Lab Grown Meat and Babies (2)
Read the first part of the article
When I lived in Luxor, Egypt during the “pandemic” the local villagers pooh-poohed covid. “We are very strong,” they said. “We can drink the water of the Nile. Covid will not harm us.”
It was true. I could never drink the water from the Nile. My insides couldn’t handle it and I would become terribly ill.
A fascinating article, Unlocking the Gut, tells us how bad that “sterile” environment actually is for us and how amazing our guts are:
“The gut microbiome is the most important scientific discovery for human healthcare in recent decades,” says James Kinross, a microbiome scientist and surgeon at Imperial College London. “We discovered it – or rediscovered it – in the age of genetic sequencing less than 15 years ago. The only organ which is bigger is the liver.” And, for all that the internet may be full of probiotic or wellness companies making big health claims about gut health, “We don’t really know how it works,” he says.
Your gut microbiome weighs about 2kg and is bigger than the average human brain. It’s a bustling community of trillions of bacteria, archaea, fungi and viruses, containing at least 150 times more genes than the human genome. We are filled to the brim with microbes, which form microbiomes on our skin, in our mouths, lungs, eyes, and reproductive systems. These have co-evolved alongside us since the beginning of human history. But the gut’s is the largest and most significant for our short- and long-term health. It is massively complex and its residents vary enormously from person to person.
Truly, our bodies are beautifully made. They are perfectly balanced with the environment around us. But we are destroying that balance.
How about lab grown meat, climate change and water pollution?
A 2019 BBC article says scientists warn that “Growing meat in the laboratory may do more damage to the climate in the long run than the cattle farms.”
Hold on. We have been assured that lab grown meat greatly reduces the methane released into the atmosphere by cows. Yet this is nothing more than another one of their cleverly worded half-truths.
Researchers from the Oxford Martin School looked at the long-term climate implications of cultured meat versus meat from cattle. The scientists say that previous studies had tended to look at the various emissions from cattle and converted them all to their carbon dioxide equivalent.
The team says this doesn’t give you the full picture as methane and nitrous oxide have different impacts on the climate.
“Per ton emitted, methane has a much larger warming impact than carbon dioxide. However, it only remains in the atmosphere for about 12 years, whereas carbon dioxide persists and accumulates for millennia,” said co-author Prof Raymond Pierrehumbert.
“This means methane’s impact on long-term warming is not cumulative and is impacted greatly if emissions increase or decrease over time.”
The scientists’ climate model found that in some circumstance and over the very long term, the manufacture of lab meat can result in more warming.
This is because the emissions from the lab are related to the production of energy which is almost entirely made up of carbon dioxide, which persists in the atmosphere for hundreds of years.
How about water pollution?
Studies have shown that artificial meat may result in the presence of organic or chemical molecule residues in water. This is because the growth process needs to “produce huge amounts of chemical and organic molecules, such as hormones, growth factors, to add to the culture medium to grow the meat” said Prof Jean-Francois Hocquette, at the French National Institute for Agricultural Research.
As if these problems weren’t enough Eco-Business warns us about the dangers of bacteria and plastic in lab grown meat:
“Animals have an immune system that naturally protects them against bacterial and other infections. This is not the case for cell culture, and in a nutrient-rich environment, bacteria multiply much faster than animal cells. To avoid producing a steak made up of more bacteria than meat, it is essential to avoid contamination, and that requires a high level of sterility.”
In the pharmaceutical industry, cell cultures are carried out in highly controlled and sanitized “clean rooms”. Sterility is most often guaranteed by using disposable plastic materials. This significantly reduces the risk of contamination, but generates plastic waste, whose level in ecosystems is already alarming. Some of the culture materials are made of stainless steel and can thus be steam sterilized or washed with detergents, but these treatments also have an environmental cost.
“While few studies have been done on the environmental impact of the pharmaceutical industry, the available data suggest that its carbon footprint may be 55% higher than that of the automotive industry.”
If this is all true and they know it, why are they so intent on making us eat this horrible stuff?
Because it desensitizes us to the next, much more important step in the quest for immortality. Making lab grown babies.
The underlying purpose of conditioning people to accept the process for making clean meat is so that people will accept essentially the same process for making “clean” babies. We are already being programmed to feel no shock or disgust at people cutting off body parts in order the change their sex. Surely making lab grown babies can’t be any worse.
While living in Egypt I was shocked to find out that female genital mutilation was still treated as normal, even healthy for a girl. I found it very hard to understand how anyone could believe this, especially mothers who had experienced it for themselves. How could they turn around and do it to their daughters? But they truly believed it was for their own good. Girls were unclean without female genital mutilation. Unsuitable for marriage.
The mutilation of our children for the sake of changing their sex is no different than female genital mutilation, in fact, it is worse.
At least girls who experience female genital mutilation can still bear children, most of them anyway. But children who are cut up and put on hormones will never be able to bear children. This is the goal. To make us sterile. How is it that people accept this obvious evil?
Sadly, most people will accept almost any abuse to their consciousness and bodies, if they have been brainwashed very carefully over a long period of time to believe it is for their “health and safety”.
Gabriel Mac is a psychically disturbed woman who mutilated herself in order to become a man. This idea that we can somehow change God’s natural order by cutting ourselves up is a lie of the elites to get ordinary citizens to allow themselves to be experimented on.
A USA Today article titled Babies without sex? encourages us to apply technology to our search for the perfect human.
“The ‘perfect’ race, ‘perfect’ baby, ‘perfect generation’ is not science fiction,” says Amrita Pande, a sociologist at the University of Cape Town in South Africa.
All of this explains the intense push for transgenderism we are experiencing now. This is why they shove down our throats their insistence that men can have babies and breast feed them.
This is why the statue above of a man attempting to breastfeed a baby has been placed outside of The Gender Museum in Denmark, which was previously known as the Women’s Museum. It is why the insulting advertisements of a flat chested male virtual communication networks star named Dylan Mulvaney can model Nike sports bras, even though he has no idea what it means to have to wear a bra to support breasts while doing sports.
It’s complete madness. And it’s meant to be that way. If the powers that be can convince ordinary people to accept insanity as normal, then it will be that much easier to get them to accept the horrors of experimentation in the elites’ quest to gain immortality for themselves.
The new promise for achieving lab grown babies is called In Vitro Gametogenesis (IVG):
“IVG technology would allow same-sex couples to have children who are biologically related to both of them; allow single persons to procreate without the genetic contribution of another person; and facilitate ‘multiplex’ parenting, where groups of more than two people procreate together, producing children who are the genetic progeny of them all. IVG could also make prenatal selection a much more refined and comprehensive process than it is today, allowing for the selection of embryos on the basis of multiple factors.”
Most importantly for the transhumanists, IVG would enable the possibility to ‘perfect reproduction’, by screening out diseases and inauspicious personality traits. Naturally, the ethicists are once again concerned. But that won’t stop anything. Eugenics has never been so lauded, without anyone actually using that dirty word.
The usual cast of billionaires is funding these efforts. An MIT article How Silicon Valley hatched a plan to turn blood into human eggs, tells us that:
“Silicon Valley billionaires including Sam Altman, the CEO of OpenAI and former president of Y Combinator; Jaan Tallinn, one of the founders of Skype; and Blake Borgeson, a cofounder of Recursion Pharmaceuticals, are investing in a company called Conception, is the largest commercial venture pursuing what’s called in vitro gametogenesis, which refers to turning adult cells into gametes—sperm or egg cells.”
Matt Krisiloff is the young man who created Conception around this technology.
Krisiloff isn’t a biologist, but he knew theoretically that a cell from a man could be turned into an egg. Being gay, he had an added incentive to make this take place. If it were ever possible, two men could have a child that was genetically related to both.
Just like we have found with lab grown meat, what do you suppose is required for the process of making eggs from stem cells? Human fetal tissue. The horrors of what occurs to cow fetuses can be applied to human fetuses. But it’s all worth it for the exciting advances we can achieve.
Conception opens the door not only for same sex-reproduction, but perhaps even for one individual—or four—to generate an offspring.
Because the technology could turn eggs into a manufactured resource, it could supercharge the path to designer children. If doctors can make a thousand eggs for a patient, they’ll also be able to fertilize all of them and test to find the best resulting embryos, scoring their genes for future health or intelligence. Such a laboratory process would also permit unfettered genetic editing with DNA engineering tools such as CRISPR. As Conception put it in a pitch sent out earlier this year, the company anticipates that artificial eggs could allow “wide-scale genomic selection and editing in embryos.”
Like all ambitious businessmen who dream of becoming the billionaire at the top of the heap, Krisiloff wants to make money—and lots of it. He wants to produce a human egg and a patented process for making them. He doesn’t see ethics or “complex liabilities, like ‘who is to blame if any eventual baby isn’t normal’,” as problems. That’s all par for the course. No great breakthrough in science has ever come without challenges.
“Hard scientific discoveries can come about faster in commercial settings,” Krisiloff says. “There could be a lot more funding if people turned research organizations into for-profit entities. I am a big believer in more basic research going on in a company context.”
Why do people put up with these obvious lies and the pompous billionaires who spread them?
Because most folks would rather trust the lies of billionaires than admit the truth of the old stories that we once instinctually knew were true. Most of us don’t want to bow to God’s authority any more than the billionaires do. We don’t want to admit the worst of all; that if we had been in that Garden of Eden, we would have done the exact same as Adam and Eve. We would have rebelled, and it would have been our own fault. We have all sinned and fallen “short of the glory of God.” We are all responsible for our own lives and the decisions we make.
But surely, the elites want to win in the end. Fake meat, synthetic meat, test tube meat, franken-meat, clean meat – apply the same words to human babies and the horror of it all becomes clear.
Fake babies, synthetic babies, test tube babies, franken-babies, clean babies.
If ever there was a time when we needed to open our mouths and proclaim the truth, that time is now. People always say to me, but what can we do? Fearlessly expose these lies to the people around you. Send them this essay. Maybe they won’t read it. Maybe they won’t listen. But keep on telling them anyway. And even more importantly, set an example by the healthy life you live. Show them by your actions that you aren’t messing around. You aren’t a hypocrite. You live the words you say.
Author: Karen Hunt
yogaesoteric
July 6, 2023