\/\/t.co\/O6krJObpQD<\/p>\n<p>\u2014 Don (@Donuncutschweiz) <a href=\"https:\/\/x.com\/Donuncutschweiz\/status\/2111072296223785376?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw\">October 16, 2026<\/a><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p><script async src=\"https:\/\/platform.x.com\/widgets.js\" charset=\"utf-8\"><\/script><\/p>\n<p><strong>The court initially wanted to exclude video testimony<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>A key point of contention so far has been the question of whether the complete video statements of the experts named by the plaintiffs may even become part of the court files.<\/p>\n<p>The court had originally decided not to admit these recordings as evidence. Attorney Peter Stassen challenged this decision with two legal objections. A first formal objection was followed by a supplementary submission on October 1st.<\/p>\n<p>Stassen explicitly invoked Article 6 of the <em>European Convention on Human Rights<\/em>, which guarantees the right to a fair trial. His argument: If a court refuses to consider submitted evidence, a fundamental principle of the rule of law is called into question.<\/p>\n<p>On October 14, the court reversed its original decision. The sworn statements of four experts will now be included in the court files after all.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Four experts and more than three hours of testimony<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>The statements now permitted comprise a total of three hours and nineteen minutes of video material. The four experts became known for their public criticism of the covid policies.<\/p>\n<p>Sasha Latypova is a former executive in the pharmaceutical industry. She publicly claims that mandatory quality controls were deliberately circumvented in the production of covid-19 vaccines.<\/p>\n<p>Dr. Mike Yeadon was formerly Vice President at Pfizer and is now one of the harshest critics of vaccination policy.<\/p>\n<p>Catherine Austin Fitts was the US Assistant Secretary of Housing and Urban Development and has been critical of globalist political concepts and international financial power structures for years.<\/p>\n<p>Dr. Joseph Sansone is a psychotherapist who deals with legal and medical issues related to the covid measures.<\/p>\n<p>Their statements address allegations of deliberate deception, intentionally caused health damage, and a broader political agenda. In their closing arguments, this is linked to the term <em>Great Reset<\/em>.<\/p>\n<p><strong>The Great Reset and a transhumanist agenda are also the subject of the lawsuit<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>The legal dispute is expressly not limited to the safety and efficacy of the covid-19 vaccines.<\/p>\n<p>In the court documents, the plaintiffs portray the entire handling of covid-19 as part of a transhumanist agenda. By this, they mean the use of technological and biological means to fundamentally alter humanity, allegedly controlled by a small circle of influential actors.<\/p>\n<p>Bill Gates plays a central role in this argument. The World Economic Forum is also explicitly mentioned.<\/p>\n<p>However far-reaching these allegations may seem, from the plaintiffs&#8217; point of view it is crucial that their claims are now the subject of legal proceedings and that the submitted statements are included in the files.<\/p>\n<p>Whether the judges will ultimately attribute significant evidentiary weight to the presented statements remains to be seen. Their formal admission does not yet constitute confirmation of the accusations. However, they cannot be disregarded in further proceedings simply because they were previously excluded from the case file.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Public pressure and the independence of the judiciary<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>According to lawyer Stassen, the growing public attention also contributed to the court reconsidering its original decision.<\/p>\n<p>In his view, the dissemination of the case, particularly via social media, alternative news platforms and international reporting, played a role.<\/p>\n<p>This also raises a fundamental question: Should public attention influence judicial decisions?<\/p>\n<p>On the one hand, societal scrutiny can help to make potential abuses visible. On the other hand, judicial decisions need to be based on applicable law and made independently of public pressure \u2013 regardless of its source.<\/p>\n<p>The next hearing on October 22nd is therefore likely to attract attention beyond the Netherlands.<\/p>\n<p>The legal proceedings against Gates and the other defendants have long since become more than an ordinary civil dispute between seven people who consider themselves victims and prominent representatives from politics and business.<\/p>\n<p>It is also a legal experiment with a fundamental question: Can a national court actually verify the official account of the covid-19 pandemic based on the evidence presented?<\/p>\n<p>The further development of this case will show what answers the court in Leeuwarden gives.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><strong>yogaesoteric<br \/>\nOctober 19, 2026<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The civil case against Bill Gates in Leeuwarden, Netherlands, has taken a remarkable turn. Following two legally substantiated objections by lawyer Peter Stassen, the Noord-Nederland court ruled on October 14th that more than three hours of sworn expert testimony should be admitted as evidence. This gives the extraordinary case a new dynamic just days before [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":5,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_uf_show_specific_survey":0,"_uf_disable_surveys":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[1382],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-247251","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-censored-news-health-5127-en"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/yogaesoteric.net\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/247251","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/yogaesoteric.net\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/yogaesoteric.net\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/yogaesoteric.net\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/5"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/yogaesoteric.net\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=247251"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/yogaesoteric.net\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/247251\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":247255,"href":"https:\/\/yogaesoteric.net\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/247251\/revisions\/247255"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/yogaesoteric.net\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=247251"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/yogaesoteric.net\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=247251"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/yogaesoteric.net\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=247251"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}