{"id":41698,"date":"2021-05-20T20:41:07","date_gmt":"2021-05-20T20:41:07","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/yogaesoteric.net\/?p=41698"},"modified":"2021-05-20T20:41:07","modified_gmt":"2021-05-20T20:41:07","slug":"the-scientific-paper-which-provided-the-recipe-for-covid-19-tests-is-just-a-house-of-cards-built-on-sand","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/yogaesoteric.net\/en\/the-scientific-paper-which-provided-the-recipe-for-covid-19-tests-is-just-a-house-of-cards-built-on-sand\/","title":{"rendered":"The scientific paper which provided the \u201crecipe\u201d for Covid-19 tests is just a \u201chouse of cards built on sand\u201d"},"content":{"rendered":"

\u201cEvery scientific rationale for the development of that test has been totally destroyed by this paper. It\u2019s like Hiroshima\/Nagasaki to the Covid test<\/em>\u201d \u2013 dr. Kevin Corbett.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/p>\n

War has broken out in the scientific literature that strikes at the existential core of Covid-19 and its proposed causative virus. At the heart of the controversy lies the fact that the creators of the most commonly used test, the RT-PCR, published instructions for how to test for SARS-CoV-2 \u201cwithout having virus material available<\/em>,\u201d in their own words, relying instead on the Chinese scientists\u2019 genetic sequence published on the internet.<\/p>\n

The paper \u201cDetection of 2019 novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) by real-time PCR<\/em>\u201d was published 24 hours after it was submitted to Eurosurveillance<\/em>, clearly evading peer review. Its lead authors were Christian Drosten and Victor Corman, which is how it took on the title \u201cCorman-Drosten paper<\/em>.\u201d It provided the \u201crecipe<\/em>,\u201d or work flow for the Covid-19 diagnostic test, quickly applied all over the world, after it was accepted as the standard of testing by the WHO.<\/p>\n

German scientist Christian Drosten was also a co-discoverer of the SARS-associated coronavirus, and developed a test for it in 2003. Drosten, who heads the Charite Institute of Virology in Berlin, and a team of fellow scientists in Europe and Hong Kong, moved very quickly, as soon as cases of the illness were being reported out of Wuhan in December of 2019. They submitted the paper on Jan. 21 (2020), it was published in Eurosurveillance <\/em>on Jan. 23, and was immediately accepted as the standard of testing internationally, by the WHO, which began sending test kits to affected regions.<\/p>\n

In the harrowing months that followed, amid lockdowns, economic collapse, school closures and widespread panic, few were aware of the immense problems with the paper, which tragically offered a testing method that would yield between 80 and 97 percent false positive results, due to a non existent gold standard which would be the virus itself.<\/p>\n

It all came to a head on Nov. 30, when the Corman-Drosten foundation paper was challenged by 22 international scientists who wrote a letter demanding the paper\u2019s retraction, along with an extensive critique citing 10 errors in the paper it deemed \u201cfatal<\/em>.\u201d<\/p>\n

Titled \u201cExternal peer review of the RT-PCR test to detect SARS-Cov-2 Reveals 10 Major Flaws At The Molecular and Methodological Level: Consequences For False-Positive Results,<\/em>\u201d the paper\u2019s lead author is Dr. Pieter Borger, an expert on the molecular biology of gene expression. Several other esteemed names are associated with the paper including Dr. Michael Yeadon, former VP of Pfizer and outspoken critic of much of the so-called science beneath the WHO\u2019s global lockdown, masking, and school shut-down measures.<\/p>\n

Another author, Dr. Kevin Corbett, spoke simply and with controlled apoplexy. He confirmed and cast additional light on the shocking fact that the paper was written in the absence of a viral isolate, among many other problems. \u201cEvery scientific rationale for the development of that test has been totally destroyed by this paper. It\u2019s like Hiroshima\/Nagasaki to the Covid test<\/em>,\u201d he said. \u201cWhen Drosten developed the test, China hadn\u2019t given them a viral isolate. They developed the test from a sequence in a gene bank. Do you see? China gave them a genetic sequence with no corresponding viral isolate. They had a code, but no body for the code. No viral morphology.<\/em>\u201d<\/p>\n

Dr. Cornett defined \u201cviral morphology<\/em>\u201d as follows: \u201cIn the fish market<\/em>, it\u2019s like giving you a few bones and saying that\u2019s your fish. It could be any fish. Not even a skeleton. Here\u2019s a few fragments of bones. That\u2019s your fish. Listen, the Corman\/Drosten paper, there\u2019s nothing from a patient in it. It\u2019s all from gene banks. And the bits of the virus sequence that weren\u2019t there they made up. They synthetically created them to fill in the blanks. That\u2019s what genetics is; it\u2019s a code. So its ABBBCCDDD and you\u2019re missing some what you think is EEE so you put it in. It\u2019s all synthetic. You just manufacture the bits that are missing. This is the end result of the geneticization of virology. This is basically a computer-made virus.\u201d<\/em><\/p>\n

In an interview posted on his Twitter feed, Dr. Pieter Borger said, \u201cThe virus wasn\u2019t in Europe and the paper was already finished<\/em>.\u201d He said these facts \u201cshould have been on television long ago. I explained it on LinkedIn, but you get banned if you do<\/em>.\u201d Regarding PCR he said, \u201cYou are not detecting a virus.<\/em>\u201d \u201cOnce I heard a good comparison<\/em>,\u201d he continued. \u201cIf you go to a junkyard and you find a wheel or a hubcap from a Mercedes, and a steering wheel of a Mercedes, can you infer that you are in a Mercedes garage at that moment? If you only see those two parts? No, you can\u2019t. You don\u2019t know anything about it\u2026 you only know you have a steering wheel, you can find those things everywhere. In every junkyard you can find them.<\/em>\u201d He describes the RT PCR tests as having \u201cno relevance for the diagnosis whatsoever<\/em>.\u201d<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/p>\n

German lawyer Reiner Fuellmich who is central to a growing group of lawyers, scientists, politicians, and even secret pharmaceutical whistleblowers, said in an interview, \u201cWe believe that in order to make this house of cards collapse, we have to attack the PCR test. The fact is, there are no asymptomatic infections<\/em>.\u201d<\/p>\n

This seemingly radical claim was bolstered by a paper out of Wuhan of all places, published by Nature.com<\/em>, which found no \u201cviable virus<\/em>\u201d in PCR positive cases.<\/p>\n

\u201cThe screening of the 9,865,404 participants without a history of COVID-19 found no newly confirmed COVID-19 cases, and identified 300 asymptomatic positive cases with a detection rate of 0.303 (95 % CI 0.270\u20130.339)\/10,000. \u2026<\/em> A total of 1174 close contacts of the asymptomatic positive cases were traced, and they all tested negative for the COVID-19.<\/em> \u2026 Of the 34,424 participants with a history of COVID-19, 107 tested positive again, giving a repositive rate of 0.310% (95% CI 0.423\u20130.574%.) Virus cultures were negative for all asymptomatic positive and repositive cases, indicating no<\/em> \u201cviable virus\u201d in positive cases detected in this study<\/em>.\u201d<\/p>\n

Dr. Corbett, a Ph.D., and retired RN elaborated: \u201cThere are 10 fatal errors in this Drosten test paper. Public Health England is a co-author on it. All the public health authorities across the EU have co-authored this paper. But here is the bottom line: There was no viral isolate to validate what they were doing. The PCR products of the amplification didn\u2019t correspond to any viral isolate at that time. I call it \u2018donut ring science.\u2019 There is nothing at the center of it. It\u2019s all about code, genetics, nothing to do with reality, or the actual person, the patient<\/em>.\u201d<\/p>\n

About critiques from the other side, that say it\u2019s been isolated \u201call over the world<\/em>\u201d, dr. Corbett said: \u201cYes, there have since been papers saying they\u2019ve produced viral isolates. But there are no controls for them. The CDC produced a paper in July, I think it was, where they said: \u2018Here\u2019s the viral isolate.\u2019 Do you know what they did? They swabbed one person. One person, who\u2019d been to China and had cold symptoms. One person. And they assumed he had it to begin with. So it\u2019s all full of holes, the whole story.<\/em>\u201d<\/p>\n

One of their 10 challenges is the stunning fact that EuroSurveillance<\/em> published the paper 24 hours after it was submitted back in January. \u201cTwenty-four hours<\/em>,\u201d Dr. Corbett said incredulously. \u201cThat never occurs. It takes months to get a review done. They turned this around in 24 hours. It was waved through, it was not peer-reviewed. There\u2019s no standard operational procedure for this test. There\u2019s major and minor concerns about this paper and we go through it all here. it should be retracted. If they retract it, it means the whole story falls to bits. The whole edifice collapses. It\u2019s a house of cards built on sand and we\u2019ve just moved the sand<\/em>.\u201d<\/p>\n

The authors of the Drosten paper, for their part, were dismissive on social media. One of them, Marion Koopman, referred to the Borger et al critique as \u201congoing nonsense.<\/em>\u201d Drosten himself launched ad-hominem<\/em> attacks at some of the authors via Twitter.Koopman<\/em> tweeted: \u201cThe labs on this paper all had worked with SARS, had samples from SARS patients in their freezers. So that made it possible to do a first check of how this would work. A valid choice in an emerging disease outbreak, where you are in the blind phase<\/em>.\u201d At press time, Eurosurveillance<\/em> at least did acknowledge to the paper\u2019s authors that they had received it and were reviewing it. When asked on Twitter if there had been a response, lead author Peter Borger replied that the response among scientists had been overwhelming in its support.<\/p>\n

From his home in Germany, Reiner Fuellmich said, \u201cThe reason why I decided to speak out is that I didn\u2019t want these crazy people who are pulling the strings behind the scenes to rule the world. I had no idea when I came out with my first video that these people and their corporations were such a powerful block. We are up against some really powerful and devious and bad, evil people. But they\u2019re not a united front. We on the good side so to speak, I am firmly convinced that we have the better people, who know much more not just intellectually<\/em>. The point is … we\u2019re humans, and they\u2019re not<\/em>.\u201d<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

yogaesoteric<\/strong>
\nMay 20, 2021<\/strong><\/p>\n

\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n

\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

\u201cEvery scientific rationale for the development of that test has been totally destroyed by this paper. It\u2019s like Hiroshima\/Nagasaki to the Covid test\u201d \u2013 dr. Kevin Corbett. War has broken out in the scientific literature that strikes at the existential core of Covid-19 and its proposed causative virus. At the heart of the controversy lies […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":4,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_uf_show_specific_survey":0,"_uf_disable_surveys":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[1362],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-41698","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-covid-19-crisis-1602-en"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/yogaesoteric.net\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/41698","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/yogaesoteric.net\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/yogaesoteric.net\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/yogaesoteric.net\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/4"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/yogaesoteric.net\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=41698"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/yogaesoteric.net\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/41698\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":41705,"href":"https:\/\/yogaesoteric.net\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/41698\/revisions\/41705"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/yogaesoteric.net\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=41698"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/yogaesoteric.net\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=41698"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/yogaesoteric.net\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=41698"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}