{"id":29743,"date":"2021-03-08T18:34:56","date_gmt":"2021-03-08T18:34:56","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/dev.yogaesoteric.net\/?p=29743"},"modified":"2021-03-26T18:36:25","modified_gmt":"2021-03-26T18:36:25","slug":"the-smoking-gun-is-the-pcr-cycle-threshold-ct-your-coronavirus-test-is-positive-you-still-might-not-have-covid-19","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/yogaesoteric.net\/en\/the-smoking-gun-is-the-pcr-cycle-threshold-ct-your-coronavirus-test-is-positive-you-still-might-not-have-covid-19\/","title":{"rendered":"The \u2018Smoking Gun\u2019 is the PCR cycle threshold (Ct): your coronavirus test is positive \u2013 you still might not have COVID-19"},"content":{"rendered":"

Exposing unwelcome truths about the deep flaws of PCR testing<\/strong><\/p>\n

\nNew York\u2019s state lab has access to the Cycle Threshold (Ct) values from the PCR tests they process. Last July, the lab identified 872 positive tests based on a threshold of 40 cycles. If the lab has used a cutoff of 35 cycles, 43% of those tests would have been considered negative. What\u2019s more, if the cycles had been limited to 30, 63% of the PCR-positive patients would have been justifiably been regarded as negative.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/p>\n

In testing data that include cycle thresholds, officials in Massachusetts, New York and Nevada have found that up to 90% of people testing positive carried barely any virus. If that data was extrapolated to nation-wide statistics, the 45,000 new \u201ccases\u201d reported at the beginning of January perhaps only 4,500 would actually need to isolate and submit to contact tracing.<\/p>\n

It is obvious that PCR tests need to be interpreted with caution as they do not reflect a true viral load, infectivity or even contagiousness. In fact, many times no viable viruses can be cultured in patients with a positive PCR test result. False positive PCR tests abound, resulting in CDC statistics that have been consistently over-estimating both the incidence rates and mortality rates related to the current epidemic, thus falsely stimulating the panic seen among the many people demanding their vaccinations NOW.<\/p>\n

Studies in France, Canada and Singapore, as reported in the August 25, 2020 issue of\u00a0Clinical Infectious Diseases<\/em>, have tried to culture the Covid-19 virus in patients that had positive PCR test results when the number of \u201ccycles\u201d used in the test exceeded 30. The scientists doing the studies were unable to culture any virus in those patients.<\/p>\n

Since many PCR test kits in the United States use cycle thresholds that are actually greater than 35, there is a serious problem with the PCR test, which is considered the \u201cgold standard<\/em>\u201d for diagnosing SARS CoV-2.<\/p>\n

In view of the general consensus (including recent acknowledgements from both the WHO and CDC) that PCR cycle thresholds (Ct) above 30 results in increasingly large false positive test rates that approach 100%. (Note that 30 cycles represents a\u00a0million<\/em>\u00a0replications of the RNA particles and 40 cycles represents a\u00a0trillion<\/em>\u00a0replications.) If it takes a trillion multiplications of a test before any viral RNA fragments (much less viable viruses) can be identified, you can be sure there are not enough viral particles to cause a disease.<\/p>\n

Below is some information that should help people understand why mRNA vaccine hesitancy makes total sense.<\/p>\n

False Positives: evidence based fact, what is the reliability of the PCR Test?<\/strong><\/p>\n

\"\"
\nIn the chart: PCR cycle threshold (11-37) and positive cell culture (black line, 100% to 0%). The colored bars indicate the number of positive cell cultures per Ct per week after infection (1 to 3 weeks). (Jafaar\/Raoult)<\/em><\/p>\n

The above chart is from a French research group that has recently shown that at a cycle threshold (Ct) of 25, about 70% of nasopharyngeal samples, which were considered PCR-positive, were viral culture positive (i.e. were infectious, the virus was present).
\nAt a Ct of 30, only 20% of the samples PCR-positive, were culture positive.
\nAnd at a Ct of 35, a miniscule 3% of samples remained culture positive.
\nAbove 35, all samples were negative.<\/p>\n

Short explanation: to establish if a biological sample is infected or not with a certain virus, the gold standard method is the cultivation (of the sample, including the supposed virus) on specific cell cultures. If this inoculation is followed, in days, by the appearance of a cytophatic effect (which can be seen at microscope), this will prove that the sample was viral infected. A sample which is positive in cell culture, is true viral positive. A sample which is PCR positive but negative in cell culture, is negative \u2013 there is no infectious virus in that sample. The french group demonstrated scientificaly that the cycle threshold can give a percentage, sometime quite big (97% at Ct of 35, for exemple), of false positive results.<\/p>\n

This means that if a person gets a \u201cpositive<\/em>\u201d PCR test result at a cycle threshold of 35 or higher (as applied in most US labs and many European labs), the chance that the person is infectious is\u00a0less than 3%<\/strong>. The chance that the person received a \u201cfalse positive<\/em>\u201d result is\u00a097% or higher<\/strong>.<\/p>\n

The chart above correlates PCR test positivity (black line) with culture results for the tested-for virus (colored bars). If more than 30 cycles are required to get a PCR-positive test result, the cultures will be consistently negative\/sterile, meaning that any positive PCR test that only becomes positive after 30 cycles can be called a false positive.<\/p>\n

Many PCR test kits on the market use a PCR Ct that is actually above a useless 35! Those kits will naturally result in large numbers of false positives that have already corrupting the CDC\u2019s and Department of Health\u2019s Covid-19 statistics \u2013 and also the CDC\u2019s drive to get people inoculated as rapidly as possible with the experimental \u2013 and untested for long-term safety and efficacy \u2013 the two mRNA vaccines.<\/p>\n

It is therefore imperative for patients who take a PCR test to know what test kit brands are being used (see partial list below) in your hospital or Public Health Dept laboratory.<\/p>\n

Here is a helpful quote: \u201c\u2026if a person gets a \u2018positive\u2019 PCR test result at a cycle threshold (Ct) of 35 or higher (as applied in most US labs and many European labs), the chance that the person is infectious is less than 3%. The chance that the person received a \u2018false positive\u2019 result is 97% or higher<\/em>.\u201d \u2013 Swiss Policy Research.<\/p>\n

So, if someone has typical flu symptoms or an influenza-like-illness (ILI) and a positive PCR test that might be a false positive (i.e., one that only turns positive at a cycle threshold over 30), perhaps your disease is something other than Covid-19 and shouldn\u2019t be reported to the CDC as Covid-19. Something to think about.<\/p>\n

And here are some examples of PCR cycle thresholds for five of the PCR test kit brands that are used in the United States:<\/strong>
\n– Quest: 50 cycles
\n– Inbios: 45 cycles
\n– Luminex: 45 cycles
\n– Gnomegen: 39 cycles
\n– ThermoFisher: 37 cycles.<\/p>\n

\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Exposing unwelcome truths about the deep flaws of PCR testing New York\u2019s state lab has access to the Cycle Threshold (Ct) values from the PCR tests they process. Last July, the lab identified 872 positive tests based on a threshold of 40 cycles. If the lab has used a cutoff of 35 cycles, 43% of […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_uf_show_specific_survey":0,"_uf_disable_surveys":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[1362,19],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-29743","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-covid-19-crisis-1602-en","category-news-events-en"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/yogaesoteric.net\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/29743","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/yogaesoteric.net\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/yogaesoteric.net\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/yogaesoteric.net\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/yogaesoteric.net\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=29743"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/yogaesoteric.net\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/29743\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":29744,"href":"https:\/\/yogaesoteric.net\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/29743\/revisions\/29744"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/yogaesoteric.net\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=29743"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/yogaesoteric.net\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=29743"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/yogaesoteric.net\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=29743"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}