Globalists Know They’re ‘Extremely Unpopular’ — But That Won’t Keep Them From Seeking ‘Total Control’ Over Global Population
According to Tim Hinchliffe, editor of The Sociable, the World Economic Forum’s “rebuilding trust” theme for the recent annual meeting was just a cover for the globalists’ real goal: to install a “total control system” using digital ID and central bank digital currencies, under the aegis of global governance.
More than 60 heads of state and 1,600 business leaders convened in Davos, Switzerland, for the World Economic Forum (WEF) annual meeting, where they discussed the threat posed by “misinformation,” warnings of a potential new “Disease X,” the benefits of artificial intelligence (AI) and the risk of “wrong leaders” being elected.
The discussions were held under the central theme of “Rebuilding Trust.”
But according to Tim Hinchliffe, editor of The Sociable, the “rebuilding trust” theme was just a cover for WEF leaders’ real goal: to install a “total control system” using digital ID and central bank digital currencies (CBDCs), under the aegis of global governance.
‘They’re not used to being transparent’
In 2023, WEF co-founder and chairman Klaus Schwab referred to the WEF’s “master the universe” agenda. This year, the focus was on the seemingly more benign effort to “rebuild trust.”
According to Hinchliffe though, the WEF has a peculiar view of how to accomplish this. “The way that they go about rebuilding trust is to declare themselves trustees. It’s shocking,” he said.
“It’s really funny because they keep talking about how they lost trust in different ways. There was losing trust in the media, losing trust in science, in technology companies.” They also took a “big jab” at X (formerly Twitter) and Elon Musk, Hinchliffe said.
He also referred to remarks made at the recent meeting by Emma Tucker, editor-in-chief of The Wall Street Journal, who said “We owned the news. We were the gatekeepers, and we very much owned the facts as well.”
This is why the fake news media is attacking Elon and the X platform. They have lost control of the narrative they once had.
“We owned the news. We were the gatekeepers, and we very much owned the facts as well”.
🔊 … Emma Tucker, WSJ Chief Editor
— Wall Street Silver (@WallStreetSilv) January 20, 2024
“She lamented that nowadays people can go to all kinds of sources and [are] very much questioning” the media, Hinchliffe said. “They’re not used to being transparent, and now they need to be more transparent.”
‘They want to make sure that their people are put in power’
The WEF’s “Global Risks Report,” released just before this year’s meeting, listed “misinformation” and “disinformation” as the greatest threats to the world over the next two years. The meeting’s participants appeared to illuminate just why the WEF considers so-called “misinformation” a threat.
During a panel discussion on “Global Risks: What’s in the Mail?” Haslinda Amin, Bloomberg News’ chief international correspondent for Southeast Asia, suggested “there is a risk the wrong leaders are elected” in elections in key countries this year.
BREAKING – WEF moderator says elections in 2024 are a risk because “there is a risk the wrong leaders are elected”
S&P Global President said “We also need to make sure we stay engaged through global institutions, like the UN, like NATO”
(They are terrified of Trump)#WEF24 pic.twitter.com/LrLmin9WMK
— Andreas Wailzer (@Andreas_Wailzer) January 19, 2024
For Hinchliffe, references to the “wrong leader” are euphemisms for “a leader that’s not a globalist.”
“They want to make sure that their people are put in power, because if not, then their whole world crumbles,” he said. “What they don’t want is whole sovereign states they want to break down borders, they want to tear down sovereignty.”
Hinchliffe connected this to the WEF’s warnings about misinformation. “If you have any information that looks bad for them and good for their opponents, they’re not going to want to have that.”
According to Hinchliffe, efforts at developing “global governance”— an idea promoted by António Guterres, the United Nation’s secretary-general, at the WEF meeting — is a veiled way of articulating the goal of “consolidating control.”
“They are kind of worried [that they’re] losing their grip on that,” Hinchliffe said.
‘Once they control what you spend your money on, it’s game over’
The WEF meeting also included discussions of digital ID — but at a subdued level compared to past meetings, according to Hinchliffe. “It’s almost like they tried not to talk about that.”
Hinchliffe said digital ID “is kind of a misnomer,” noting that the term is most often used to refer to “digital identity,” which he said, “includes everything about you, which is linked to everything, to control basically every aspect of your life.”
“They want it, to control everything,” he said. “Digital ID is for financial services, school enrollment, vaccination status, but it’s so much more than that. They’re going to try to use it for accessing the internet, using cybersecurity or even AI.”
Hinchliffe said digital ID also would be linked to “programmable” CBDCs, meaning “they can turn it on or off, they can set expiry dates, they can say that you can only spend this much here, that much there, only on certain products or services.”
CBDCs and digital ID also would be tied to a purportedly “climate”-related agenda, according to Hinchliffe. He noted that CBDCs could then be used to limit travel, track personal carbon footprints, and control and track transactions.
“Once they control what you can spend your money on, then it’s game over,” he said, adding, “That is what the digital ID is completely necessary for. They need that to control your finances. We don’t need it, but they want it.”
Digital ID akin to a ‘digital control system’
Digital ID also is “very necessary” for tracking the unvaccinated, according to Queen Máxima of the Netherlands at this year’s meeting.
Hinchliffe said the “digital inclusion” promised by technologies such as digital ID actually “means physical exclusion,” citing vaccine passports and digital health certificates as examples.
Queen Maxima of the Netherlands at WEF in Davos: [Digital ID] is very necessary for financial services, but not only – it is also good for school enrollment; it is also good for health — who actually got a vaccination or not" #DigitalID #WEF24 https://t.co/DJiO8nISih pic.twitter.com/RgYA2ahXS0
— Tim Hinchliffe (@TimHinchliffe) January 18, 2024
Hinchliffe referred to a recently launched United Nations initiative, the “50-in-5” campaign, “to roll out digital public infrastructure.” He said this consists of “digital ID, digital payments, which is the CBDC, and massive data sharing,” adding that “vaccine passports are part of it as well.”
According to Hinchliffe, this amounts to a “digital control system.”
Calls for AI regulation by WEF participants an attempt to secure monopoly
The WEF meeting’s “Preparing for Disease X” panel featured remarks by World Health Organization Director-General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, warning that a yet-unknown pathogen, referred to as “Disease X,” could cause a new pandemic.
Hinchliffe said the definite language used by the participants when referring to “Disease X” belies advance knowledge of — or preparation for — such an occurrence.
Tedros: “Covid (was) the first Disease X" pic.twitter.com/bp7x1Xuxy6
— Ian Miles Cheong (@stillgray) January 17, 2024
“In my opinion, they already have ‘Disease X’,” he said. “It’s probably been engineered somewhere, and they’ve already been working on the cure, the vaccine for it.”
Hinchliffe drew parallels with “Event 201,” a coronavirus pandemic simulation held in October 2019, which appeared to “predict” the subsequent covid pandemic and also “outlined media censorship and controlling the narrative.”
WEF meeting participants, including Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla, also touted the benefits of AI in vaccine development and healthcare applications — but called for regulation of the technology. For Hinchliffe, what they meant is regulating AI “for everybody else and not them,” in order to “push out the competition” and “have a further monopoly on it.”
‘Globalists know how extremely unpopular they are’
For Hinchliffe, the endgame for most WEF participants is global governance. “They want to set rules for everyone else to follow,” he said.
However, he said the public is increasingly aware of the WEF’s plans and that their unpopularity is evident when looking at comments posted on virtual communication networks.
“These globalists know how extremely unpopular they are,” he said. “And that’s why they want to control narratives.”
yogaesoteric
February 5, 2024