EXPOSED: The Great Reset, AI Revolution & ‘Global Boiling’: Unveiling the Secret Depopulation Plan – YOU are the Carbon Footprint they want to Eliminate (1)

A chilling plan has been uncovered that should shock you to your very core.

For decades, global powers have been orchestrating a depopulation strategy, hidden under the guise of public health crises, economic instability, and environmental concerns.

Now, with the dawn of the AI revolution, fondly referred to as the Fourth Industrial Revolution by Klaus Schwab, founder of the World Economic Forum, the world faces an unsettling future.

With artificial intelligence poised to replace low-wage labour, the once indispensable human workforce is now suddenly being painted as the villain in a so-called environmental saga that has been referred to with many names: ‘global warming’, ‘climate change’ and now even ‘global boiling’ as the UN Secretary-General outrageously announced to the world on July 27th 2023 when he falsely proclaimed:

Climate change is here. It is terrifying. And it is just the beginning.

The era of global warming has ended; the era of global boiling has arrived.

The air is unbreathable.” – UN Secretary-General António Guterres opening remarks at press conference on climate. Source

But the truth is that the alleged climate change crisis is just another cog in a concealed depopulation agenda, skilfully engineered by the powers that be.

And the only carbon footprint they want to eliminate is you.

Brace yourself as we venture into the heart of this spine-chilling narrative, navigating the labyrinth of ominous forecasts, top-secret documents, strategic policies, and the climate change narrative that is part of a disturbing grand design.

Section 1: An AI-driven World and the Unthinkable Proposition

Artificial Intelligence (AI) is becoming omnipresent, promising a future of endless possibilities. But could there be a dark twist?

Imagine this:

As AI continues to evolve, millions, if not billions of humans will no longer be needed for everyday jobs that have paid low wages by design.

They will in effect become “useless eaters”.

The establishment is not going to pay for them to live, so instead, a plan has been in the making for decades that involves deliberately trimming down the human population.

Welcome to a chilling truth that plunges us deep into an underbelly of disturbing predictions and eerie patterns that you will not find reported on BBC News.

Section 2: The Oracle of Doom – Deagel’s Depopulation Forecast

Deagel.com is an obscure online entity known for its exhaustive data on military capabilities and eyebrow-raising depopulation forecasts for 2025.

We can reveal that recent findings link Deagel directly to significant players on the world stage: The Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), the U.S. Department of Defense (DoD), and The Rockefeller Foundation.

Deagel’s apocalyptic depopulation forecasts for 2025 predict significant population declines in various countries, stirring unease given the current excess death data being recorded around the world.

Deagel.com’s [infamous] 2025 forecast was removed from their website sometime in 2020. However, thanks to the Wayback Machine / Internet Archive, we are able to view the original predictions before discovered by critical thinkers.

In 2020, Deagel offered a series of startling predictions: by 2025, they projected that the population of the United Kingdom would shrink by a staggering 77.1%.

The United States was not far behind with a forecasted decrease of 68.5%. Germany was predicted to witness a reduction of 65.1%, while Australia was expected to see a population dip of 34.6%. These projections also highlighted significant declines in many other Western nations.

Source

A full list of Deagel’s original apocalyptic depopulation predictions can be viewed here.

We can affirm that Dr. Edwin A. Deagle Jr., who passed away on February 16th 2021, is the confirmed figurehead authorities would like you to believe is solely behind Deagel.com.

During his life, Dr Edwin served as the Assistant to the Secretary of Defense and the Deputy Secretary of Defense. He was also the Director of International Relations for The Rockefeller Foundation.

But declassified documents, released via Freedom of Information Act requests, reveal Deagle’s communication with the then United States Director of Central Intelligence, Stansfield Turner, proving a relationship existed with the top of the CIA.

One document, dated 1977, intriguingly refers to an event described as “the most significant in the intelligence field since 1947.”

Source

The full letter to then CIA Director Stansfield Turner from Dr Edwin A. Deagle Jr., the Deputy Director for International Relations for The Rockefeller Foundation

Source

The full letter to Dr Edwin A. Deagle Jr., the Deputy Director for International Relations for The Rockefeller Foundation from then CIA Director Stansfield Turner

Source

The CIA has released 23 FOIA articles relating to Dr Deagle, the Rockefeller Foundation, the U.S. DOD and the former director of the CIA.

This information underlines that Deagel.com is not a one-man operation, but rather a concerted effort by key components of the U.S. Military Industrial Complex – namely the CIA, the U.S. Department of Defense, and the enigmatic Rockefeller Foundation.

These connections lend a disturbing gravity to Deagel’s bleak depopulation predictions. It raises a question that should send shivers down your spine: Why would an organization, entwined with the world’s power structures, forecast such a chilling future?

Section 3: The Ghost of Kissinger and the Depopulation Strategy

Referring to a memorandum written by General Taylor, in 1973, General Draper and his colleagues presented their views that the population explosion in developing countries was not only a threat to US interests in the economics and in the development of those countries but also, more fundamentally, presented a danger to the United States political-military interests.

And the shadow of former Secretary of State Henry Kissinger looms over this discourse. It was under his stewardship that the National Security Study Memorandum 200 (NSSM 200), colloquially known as the Kissinger Report, was conceived.

The report, formulated in 1974, represented a seismic shift in American foreign policy, positioning population control at the forefront of its security strategy. Its stated aim was to address population growth in the developing world, but the machinations behind it were arguably far more sinister.

NSSM 200 identified 13 countries that were seen as particularly problematic due to their rapidly expanding populations. The report advocated for population control measures and even endorsed the idea of using food as a weapon to enforce such measures, giving a glimpse into a disconcerting way of thinking.

A full analysis of the Kissinger Report can be read here.

Source

NSSM 200 and its chilling implications bring us to ask: Could it be that the same ethos, the very thought of population control for strategic gains, has seeped into the narrative of today’s world? And could this ethos be driving the forces shaping our present and our future?

The evidence certainly suggests so.

Section 4: UN Agenda 2030, Eco-Terrorists, Propaganda & Lies: Problem, Reaction, Solution

Agenda 21’s alleged initial aim was to achieve global sustainable development by the year 2000, with the “21” in Agenda 21 referring to the original target of the 21st century.

The UNs Agenda 2030, also known as the Sustainable Development Goals, were a set of goals decided upon at the United Nations (“UN”) Sustainable Development Summit in 2015. Agenda 2030 took all of the goals set by Agenda 21 and reasserted them as the basis for “sustainable development.”

Agenda 2030 professes to protect biodiversity. But deep within its winding narratives and subplots, lurks a sinister script for a world with fewer humans.

If we look beyond the fluffy language they use as an attempt to convince you they are a force for good – then we can see what their actual aims truly are. And Dr Michael Coffman and Henry Lamb have some of the answers.

Dr. Michael Coffman was an author, researcher, speaker, and founding contributor to the fight against Agenda 21 Sustainable Development. He was President of Environmental Perspectives, Inc., and Executive Director of Sovereignty International.

Dr. Coffman played a crucial role in stopping the ratification of the Biodiversity Treaty in the US Senate. However, he sadly died in 2017.

Henry Lamb was the first to discover Agenda 21 and sound the alarm. He wrote the book The Rise of Global Governance, and Agenda 21. He also produced a series of videos on Agenda 21. These stand as invaluable tools for anyone wanting to know where this evil agenda came from and why it needs to be stopped. Lamb died in 2012.

Conservation of biological diversity is the subject of Chapter 15 of Agenda 21 and has been translated into Agenda 2030 as SDG15.

But do not be fooled by the use of the words “conservation”, “protect” and “restore” because you will see that SDG15 has nothing to do with conservation. Nor does it have much to do with biological diversity.

Buried within three of the UN’s foundational documents are the true aims of SDG15. These three documents are the 1992 Biodiversity Treaty; the 1992 Wildlands Project and the 1995 Global Biodiversity Assessment.

Signed by 150 government leaders at the 1992 Rio Earth Summit, the Convention on Biological Diversity is dedicated to promoting “sustainable development.” The Convention on Biological Diversity is also referred to as the Biodiversity Treaty.

If the Convention on Biological Diversity, the Biodiversity Treaty, had been signed by the US Senate in the summer of 1994, it “would have mandated a reduction in the Earth’s human population by two-thirds in 30 to 50 years”.

The U.S. had Dr Michael Coffman to thank for that. But the spanner he had thrown in the works of the establishment’s plan to depopulate the planet was sadly buried with him in 2017.

The Wildlands concept is primarily the work of David Foreman, the principal founder of the eco-terrorist group Earth First! and a former member of the board of the Sierra Club.

The group used direct action tactics and in contrast with the cautious lobbying efforts of the established environmental organizations, “monkeywrenching“—industrial sabotage traditionally associated with labour struggles—would become the chief tactic of the Earth First! movement in the 1980s.

The Earth First! Journal; which grew out of the Earth First! newsletter, was edited by Foreman. In its first issue, Foreman set out the organization’s goals:

We will not make political compromises. Let the other outfits do that. EARTH FIRST will set forth the pure, hard-line, radical position of those who believe in the Earth first.”

The journal confirmed Earth First! was an eco-terrorist group.

In 1990, Foreman was one of five people arrested by the Federal Bureau of Investigation following Operation THERMCON, in which FBI agents infiltrated an Arizona Earth First! group, encouraging them to sabotage a powerline feeding a water pumping station.

While Foreman had no direct role in the attempted sabotage, he ultimately pleaded guilty to a misdemeanour for handing two copies of Ecodefense to an FBI informant and received a suspended sentence.

David Foreman of Earth First!

The unusual concept proposed by the Wildlands Scheme requires a radical reimagining of human civilization. This includes shutting down mines, removing roads from natural landscapes, halting timber harvesting, and even relocating human populations. The aim is to drastically reshape our interaction with the environment.

“On page 15 of The Wildlands Project, Dr. Reed Noss says that we need to convert at least 50% of the land area of North America to wilderness off limits to human beings.

Those core wilderness areas are to be interconnected by wilderness corridors off-limits to human beings. Those wilderness areas are to be surrounded by buffer zones that may have limited resource use under the supervision and permitting of the federal government in collaboration with non-government organisations.

The human population is to be resettled into the remaining 25% of the land into communities that are described as ‘sustainable communities’.”

The environmental organization Earth First!, established in 1980, pioneered a form of direct action to stop perceived threats to the environment, paving the way for modern groups like Just Stop Oil and Extinction Rebellion.

Much like Earth First!, these newer groups utilize direct action strategies and civil disobedience as tools to raise awareness and pressure governments and corporations to address environmental issues.

However, while Earth First!’s actions primarily focused on specific threats such as deforestation and urban development, Just Stop Oil! and Extinction Rebellion operate with a broader mandate, targeting systemic issues like fossil fuel dependency and climate change.

They aim to radically transform society’s relationship with the environment to mitigate the impacts of climate change. Yet, they all share a core belief in the necessity of drastic action to preserve and restore the Earth’s ecosystems.

But it’s extremely interesting to note who is actually funding these groups. Just Stop Oil’s main source of income has come from Aileen Getty, the billionaire heiress to Getty Oil fortune. The Getty Oil Company was an American oil marketing company, with its origins as part of the large integrated oil company founded by J. Paul Getty.

Meanwhile, Extinction Rebellion’s largest donor is British billionaire Sir Chris Hohn who manages the TCI hedge fund. But TCI made a large part of its fortune from an Indian coal producer, and even now it owns shares in three railroads that burn tons of diesel and ship fossil fuels. This includes oil sands, one of the worst sources of alleged greenhouse gases.

Why would entities deeply intertwined in the oil and coal industry bankroll groups advocating for the exact opposite – a world free from fossil fuel dependency?

The answers could be manifold: perhaps it’s a clever ploy to appear more environmentally friendly, or maybe it’s an attempt to control the narrative and influence the speed and direction of the inevitable shift towards “greener” energy.

Regardless of the motivations, this strange alliance highlights the tangled web of interests and influences within the environmental movement, suggesting a far more complex picture beneath the surface.

Read the next part of the article

 

yogaesoteric
December 1, 2023

 

Also available in: Română

Leave A Reply

Your email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish. Accept Read More