![\"\"](\"https:\/\/yogaesoteric.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/06\/medic-suneel-e1624298775271.jpg\")
<\/p>\nDr. Suneel Dhand, an internal medicine physician based in the United States explains that vaccines aren’t required if one has acquired antibodies from infection, which, according to him, are much more effective than the vaccine.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Reflect on: Is the vaccine as safe and effective as it’s been marketed to be?<\/p>\n
What occurred<\/strong><\/p>\n Dr. Suneel Dhand, an internal medicine doctor with a hefty following on YouTube, supports and believes in routine vaccinations, as well as recommends them to all of his patients. According to him, \u201cvaccinations have been amazing<\/em>\u201d for humanity, and while this belief is shared by many, it\u2019s important to point out that it\u2019s also strongly opposed by many, and that includes a wealth of scientists and doctors. In one of his most recent YouTube posts, Dr. Dhand explains why he\u2019s on the fence about taking the COVID vaccine. He explains when it comes to any type of illness, if people have antibodies for it, he or any other doctor at his clinic never administers a vaccine. \u201cI\u2019m not aware of any vaccine out there which will ever give you more immunity than if you\u2019re naturally recovered from the illness itself\u2026 If you\u2019ve naturally recovered from it, my understanding as a doctor level scientist is that those antibodies will always be better then a vaccine, and if you know any differently, please let me know.<\/em>\u201d<\/p>\n Vaccine expert and Harvard professor of medicine Dr. Martin Kulldorff recently tweeted that, \u201cAfter having protected themselves while working class were exposed to the virus, the vaccinated Zoomers now want Vaccine Passports where immunity from prior infection does not count, despite stronger evidence for protection. One more assault on working people<\/em>.\u201d<\/p>\n There are multiple studies hinting at the point the professor makes, that those who have been infected with covid may have immunity for years, and possibly even decades. For example, according to a new study authored by respected scientists at leading labs, individuals who recovered from the coronavirus developed \u201crobust<\/em>\u201d levels of B cells and T cells (necessary for fighting off the virus) and \u201cthese cells may persist in the body for a very, very long time.<\/em>\u201d This is just one of many examples. There are studies that suggest infection to prior coronaviruses, which prior to COVID-19 circled the globe infecting hundreds of millions of people every single year, can also provide protection for COVID-19.<\/p>\n Remember, we are talking about a virus that has a survival rate of 99.5 percent for people under the age of 70, and that the number of people who have been exposed to COVID is estimated to be a great deal higher than those who have tested positive. This is true for many other similar viruses, including other coronaviruses which circle the globe every single year and infect hundreds and millions of people given the common so-called \u201ccolds<\/em>\u201d.<\/p>\n Why is this important?<\/strong><\/p>\n Because it calls into question measures that are threatening to take away the freedoms of people who refuse to take the vaccine. Vaccines may be required to travel, go to certain restaurants, concerts, enter certain public buildings and so on.<\/p>\n Kulldorff and Dr. Bhattacharya, a physician and professor at Stanford Medical School explain, \u201cThe idea that everybody needs to be vaccinated is as scientifically baseless as the idea that nobody does. Covid vaccines are essential for older, high-risk people and their caretakers and advisable for many others. But those who\u2019ve been infected are already immune. The young are at low risk, and children \u2013 for whom no vaccine has been approved anyway \u2013 are at far less risk of death than from the flu.<\/em><\/p>\n Vaccine passports are unjust and discriminatory. Most of those endorsing the idea belong to the \u2018laptop class\u2019 \u2013 privileged professionals who worked safely and comfortably at home during the epidemic. Millions of Americans did essential jobs at their usual workplaces and became immune the hard way. Now they would be forced to risk adverse reactions from a vaccine they don\u2019t need.<\/em>\u201d<\/p>\n How have we come to a point as a society where these measures can be put in place when they go against the will of so many people? How can we call ourselves a democracy? Wouldn\u2019t it be better if recommendations were made instead of using authoritarian-type of measures? If you take the vaccine, should you not be comfortable with the fact that otherone haven\u2019t, given the fact that you have and you believe it is safe and effective? If that\u2019s the case, what do you have to worry about, if you are protected?<\/p>\n