June “Pride” – How America Went Gay

Homosexuality is Depopulation and Destablilization

Introduction by Henry Makow

The promotion of homosexuality is designed to depopulate and destabilize society by destroying the nuclear family.

Until 1975, homosexuality was recognized for what it is, a developmental disorder. The massive crusade to mainstream homosexuality is characteristic of Satanism, which pretends that sick is healthy and unnatural is normal. Society is satanically possessed. Mankind has been colonized by a satanic cult, Freemasonry (Jewish Cabalism) which is a proxy for the Cabalist Jewish central banking cartel. Our political, economic and cultural leaders are traitors, factotum for the satanist banking cartel that controls society through credit.

Aren’t you suspicious that every single corporation is promoting this developmental disorder? Homosexuality is another depopulation psy op like covid, which was nothing but the flu rebranded. I have compassion for gays. It’s not their fault that their mothers were overbearing or they were sexually abused as youths, or simply fooled by the mainstream propaganda. I feel no more animosity toward them than I would for someone who was autistic. But we need to oppose the Illuminati plan to subvert society by spreading this disorder until it becomes the social norm.

The real issue is heterophobia, not homophobia.

We will destroy all collective forces except our own” say the Protocols of Zion (16-4). Collective forces include race, religion (God), nationhood and family (gender).

As in many countries June is the “gay pride month”, we present the How America Went Gay classic 1995 essay written by Charles Socarides, the psychiatrist who pioneered the treatment of homosexuality, and whose work is now banned in many U.S. states.

How America Went Gay

For more than 20 years, I and a few psychiatrists have felt like an embattled minority, because we have continued to insist that gays aren’t born that way.

For most of this (20th) century, we have considered this behavior aberrant……. a pathology. We had patients who would seek out one sex partner after another, total strangers, on a single night, then come limping into our offices the next day to tell us how they were hurting themselves.

Now, in the opinion of those who make up the so-called cultural elite, our view is out of date. The elite says we hurt people more than we help them, and that we belong in one of the century’s dustbins. They have managed to sell this idea to many Americans, thereby making homosexuality fashionable and raising formerly aberrant behavior to the status of an “alternate lifestyle.”

Homosexual Revolution Orchestrated

How did this change come about? Well, the revolution did not just happen.

It was all part of a plan, as one gay publication put it, “to make the whole world gay.” I am not making this up. You can read an account of the campaign in Dennis Altman’s The Homosexualization of America. In 1982 Altman, himself gay, reported with an air of elation that more and more Americans were thinking like gays and acting like gays. There were engaged, that is, “in numbers of short-lived sexual adventures either in place of or alongside long-term relationships.” Altman cited the heterosexual equivalents of gay saunas and the emergence of the swinging singles scene as proofs that “promiscuity and ‘impersonal sex’ are determined more by social possibilities than by inherent differences between homosexuals and heterosexuals, or even between men and women.”

Heady stuff. Gays said they could “reinvent human nature, reinvent themselves.” To do this, these re-inventors had to clear away one major obstacle. No, they didn’t go after the nation’s clergy. They targeted the members of the psychiatric community, and neutralized them with a radical redefinition of homosexuality itself. In 1972 and 1973 they co-opted the leadership of the American Psychiatric Association and, through a series of political manoeuvres, lies and outright flim-flams, they “cured” homosexuality overnight-by fiat. They got the A.P.A. to say that gay sexual orientation was “not a disorder.” It was merely “a condition” – as neutral as left-handedness.

Hatred, Intimidation & Intolerance

This amounted to full approval of homosexuality. Those of us who did not go along with the political redefinition were soon silenced at our own professional meetings. Our lectures were cancelled inside academe and our research papers turned down in the learned journals. Worse actions followed in the culture at large. Television and movie producers began to do stories promoting homosexuality as a legitimate lifestyle.

For some years now, gays have been disrupting our meetings, shouting down people trying to deliver their scientific papers, threatening doctors like myself. The gay activists have a ferocious irrationality. They turn every scientific agreement into a political issue, which is all they can really do since the only science they have going for them is pseudoscience.” – Homosexuality: A Freedom Too Far pp.153-154.

A gay review board told Hollywood how it should deal with or not deal with homosexuality. Mainstream publishers turned down books that objected to the gay revolution. Gays and lesbians influenced sex education in our nation’s schools, and gay and lesbian libbers seized wide control of faculty committees in our nations’ colleges. State legislatures nullified laws against sodomy.

If the print media paid any attention at all, they tended to hail the gay revolution, possibly because many of the reporters on gay issues were themselves gay and open advocates for the movement. And those reporters who were not gay seemed too intimidated by groupthink to expose what was going on in their own newsrooms.

And now, what occurs to those of us who stand up and object? Gay activists have already anticipated that. They have created a kind of conventional wisdom: that we suffer from homophobia, a disease that has actually been invented by gays projecting their own fear on society. And we are bigots besides, because, they say, we fail to deal with gays compassionately.

Gays are now no different than people born black or Hispanic or physically challenged. Since gays are born that way and have no choice about their sexual orientation, anyone who calls homosexuality an aberration is now a bigot. Un-American, too. Astoundingly now, college freshmen come home for Thanksgiving to announce, “Hey, Mom! Hey, Dad! We’ve taken the high moral ground. We’ve joined the gay revolution.”

Brainwashed

My wife, Clare, who has an unerring aptitude for getting to the heart of situations, said one day recently in passing, “I think everybody’s being brainwashed.” That gave me a start. I know “brainwashing” is a term that has been used and overused. But my wife’s casual observation only reminded me of a brilliant tract I had read several years ago and then forgotten. It was called After the Ball: How America Will Conquer its Fear and Hatred of Gays in the 1990s, by Marshall Kirk and Hunter Madsen.

That book turned out to be the blueprint gay activists would use in their campaign to normalize the abnormal through a variety of brainwashing techniques once catalogued by Robert Jay Lifton in his seminal work, Thought Reform and the Psychology of Totalism: A Study of Brainwashing in China.

These activists got the media and the money to radicalize America-by processes known as desensitization, jamming and conversion. They would desensitize the public by selling the notion that gays were “just like everyone else.” This would make the engine of prejudice run out of steam, i.e., lull straights into an attitude of indifference.

They would jam the public by shaming them into a kind of guilt at their own “bigotry.” Kirk and Madsen wrote:

All normal persons feel shame when they perceive that they are not thinking, feeling, or acting like one of the pack. The trick is to get the bigot into the position of feeling a conflicting twinge of shame when his homo-hatred surfaces. Thus, propagandistic advertisement can depict homophobic and homo-hating bigots as crude loudmouths. It can show them being criticized, hated, shunned. It can depict gays experiencing horrific suffering as the direct result of homo-hatred-suffering of which even most bigots would be ashamed to be the cause.”

Finally, this was the process they called “conversion.” Kirk and Madsen predicted a mass public change of ideology would follow, even among bigots, “if we can actually make them like us.” They wrote, “Conversion aims at just this – conversion of the average American’s emotions, consciousness, and will, through a planned psychological attack, in the form of propaganda fed to the nation via the media.”

In the movie Philadelphia we see the shaming technique and the conversion process working at the highest media level. We saw Tom Hank’s character suffering (because he was gay and had AIDS) at the hands of bigots in his Philadelphia law firm. Not only were we ashamed of the homophobic behavior of the villainous straight lawyers in the firm; we felt nothing but sympathy for the suffering Hanks. (Members of the Motion Picture Academy felt so much sympathy they gave Hanks an Oscar.) Our feelings helped fulfil Kirk and Madsen’s strategy: “to make Americans hold us in warm regard, whether they like it or not.”

Few dared speak out against Philadelphia (1993) as an example of the kind of propaganda Kirk and Madsen had called for. By then, four years after the publication of the Kirk-Madsen blueprint, the American public had already been programmed. Homosexuality was now simply “an alternate lifestyle.”

Best of all, because of the persuaders embedded in thousands of media messages, society’s acceptance of homosexuality seemed one of those spontaneous, historic turnings in time-yes, a kind of conversion. Nobody quite knew how it occurred, but the nation had changed. We had become more “sophisticated”, more “loving toward all”, even toward those “afflicted” with the malady – excuse me, condition.

By 1992 the President of the United States said it was the time that people who were openly gay and lesbian should not be ousted from the nation’s armed forces. In 1993 the nation’s media celebrated a huge outpouring of gay pride in Washington, D.C. Television viewers chanted along with half a million marchers, “Two, four, six, eight! Being gay is really great.” We felt good about ourselves. We were patriotic Americans. We had abolished one more form of discrimination, wiped out one of society’s most enduring afflictions: homophobia. Best of all, we knew now that gay was good, gay was free.

Excuse me. Gay is not good. Gay is decidedly not free. How do I know this? For more than 40 years, I have been in solidarity with hundreds of homosexuals, my patients, and I have spent most of my professional life engaged in a kind of ‘pastoral care’ on their behalf.

But I do not help them by telling them they are fine, when they are not fine. Nor do I endorse their “new claim to self-definition and self-respect.”

Tell me: Have we dumped the idea that a man’s self-esteem comes from something inside himself (sometimes called character) and from having a good education, a good job and a good family – and replaced that notion with this, that he has an affinity to have sex with other men?

In point of fact, many of my patients had character; they had an education; they were respected ad men and actuaries and actors. But they were still in pain – for one reason and one reason alone. They were caught up in this compulsion to have sex with other men. They were not free. They were not happy. And they wanted to see if they could transform.

Over the years, I found that those of my patients who really wanted to transform could do so, by attaining the insight that comes with a good psychotherapy.

Others found other therapies that helped them get to the bottom of their compulsions, all of which involved high motivation and hard work. Difficult as their therapeutic trips were, hundreds and thousands of homosexuals transformed their ways. Many of my own formerly homosexual patients – about a third of them – are married today and happily so, with children. One-third may not sound like a very good average. But it is just about the same success rate you will find at the best treatment centers for alcoholics, like Hazelden in Minnesota and the Betty Ford Clinic in California.

Another third of my patients remain homosexual, but privately, not part of the gay scene. Now, after therapy, they still have gay relationships, but they have more control over their impulses because now they understand the roots of their need for gay sex. Some of these are even beginning to turn on to women. I add this third to my own success rate – so that I can tell people in all honesty that my batting average is 667 out of more than 1000 ‘at bats.’

Of course, I could bat 997 out of 1000 if I told all my patients in pain that their homosexuality was “a special call” and “a liberation.” That would endear me to everyone, but it would not help them. It would be a lie – despite recent pieces of pseudo-science bolstering the fantasy that gays are “born that way.”

The media put its immediate blessing on this “research,” but we were oversold. Now we are getting reports, even in such gay publications as The Journal of Homosexuality, that the gay-gene studies and the gay-brain studies do not stand up to critical analysis. (The author of one so-called “gay-gene theory” is under investigation by the National Institutes of Health for scientific fraud.)

Causes Of Homosexual Disorder

I was not surprised to hear this. My long clinical experience and a sizable body of psychoanalysis research tell me that most homosexuals are reacting, at an unconscious level, to something amiss with their earliest upbringing – overcontrolling mothers and abdicating fathers. Through long observation, I have also learned that the supposedly liberated homosexual is never really free. In his multiple, same-sex adventures, even the most effeminate gay was looking to incorporate the manhood of others, because he was in a compulsive, never-ending search for the masculinity that was never allowed to build and grow in early childhood.

Once my patients have achieved an insight into this dynamics – and realized there is no fault involved in their longtime and unconscious need – they have moved rather quickly on the road to recovery. Their consequent gratitude to me is overwhelming. And why shouldn’t it be? They were formerly caught up in compulsions they could not understand, compulsions they could not control, and which were hurting them. Now they are in charge of their own lives.

Their former promiscuity may have looked a lot like “liberation.” But it was not true freedom. It was a kind of slavery. And it was not a lifestyle. With the onset of AIDS, as the playwright and gay militant Larry Kramer said in a 1993 interview, it turned out to be a death style. I have had some patients tell me, “Doctor, if I weren’t in therapy, I’d be dead.”

[“In addition, child and youth sexual abuse is a major cause of homosexuality. A 1992 study of 1000 homosexuals found that 37% had been abused sexually by an older male.” – Socarides, Homosexuality: A Freedom Too Far, p. 88]

In War, First Casualty Is Truth

Testimonials from my recovered patients make me feel my work is worthwhile – despite regular demands from the gay rights community for my silence. What would they have me do? Pack my bags, find a new profession, lock up a lifetime of research and analysis, hide my truth under a bushel? It is not my psychoanalytic duty to tell people they are marvelous when they are out of control, much less ask disingenuous rhetorical questions like, “What kind of God would afflict people with an ‘objective disorder’ in the disposition of their hearts?

Giving God the credit for their gayness is a persistent refrain in much homosexual literature today, and I am saddened to see people of evident good will become unwitting parties to the blasphemy. Gays ascribe their condition to God, but He should not have to take that rap, any more than He should be blamed for the existence of other man-made maladies – like war, for instance, which has proven to be very unhealthy for humans and for all other living beings. God does not make war. Men do.

And, when homosexuality takes on all the aspects of a political movement, it, too, becomes a war, the kind of war in which the first casualty is truth, and the spoils turn out to be our own children. An exaggeration? Well, what are we to think when militant homosexuals seek to lower the age of consensual sexual intercourse between homosexual men and young boys to the age of 14 (as they did in Hawaii in 1993) or 16 (as they tried to do in England in 1994)? In the Washington March for Gay Pride in 1993, they chanted, “We’re here. We’re queer. And we’re coming after your children.”

What more do we need to know?

Does homosexuality threaten society? “Yes, and the most troubling to me is that we don’t know it yet. The American public doesn’t understand. For more than 40 years, the most basic institution in society has been under assault, while the nation’s traditional watchdog, the press, has been largely unconcerned. Sexual freedoms don’t give anyone the permission to destroy society. And that’s what the gay rights movement is doing, destroying society, in the name of a so-called freedom, a fictive freedom.” – Socarides, Homosexuality: A Freedom Too Far, pp.285-6.

 

yogaesoteric
June 10, 2024

 

Leave A Reply

Your email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish. Accept Read More