![\"\"](\"https:\/\/yogaesoteric.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/1-12.jpg\")
<\/p>\nMaybe there are many people which had not heard most of the details shared on alt-media about covid jab, so you might appreciate hearing some of what is told here.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
#1: Vaccine makers are immune from liability<\/strong><\/p>\n The only industry in the world that bears no liability for injuries or deaths resulting from their products, are vaccine makers. First established in 1986 with the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act, and reinforced by the PREP Act, vaccine makers cannot be sued, even if they are shown to be negligent.<\/p>\n The covid-vaccine makers are allowed to create a one-size-fits-all product, with no testing on sub-populations (i.e. people with specific health conditions), and yet they are unwilling to accept any responsibility for any adverse events or deaths their products cause. If a company is not willing to stand behind their product as safe, especially one they rushed to market and skipped animal trials on, we are not willing to take a chance on their product.<\/p>\n No liability. No trust.<\/p>\n Here\u2019s why\u2026<\/p>\n #2: The checkered past of the vaccine companies<\/strong><\/p>\n The four major companies who are making these covid vaccines are\/have either: Moderna had been aiming to \u201cModernize our RNA<\/em>\u201d (thus the company name) \u2013 for years, but had never successfully brought ANY product to market \u2013 how nice for them to get a major cash infusion from the government to keep trying.<\/p>\n In fact, all major vaccine makers (save Moderna) have paid out tens of billions of dollars in damages for other products they brought to market when they knew those products would cause injuries and death \u2013 see Vioxx, Bextra, Celebrex, Thalidomide, and Opioids as a few examples.<\/p>\n If drug companies willfully choose to put harmful products in the market, when they can be sued, why would we trust any product where they have NO liability?<\/p>\n In case it hasn\u2019t sunk in, let us reiterate\u2026 3 of the 4 covid vaccine makers have been sued<\/u> for products they brought to market even though they knew injuries and deaths would result.<\/p>\n Let us reiterate this point: given the free pass from liability, and the checkered past of these companies, why would we assume that all their vaccines are safe and made completely above board? Where else in life would we trust someone with that kind of reputation? To many people that makes as much sense as expecting a remorseless, abusive, unfaithful lover to become a different person because a judge said deep down he is a good person.<\/p>\n No. We don\u2019t trust them. No liability. No trust.<\/p>\n #3: The ugly history of attempts to make coronavirus vaccines<\/strong><\/p>\n There have been many attempts to make viral vaccines in the past that ended in utter failure, which is why we did not have a coronavirus vaccine in 2020. In the 1960\u2019s, scientists attempted to make an RSV (Respiratory Syncytial Virus) vaccine for infants. In that study, they skipped animal trials because they weren\u2019t necessary back then. In the end, the vaccinated infants got much sicker than the unvaccinated infants when exposed to the virus in nature, with 80% of the vaccinated infants requiring hospitalization, and two of them died.<\/p>\n After 2000, scientists made many attempts to create coronavirus vaccines. For the past 20 years, all ended in failure because the animals in the clinical trials got very sick and many died, just like the children in the 1960\u2019s.<\/p>\n You can read a summary of this history\/science here<\/a>.<\/p>\n Or if you want to read the individual studies you can check out these links: The typical pattern in the studies mentioned above is that the children and the animals produced beautiful antibody responses after being vaccinated. The manufacturers thought they hit the jackpot. The problem came when the children and animals were exposed to the wild version of the virus. When that occurred, an unexplained phenomenon called Antibody Dependent Enhancement (ADE) also known as Vaccine Enhanced Disease (VED) appeared because the immune system produced a \u201ccytokine storm<\/em>\u201d (i.e. overwhelmingly attacked the body), and the children\/animals died.<\/p>\n The vaccine makers have no data to suggest their rushed vaccines have overcome that problem. In other words, never before has any attempt to make a coronavirus vaccine been successful, nor has the gene-therapy technology that is mRNA \u201cvaccines<\/em>\u201d been safely brought to market<\/u>, but hey, since they had billions of dollars from government funding, we are sure they figured that out. Except they don\u2019t know if they have\u2026<\/p>\n #4: The \u201cdata gaps\u201d submitted to the FDA by the vaccine makers<\/strong><\/p>\n When vaccine makers submitted their papers to the FDA for the Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) (Note: An EUA is not the same<\/u> as a full FDA approval), among the many \u201cData Gaps<\/em>\u201d they reported was that they have nothing in their trials to suggest they overcame that pesky problem of Vaccine Enhanced Disease.<\/p>\n They simply don\u2019t know \u2013 i.e. they have no idea if the vaccines they\u2019ve made will also produce the same cytokine storm (and deaths) as previous attempts at such products.<\/p>\n As Joseph Mercola points out\u2026 \u201cPrevious attempts to develop an mRNA-based drug using lipid nanoparticles failed and had to be abandoned because when the dose was too low, the drug had no effect, and when dosed too high, the drug became too toxic. An obvious question is: What has<\/em> been modified that now makes this technology safe enough for mass use?<\/em>\u201d<\/p>\n If that\u2019s not alarming enough, here are other gaps in the data \u2013 i.e. there is no data to suggest safety or efficacy regarding: In case you think we are making this up, or want to see the actual documents sent to the FDA by Pfizer and Moderna for their Emergency Use Authorization, you can check out at the links below. The data gaps can be found starting with page 46 and 48 respectively. For now let\u2019s turn our eyes to the raw data the vaccine makers used to submit for emergency use authorization.<\/p>\n #5: No access to the raw data from the trials<\/strong><\/p>\n Would you like to see the raw data that produced the \u201c90% and 95% effective<\/em>\u201d claims touted in the news? We too\u2026 But they won\u2019t let us see that data. As pointed out in the BMJ<\/em><\/a> (British Medical Journal<\/em>), something about the Pfizer and Moderna efficacy claims smells really funny.<\/p>\n There were \u201c3,410 total cases of suspected, but unconfirmed covid-19 in the overall study population, 1,594 occurred in the vaccine group vs. 1,816 in the placebo group<\/em>.\u201d Wait\u2026what? Did they fail to do science in their scientific study by not verifying a major variable? Could they not test those \u201csuspected but unconfirmed<\/em>\u201d cases to find out if they had covid? Apparently not. Why not test all 3,410 participants for the sake of accuracy? Can we only guess they didn\u2019t test because it would mess up their \u201c90-95% effective<\/em>\u201d claims? Where\u2019s the FDA?<\/p>\n Would it not be prudent for the FDA, to expect (demand<\/u>) that the vaccine makers test people who have \u201ccovid-like symptoms<\/em>,\u201d and release their raw data so outside, third-parties could examine how the manufacturers justified the numbers? We mean it\u2019s only every citizen of the world they\u2019re pursueing to get to take these experimental products\u2026<\/p>\n Why did the FDA not require that? Isn\u2019t that the entire purpose of the FDA anyway? Good question. Foxes guarding the hen house? Seems like it.<\/p>\n No liability. No trust.<\/p>\n #6: No long-term safety testing<\/strong><\/p>\n Obviously, with products that have only been on the market a few months, we have no long-term safety data. In other words, we have no idea what this product will do in the body months or years from now \u2013 for ANY population.<\/p>\n Given all the risks above (risks that ALL pharmaceutical products have), would it not be prudent to wait to see if the worst-case scenarios have indeed been avoided?<\/p>\n Would it not make sense to want to fill those pesky \u201cdata gaps<\/em>\u201d before we aim to give this to every man, woman, and child on the planet?<\/p>\n Well\u2026that would make sense, but to have that data, they need to test it on people, which lead us to the next point\u2026<\/p>\n #7: No informed consent<\/strong><\/p>\n What most who are taking the vaccine don\u2019t know is that because these products are still in clinical trials, anyone who gets the shot is now part of a clinical trial<\/u>.<\/p>\n They are part of the experiment. Those (like us) who do not take it, are part of the control group. Time will tell how this experiment works out.<\/p>\n But, you may be asking, if the vaccines are causing harm, wouldn\u2019t we be seeing that all over the news? Surely the FDA would step in and pause the distribution?<\/p>\n Well, if the adverse events reporting system was working, maybe aspects would be different.<\/p>\n #8: Under-reporting of adverse reactions and death<\/strong><\/p>\n According to a study done by Harvard (at the commission of US government), less than 1% of all adverse reactions to vaccines are actually submitted to the National Vaccine Adverse Events Reports System (VAERS) \u2013 read page 6 at this link<\/a>.<\/p>\n While the problems with VAERS have not been fixed (as you can read about in this letter to the CDC<\/a>, at the time of this writing VAERS reports over 2,200 deaths from the current covid vaccines, as well as close to 60,000 adverse reactions. \u201cVAERS data released today showed 50,861 reports of adverse events following COVID vaccines, including 2,249 deaths and 7,726 serious injuries between Dec. 14, 2020 and March 26, 2021.<\/em>\u201d<\/p>\n And those numbers don\u2019t include (what is currently) 578 cases of Bell\u2019s Palsy.<\/p>\n If those numbers are still only 1% of the total adverse reactions (or .8 to 2% of what this study<\/a>\u00a0published recently in the JAMA<\/em> found), you can do the math, but that equates to somewhere around 110,000 to 220,000 deaths from the vaccines to date, and a ridiculous number of adverse reactions. Bet you didn\u2019t see that on the news.<\/p>\n That death number would currently still be lower than the 424,000 deaths from medical errors that occur every year (which you probably also don\u2019t hear about), but we are not even six months into the rollout of these vaccines yet.<\/p>\n If you want a deeper dive into the problems with the VAERS reporting system, you can check out these. #9: The vaccines do not stop transmission or infection<\/strong><\/p>\n Wait, what? Aren\u2019t these vaccines supposed to be what we\u2019ve been waiting for to \u201cgo back to normal<\/em>\u201d? Nope.<\/p>\n Why do you think we\u2019re getting all these conflicting messages about needing to practice social distancing and wear masks AFTER we get a vaccine? The reason is because these vaccines were never designed to stop transmission OR infection.<\/p>\n If you don\u2019t believe, see again the papers submitted to the FDA linked above.<\/p>\n The primary endpoint (what the vaccines are meant to accomplish) is to lower your symptoms. Sounds like just about every other drug on the market right? That\u2019s it\u2026lowering your symptoms is the big payoff we\u2019ve been waiting for.<\/p>\n Does that seem completely pointless to anyone but us? Heck, there are plenty of other aspects we can do to lower the symptoms that don\u2019t involve taking what appears to be a really risky product.<\/p>\n Now for the next logical question: We can\u2019t make sense of that either. Take the risk. Get no protection. Suffer through the vaccine side-effects. Keep wearing your mask and social distancing\u2026 And continue to be able to spread the virus. What?<\/p>\n It gets worse.<\/p>\n #10: People are catching covid after being fully vaccinated<\/strong><\/p>\n Talk about a bummer. You get vaccinated and you still catch covid. In reality, this phenomenon is probably occurring everywhere, but those are the ones making the news now.<\/p>\n Given the reasons above (and what\u2019s below), maybe this doesn\u2019t surprise you, but bummer if you thought the vaccine was a shield to keep you safe. It\u2019s not. That was never the point.<\/p>\n If 66% of healthcare workers in L.A. are going to delay or skip the vaccine\u2026maybe they aren\u2019t wowed by the rushed science either. Maybe they are watching the shady way deaths and cases are being reported\u2026<\/p>\n #11: The overall death rate from covid<\/strong><\/p>\n According to the CDC\u2019s own numbers, covid has a 99.74% survival rate. Why would someone take a risk on a product, that doesn\u2019t stop infection or transmission, to help him overcome a cold that has a 0.26% chance of killing him \u2013 actually if his age range is has about a 0.1% chance of killing him (and .01% chance of killing his kids), why? But let\u2019s not split hairs here.<\/p>\n With a bar (death rate) that low, we will be in lockdown every year\u2026i.e. forever.<\/p>\n But wait, what about the 500,000 plus deaths, that\u2019s alarming right?<\/p>\n #12: The bloated covid death numbers<\/strong><\/p>\n Something smells really funny about this one. Never before in the history of death certificates has US government modified how deaths are reported. Why now, are they reporting everyone who dies with covid in their body, as having died of covid, rather than the co-morbidities that actually took their life?<\/p>\n Until covid, all coronaviruses (common colds) were never listed as the primary cause of death when someone died of heart disease, cancer, diabetes, auto-immune conditions, or any other major co-morbidity. The disease was listed as the cause of death, and a confounding factor like flu or pneumonia was listed on a separate line.<\/p>\n To bloat the number even more, both the W.H.O. and the C.D.C. modified their guidelines such that those who are suspected or probable (but were never confirmed) of having died of covid, are also included in the death numbers. Seriously?<\/p>\n If we are going to do that then should we not go back and modify the numbers of all past cold and flu seasons so we can compare apples to apples when it comes to death rates?<\/p>\n According to the CDCs own numbers<\/a>, (scroll down to the section \u201cComorbidities and other conditions<\/em>\u201d) only 6% of the deaths being attributed to covid are instances where covid seems to be the only issue at hand.<\/p>\n In other words, reduce the death numbers you see on the news by 94% and you have what is likely the real numbers of deaths from just covid.<\/p>\n Even if the former CDC director is correct and covid-19 was a lab-enhanced virus (see Reason #14 below), a 0.26% death rate is still in line with the viral death rate that circles the planet ever year.<\/p>\n Then there\u2019s this Fauci guy. We would like to trust him, but besides the fact that he hasn\u2019t treated one covid patient\u2026you should probably know\u2026<\/p>\n #13: Fauci and six others at NIAID own patents in the Moderna vaccine<\/strong><\/p>\n Thanks to the Bayh-Dole Act, government workers are allowed to file patents on any research they do using tax payer funding. Tony Fauci owns over 1,000 patents, including patents being used on the Moderna vaccine\u2026which he approved government funding for. In fact, the NIH (which NIAID is part of) claims joint ownership of Moderna\u2019s vaccine.<\/p>\n Does anyone else see this as a MAJOR conflict of interest, or criminal even? Criminal, because there\u2019s also this pesky problem that makes people even more distrustful of Fauci, NIAD, and the NIH in general.<\/p>\n #14: Fauci is on the hot seat for illegal gain-of-function research<\/strong><\/p>\n What is \u201cGain-of-Function<\/em>\u201d research? It\u2019s where scientists attempt to make viruses gain functions \u2013 i.e. make them more transmissible and deadlier.<\/p>\n Sounds at least a touch unethical, right? How could that possibly be helpful? US government agreed, and banned the practice. So what did the Fauci-led NIAID do?<\/p>\n They pivoted and outsourced the gain-of-function research (in coronaviruses no less) to China \u2013 to the tune of a $600K grant. You can see more details, including the important timeline of these events in this fantastically well-researched documentary<\/a>.<\/p>\n Mr. Fauci, you have some explaining to do\u2026and we hope the cameras are recording when you have to defend your actions.<\/p>\n For now, let\u2019s turn our attention back to the virus\u2026<\/p>\n #15: The virus continues to mutate<\/strong><\/p>\n Not only does the virus (like all viruses) continue to mutate, but according to world-renowned vaccine developer Geert Vanden Bossche it\u2019s mutating about every 10 hours. How in the world are we going to keep creating vaccines to keep up with that level of mutation? We\u2019re not.<\/p>\n Might that also explain why fully vaccinated people are continuing to catch covid? Why, given that natural immunity has never ultimately failed humanity, do we suddenly not trust it?<\/p>\n Why, if we ask questions like the above, or post links like those you found above, will these thoughts be deleted from all major social media platforms?<\/p>\n That brings us to the next troubling problem with these vaccines.<\/p>\n #16: Censorship\u2026 and the complete absence of scientific debate<\/strong><\/p>\n How did you enjoy all those nationally and globally-televised, robust debates put on by public health officials, and broadcast simultaneously on every major news station? Wasn\u2019t it great hearing from the best consciences in medicine, virology, epidemiology, economics, and vaccinology from all over the world as they vigorously and respectfully debated aspects like: Wasn\u2019t it great seeing public health officials (who never treated anyone with covid) have their \u201cscience\u201d questioned?<\/p>\n Wasn\u2019t it great seeing the FDA panel publicly grill the vaccine makers in prime time as they stood in the hot-seat of tough questions about products of which they have no liability?<\/p>\n Oh, wait\u2026you didn\u2019t see those debates? No, you didn\u2019t\u2026 because they never occurred. What occurred instead was heavy-handed censorship of all but one narrative.<\/p>\n Ironically, Mark Zuckerberg can question vaccine safety, but anyone else can\u2019t?<\/p>\n Hypocrite? When did the first amendment become a suggestion? It\u2019s the FIRST amendment Mark \u2013 the one US founders thought was most important.<\/p>\n With so much at stake, why are we fed only one narrative\u2026shouldn\u2019t many perspectives be heard and professionally debated?<\/p>\n WHAT HAS OCCURRED TO SCIENCE? What has occurred to the scientific method of always challenging our assumptions?<\/p>\n What occurred to lively debate in Western society?<\/p>\n Why did anyone who disagrees with the WHO, or the CDC get censored so heavily?<\/p>\n Is the science of public health a religion now, or is science supposed to be about debate?<\/p>\n If someone says \u201cthe science is settled<\/em>\u201d that\u2019s how we know that we are dealing with someone who is closed minded.<\/p>\n By definition science (especially biological science) is never<\/u> settled. If it was, it would be dogma, not science.<\/p>\n WE WANT TO BE GOOD CITIZENS. For real. If lockdowns work, we want to do our part and stay home. If masks work, we want to wear them. If social distancing is effective, we want to comply. But, if there is evidence they don\u2019t (masks for example), we want to hear that evidence too. If highly-credentialed scientists have different opinions, we want to know what they think. We want a chance to hear their arguments and make up our own conscience. We don\u2019t think we are the smartest persons in the world, but we think we can think. Maybe we are weird, but if someone is censored, then we REALLY want to hear what they think. Don\u2019t you?<\/p>\n Is censorship not the technique of dictators, tyrants, and greedy, power-hungry people? Is it not a sign that those who are doing the censoring know it\u2019s the only way they can win?<\/p>\n What if a man who spent his entire life developing vaccines was willing to put his entire reputation on the line and call on all global leaders to immediately stop the covid vaccines because of problems with the science?<\/p>\n What if he pleaded for an open-scientific debate on a global stage? #17: The world\u2019s leading vaccinologist is sounding the alarm\u2026<\/strong><\/p>\n Here is what may be the biggest reason this covid vaccine doesn\u2019t make sense. When someone who is very pro-vaccine, who has spent his entire professional career overseeing the development of vaccines, is shouting from the mountaintops that we have a major problem, we think the man should be heard.<\/p>\n In case you missed it, and in case you care to watch it, here<\/a> is Geert Vanden Bossche, explaining:
\n1. Never brought a vaccine to market before covid (Moderna and Johnson & Johnson).
\n2. Are serial felons (Pfizer, and Astra Zeneca).
\n3. Are both (Johnson & Johnson).<\/p>\n\n
\n\u2022 Pfizer has the distinction of the biggest criminal payout in history<\/u>. They have lost so many lawsuits it\u2019s hard to count. You can check out their rap sheet here<\/a>.\u00a0Maybe that\u2019s why they are demanding that countries where they don\u2019t have liability protection put up collateral to cover vaccine-injury lawsuits.
\n\u2022 Astra Zeneca has similarly lost so many lawsuits it\u2019s hard to count. Here are two examples:
\nhttps:\/\/www.justice.gov\/opa\/pr\/pharmaceutical-giant-astrazeneca-pay-520-million-label-drug-marketing<\/a>
\nhttps:\/\/www.reuters.com\/article\/us-astrazeneca-texas-lawsuits-idUSKBN1KT0Q9<\/a>
\nYou get the point. And in case you missed it, the company had their covid vaccine suspended in at least 18 countries over concerns of blood clots, and they completely botched their meeting with the FDA with numbers from their study that didn\u2019t match.
\n\u2022 Oh, and apparently J&J (whose vaccine is approved for \u201cEmergency Use<\/em>\u201d in the US) and AstraZeneca (whose vaccine is not approved for \u201cEmergency Use<\/em>\u201d in the US), had a little mix up in their ingredients\u2026 in 15 million doses. Oops.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n
\n\u2022 In 2004 attempted vaccine produced hepatitis in ferrets
\nhttps:\/\/www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov\/pmc\/articles\/PMC525089\/<\/a>
\n\u2022 In 2005 mice and civets became sick and more susceptible to coronaviruses after being vaccinated
\nhttps:\/\/www.nature.com\/news\/2005\/050110\/full\/050110-3.html#ref-CR1<\/a>
\nhttps:\/\/www.pnas.org\/content\/102\/3\/797<\/a>
\n\u2022 In 2012 the ferrets became sick and died. And in this study mice and ferrets developed lung disease.
\nhttps:\/\/www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov\/pmc\/articles\/PMC\/3335060\/<\/a>
\n\u2022 In 2016 this study also produce lung disease in mice.
\nhttps:\/\/www.tandfonline.com\/doi\/full\/10.1080\/21645515.2016.1177688?scroll=top&needAccess=true<\/a><\/p>\n![\"\"](\"https:\/\/yogaesoteric.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/2-10.jpg\")
<\/p>\n
\n\u2022 Anyone younger than age 18 or older than age 55
\n\u2022 Pregnant or lactating mothers
\n\u2022 Auto-immune conditions
\n\u2022 Immunocompromised individuals<\/p>\n\n
\n<\/u>Hard to believe, right?<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n
\nhttps:\/\/www.fda.gov\/media\/144245\/download<\/a>
\nhttps:\/\/www.fda.gov\/media\/144434\/download<\/a><\/p>\n
\nhttps:\/\/childrenshealthdefense.org\/defender\/vaccine-injury-reporting-systems-utterly-inadequate\/<\/a>
\nhttps:\/\/childrenshealthdefense.org\/defender\/covid-vaccine-injuries-vaers-cdc\/?utm_source=salsa&eType=EmailBlastContent&eId=9af36675-e8d3-4040-a6be-abcb46990996<\/a><\/p>\n![\"\"](\"https:\/\/yogaesoteric.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/3-6-scaled.jpg\")
<\/p>\n
\n1. It can\u2019t stop us from spreading the virus.
\n2. It can\u2019t stop the virus from infecting us once we have it.
\n3. To get the vaccine is to accept all the risk of these experimental products and the best it might do is lower symptoms?<\/p>\n
\n– If we\u2019re worried about asymptomatic spreaders, would the vaccine not make it more likely that we are creating asymptomatic spread?
\n– If it indeed reduces symptoms, anyone who gets it might not even know they are sick and thus they are more likely to spread the virus, right?
\n– For what it\u2019s worth, we heard many people say the side effects of the vaccine (especially the second dose) are worse than catching covid.<\/p>\n
\n\u2022 It\u2019s occurring in Washington State
\n\u2022 It\u2019s occurring in New York
\n\u2022 It\u2019s occurring in Michigan
\n\u2022 It\u2019s occurring in Hawaii
\n\u2022 It\u2019s occurring in several other states too.
\n\u2022 It occurred to 80% of 35 nuns who got the vaccine in Kentucky. Two of them died by the way.<\/p>\n![\"\"](\"https:\/\/yogaesoteric.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/4-3.jpg\")
<\/p>\n
\n\u2022 Lockdowns
\n\u2022 Mask wearing
\n\u2022 Social-distancing
\n\u2022 Vaccine efficacy and safety trials
\n\u2022 How to screen for susceptibility to vaccine injury
\n\u2022 Therapeutics, (i.e. non-vaccine treatment options)<\/p>\n
\nWould you want to hear what he has to say?
\nWould you want to see the debate he\u2019s asking for?<\/p>\n
\n1. Why the covid vaccine may be putting so much pressure on the virus that we are accelerating it\u2019s ability to mutate and become more deadly.
\n2. Why the covid vaccines may be creating vaccine-resistant viruses (similar to anti-biotic resistant bacteria).
\n3. Why, because of previous problems with Antibody Dependent Enhancement, we may be looking at a mass casualty event in the next few months\/years.<\/p>\n
![\"\"](\"https:\/\/yogaesoteric.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/5.jpg\")
<\/p>\n