Archbishop Viganò Names Global Elite In “Crimes Against Humanity”
Archbishop Carlo Maria Viganò has issued a stark and uncompromising statement, accusing what he describes as a “subversive elite” of infiltrating Western governments and institutions in order to impose the programme commonly referred to as Agenda 2030.
According to Viganò, who has been excommunicated by the Catholic church, this project represents not reform, but a coordinated assault on national sovereignty, democratic accountability, and public consent.
He goes further, claiming that those who challenge this direction are being systematically silenced through censorship, intimidation, psychiatric labelling, and even arrest. As evidence of this alleged repression, he points to the case of German lawyer Reiner Fuellmich, who is in prison for embezzlement, accusation that he denies. Viganò describes Fuellmich as a political prisoner whose real offence was speaking out against powerful interests.
In language that leaves little room for ambiguity, the archbishop argues that responsibility lies not with dissidents or critics, but with figures at the centre of global finance, pharmaceuticals, and supranational governance. He names Anthony Fauci, Bill Gates, Klaus Schwab, George Soros, Ursula von der Leyen, and Albert Bourla, among others, as emblematic of what he sees as a system that has operated beyond democratic control.
Whether one agrees with Viganò’s conclusions or not, his intervention reflects a broader and undeniable reality: trust in institutions has collapsed, dissent is increasingly pathologized, and questions that once belonged to public debate are now treated as dangerous.
I don’t outsource my views on the current state of the world to politicians or prelates. But I’m also not in the habit of dismissing uncomfortable voices simply because they make the powerful uneasy. When lawyers, journalists, doctors, and common citizens are imprisoned, censored, or marginalised for challenging authority, the proper response is not reflexive dismissal, but scrutiny.
A society confident in its legitimacy does not fear debate. A system that silences critics invites suspicion.
Author: facebook.com/thepeoplesbritain
yogaesoteric
February 3, 2026