A former Air Force expert makes serious accusations on TV: What occurs in the atmosphere is not explained to the public
The US news channel Newsmax has once again drawn attention to a topic that is rarely, if ever, covered by major media outlets: potential government intervention in the atmosphere and its health and environmental consequences.
In an interview, former US Air Force environmental specialist Kristin Megan spoke about her experiences and insights from her professional career. Megan is among those who have been pointing out for years that certain forms of geoengineering and weather modification are not only being researched theoretically, but are already being implemented in practice.
Statements from a military and technical context
Megan describes how, during her work for the Air Force, she was involved in the identification, assessment, and documentation of hazardous materials. Doing so, she encountered substances that, according to her, are not only used in industrial or military contexts but are also detectable in the atmosphere.
She refers to internal forms, safety data sheets, and soil and air analyses that, in her view, indicate the systematic use of certain substances. She also emphasizes that such concepts are now openly discussed in scientific literature and government documents on climate change.
Laws as evidence of real-world practice
A central argument of those who support this view is the existence of federal and state laws that are intended to regulate or prohibit weather manipulation or atmospheric interventions. For Megan and other observers, this raises the question of why such regulations exist if there is no practical application of them.
Especially in US states like Florida and Texas, the topic has recently been the subject of increased political debate – a fact that Newsmax addresses in its reporting.
Health and environmental concerns
In the interview, Megan also points to potential health effects that she associates with certain metals and salts. According to her, these could enter the human body through inhalation and precipitation, potentially having long-term consequences for bones, the nervous system, and the cardiovascular system.
Many scientists view these statements critically, while proponents of independent investigations demand an open and transparent review of the substances and measurement data mentioned.
Media reticence – deliberate omission or caution?
It is striking that major media outlets largely avoid the topic or only cover it superficially. While critics see this as necessary restraint regarding theses that have not yet been definitively evaluated, others interpret this reticence as media silence on uncomfortable questions.
Conclusion
Regardless of one’s assessment of the arguments presented, the interview demonstrates one aspect above all: The debate about geoengineering, weather modification, and their potential consequences is real, international, and politically relevant.
Newsmax is helping to bring this discussion into the public eye – in a media landscape where many of these questions have rarely been raised. Whether the allegations presented can be fully substantiated remains a matter for further investigation. However, it is clear that the issue will not disappear by being ignored.
🚨 Whistleblowerin spricht im US-Fernsehen Klartext
Eine ehemalige Umweltspezialistin der US Air Force erhebt im Interview mit Newsmax schwere Vorwürfe:
Seit Jahren würden atmosphärische Eingriffe stattfinden – mit möglichen Folgen für Mensch, Umwelt und Landwirtschaft.🗣 „Es… pic.twitter.com/yvP5pdBD58
— Don (@Donuncutschweiz) December 16, 2025
yogaesoteric
January 16, 2026