65 Chemical Cross-Contaminants Found In Popular Children’s Vaccine INFANRIX Hexa
The National Order of Biologists made a
€10,000 donation to a group that questions the safety of vaccines. The
Infanrix Hexa vaccine was the first one tested, and results showed no trance of
antigens and a high level of contamination.
Why is this not big news? Why does the vaccine
not contain any of the antigens it’s supposed to guard against? This test shows
clear and large causes for concern, so why does it not make mainstream headlines?
Facebook, which seems to have become a
government-run agency claiming to help fight the war on ‘fake news,’ has
pledged to delete and flag content that spreads misinformation. This is great, and
should be done, but the only problem is that content around the internet is being
taken down, flagged, and deemed as a ‘conspiracy theory’ when it is
well-supported, factual, and backed by peer-reviewed science.
The measles outbreak last year in Washington
State for example, was followed by the state pushing hard for all school-aged
children to receive a mandatory MMR vaccination. These outbreaks are constantly
being blamed on unvaccinated children, but the mainstream never pointed people
towards the actual statistics showing that Washington State, like many other states,
have not experienced a drop in MMR vaccination coverage. Instead, MMR vaccine
coverage is very high.
Furthermore, they never mentioned that
there’s been a long history of measles outbreaks in highly vaccinated and
fully vaccinated populations, and they didn’t mentioned the deaths,
disabilities, and adverse reactions that’ve occurred as a result of the MMR
vaccine either. Why don’t they mention that the death rate from measles in
Washington State was just 1.4/10,000 before the introduction of the vaccine? You can
read more about that and access multiple studies and testimonies on this subject in
the article linked below:
Biochemical Engineer Drops Bombshell Facts
About Measles & The MMR Vaccine In Washington
Information and science are constantly emerging
regarding vaccinations, but we never hear about any of it from mainstream media. In
this article
it is presented how Robert F. Kennedy explained about big pharmaceutical companies
are the biggest lobbyists, even more than big oil, and how they’ve completely
compromised both the Democrats and the Republicans.
‟They’ve captured them (our
regulatory agencies) and turned them into sock puppets. They’ve compromised
the press… and they destroy the publications that publish real science.ˮ
Robert F. Kennedy
So, what’s some of the latest information
regarding vaccine safety?
An article published in Nature, International Journal
of Science titled “Italian scientists protest funding for vaccine-
safety investigation” outlines how The National Order of Biologists made
a €10,000 donation to a group that questions the safety of vaccines.
The groups name is Corvelva, and they received
the donation on the 26th of October of 2018. The group believes that the research it
conducts is necessary because “previous studies it has funded, which have
not yet been published in a peer-reviewed journal, indicate that some vaccines
contain impurities, or lack the active ingredients they claim to
contain.”
Nature points out that “Some scientists
in Italy are up in arms over a donation from the organization that oversees the
nation’s professional biology qualification to an advocacy group that opposes
the country’s policy of mandatory childhood vaccination.”
This part is confusing: Why would any group or
any scientist oppose more safety studies regarding vaccinations? Wouldn’t
professionals on both sides of the coin be in support of as much vaccine safety
testing as possible?
ONB president Vincenzo D’Anna told
Nature in an e-mail interview that there is a need for truly independent
vaccine research because, in his opinion, work conducted in public laboratories and
at universities is usually influenced or funded by companies that produce
vaccines.
“The goal is to contribute to complete
the biological and chemical analyses on vaccines,” he said in the
interview, part of which the ONB has published in its Bulletin.
Again, Nature pointed out that many
scientists dismiss the need for more vaccine safety testing and that they are upset.
That being said, it’s a comforting thought that ONB disagrees and that they
are supporting this type of thing. Clearly, many professionals within that
organization don’t believe that vaccines go through rigorous safety testing,
as is claimed by many. Again, what harm could be done by further testing?
What Did They Find?
The first vaccine that was tested was the Infanrix
Hexa vaccine. It’s a six-in-one vaccine that’s manufactured by
GlaxoSmithKline (GSK) that’s supposed to contain the following antigens:
tetanus, diphtheria, and pertussis toxoids; inactivated poliomyelitis viral strains
1-2-3; and hepatitis B surface antigen.
Corvelva discovered that none of these antigens
were actually in the vaccine, which means it had zero antibodies to the intended
antigens to be created. This was a huge shock, and in addition to that they also
found the following:
Traces of 65 chemical cross-contaminants from
other manufacturing lines:
• chemical toxins;
• unrecognizable macromolecules;
• various free bacterial peptides that are
potential allergens and are capable of inducing autoimmune reactions.
According to Corvelva,
‟Tetanus, diphtheria and pertussis
toxoids, D antigens of Poliomyelitis 1-2-3, hepatitis B proteins obtained with
genetic engineering and Haemophylus polysaccharides chemically linked to tetanus
toxoid as carrier. Toxoids are created by treatments with formaldehyde and
glutaraldehyde that should remove toxicity keeping intact their ability to stimulate
protective antibodies against original toxins.
We were expecting to find the three toxoids
and the other antigens not modified by treatment with formaldehyde and
glutaraldehyde, to separate the antigens from each other and to be digestible by the
enzyme specific for proteins (trypsin).
We have found instead a real
polymer, insoluble and indigestible, that we supposed to be the set of antigens
chemically bound together (has to be defined if this is present as an aggregate of
the individual antigens or a single macromolecule), on which we can find in
literature partial information regarding the single antigens.
This macromolecule could not be recognized in
any way by the protein databases, and in fact it turned out to be a solid compound
of an unknown chemical structure.
Proteins solubility and their digestion (i.e.
the capacity to divide them into small peptide fragments) are two typical proteins
characteristics that not only makes it possible to study them through some specific
analysis methods
but are also fundamental for the interaction with the
immune system to create protective antibodies, because if the protein
structure is heavily altered from the original one, the new antibodies result
completely different from those that are able to attack the original antibodies
causing illnesses.
Since this polymer we have encountered,
derived from the antigenic mix, is not only different for its spatial conformation
but it’s chemically different, so we can state that we are not
facing antigens similar to the original ones but in the form of a compound with an
unknown and unpredictable toxicity and efficacy.ˮ
The fact that the vaccine antigens were not
detected is seriously concerning, and so is the fact that, of the 65 signs of
chemical contaminants, only 35% are known. This was only the first phase of this
safety testing, as a second analytical study with standard controls will be
released.
7 chemical toxins were also identified, and the
group states that these toxins have a structure that could probably be partially
derived from the formaldehyde, glutaraldehyde and cyanogen bromide reactions with
other chemical contaminants in the vaccine.
‟We’d like to point out that the
toxicity of many of these toxins have been confirmed andpublished in
Pubchem or Toxnet andthis poses important safety problems, issues and
concerns.
From the protein and peptide fraction study,
various free peptides of bacterial origin have been obtained probably coming from
the bacterial culture cells used for the antigen extraction.
Literature
reports bacterial peptides as potential allergens 5 and also as capable of inducing
autoimmune reactions 6 and these too put a safety issue that needs to be further
clarified with the regulatory bodies.
Coming back to the two basic principles that
have been our topic on this analysis path, we reaffirm what we have said in the
recent interview on the scientific journal Nature: we are inquiring the vaccines
efficacy and safety and we can’t quite understand how it is possible to claim
that this vaccine is even able to generate the 6 protective antibodies –
reason why it is designed for – and furthermore to understand how this cluster
made of neurotoxic antigens bound together can be claimed as not toxic for
newborns.
Infanrix Hexa hexavalent, as for the method
we have commissioned, casts major doubts on both its effectiveness and on its
safety…
One thing is for sure: we will not stop to
proceed.ˮ
More Vaccine Controversy From
Italy
In the 90s, Dr. Antonietta Gatti discovered the
relationship between micro- and nano-particles as well as a great number of
pathologies: cardiovascular diseases, many forms of cancer, multiple neurological
diseases, and autoimmune diseases. She’s taken part in many international
research projects, including the pathologies induced by depleted uranium, waste
incineration, food polluted with inorganic particles, and more.
Currently, she is the coordinator of the Italian
Institute of Technology’s Project of Nanoecotoxicology, called INESE.
She is also a selected expert of the FAO/WHO for
the safety in nanotechnological food, a Member of the NANOTOX Cluster of the
European Commission, the author of the book “Nanopathology: the health
impact of nanoparticles,” on the Editorial Board of the Journal of
Biomaterials Applications, and a Member of the CPCM of the Italian Ministry of
Defense.
Furthermore, her and her husband Dr. Stefano
Montanari founded a laboratory called Nano-diagnostics for the evaluation of the
pathological tissues of patients. It’s presently at the University of Modena
and Reggio Emilia, Italy.
Last year, the Italian police raided their home,
and the police took all digital assets that were owned by the the two
nanopathologists including their laptops, computers, and flash-drives; basically
years of work and research.
James Grundvig via the World Mercury
Project describes what happened quite well:
“Because Gatti and Montanari had taken
their research of nanodust and nanoparticles, from in-vivo (performed in a living
organism) and in-vitro (performed in a test tube) to what unseen contamination might
reside in vaccines in 2016, they came under the microscope of the United States,
European, and Italian authorities.
They had touched the third rail of medicine.
They had crossed the no-go zone with the purported crime being scientific research
and discovery. By finding nano-contamination in random vaccines, Gatti and Montanari
revealed, for the first time, what no one knew: Vaccines had more than aluminum
salts adjuvants, Polysorbate-80, and other inorganic chemicals in them, they also
harbored stainless steel, tungsten, copper, and other metals and rare elements that
don’t belong in shots given to fetuses, pregnant women, newborns, babies and
toddlers developing their lungs, immune and nervous systems.”
The scientists published their work in January of
2017, titled, New Quality‐Control Investigations on Vaccines: Micro‐
and Nanocontamination. If science wasn’t plagued by corruption, an
investigation would have started, healthcare agencies would be involved, and vaccine
safety policies would have come under intense scrutiny, but that never
happened.
The Takeaway
There are numerous vaccine safety issues. The
bioaccumulation of various vaccine ingredients, for example, are one. Ingredients
like aluminum have been added to vaccines for more than 100 years under the
assumption that they are safe. It’s only within the last couple years that
scientists decided to look to see where these ingredients go after being
injected.
They found that aluminum, when injected,
doesn’t exit the body, it actually travels to distant organs and the brain.
You can access those studies and read more about that here. You can also watch a
short video from Dr. Christopher Shaw from the University of British Colombia
explaining the difference between injectable aluminum and the aluminum our body
takes in from food. Here is another related study you can read that goes into
further detail.
The main point should be that no parent should
ever be made to feel guilty for not vaccinating their children. Vaccines are clearly
not as safe as they’re marketed to be, and it’s important that we ask
ourselves why this type of information goes virtually unacknowledged by the
masses.
yogaesoteric
March 16, 2020