States push back against mRNA injections, announce bans on deadly shots

Three U.S. states – Kentucky, Montana and Idaho – are leading a nationwide push to ban or pause the use of mRNA vaccines.

The Bluegrass State introduced a bill that would ban the administration of any human gene therapy product until July 2035. Included in this 10-year ban are mRNA vaccines. But Kentucky isn’t alone in this pushback against the injections, as Montana and Idaho have followed suit.

In Montana, House Bill 371 seeks to classify the administration of mRNA vaccines as a misdemeanor punishable by a $500 fine per incident and a review of the offender’s professional license. State Rep. Greg Kmetz (Republican), the bill’s sponsor, argues that mRNA vaccines have caused “enormous numbers of deaths, disabilities and serious adverse events.”

Meanwhile, Idaho’s proposed Senate Bill 1036 would impose a 10-year moratorium on mRNA vaccines and other gene-based therapies similar to that of Kentucky’s. The measure is named after Doug Cameron, a rancher who reportedly suffered severe injuries after receiving a Wuhan coronavirus (covid) vaccine.

State Sen. Brandon Shippy (Republican), the bill’s sponsor, emphasized the need for caution and transparency. “All gene therapy products being used for immunization should be put on hold until we can determine their safety and efficacy,” he remarked.

The push to ban mRNA vaccines is not limited to state legislatures, with grassroots efforts at the county level gaining momentum. Idaho’s Boise and Washington counties have passed resolutions advising against the use of mRNA vaccines, particularly for children. Similar initiatives are underway in Iowa, South Carolina, Texas and Washington, where local officials are considering resolutions to warn citizens about the potential dangers of these vaccines.

The dark side of mRNA vaccines, and why they should be banned

The mRNA vaccines, particularly those developed for covid, pose significant risks to public health. The mRNA technology uses synthetic genetic material to instruct cells to produce a protein that triggers an immune response. Despite claims of these kinds of vaccines being “safe and effective,” reports of adverse events including severe injuries and deaths, show that these vaccines may not be as safe as claimed.

Epidemiologist Nicolas Hulscher of the McCullough Foundation, a vocal critic of mRNA vaccines, believes these state and local efforts could force the federal government to reconsider its stance. He and others argue that the growing body of evidence linking mRNA vaccines to adverse events – including cancers, miscarriages and abnormal bleeding – warrants immediate action.

The debate over mRNA vaccines is not just a scientific or medical issue, it’s a deeply political one. The push to ban these vaccines is about reclaiming personal freedom and resisting government overreach. The federal government’s handling of the covid pandemic through mandates and coercive policies eroded public trust.

 

yogaesoteric
February 25, 2025

 

Leave A Reply

Your email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish. Accept Read More