The Importance of Truth (1)
It is not my intention to unsettle those persons unwilling to disturb their cerebral repose by confronting uncomfortable facts, thus I forewarn this article may cause cognitive dissonance, which results from the consciousness’ inability to hold two conflicting beliefs simultaneously. However, truth is vitally important and such topics need to be addressed.
Modern society has been subjected to a network of lies and false narratives so pervasive it has become the accepted ‘norm’. However, the lies are certainly not accepted by all people. We have all been subjected to fake science and related ideologies that we were ‘born into’, and ‘educated’ to accept, and have thus been living in a ‘systematized delusion’.
A ‘systemized delusion’ is defined as “one based on a false premise, pursued by a logical process of reasoning to an insane conclusion; there being one central delusion, around which other aberrations of the thinking converge” (McClintock). Truth is important for without it we are lost, adrift, and rudderless in a sea of lies. If left to condition you, such fake narratives are going to send you sailing in the wrong direction. The importance of truth should not be discounted. All there is rests upon truth, and only by truth can the world be sustained.
“No face which we can give to a matter will stead us so well at last as the truth. This alone wears well. Say what you have to say, not what you ought. Any truth is better than make-believe.” – Henry David Thoreau
“Rather than love, than money, than fame, give me truth. I sat at a table where were rich food and wine in abundance, and obsequious attendance, but sincerity and truth were not; and I went away hungry from the inhospitable board.” – Henry David Thoreau
“As if there was safety in stupidity alone.” – Henry David Thoreau
“I do not know what I may appear to the world; but to myself I seem to have been only like a boy, playing on the sea shore, finding a smoother pebble or a prettier shell, whilst the great ocean of truth lay all undiscovered before me.” – Sir Isaac Newton
The book Godless Fake Science demonstrates that much of the scientific narrative we have been taught from our school days onwards, is based on falsehood, and that the institution of ‘science’ itself has in many ways been hijacked by financial interests seeking to advance their own narrative and agenda. Modern science, like economics, banking, and corporate-owned mass media, has become part of a paradigm borne by deceit, and corporate greed; and which paints God out of the picture.
The manipulation and fraudulent distortion of scientific and economic data has long been used by the ‘new world order crowd’ to promote false and deceptive agendas. These agendas stem from the top echelons of the international political, mega-corporate and financial system, and those few so-called financial elites who control it. These agendas also include bogus science posing as fact, which is then utilised to promote an ulterior agenda. The financialists that have a controlling interest in the world banking and corporate system have been able to do so as they have owned and controlled the money creation process itself for the past century. By fully controlling the source of money creation and distribution the money-masters have been able to fund any agenda they wish and, similarly, defund anything they wish.
“Give me control of a nation’s money supply and I care not who makes its laws.” – Mayer Amschel Rothschild
The money creation process was hijacked by this same line of corporate mechanics in the Federal Reserve coup of 1913, and has been under private control ever since. See the book Demonic Economics and the Tricks of the Bankers for more details. There is ‘nothing new under the sun’, certain narcissistic folks are always seeking power and control. The unpalatable reality is that both economic and scientific tricks are used by this new world order Davos group, and their cohorts at the UN, WEF, and WHO, etc., to increase their own economic power/control over world society. Communist control ideology; monopoly capitalism; along with corporate, banking, political, and media control, are the everyday tools of this group. Thus, society has become inundated with Godless fake science and subversive ideologies that serve an ulterior agenda.
Fake Climate Science
An example of a false scientific narrative is that CO2, or methane emissions from livestock, such as cows, causes climate. The cult of ‘manmade climate change’ is a media and UN politically-promoted ‘ideology’, that is used for a wider agenda of control. Manmade climate change from CO2 emissions or methane from livestock, is not based in fact and has hijacked real environmentalism. Note the video presentations by renowned scientists on the Irish Climate Science Forum website:
“In the long history of the Earth there has been almost no correlation between climate and CO2. The paloeclimate record shows unambiguously that CO2 is not a control knob, the narrative is absurd. It gives governments the power to control the energy sector. For about 33 years, many of us have been battling against the climate hysteria. There were more important leading people who were objecting to it, they were unfortunately older and by now most of them dead.
Elites are always searching for ways to advertise their virtue and assert their authority. They believe they are entitled to view science as a source of authority rather than a process, and they try to appropriate science, suitably and incorrectly simplified, as the basis for their movement. Movements need goals, and these goals are generally embedded in legislation. The effect of legislation long outlasts the alleged science. As long as scientists are rewarded for doing so they are unlikely to oppose the exploitation of science.” – Richard L Lindzen, Professor Emeritus of Atmospheric Sciences, MIT
Via decades of climate propaganda, the financialists behind all the CO2 hoax have misdirected the ‘educated’ (indoctrinated) masses into a doomsday frenzy. For example, a neighbour, a nice woman, will now not even burn wood logs in her stove to heat her house, for fear of climate change, and criticizes others who do so; and a local grocery store manager, a man in his 50s, confided to me he was in severe anxiety about the climate disaster.
I do not deny the climate is changing for it appears to have always gradually changed naturally in its own cycle, however, the reality is carbon emissions or methane from livestock, such as cows, are not the cause. Richard L Lindzen, Professor Emeritus of Atmospheric Sciences at MIT summarises the battle against the climate hysteria as follows:
“The ‘educated’ class is most vulnerable to the absurd narrative. When we talk about science we are talking to people who have no idea even of the vocabulary, the educated masses are aware of their scientific ignorance and this leaves them very insecure. They need simple narratives it allows them to believe that they actually do understand the science, and as we see today with climate it allows them to become ignorantly proud of their alleged accomplishment. The situation is compounded when it comes to climate where most scientists are also ignorant, but where their support for the narrative comforts the non-scientists. I suspect this elite (educated class) feels they need to show they too have met challenges even if the challenges are purely imaginary, this seems particularly true of young people, most ordinary people don’t have these problems.
Our task is to show the relevant people, the people who make decisions for us, the political people, the overall stupidity of this issue rather than punching away at the details. It is likely that we have to capitalise on the insecurity of the educated elite and make them look silly instead of superior and virtuous. We need to remember that they are impervious to real science unless it is reduced to their level. Whether we are capable of doing so is an open question.” – Richard L Lindzen, Professor Emeritus of Atmospheric Sciences, MIT
Victims of the climate catastrophe narrative believe that “on the ground, more and more people are dying from heat wave flooding, wildfires and communities are being wiped out by rising seas”. Dr Nils-Axel Mörner, a former Committee Chairman at the original UN Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), and former head of the Paleo Geo-physics and Geo-dynamics department in Stockholm, has exposed this narrative as false. Dr Mörner resigned in protest of the lies and fake science contained in the UN IPPC documents. Yet none of this information is provided to students in the universities of the world today, not to mention on television. He states:
“I was the chairman of the only international committee on sea levels changes and as such a person I was elected to be the expert reviewer on the (UN IPPC) sea levels chapter. It was written by 38 persons and not a single one was a sea level specialist. I was shocked by the low quality, it was like a mediocre student’s paper. I went through it and showed them that it was wrong and wrong and wrong – in one case I said ‘look at your own diagram – it shows that what you are writing is wrong’, and what did they do? They took off their diagram and left the writing!
The scientific truth is on the side of the skeptics. When you come to the idea of ‘97% of scientists agree’ – this is just a lobbying trick, 97%. I have thousands of high ranked scientists all over the world who agree that NO, CO2 is not the driving mechanism and that everything is exaggerated. There is no way that sea levels can rise by two meters by the beginning of the next century, this is against physics.
In the field of physics, 80 to 90% of physicists know that the CO2 hypothesis is wrong – amongst geologists and astronomers 80% know the hypothesis is wrong. Of course, metrologists believe in this because that is their own profession – they live on it. I suspect that behind-the-scenes promoters have an ulterior motive. It’s a wonderful way of controlling taxation that is controlling people.”
Professor John R. Christy, Director of Atmospheric and Earth Sciences, University of Alabama, has provided detailed analysis of climate data, and has also shattered the narrative that “on the ground, more and more people are dying”. I summarise the main points from his analysis below:
“Temperatures were higher in the 1930s than today. The number of major tornadoes between 1954 and 1986 averaged 56 per year, but between 1987 and 2020 the average was only 34 per year; between 1895 and 2015 on average there has been no change in the number of very wet days per month, and no change in the number of very dry days per month, and the 20 driest months were before 1988. Between 1950 and 2019 the percentage of land area experiencing droughts has not increased globally – the trend is flat; the incidence of wildfires in North America between 1600 and 2000 has decreased substantially. Antarctic sea ice coverage has increased up to 2014, then dropped for 3 years, and has been increasing significantly again since 2017; there is much more sea ice today than there was 2,000 years ago, coverage has been dropping in recent years in the artic.
Sea levels rose 12.5 cm per decade for 8,000 years and then it levelled off, now it rising only 2.5 cm per decade. Worrying about 30 cm rise in sea level in a decade is ridiculous! In a hurricane the east coast of the U.S. gets a 20-foot rise in 6 hours, so a 30 cm rise will be easily handled! Climate related deaths have plummeted; hundreds of thousands of people used to die from hurricanes now it’s just dozens.”
There are tons of evidence of the fake pandemic; and details research indicate that a so-called covid-19 virus does not actually exist, and that the entire discipline of virology took a wrong turn (to put it kindly) in 1950s. Countless millions of viruses exist in nature that have no detrimental effect to us. The research of Dr. Stefan Lanka, amongst other scientists and doctors, indicates pathogenic viruses that cause disease simply do not exist. Virus pandemics are a mega-corporate scam. Toxins are a cause of disease in the body – is it not time that modern-day vaccine adjuvants containing substances, such as the toxin aluminium, came under closer scrutiny?
Fake Science in the Biopharmaceutical Sector
Another area rife with fake science is the Big Pharma and vaccine industry. Are you aware that Big Pharma has paid more than $35 billion in criminal penalties for falsifying science? An area where the bio-pharmaceutical companies can be sued is for falsifying science. For example, Glaxo, Pfizer, Johnson and Johnson, and Merck have paid $35 billion in criminal penalties for lying to doctors, for defrauding and falsifying science, and for the deaths of hundreds of thousands of Americans, due detrimental aspects and side effects of their drugs and health products.
Furthermore, whistleblowers have informed us that the pharmaceutical industry routinely modifies trial results to secure official approval for a new drug. In such instances, the motivation is profit. In 2015, Dr Richard Horton, then editor-in-chief of the Lancet, the prestigious medical journal, made the following observation:
“A lot of what is published is incorrect. This symposium – on the reproducibility and reliability of biomedical research, touched on one of the most sensitive issues in science today. Much of the scientific literature, perhaps half, may simply be untrue. Afflicted by studies with small sample sizes, tiny effects, invalid exploratory analyses, and flagrant conflicts of interest, together with an obsession for pursuing fashionable trends of dubious importance, science has taken a turn towards darkness. As one participant put it, ‘poor methods get results’. The apparent endemicity of bad research behaviour is alarming… scientists too often sculpt data to fit their preferred theory of the world. Or they retrofit hypotheses to fit their data.”
An area of note is in relation to cholesterol, and statin drugs, the so-called miracle drugs widely prescribed to lower blood cholesterol levels. Statins are perhaps the most profitable drug in the history of medicine. According to Dr. Malcolm Kendrick:
“The protection provided by statins is so small as to be not worth bothering about for most men and all women. Statins have many more side effects than has been admitted and their advocates should be treated with skepticism due to their links with the drugs’ manufacturers.”
Neo-Darwinian Evolution – Falsehood Posing as Fact
Another prime example of Godless scientific falsehood posing as fact is the atheistic theory of neo-Darwinian evolution that has been incessantly promoted since the 1850s. This still continues today, despite the fact that, in 2008, over 700 scientists, all with doctorate degrees, made a joint declaration titled A Scientific Dissent from Darwinism, stating:
“We are skeptical of claims for the ability of natural selection and random mutation to account for the complexity of life. Careful examination of the evidence for Darwinian theory should be encouraged.”
There is comprehensive evidence and testimony that Darwin’s theory has no evidential basis; and there is thorough research of scientists and biologists that have exposed these flaws. Yet, the theory is being taught by government education systems worldwide to billions of children and students, in schools and universities, and to the rest of us via nature documentaries, movies, etc., on TV. The reality is our ancestors were not monkeys. If you want to believe your ancestors were monkeys you have every right to do so, but it just isn’t true. You have been brainwashed over decades by the education (indoctrination) and media system. You can unlock yourself from that psychic zoo at any time. The groups behind the historical promotion and dissemination of this fake scientific doctrine are steeped in atheistic ideology.
“Scientists did accept the theory before it was rigorously tested. Evolutionary science became the search for confirming evidence, and the explaining away of negative evidence.” – Phillip Johnson, Berkely law professor
“Evolution became in a sense a scientific religion. Almost all scientists have accepted it and many are prepared to ‘bend’ their observations to fit with it. To my reasoning, the theory does not stand up at all.” – Lipson HS, A Physicist Looks at Evolution, Physics Bulletin, vol.31 (May 1980), p.138.
Read the second part of the article
Author: Mark Keenan (former scientist at the UK Government Dept. of Energy and Climate Change, and at the United Nations Environment Division)
September 23, 2023