The history of population control is important

Reducing global population has been a consistent goal of the ruling class for centuries. While many support the abstract idea of population control, no one wants to volunteer to be the ones who are culled. The business of population control has hence been a very messy subject.

When the covid vaccine program began many people suspected the covid vaccines would have an “unexpected” side effect of reducing fertility. Early in their development, Mike Yeadon (and others) at great personal risk publicly warned regulators of a clear fertility danger inherent to the vaccine (found in section IX of their petition).

Subsequent regulatory document leaks from the European FDA revealed Pfizer exempted themselves from testing the key areas of concern (infertility, autoimmunity and cancer) in animals. This highly unusual moved further suggested serious problems existed in these three areas (as you can’t find something if you don’t test for it).

Despite repeated denials, signs of each of these key complications from the vaccine had emerged. While we do not have every piece of the puzzle – there are likely many “population control initiatives” we’ve never heard of – we know enough to paint a clear picture of this dirty business.

The first half of this article will lay out the historical precedent of using any means necessary to reduce the population, while the second part will examine how this has been attempted with vaccinations.

Beliefs of population control

There are three overlapping schools of thought that have created the zealous belief in a need for population control.

Many governments, especially those in the East, have adopted the viewpoint that periodic wars are necessary for the stability of the society. This viewpoint primarily arises from social instability caused by too many young adult males in the state coupled with the issues that occur when there is insufficient food available to the population. In turn, many wars have been fought specifically for this reason. This is a common theme in China, as they have observed over the centuries the one aspect that will create rebellions are famines.

Following World War 2, the Western ruling elite came to a consensus that the war approach was no longer tenable due to the extreme collateral infrastructure and environmental damage modern weaponry (i.e. nukes) created. There are only two exceptions to this rule:

– wars in third-world countries lacking modern weaponry, where collateral damage was inconsequential to first-world countries

– talks that occurred within the Chinese military leadership, but have so far not materialized, over starting a war with India so both countries could mutually alleviate their challenging population burden. For context, China has attempted population control with their “one-child” policy, but it has been met with mixed success and widespread social resistance.

The alternative to war is a multipronged attack that seeks every possible avenue to reduce fertility and accelerate aging, which many argue is the more humane option of the two. One of the curious facts observed over the decades is how frequently an odd policy or environmental agent always seems to converge on the common pathway of reducing population. Once or twice, you can write it up as a coincidence, but at a certain point, you have to wonder if it is all intentional.

When studied the early history of infectious diseases, one of the most striking aspects was the absolute squalor the serfs were forced into as the feudal lords kicked them off the land to live in the early cities. It was much worse than most people of this modern era can even conceive of.

When first learned of this, some guessed this is necessary to have been viewed as a necessary trade off by the European rulership to support the Industrial Revolution, which was vital for national development. After learned about the Malthusian philosophy, some realized the abhorrent living situations was likely the goal in of itself.

In 1798, Rev. Thomas R Malthus published the influential work “An Essay on the Principle of Population”, which argued that human populations tend to increase at a geometrical (exponential) rate, but the means of subsistence (food) grows at only an arithmetic (linear) rate. “The power of population is indefinitely greater than the power of the earth to produce subsistence for man,” according to Malthus, who therefore believed the standard of living of the masses could not be improved without the checks of war, famine, or disease. In their absence, population would increase by a geometric rate and lead to a catastrophic “Malthusian” food supply collapse.

While there are numerous errors in his theory, Malthus was appointed to multiple important positions, and his ideas appear to have gradually become a prevailing conviction among members of the ruling classes in the 19th century. These ideas also influenced other key figures, such as Charles Darwin as he created his theory of evolution and natural selection.

Numerous groups were founded over the decades, which emphasized birth control and increasing mortality of the poor. These groups included Dr. George Drysdale’s Elements of Social Science in 1854, the Malthusian League in 1877, and Margret Sanger’s National Birth Control League in 1915, which became the Planned Parenthood Federation of America in 1942. Initially these groups were domestic, but gradually they became global where they tied international aid and development to population control measures.

The Malthusian and Darwinian ideals gradually gave birth to Social Darwinism and Eugenics, which were widely adopted by the ruling elite. Social Darwinism argued that class divisions were the will of nature and that this form of natural selection, rather than being evil, was necessary. The most extreme version of this ideology, eugenics, appears to have arisen from two key factors:

1. The tribal nature of human beings and the tendency to view all other tribes as inferior (the ruling class felt this way towards the poor).
2. The advances of society were making it possible for many of the weaker members of society, who previously would have died off, to survive long enough to reproduce and, over time, significantly weaken the gene pool.

Eugenics in turn advocated preventing those who were less “fit” from breeding. This has been responsible for horror upon horror since its inception, and it provided the theoretical foundation for why, among other aspects, the Nazis forcibly sterilized the mentally ill. In many cases, programs with more immediate results were also implemented. While most are aware of the millions executed by Hitler, other dictators such as Pol-Pot, Joseph Stalin, and Mao Zedong arguably did even worse.

A lead researcher in this field coined the term “democide” and estimates these governments executed approximately 150 million people in the previous century. When the Nazis eventually were tried at Nuremberg for their crimes against humanity, few know that that many cited the fact similar actions were first conducted by the “Great United States” in their defense.

For example, consider one of the more problematic Supreme Court rulings, Jacobson vs. Massachusetts. It held that Jacobson, who having previously suffered a severe adverse reaction from a smallpox vaccine which led him to contest Massachusetts’ smallpox booster mandate, did not have the right to refuse forced vaccination. Following this ruling, Virginia passed a law authorizing the involuntary sterilization of people the deemed to be “feeble-minded,” or mentally ill. Citing Jacobson vs. Massachusetts, a Supreme Court Justice wrote: “The principle that sustains compulsory vaccination is broad enough to cover cutting the Fallopian tubes.” By 1930, dozens of states were forcing women to undergo involuntary sterilization, and more than 60,000 American women were sterilized by the government against their will.

While books could be written on the horrors of eugenics, the key point to remember is that the discipline never disappeared and has enjoyed sustained support from the upper class. Did you know that the creators of the dangerous AstraZeneca covid vaccine – which has been promoted as the vaccine of choice for the third world – have extensive ties to major eugenics organizations? Many wish that was a making up story.

One of the major shifts that had appeared within these movements has been who they target. Until recently, they seemed to be racist against specific sets of people, primarily those of color. Planned Parenthood’s founder, for example, wanted to reduce the black birth rate, but many were far worse. Eugenics was also conducted by whites against other whites, however it typically was due to class differences or perceived genetic quality rather than race (the only exception we can think of was the British Empire towards the Irish).

This all seems to have shifted recently to where the healthy and affluent white members of society are now being targeted too. As this is a new change, much of the western population has been caught off guard, and there has been a much higher covid vaccination uptake in whites than other races who remember being targeted by their government.

Governmental planning for population control

Numerous documents and conferences (a few of which will be discussed) suggest population control has also been a priority for both national governments and international governments. The infamous 1966 Iron Mountain Report is the most well-known example, and while it echoes many of the themes laid out in this article, there are serious questions regarding its authenticity.

As such, this Report contained the argument that the need for war could be replaced by having the population gradually only become able to reproduce through artificial fertilization. This is a theme echoed in many other places, such as Aldous Huxley’s novel “Brave New World”. While it is difficult to estimate precisely, the use of in-vitro fertilization (IVF) has steadily increased and is expected to continue to do so: the CDC estimates its use has “more than doubled” in the last decade. There are numerous reports that since the vaccines have launched, covid has significantly increased the need for and difficulty of IVF.

For those interested in medicine’s monopolization of the pregnancy process and the tragic harm it creates, “The Business of Being Born” (which can be viewed online) and Robert S. Mendelsohn’s writings on the subject are two of the best resources which can be found on the subject.

National Security Study Memorandum 200 is the most well-known authentic government document advancing a systematic population control agenda. Written in 1974 by Kissinger during Nixon’s presidency (and unclassified decades later), it identified third world population growth as a critical national security issue for the United States and outlined a variety of steps to combat it.

Population control has also been discussed within the public media. The 9/4/94 Associated Press article “Compromise near on Population Control Plan” stated:

“On the eve of the opening of the United Nations Population Conference in Cairo, a U. S. official said that a compromise on the sensitive issues of abortion and birth control was “very close.”

During three preparatory conferences, delegates from 170 countries agreed on more than 90 percent of the plan for controlling population.”

The confidential Cobden Club Memo Mandate for Reduction of Existing World Population is a now accessible document allegedly presented to a group of international representatives shortly before the 1992 United Nations Conference on Environment and Development, which focused on managing the consequences of overpopulation.

This memo referenced many other projects for population reduction, stressed the urgency of globally implementing population reduction, and advocated having each member of the UN security council (the primary military powers) force the rest of the world into submission to this agenda.

While the actual summit occurred (this is where Agenda 21 was formulated), like the Report from Iron Mountain and many other documents in this genre, we are ultimately unsure if this document is authentic, which is part of what makes researching these subjects so challenging.

Mechanisms of population control

Population control measures typically follow one of three approaches:

1. Create social changes that discourage having children.
2. Introduce an environmental factor that decreases male testosterone and sperm viability.
3. Directly sterilize (or give birth control to) women of childbearing age.

Social Approaches:

The first approach is a politically touchy subject. Here are a few quick examples:

• Second Wave Feminism transitioned a significant portion of the population from raising families at home to a sterile existence working outside the home. Second Wave Feminism was essential for US and corrected many serious injustices towards women, but there is also some evidence to suggest the movement was hijacked to help the upper class by removing women from a motherly role and doubling the workforce. For example a pioneer of this movement, Gloria Steinem who strongly discouraged being a housewife, was also a CIA operative.
• The societal messages around dating have been shifted from romantic bonding (which produces children) to a hookup culture without intimacy.
• Women are strongly encouraged to pursue a career before having children or a family, which frequently results in them missing the opportunity to do so.
• Previously rare sexual pairings that either cannot or are unlikely to produce children are actively encouraged by the media and corporatocracy.
• Alternatives to relationships, such as computer or video addictions, are strongly encouraged in society.
• Economically, it has become more and more difficult for persons to afford to have children.
• Having children is labeled as environmentally destructive and hence strongly discouraged.
• Having children is now characterized as a major obstacle to spiritual growth and self-development.
• The widespread support and social validation for having children has gradually diminished.

As the years have gone by, fewer and fewer people are interested in having children, and some combination of the above reasons are typically cited. People who have children have a much deeper sense of happiness than those who do not, despite media messages suggesting the opposite.

The idea of population control or mass extinction for the greater good has also been increasingly observed within the media. “Avengers Endgame” was the top grossing film of 2019, and it was so heavily promoted throughout the media that it accomplished the unique feat of almost doubling the revenue of the runner-up. Many have often wondered whether this was deliberate on account of the message the movie spread in the months immediately preceding Covid-19 of the need to be evil and eliminate half the population for the “greater good”.

 

yogaesoteric
October 17, 2022