{"id":56705,"date":"2021-10-15T23:04:41","date_gmt":"2021-10-15T23:04:41","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/yogaesoteric.net\/?p=56705"},"modified":"2021-10-15T23:04:41","modified_gmt":"2021-10-15T23:04:41","slug":"lies-that-kill-truth-that-saves-a-concise-briefing","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/yogaesoteric.net\/en\/lies-that-kill-truth-that-saves-a-concise-briefing\/","title":{"rendered":"Lies that kill, truth that saves: a concise briefing"},"content":{"rendered":"

Arm yourself with knowledge and survive the globalist attack<\/strong><\/p>\n

In the interests of arming you would some knowledge that might assist your survival, the following featured article from Biz News<\/a><\/em> gives you an excellent briefing on the lies and false data underpinning the effort to jab the entire populace with booby-trapped experimental biochemical agents.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/p>\n

Natural immunity vs Covid-19 vaccine-induced immunity \u2013 Marc Girardot of PANDA<\/strong><\/p>\n

Covid-19 brought about an age of misinformation like never before. With this, the responsibility of journalists to provide informed, well-researched and objective news to the public has never been of more paramount importance. This article by Marc Girardot, a member of PANDA, is loaded with hyperlinks \u2013 each of which provide the source of those facts asserted in the article. The links and pictures are an integral part of this article, which takes a deep dive into the issue of natural immunity and Covid-19 vaccination. This article is not and should not be construed as \u2018anti-vax\u2019. Rather, it provides evidence of natural immunity. It is impeccably researched and well worth reading. \u2013 Nadya Swart<\/em><\/p>\n

Should people who have recovered from covid take a vaccine? <\/strong><\/p>\n

Epidemiology, immunology and the clinical data all say a clear \u201cNo!\u201d. There is no good reason to vaccinate the recovered.<\/em><\/p>\n

By Marc Girardot*<\/em><\/p>\n

A British friend, recovered from covid, decided to get vaccinated despite being naturally immune. This is the email he recently sent me:<\/p>\n

\u201cMarc I suffered a mild stroke on Wednesday 8 days after taking the Astrazeneca 2nd dose. Since I am a marathon runner I am a very \u2018rare case\u2019. I don\u2019t smoke, have high blood pressure, high cholesterol, family history or come into any of the risk categories for blood clots\u2026<\/em><\/p>\n

You did warn me against taking the second dose and I wished I\u2019d heeded your advice. I\u2019ve taken a totally unnecessary risk with my life and I bitterly regret doing it.<\/em>\u201d<\/p>\n

Contrary to most, Tony was informed; he had been told about the power of natural immunity, about the long \u2013 if not lifelong \u2013 duration of immunity, of the risk inherent to any medical procedure (yes, vaccination is a medical procedure!), as well as of the rising levels of adverse events. He admitted he hadn\u2019t imagined it could happen to him\u2026<\/p>\n

Though it is hard to assess precisely the actual severity and breadth of vaccine-related adverse events, it is very clear that vaccination against covid-19 isn\u2019t as harmless<\/a> as pharmaceuticals, mainstream media, academia, health authorities and the medical community have been saying. And, in contrast to high risk individuals who are still susceptible, recovered people have no real benefit to balance the additional risks of vaccination.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/p>\n

For over a year, mainstream media, health authorities as well as many \u201cexperts\u201d have been downplaying the power of the immune system, dismissing natural immunity<\/a> and proclaiming that immunity to covid-19 was short-lived<\/a>. Simultaneously, vaccines have been portrayed as the silver bullet to this crisis, an incidental procedure with no risk whatsoever. The data shows a different picture and many are coming forward<\/a>, to challenge<\/a> the official narrative. We will demonstrate that this is a fallacy.<\/p>\n

The human immune system is one of the most sophisticated achievements of evolution. The survival of our species has depended on it for millenia. And today, we are still very much relying on it. For the record, 99% of people infected with SARS-CoV-2 recover without treatment. Only 1% of SARS-CoV-2 patients, who did not receive early home-based treatment, end up hospitalised<\/a>. In other words, the immune system overwhelmingly protects. Even vaccines depend entirely on the immune system: vaccines essentially teach our immune systems what viral markers to be prepared for, they are not cures per se. Without a functional immune system, there can be no effective vaccine<\/a>.<\/p>\n

On the waning immunity fallacy<\/strong><\/p>\n

Once recovered, the immune response recedes, notably via a decrease in antibodies. It is not only natural; it is indispensable to restore the body to a normal balanced state. Just as a permanent state of fever would be harmful, a high number of targetless antibodies or T-cells constantly circulating throughout the body could create serious complications such as autoimmune diseases<\/a>. Taking an evolutionary perspective, only those whose antibody and T-cells count waned post-infection survived. So, a dropping number of antibodies and T-cells is reassuring, even healthy.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/p>\n

But this decrease in T-cells and antibodies doesn\u2019t mean at all that immunity is gone. It means the immune system has adapted to the new situation, and is now just on sentinel mode<\/em>: Memory B- and T-cells, circulating in the blood and resident<\/a> in tissues, act as vigilant<\/a> and effective sentinels for decades:<\/p>\n