Why is Lloyd’s of London excluding coverage for 5G?

How curious that Lloyds of London has excluded from their
policies any negative health effects caused by wi-fi technologies. Now, WHY would Lloyds leave
all that money on the table if these technologies are so safe? And, why are other insurance
companies following Lloyds’ lead?

If you think that following-the-money provides insights,
you’ll probably conclude that something very big is embedded in this decision.

The FCC and other government regulatory bodies, in collusion
with the big telecomm industries, are ferociously pushing smart meters, 5G and the Internet of
Things.

This roll-out is not only happening in the US, but all over
the world. The giant telecomms gush enthusiastically about how everything will be
connected.

We’re gonna have incredibly high-speed connectivity so
little girls and teens can, at supersonic speed, upload pics of their latest nail-polish jobs or
cute puppy videos to Facebook, Pinterest, etc., for their friends to gasp and giggle… and,
of course, click “like” and forward these to their friends… again, all at warp
speed.

It’s pretty clear that this whole “play” by
the giant telecomms is seen by them as a financial windfall – for them. And, via their
lobby groups, it’s seen as a windfall for all the politicians who support this agenda.
Politicians will be rewarded in the usual manner – pricey junkets to exotic places,
elegant dinners, campaign contributions and, of course, cushy “golden parachute”
jobs for those wi-fi supportive ex-politicians within the telecomm industries, or within their
lobby groups. In short, crony business as usual.

There’s a tiny but growing wrinkle in this rosy
scenario of sugar plums dancing in the heads of these telecomm leaders. Specifically, Lloyds of
London, one of the world’s premier insurance groups, is refusing to insure health claims
made against wireless technologies. And, other insurance companies are following Lloyd’s
lead in this.

If you follow the money, this is huge. After all, if these
wi-fi techno-toys are so safe, why is Lloyds leaving all this additional money on the table?

Well, Lloyd’s November 2010 Risk Assessment
Team’s Report gives us a solid clue: the report compares these wireless technologies
with asbestos, in that the early research on asbestos was “inconclusive” and only
later did it become obvious to anyone paying attention that asbestos causes cancer.

Keep in mind that Lloyd’s Risk Assessment study of
wi-fi was published over 9 years ago. Even back then, however, their Risk Assessment Team
was smart enough to realize that new evidence just might emerge showing that the various wi-fi
frequencies do cause illness. The result? Lloyds opted to exclude coverage for wi-fi related
illnesses.

And then, PG&E followed close on, slipping in its own
legal clauses (just as it was rolling out smart meters) that claim no liability for wi-fi
related health damage. The schools who opt to put in wi-fi are responsible, according to
PG&E, and any other organizations that opt to have PG&E put wi-fi in their buildings are
the responsible parties.

Today, many more recent peer-reviewed scientific studies show
a range of serious damage caused by these wi-fi frequencies. 5G brings a quantum leap in damage
– to DNA, to cell mitochondria, and much more.

Fortunately the global public is waking up. Conversations are
in the air about a global class-action lawsuit vs. the specific individuals worldwide who are
recklessly ignoring the Precautionary Principle in their promotion of advanced wi-fi technologies.
In part – goes the growing conversation – the lawsuit will be based on the Nuremburg
Principle of “informed consent.”

After all, what’s going on is a tiny handful of people
are pushing a huge experiment on what will be billions of people, all without have gotten their
informed consent and without insurance for those who are electromagnetically sensitive – a
growing group to watch. These unfortunate individuals are our “canaries” in the coal
mine.

Pay close attention. This whole issue is about to become a
whole lot more interesting.

Why Does Lloyd’s of London Exclude EMF Coverage
– EMF and Your Health Series #4 

After years of listening to cellular phone companies assure
us that WiFi and cell phone transmission is safe, why did Lloyds of London, a company who will
take risks when other insurers won’t exclude EMF injuries? Are they expecting an avalanche
of health claims related to EMF?

What Does Lloyd’s of London Know that We
don’t know?

Lloyd’s of London

Lloyd’s underwriters must be reading the research
findings from major publications like the BioInitiative Report. Included in this report are summaries of
research publications between 1990-2014 on the biological effects of radiofrequency and cell
phone radiation. The research news is chilling. Prolonged exposure to EMF causes cellular
malfunction, the formation of free radicals which then leads to a multitude of health issues.
There are many physicians who now believe EMF effects underlie all medical issues.

This report was created by 29 authors from around the world,
including 10 with medical degrees, 21 PhDs and 3 masters degrees. More than 100,000 people visit
their site annually (http://www.bioinitiative.org). No longer can public officials pretend EMF
is harmless. The cat is out of the bag!

Schools May Foot the Bill with WiFi
Injuries

Lloyds is dumping the blame back on schools. In their
insurance waiver, they state clearly that it is schools responsibility to inform parents and
teachers if WiFi is being installed in their schools.

Parents for Safe Schools and other groups want to know why
schools are not acknowledging the proven health effects of EMF? By allowing WiFi to be installed
in the schools, they are acting as if WiFi is a safe technology. For many individuals, animals
and plant life, serious health consequences occur with daily exposure to EMF.

Get Protection for Your Cell phone and WiFi &
Your Body

Multi-level protection it’s recommended.

First and foremost, protect your entire body from the harmful
effects of EMF and WiFi with a BioShield. There are also a number of ways you can dampen the
amount of radiation coming from your cell phone. Don’t wait until you have symptoms to get
protected. If you want to add EMF protection in your work and living spaces, there are several
options as well.

Lloyd’s Won’t Discuss Their New EMF
Exclusion Clause

One of the interpretations of this revealing statement is
that CFC Underwriting, and perhaps all of “the market” has realized that the time
has come to hedge against a future surge in “illnesses caused by continuous long-term
non-ionising radiation exposure i.e. through mobile phone usage.” Why else would they
refuse coverage “across the market as standard”?

Lloyds Refuse To Discuss Why They Excluded RF/EMF
Claims

“Unfortunately, Lloyd’s doesn’t have a
spokesperson who can talk about this so we’re going to have to decline.” Their
refusal to talk about the policy change would possibly “draw attention away from more
important aspects of the story.”

Phi Beta Iota: Despite of the items offered for protection
this is a huge problem that will not be solved by buying this kind of stuff. Everyone now
understands tobacco and asbestos risks. This is worse. This is also impacting on animals
including livestock and on plants including food.

yogaesoteric

January 24, 2020

 

Also available in: Français