{"id":65419,"date":"2021-12-19T22:25:40","date_gmt":"2021-12-19T22:25:40","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/yogaesoteric.net\/?p=65419"},"modified":"2021-12-22T22:50:30","modified_gmt":"2021-12-22T22:50:30","slug":"brian-gerrishs-testimony-to-reiner-fullmich-our-oppressors-are-very-frightened-people-ii","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/yogaesoteric.net\/en\/brian-gerrishs-testimony-to-reiner-fullmich-our-oppressors-are-very-frightened-people-ii\/","title":{"rendered":"Brian Gerrish\u2019s testimony to Reiner F\u00fcllmich: Our oppressors are very frightened people (II)"},"content":{"rendered":"

On 28 May 2021, Brian Gerrish gave evidence to the 54th session of the Stiftung Corona Ausschuss, the German-based extraparliamentary inquiry by lawyers into the medical establishment\u2019s and public policymakers\u2019 handling of the Covid crisis internationally. The theme for the day during the 54th session was \u201cCaught between nudging and side effects<\/em>\u201d. A transcript of this testimony is below.<\/p>\n

Read the first part<\/a> of the article<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a><\/p>\n

Viviane Fischer<\/strong>: So you think that also the leaked documents that we see [in Germany], like for instance this Panic Paper that was leaked by someone, or at least it was not officially put out \u2013 I mean, this created a lot of fear, I guess, also, because some people could see through the whole narrative then, after reading through the paper, but actually even the fact that it came out, and that some people read it or heard about it who were stuck in the fear narrative: maybe it even put them into more fear, just the way that it was designed.<\/em><\/p>\n

I mean, that you get an outcry, that a lot of people were upset that the Government would use this picture of your Grandma basically being suffocated by you, the child who infects her with Coronavirus; but once this picture is kind of in the official realm, some people hear it and then have these fantasies in their head, and get even more afraid.<\/em><\/p>\n

Brian Gerrish<\/strong>: Well, that is absolutely correct. We can see here in the UK that particularly the BBC<\/em> has been using applied psychology in this way: heavily emotive, distressing photographs with very little factual reporting to support the image, the idea given in the photograph.<\/p>\n

This is deliberate. It\u2019s calculated. It\u2019s now very easy to see that this is taking place.<\/p>\n

So, [with] the background of everything that\u2019s occurred with the \u201cpandemic<\/em>\u201d, we know that every speech that\u2019s made, every document that goes out, is likely to contain a reinforcing psychological message.<\/p>\n

But the other aspect that I think that is important, from the UK at least; if we go back to 2010, when that Mindspace document was released, within a year we started to see the first exercises which were going to prepare for a pandemic.<\/p>\n

So, in 2016 [N.B.: Brian said \u20182011<\/em>\u2019 by mistake, which was the year of the previous Pandemic Preparedness Paper], we had an event called Exercise Cygnus<\/em>, which was the UK influenza pandemic preparedness plan.<\/p>\n

That was followed by other official documents talking about a possible future pandemic, and then in 2017, there was a very significant document called Emergency Preparedness, Resilience and Response<\/em> [N.B.: Brian generalised the name as \u201cPreparing for the Next Pandemic<\/em>\u201d].<\/p>\n

What was, and what is, interesting in reading these documents is that some of them \u2013 not all, but some of them \u2013 qualify the document by saying, \u201cWell, we can\u2019t predict that a pandemic will<\/em> occur: we can look long-term over what\u2019s<\/em> occurred in the world; we can look back to 2018 and the flu pandemic and the damage; but we can\u2019t be certain of when there will be another future pandemic<\/em>.\u201d<\/p>\n

But suddenly, in a very short space of years, we can see in the UK a flurry of papers \u2013 and again, we can make these available to you \u2013 where, suddenly, people are all talking about \u201cthe coming pandemic<\/em>\u201d.<\/p>\n

Now, these are UK political public documents. They are not even on the level of the SPARS Pandemic-type documents, where these big exercises have been run in America and elsewhere, looking at the possibility of a pandemic coming. This is a cluster of papers and supposed research in the UK which is quite extraordinary.<\/p>\n

Is it a coincidence that in a few years, you have paper after paper warning that a pandemic is coming? What I can see when I read these papers is very little fact but a lot of emotive language.<\/p>\n

And, of course, people who had a job in the public sector, in the lower government system, would have been very susceptible to reading this material and then thinking, \u201cMy goodness, we need to make local preparations for this!<\/em>\u201d<\/p>\n

So I look at these documents, and I\u2019m pretty confident that what we are seeing is the seeding of ideas of a coming pandemic.<\/p>\n

Of course, those seeds were placed in people\u2019s consciousness, and then the moment we started to get reports of a pandemic coming \u2013 particularly, for us [in Britain], from the BBC \u2013 people would have started to become worried, or would have started to think about that material and would have started to react in a way that the Government would want.<\/p>\n

So we\u2019ve got the substantive evidence showing that the British Government will and does use applied psychology to get its policies across, that substantive evidence saying that they\u2019re going to go as far as making people fearful.<\/p>\n

And I\u2019ll add that if you make people stressed and fearful, you\u2019re also going to give them mental health problems, and we now live in a country where there\u2019s a huge rise in depression and suicides, none of which is being talked about in the mainstream press, because the increase in those adverse mental health effects has been so huge since the lockdown policies have been in place; this is an elephant in the room in the UK.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a><\/p>\n

We have the evidence in documents of this type of calculated, destructive applied psychology; but then you can also see, if you start talking to people in public services, to doctors and nurses in the National Health Service here and the hospital service, they are telling us that they\u2019ve also witnessed the sudden flood of these papers, effectively preparing them for a pandemic that was coming. Yet this was a pandemic that the papers said couldn\u2019t be predicted!<\/p>\n

Reiner F\u00fcllmich<\/strong>: Brian, at the beginning of today\u2019s session, Dr. Wolfgang Wodarg and I discussed the fact that a new narrative has been put out into the mainstream media, probably starting out in the United States with Fox News, and they have a host by the name of Tucker Carlson, who explained on one of his news shows that finally, there will be justice, because [Anthony] Fauci has been caught lying to the public about his involvement with the Wuhan virology lab, and how he had conducted gain-of-function experiments there, which was being financed behind the back of the American taxpayer, and against the will of the [US] Government, by US tax dollars.<\/em><\/p>\n

But the real message wasn\u2019t, \u201cWe\u2019re going to get Fauci.\u201d The real message was, \u201cFauci didn\u2019t tell us that there was a dangerous virus that escaped from the Wuhan lab!\u201d Now, in the meantime, we know that there was probably an accident at the Wuhan lab, but it didn\u2019t cause any real damage. However, those people who seem to have been preparing for this agenda to be rolled out (as you just explained, and as others have explained to us before)<\/em> \u2013 those people took this opportunity and used this as a springboard in order to start rolling out the \u201cpandemic\u201d, which is really a plandemic, and which is really only a PCR test pandemic.<\/em><\/p>\n

Would you agree with that, that in reality \u2013 and this is really important<\/em> \u2013 we do not have a dangerous virus, because the WHO, in accordance with what John Ioannidis says, put the danger of this pandemic at about the level of a common flu: 0.14 or 0.15% infection-fatality rate; so would you agree that this is really not a pandemic but this is a co-ordinated effort?<\/em><\/p>\n

As you said when you first started talking to us, this is not madness, it is a calculated effort which uses lots of psychology, NLP, in order to keep people in fear, in order to make them do things that they otherwise wouldn\u2019t do?<\/em><\/p>\n

Brian Gerrish<\/strong>: I certainly do believe that. There\u2019s a number of points there in what you\u2019ve just said to me.<\/p>\n

The first important one is: all of the evidence that\u2019s come in through the UK Column<\/em>, and our analysis, has shown that even the Government\u2019s own statistics have proven that what is occurring is effectively a normal flu season. And although they aimed extremely hard to manipulate and skew, bend the statistics, the Office for National Statistics in the UK actually did its job: the statistics that that centre pushed out to the public were actually correct, and showed that there was no pandemic. But the Government\u2019s interpretation of it was a blatant twisting of the facts and information.<\/p>\n

Reiner F\u00fcllmich<\/strong>: The same fact occurred here.<\/em><\/p>\n

Brian Gerrish<\/strong>: Yes, and I can reinforce that statement by saying to you that we now have a stream of people coming to us \u2013 doctors and nurses \u2013 saying that at the time when the British Government was claiming hospitals were full of covid patients, they were not full.<\/p>\n

Even specialist facilities that were created in hospitals never had a single patient going through them, never mind the big centre set up in London for thousands of patients that ended up, I think, with about 63 patients in a multi-thousand [bed] facility!<\/p>\n

In hospitals, we have had hospital consultants [senior treating physicians] telling us that they were responsible for setting up specialist covid wards, which they did, and when those wards were set up, they never had a single covid patient in them.<\/p>\n

And while that was occurring, the British Government sent elderly people, who clearly did have flu \u2013 they were in the hospitals and they had flu, they were ill \u2013 the Government sent those elderly people in their thousands back into the care and residential homes, where of course, in a closed environment, that infection spread.<\/p>\n

Even the wider press \u2013 certainly the newspapers in the UK: the Daily Express<\/em>, I think the Daily Mail<\/em> and the Daily Telegraph<\/em> and the Guardian<\/em> \u2013 all reported at one stage that the evidence was that tens of thousands of elderly people had died unnecessarily. Now, the experts that talk to us at the UK Column<\/em> say the figure is not tens of thousands; it\u2019s hundreds of thousands.<\/p>\n

So, we have the lie over whether it was a pandemic, and one of the tricks that the British Government and the BBC<\/em> have used is that they talk about the statistics relating to Covid-19 in a cumulative sense. They keep adding the figures together. But, of course, flu is always logged as a seasonal occurrence.<\/p>\n

A flu season comes, people catch flu, some people die \u2013 that\u2019s always the case \u2013 and then, as the weather gets better, flu disappears. And then, next winter, that is a new flu season, and the statistics start again. But with covid, the statistics have been added across the two seasons.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a><\/p>\n

Now, this is the use of psychology to manipulate people\u2019s consciousness. It\u2019s absolutely blatant.<\/p>\n

You mentioned Fauci. I believe that what you\u2019re seeing at the moment is a smokescreen. Yes, there are questions that need to be asked about what was occurring in the Wuhan lab, and certainly we know that it has been standard procedure for many years that if a vaccine is to be created, the pharmaceutical companies will enhance a virus strain as part of their techniques for producing a new virus; so we can imagine that in any laboratory, dangerous enhanced viruses might be created.<\/p>\n

So we know that laboratories are doing what is essentially dangerous work on the enhancements of viruses, so it is of course possible that something escaped.<\/p>\n

But I think that the timing of the suddenly turning of attention back to Fauci is very interesting, and I believe that this is being done because they know that the wider public is starting to ask the right questions about what has been done as a result of the Covid-19 vaccination policy. So, to try to distract people away from asking the key questions about vaccination, they\u2019re now coming back to Fauci.<\/p>\n

And the other man who has suddenly disappeared from the public arena is Bill Gates. Now, why has Bill Gates disappeared? Well, there are a number of interesting questions, but the first problem he faced was that it became known that he had a friendship with Epstein. So, all of a sudden, Mr. Bill Gates has gone from being the squeaky clean, well-behaved entrepreneurial philanthropic businessman to being smeared with the fact that he had a very questionable friendship with [Jeffrey] Epstein. And Melinda Gates has now said that she warned her husband about that relationship many years ago.<\/p>\n

So, suddenly, Bill Gates has been exposed in the wider media. That occurred first, and now suddenly we\u2019re getting attention focused back on Fauci. My feeling is that the people who are responsible for this despicable plan have now started to think that the public is beginning to look in the right direction, and so they need something to distract them.<\/p>\n

And I think we\u2019re going to see a ramping-up of accusations that it was the Chinese who produced a bioweapon, that Fauci was involved. This is all emotive media stuff; this is not proper analysis of what\u2019s been occurring. That\u2019s my personal opinion; I could be wrong.<\/p>\n

Reiner F\u00fcllmich<\/strong>: Actually, I think we agree with that, and everyone who we\u2019ve spoken to agrees with that. It looks as though those who are responsible for this agenda are beginning to throw people under the bus,<\/em> but \u2013 obviously \u2013 only for this very purpose: to distract the general public\u2019s attention from what they\u2019re doing. They\u2019re asking the right questions.<\/em><\/p>\n

So, in a way, I think this shows that they\u2019re losing control, to a degree. They\u2019re not losing complete control, but they\u2019re losing control. What do you think about this?<\/em><\/p>\n

Brian Gerrish<\/strong>: I agree with that, and if we want to inject some good news into our discussion, the people we are up against, the people we are fighting, are inherent liars. They tell lies; they do not tell the truth. And the problem with that is that eventually, they become caught in their own lies. So I think this is a big part of what\u2019s started to occur.<\/p>\n

I can give you another example, from within the UK, of where we see that there has suddenly been some emerging fear in the system. The UK agency which is responsible for the safety and regulation of medication is called the MHRA, the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency. That is the organisation which has been collecting data on vaccine adverse effects, and for you and anyone who\u2019s ultimately watching or listening, their latest reports are that within the UK, there have been 859,481 adverse reactions \u2026<\/p>\n

Reiner F\u00fcllmich<\/strong>: Did you say 850,000?!<\/em><\/p>\n

Brian Gerrish<\/strong>: 859,481. And there have been 1,213 deaths. Now, those statistics are the UK Government\u2019s own statistics; they\u2019ve not come from me, they\u2019ve come from the UK Government, and they come from the MHRA Yellow Card system.<\/p>\n

This is supposedly the safety system by which anybody who comes into contact with an adverse vaccine reaction \u2013 whether it be something you experienced yourself or you witnessed as a family member or friend, or indeed if you\u2019re somebody in the medical profession \u2013 you should log a Yellow Card vaccine adverse reaction message, and it is the MHRA that holds that database.<\/p>\n

Now, in the MHRA\u2019s own documentation, they stated in 2018 that to their knowledge, for any medication, including vaccines, less than 10%<\/u> of the serious adverse reactions were ever recorded. Less than 10%! And for more minor vaccine adverse reactions, they said that the figure recorded would be between 2% and 4% [of the actual total].<\/p>\n

Now, if we consider that statement against [the record of] 859,000 adverse reactions and 1,213 deaths, we could be looking at 12,000 people who have died.<\/p>\n

We as the UK Column<\/em> have reported a great deal about this data, and on the ukcolumn.org<\/em> website, my colleague, Mike Robinson, has provided a search engine so that you can search the MHRA\u2019s own data. And this is very interesting, because you cannot search the data on the MHRA\u2019s website; it simply provides it as sheets of data. This is very confusing and misleading for the public.<\/p>\n

But the caveat that maybe only 10% of serious effects got recorded is very significant. In the last couple of weeks, the MHRA added a new paragraph in relation to that caveat about the low reporting of adverse effects. They said, \u201cOf course, the figure of 10% and 2\u20134% does not apply to Yellow Card reports of Covid-19 vaccine adverse effects<\/em>.\u201d<\/p>\n

Read the third part<\/a> of the article<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

yogaesoteric<\/strong>
\nDecember 19, 2021<\/strong><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

On 28 May 2021, Brian Gerrish gave evidence to the 54th session of the Stiftung Corona Ausschuss, the German-based extraparliamentary inquiry by lawyers into the medical establishment\u2019s and public policymakers\u2019 handling of the Covid crisis internationally. The theme for the day during the 54th session was \u201cCaught between nudging and side effects\u201d. A transcript of […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":5,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_uf_show_specific_survey":0,"_uf_disable_surveys":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[973],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-65419","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncovering-freemasonsrys-manipulations-3480-en"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/yogaesoteric.net\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/65419","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/yogaesoteric.net\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/yogaesoteric.net\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/yogaesoteric.net\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/5"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/yogaesoteric.net\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=65419"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/yogaesoteric.net\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/65419\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":65924,"href":"https:\/\/yogaesoteric.net\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/65419\/revisions\/65924"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/yogaesoteric.net\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=65419"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/yogaesoteric.net\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=65419"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/yogaesoteric.net\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=65419"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}