Do All USA Federal Agencies Mess With Science?
Where are mainstream media news reports about a “principle NOAA scientist” and whistleblower, Dr. John Bates, indicating the 2015 NOAA paper “Pausebuster” based its claims on ‘unverified’ and experimental dataset measuring land temperatures?
According to the LondonDailyMail.com, “on a then newly issued sea-temperature dataset that is now to be withdrawn and replaced because it exaggerates both the scale and speed of warming.ˮ
“Pausebuster” was published by Science in June of 2015, just six months before the UN Paris climate-change conference, which led to UK’s David Cameron and the USA’s Barack Obama signing what’s been called the “Paris Agreement On Climate Change”.
However, allegations were surfacing in 2017 about NOAA breached its own rules regarding scientific integrity. Oh no! Not another federal government agency acting like the CDC and FDA pushing pseudoscience? Where’s Congress? Believe it or not, members were going to do something about that one, but not vaccine’s mischief science and fraud!
Republican Lamar Smith, who chairs the influential House of Representatives Committee on Science, Space and Technology, announced the inquiry last year in a letter to Benjamin Friedman, acting chief of the organisation at the heart of the MoS disclosures, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA).
Climatism very interestingly published a statement made in 1960 by former President Dwight D Eisenhower, which seemingly amounts to either pure prophecy or precognition:
“The prospect of domination of the nation’s scholars by Federal employment, project allocation, and the power of money is ever present and is gravely to be regarded.
Yet in holding scientific discovery in respect, as we should, we must also be alert to the equal and opposite danger that public policy could itself become the captive of a scientific-technological elite.ˮ
According to some, nothing can define better what’s happening in the XXI century in the fields of medicine, science, technology, business and industry, plus government agencies at all levels, than what President Eisenhower foresaw 57 years ago.
You name it: microwave tech, cell tower and 5GHz and higher; Big Pharma and pharmaceuticals, vaccinology; nuclear power generation and safety; genetic engineering and gene modification; solar radiation management, i.e., chemtrails; HAARP, the list goes on and on and on.
Every industry has its lobbyists and acolytes who run roughshod over accurate science to promote skewed science for vested interests and profiteering at the expense of those whom they claim to make life better and easier for unassuming customers, who gullibly buy into and become addicted to ‘smart’ stuff and gadgets.
Here’s a case on point
The AMI Smart Meters utilities are forcing on to electric, natural gas and water customers: dangerous plastic-parts-computer-like-utility-meters prone to overheating, fires while producing “dirty electricity” and EMFs/RFs/ELFs.
Every utility totally disregards non-thermal wave adverse health effects, which cause electromagnetic hypersensitivity (EHS) for a greater number of people every day. That should be prosecuted as criminal activity.
Utility customers, who have been affected by those meters since they were retrofitted on to their services, should press legal assault and battery charges against utilities. When that happens, maybe the courts will realize the need for valid science rather than vested interest pseudoscience being given to government agencies to get approval for ‘hot shot’ money-making innovations.
Microwave industry trade associations deliberately deny and claim there are no emissions such as EMFs. However, non-thermal radiation waves were found and confirmed by 32 percent of microwave trade studies! That’s what could be called smoke and mirrors science: it’s there, but we don’t acknowledge it.
Federal agencies, such as the Federal Communication Commission, buy into that hype hook, line and sinker to the detriment of the taxpaying public whom FCC should be protecting. Rather, FCC acts as an industry’s shill, or so it seems, since the FCC depends upon industry trade associations to set EMF/RF/ELF exposure regulations.
Example of a non-thermal radiation wave adverse effect
Correlation Between Cellular Phone Use and Epithelial Parotid Gland Malignancies
“Heavy users have rates of malignant parotid gland tumors that are seven to 13 times higher than might otherwise be expected.” – Chinese Put Cancer of the Parotid Gland on Center Stage
How former President Eisenhower could have seen it so clearly and yet we, who are experiencing and living that reality, can’t see what’s really happening to us every moment!
March 20, 2018