{"id":65911,"date":"2021-12-22T22:48:15","date_gmt":"2021-12-22T22:48:15","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/yogaesoteric.net\/?p=65911"},"modified":"2022-01-06T19:46:39","modified_gmt":"2022-01-06T19:46:39","slug":"brian-gerrishs-testimony-to-reiner-fullmich-our-oppressors-are-very-frightened-people-iii","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/yogaesoteric.net\/en\/brian-gerrishs-testimony-to-reiner-fullmich-our-oppressors-are-very-frightened-people-iii\/","title":{"rendered":"Brian Gerrish\u2019s testimony to Reiner F\u00fcllmich: Our oppressors are very frightened people (III)"},"content":{"rendered":"

On 28 May 2021, Brian Gerrish gave evidence to the 54th session of the Stiftung Corona Ausschuss, the German-based extraparliamentary inquiry by lawyers into the medical establishment\u2019s and public policymakers\u2019 handling of the covid crisis internationally. The theme for the day during the 54th session was \u201cCaught between nudging and side effects<\/em>\u201d. A transcript of this testimony is below.<\/p>\n

Read the previous part<\/a> of the article<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/p>\n

Brian Gerrish<\/strong>: Once the UK Column<\/em> started to draw the public\u2019s attention to the fact that the MHRA already had 859,000 adverse effects recorded and 1,200 deaths, and that this might only be a very small proportion of the total number of adverse reactions, the MHRA attempted to deceive the public by posting a notice saying that this 10% [rule] did not apply to adverse reactions as a result of covid-19 vaccination.<\/p>\n

Viviane Fischer<\/strong>: But did anyone buy this?<\/em><\/p>\n

Brian Gerrish<\/strong>: Well, some people will inevitably buy it, because members of the public who read this information without having a fuller understanding are still in the psychological position that they believe what the Government tells them. And this is a very big mistake, of course. So some people did believe them, but some didn\u2019t.<\/p>\n

Now, we as a media organisation challenged that very strongly, and then something very interesting occurred: the MHRA suddenly announced that it was going to have a special initiative for patient information and safety. And when you look at the documents they produced, there\u2019s words on the paper, but the documents do not actually say what they are going to do to improve patient safety.<\/p>\n

The other part of the story in the UK is that the MHRA has overall responsibility for logging vaccine adverse effects, but what they are not doing is then investigating to produce the final conclusion on whether an effect was indeed created by a vaccine or not.<\/p>\n

Viviane Fischer<\/strong>: The same here<\/em>.<\/p>\n

Brian Gerrish<\/strong>: And if it\u2019s the same in Germany, then we are starting to see that there\u2019s a pattern emerging. This cannot be an accident; this cannot be a coincidence.<\/p>\n

Viviane Fischer<\/strong>: And it\u2019s amazing: we just discussed this earlier on in this session that they\u2019re not doing autopsies. They\u2019re really refusing: it\u2019s either coming from the state prosecutors or it\u2019s somehow being hindered behind the scenes, political decisions, whatever. They\u2019re not doing any autopsies on the people who were registered or declared by their relatives that there might be a causality with regard to the vaccines. They\u2019re not looking at it, and if they do, they say, \u201cOh, there\u2019s no connection.\u201d Even after doing a minor, cursory inspection, they say, \u201cOh, there\u2019s no connection; it cannot be.\u201d<\/em><\/p>\n

Brian Gerrish<\/strong>: Well, that is also occurring in the UK, that post mortems are not being conducted. We\u2019ve even seen \u2013 this is factual, because we have interviewed the family concerned \u2013 [a case] where a family\u2019s father died of a heart attack very shortly after receiving a vaccination, and the hospital did not submit a Yellow Card report, and later, when the family had submitted that report, nothing occurred. Six and a half weeks passed.<\/p>\n

They then said to the MHRA, \u201cWhat are you doing to investigate the death?<\/em>\u201d And the first thing the MHRA asked them was, \u201cWas there a post mortem?<\/em>\u201d Well, of course, the responsibility to do the post mortem comes from the medical team, who should have taken a decision that it could be linked to the vaccine, [and that] therefore, there was a need for a post mortem. But when it was too late, and the person had been buried, then the MHRA said, \u201cWell, there wasn\u2019t a post mortem.<\/em>\u201d<\/p>\n

And the other fact that occurred in the UK, about two years ago, [was a modification:] originally, death certificates had to be signed by two doctors, and this, within the \u201cpandemic<\/em>\u201d, was changed so that there only had to be one signature. Constantly, on the death certificates, \u201ccovid<\/em>\u201d was recorded when family members said, \u201cBut my father, my mother, my brother died of cancer!<\/em>\u201d But because they had supposedly tested positive for covid-19, that was actually recorded as the cause of death.<\/p>\n

So this is the official falsification of statistics, with a direct impact on the health of the nation. This is calculated. And this is why I come back to the statement that it is not madness; if you analyse very carefully the political decisions, the policies, the documents, what we are looking at is genocide. It\u2019s planned. It\u2019s premeditated.<\/p>\n

I\u2019ve even had a senior member of the National Health Service \u2013 who has spoken to us as a whistleblower \u2013 use that very term. Her words were, \u201cWhat I have watched unfolding within the health service in the UK is genocide<\/em>.\u201d<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/p>\n

Reiner F\u00fcllmich<\/strong>: Was that a member of the medical community?<\/em><\/p>\n

Brian Gerrish<\/strong>: That was a board member of one of the NHS Boards. And we have nurses telling us this; we have nurses using the term \u201cgenocide<\/em>\u201d. I have some doctors who are also using this term, but they\u2019re not using it lightly, and they\u2019re not using it because they\u2019re aware that that other individual used it. It comes out as a word when you interview them about their experiences and what they have seen.<\/p>\n

Viviane Fischer<\/strong>: Do you think the rush to vaccinate the children \u2026 The [German] Government has now said that from 7 June on, children are supposed to be vaccinated, and everything is supposed to be over and done before the next school year. So this seems to be pretty outrageous; obviously, a lot of people are very upset about this new initiative<\/em>.<\/p>\n

They say it\u2019s not going to be mandatory, but with peer pressure, and with them saying you can only access the schools again with testing or with vaccination, or only with vaccination, of course, there\u2019s pressure; it\u2019s basically mandatory, or it\u2019s going to become mandatory.<\/em><\/p>\n

I wonder, do you think they are now rushing this through because they see that the side effects of the vaccinations are going to become more and more obvious?<\/em><\/p>\n

Maybe if they introduced this later in the year, quite a few parents might shy away from the vaccinations, whereas now it\u2019s still in-between, and maybe with the option of going on vacations, it\u2019s maybe a good idea to lure people or nudge people into getting even their children vaccinated now? What\u2019s your take on that?<\/em><\/p>\n

Brian Gerrish<\/strong>: I totally agree with your analysis there. It is very clear that there is now a massive urgency to vaccinate children, and we can see that in open statements of politicians. One politician, [the former Health Secretary] Jeremy Hunt, stood up in Westminster a couple of days ago and basically said that it was vital that we started to vaccinate schoolchildren.<\/p>\n

So we can see open statements, but we can also see other documentation circulating where, again, there is this malicious use of psychology, because schoolteachers are being told that if they encounter parents who are reluctant to have their children vaccinated, those parents are effectively going to be listed as extremists.<\/p>\n

So we can again see this psychological wedge coming in, to break people away from their children. Of course, if you get parents away from the children, then the Government can do what they like with the children.<\/p>\n

And, as I say this to you, I think it\u2019s reasonable for me to say that many years ago, twenty years ago, I was reading a very informative political book called The European Union Collective: Enemy of its Member States<\/em> [by Christopher Story], and in that book there was a table which purported to be a table of the psychological attack on Western nations. It involved a period of demoralisation; it involved a period of destabilisation; and the ultimate five years was that there was going to be complete chaos and collapse.<\/p>\n

And as I read that table \u2013 and I had not long been out of the military at that stage \u2013 my conscience said, \u201cSome of this is<\/em> occurring around us. I can think of examples!<\/em>\u201d And I have given public talks on part of this idea \u2013 I will call it an \u201cidea<\/em>\u201d \u2013 that a psychological attack, a demoralising attack, is being unleashed on our respective nations. I believe that that is the case.<\/p>\n

And I believe that when you see how the policy for this covid scam, this lie, is being mirrored in the UK, in France, in Germany, and across all the other countries, then we can see that clearly, the power base that\u2019s injecting this is not democratic in any form. It\u2019s hostile to us.<\/p>\n

I\u2019ll just add, because it\u2019s a little aspect that I didn\u2019t want to forget, that Bill Gates has supported an organisation called CEPI: the Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations. The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation had put in several hundred million dollars to that organisation.<\/p>\n

Well, by a \u201cmiracle\u201d, CEPI ended up funding the very biological testing laboratory that the MHRA in the UK was going to use, and is using, to tell us whether the vaccines are safe! So Bill Gates\u2019 money goes into CEPI; and from CEPI, it goes to support the very laboratory that is being used to tell us that vaccines are safe \u2013 on the basis that they\u2019ve recorded 860,000 side effects, officially!<\/p>\n

But they haven\u2019t done any correlation as to whether there\u2019s causation there with the vaccines themselves. That research has not been done.<\/p>\n

So it\u2019s obvious that what you have is a system that has been set up in order to deceive the public about what is truly occurring with these vaccines. And I think they want the children because they are now quite scared to see the right questions being asked, and they know that if they want to get the children vaccinated, they\u2019ve got to hurry.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/p>\n

Viviane Fischer<\/strong>: I have one more question. We\u2019re looking at all the measures: the masks, this bizarre testing, now the vaccination, and the social distancing. Do you think these have foremost a psychological aspect, of being that you\u2019re power-struck or that you have to show obedience?<\/em><\/p>\n

And also, I was wondering: do you think it\u2019s maybe also, in addition, that they\u2019re all technologically, pharmacologically, all elements of the same goal: to get you sick?<\/em><\/p>\n

Because there\u2019s stuff in the tests, the swabs, we know, that is not good, and the masks are making people get infected more easily with a virus or the flu or whatever. So could it be that it\u2019s also really elegantly orchestrated on a medical basis?<\/em><\/p>\n

Brian Gerrish<\/strong>: Yes. I think what you are saying is correct. It\u2019s difficult for people [to imagine]. If we say that we are reasonable people \u2013 we, the assembled people here today, are not perfect, but we\u2019re reasonable people and we\u2019re concerned about our fellow man and woman; that\u2019s what\u2019s in our heads \u2013 when you have that in your head, it\u2019s very difficult for you then to look at somebody who is unleashing an utterly brutal plan on people.<\/p>\n

If even [just] tens of thousands of elderly people were deliberately killed in the UK (and I believe the evidence for that is overwhelming), then the people who took the decision to kill the elderly people are also capable of taking the decision to kill off other members of society that they don\u2019t believe are worth anything.<\/p>\n

Just to come back to psychology and documents: I have a National Health Service document which is talking about patient safety, and it says \u201cIf we did this or that, we could perhaps save the lives of 160 people a year. That would be worth \u00a323 million<\/em>.\u201d<\/p>\n

Every time the NHS document is talking about protecting human beings, it puts a financial value on that. And when I see those sentences, I know that the person who has written that document does not think in the way that I suspect you and we all think.<\/p>\n

So, what they\u2019re doing to the children with the masks and the social distancing \u2013 and giving them lessons in \u201chow dangerous the virus is<\/em>\u201d \u2013 that is frightening the children. This is all a psychological attack on their consciences, and the people are doing it know full well that this is going to result in all sorts of mental health problems in the children.<\/p>\n

There\u2019s a very important paper which is called Biderman\u2019s Chart of Coercion<\/em>. It\u2019s a World Health Organisation-recognised paper about non-physical techniques of torture. Virtually every covid pandemic measure can be ticked off against one of the entries in Biderman\u2019s chart.<\/p>\n

And as I was waiting to come live with you, a very well-informed lady has sent me a document where in the UK, they\u2019re now saying that if a baby is born and there is any suspicion that that child may test positive for covid, there should be no skin contact.<\/p>\n

Viviane Fischer<\/strong>: It\u2019s really getting out of hand. Do you think that the spin for this whole<\/em> fact is written in England? Do you think that [the UK] is really the spider in the web? Would you discover [that], together with the French people? Is it an American script? It must be centrally organised somehow.<\/em><\/p>\n

Brian Gerrish<\/strong>: Well, this of course is a very interesting question, because when I talked about the destabilisation chart [in Christopher Story\u2019s book], that allegedly was part of a Communist plan to destabilise the West.<\/p>\n

But I think that if we take a more mature view of it at the moment, if we look at the power base (and at the moment, we\u2019re focused on the power base of the pharmaceutical companies), the power base is within the networks of those companies. And, of course, those companies can only function with the people who control their billions of dollars of working capital and profits.<\/p>\n

So, for me, it\u2019s very easy to say that if you want to start working out who is doing this, then you have to look at who is actually controlling the sums of money.<\/p>\n

And this can be quite emotive, depending on how you put this argument across, but in the UK, the Government \u2013 which has not been able to build hospitals, which can\u2019t fill in holes in the road, which can\u2019t run the schools \u2013 suddenly announces that we have got \u00a3800 billion which has appeared out of thin air in order to fight covid. Well, this tells us something very important.<\/p>\n

Read the next part<\/a> of the article<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

yogaesoteric
\nDecember 22, 2021<\/strong><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

On 28 May 2021, Brian Gerrish gave evidence to the 54th session of the Stiftung Corona Ausschuss, the German-based extraparliamentary inquiry by lawyers into the medical establishment\u2019s and public policymakers\u2019 handling of the covid crisis internationally. The theme for the day during the 54th session was \u201cCaught between nudging and side effects\u201d. A transcript of […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":4,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_uf_show_specific_survey":0,"_uf_disable_surveys":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[973],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-65911","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncovering-freemasonsrys-manipulations-3480-en"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/yogaesoteric.net\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/65911","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/yogaesoteric.net\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/yogaesoteric.net\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/yogaesoteric.net\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/4"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/yogaesoteric.net\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=65911"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/yogaesoteric.net\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/65911\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":66086,"href":"https:\/\/yogaesoteric.net\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/65911\/revisions\/66086"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/yogaesoteric.net\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=65911"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/yogaesoteric.net\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=65911"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/yogaesoteric.net\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=65911"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}