U.S. Supreme Court Protects Freemason Corporations and Big Pharma – Strikes Down Any Legal Opposition to Covid-19 “Vaccines” and Mandates

The Supreme Court has, once again, overturned lower court rulings that challenged the U.S. Federal Government’s role in mandating covid-19 bioweapon shots. The conservative majority, once again, ruled to protect the interests of Big Pharma and their immunity from being prosecuted in the U.S. judicial system, as it has done consistently since 2011, even though the pharmaceutical companies were not the defendants in these cases, but obviously benefited from this ruling.

The U.S. Supreme Court vacated the rulings in three lower court cases that had challenged the Biden administration’s federal covid-19 vaccine mandate for federal agency employees and military service personnel. The decision by the nation’s highest court to grant the Biden administration’s request to set aside the previous judicial rulings rejecting a federal covid vaccine mandate erases the legal precedent set by the lower courts.

The Appellate courts were split in their decisions about the covid vaccine mandate with those challenging the federal vaccine mandate succeeding in some cases and the Biden administration prevailing in other cases.

The Supreme Court majority instructed the lower court to dismiss the cases as moot after the vaccine mandates were rescinded. By wiping out the historical record, the Supreme Court has ensured that any legal challenges to future vaccine mandates will be cases of first impression without precedent.

For the first time (to my knowledge) since the covid-19 shots were approved in December of 2020, one of the nine Supreme Court Justices actually dissented in the majority court view on covid-19 vaccine mandates, and it was Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson, whom many claim is the most “liberal” judge currently on the bench.

The unsigned Supreme Court decision vacated the rulings against the mandates and ordered the lower court to vacate the preliminary injunction against the Biden administration as moot. Only Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson explained the decision. She agreed with the other justices that the lower court ruling should be vacated in one decision and dissented in the other two cases, explaining that the government failed to “establish equitable entitlement” to the vacatur.

In a recent case, Justice Jackson argued in a dissenting opinion that the Supreme Court may vacate a lower court’s rulings in a case that has become moot when an unfair result is faced by the losing party who can’t appeal the decision. She explained that it is an exceptional remedy that should only be granted when equity demands it.

Justice Jackson wrote: “Later, this Court clarified that this ‘Munsingwear vacatur’ remedy is available only in ‘extraordinary’ or ‘exceptional’ cases where a party meets the burden of demonstrating equitable entitlement to vacatur in an otherwise moot case.”

Justice Jackson further clarified that the court has long recognized that a Munsingwear vacatur is generally not a fair ruling when the party requesting the vacatur, “played a role in rendering the case moot.”

Justice Jackson wrote: “As a general matter, I believe that a party who claims equitable entitlement to vacatur must explain what harm—other than having to accept the law as the lower court stated it—flows from the inability to appeal the lower court decision.”

Ultimately, Justice Jackson did not find that the government, “established equitable entitlement” to the vacatur and was not warranted in two of the three cases.

While this may seem confusing to the conservative talking head “experts” who only started publishing opposition to vaccine mandates since 2021 when so many multitudes of people died or became crippled from the covid-19 bioweapon shots, those of us who have covered this issue for decades now fully understand that this is the norm, not the exception, where only liberals have ever dared to dissent to giving legal immunity for Big Pharma and their killer vaccines, while conservatives have always protected Wall Street and the bankers and corporations that run this country, all in the name of “free markets” and “capitalism.”

The Conservative Right is who supported the 1986 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act which gave pharmaceutical companies producing vaccines legal immunity in the courts from being sued due to injuries and deaths caused by their vaccine products. Conservative President Ronald Reagan signed that bill into law.

The law was challenged at the Supreme Court in 2011 with Bruesewitz v. Wyeth LLC, and the law was upheld as the Court ruled that vaccines are “unavoidably unsafe.” All of the conservatives on the bench sided with Big Pharma, including Justice Clarence Thomas and Justice Samuel Alito, considered “solid conservatives.”

And who wrote the dissenting opinion complaining that the Court was overstepping its bounds and ruling beyond what Congress intended by giving Big Pharma too much power? Liberal Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor. She was joined in dissent only by Ruth Bader Ginsburg, now deceased and no longer on the Court.

I am certainly not suggesting that liberals are anti-vaccine and anti-vaccine mandates, as they are not.

BOTH the liberal Democrat Party and the conservative Republican Party are solidly pro-vaccine, and cannot be (s)elected to office without supporting the vaccine industry.

The liberals, in general, believe in vaccines and vaccine mandates, with California Governor Gavin Newsom being the poster boy for protecting the vaccine industry and trying to criminalize any doctor who dares to write an exemption. If liberals oppose anything to do with vaccines, it is generally pointing out the crimes of Wall Street and how we need “safer vaccines.” (But keep taking them in the meantime.)

The conservatives, in general, believe that vaccines are necessary for life, and that even though some people do die and are crippled by them, that is just fine for the “greater good”, and that therefore pharmaceutical companies should not be blamed for their products even if they kill and maim people. Ronald Reagan would be the poster boy for the conservative vaccine position.

But both end up with the same result: MEDICAL TYRANNY.

So when you see an article from one of the newer false prophets in the alternative media stating that we can now “sue Pfizer for damages” or any other such nonsense, you can just ignore it and move on to the more important topics facing us today as WW III develops, because Corporate America OWNS the U.S. Supreme Court, who serve them, and not the public.

Author: Derek Knauss

yogaesoteric
February 19, 2024