Où sont les victimes?
“Where are the guns, where are the daggers, the horses, and the outlaws’ arrows?” say the lyrics of an old Romanian folk song. The outlaws’ arrows are long gone. That much is clear. Still, où sont les victimes? I mean where are the so-called “victims” of Gregorian Bivolaru, ladies and gentlemen journalists and policemen? Well, they’re nowhere to be found, because in fact they never were.
Since Tuesday 28 November, the French, Romanian and international press, from New Zealand to China and Pakistan, have been mourning the poor so-called “victims” kept almost in chains, if you were to follow the journalists, by Gregorian Bivolaru and his iron men of the organised crime “gang” also called “Tantric multinational” – at least some are more creative. A handful of French organisations with impressive acronyms, Miviludes, OCRVP, Caimades, “specialised” in “sectarian deviations” or “repression of violence against individuals” (but violence against the “yellow vests” or against demonstrators anti-compulsory vaccination is of no interest to anyone, don’t be fooled), they sent report after report and referred to the French authorities the “dramas” of women who had been “kidnapped“, “abducted“, “trafficked“, “subjected to sexual violence“, “raped“, “psychologically manipulated“, etc. As proof, during the concerted intervention of 175 police officers on 28 November at 6am, some 26 women were found in several houses near Paris and in the south of France and were thus “released”. Quod erat demonstrandum (which was to be demonstrated).
The only problem with this logic is that, according to our information from POMSIEY (the Press Office of the MISA School of Integral Esoteric Yoga), none of the 26 so-called victims have claimed that they were held by force, against their will, or that they were forced by anyone to do anything. What’s more, instead of jumping for joy at being “freed“, they complained about the degrading way they were treated by police and investigators. At 6am, at temperatures just above freezing, they were taken out of the house in pajamas and slippers, handcuffed and with their hands behind their backs! Some of the more level-headed policemen let them get dressed though. French gallantry… Equally gallant, the policemen made a point of remarking, when the women arrived at the station in their pajamas: “See how well we treated you? We brought you here by bus!”. How else could they have brought them, by bike, on the Tour de France?
Arrived before the investigating bodies, the women were received by attentive and benevolent psychologists, who strove to explain to them, with or without acronyms, that they can rejoice, it’s a great day for them, they are free again (in the meantime their handcuffs had been removed, you may have understood). Surprise, none of the arrested women seems too happy. The discussion progresses, the “victims” are asked to sign some standard statements, so that the guilty can be identified, punished (impaled if necessary). Double surprise, the girls don’t want to sign, they ask to be left alone and insist that they are nobody’s victims. Brought to the end of her patience, one of them even bangs her fist on the table (an argument that transcends language barriers), she doesn’t want to sign anything, what’s so hard to understand? A few, more emotional ones, apparently have signed something, but more of an “account of the facts” than a complaint against someone who did something to them…
The story doesn’t end there. The time has come for the cops to let them go. Those – few – who did sign something were taken to a kind of hotel where victims of human trafficking are usually housed. Those who didn’t comply, were left on the street – pardon me, dans la rue – dressed as they managed to dress in a rush, without money and phones, that had been confiscated from them before the “handcuffing” operation. Did the good cops care that they were leaving “victims” stranded, with nowhere to go, their homes sealed, no one to call, nothing to eat, no money to pay? How the poor women managed on the streets of Paris and how some of them managed to get back to their homes we will hopefully find out soon. What is certain is that we still know nothing about some of them… Yes, it seems incredible, but these are the facts. And so far we only know a small part.
And now an easy question, let’s give everyone a chance to win. Does anyone see any resemblance to the 2004 events in Romania? Other than the fact that Romania is a francophone country… Then, as now, the supposed “victims” were brutalized by the (dis)order forces, kept on the ground half-dressed or half-undressed, depending on your personal view, with a gun to their heads (that’s what the French didn’t think of). Then, as now, the prosecutors tried to extract false incriminating statements from them, and unfortunately in places they actually succeeded. Then, as now, the press made a fuss and drew cries of indignation from Romanians who were moved by the fate of the poor people who were trafficked and exploited. Then, as now, the press did not think, or if they did, they did not dare to ask a common sense question: where are the alleged victims, gentlemen? You just said that you are facing “the biggest organised crime network since the Revolution”. There can’t be a “human trafficking network” with more “network” members than victims. Seriously now.
With the victims in France we’ve pretty much got it figured out, at least from the information available so far. There is still the question of the members of the “organised gang” that kidnapped and abducted women. Also from the international press, we have learned that 41 people were arrested on Tuesday 28 November as a result of a large-scale police operation. From Tuesday to Friday, when they were brought before the judges with a proposal for preventive arrest, 15 remained. Of those 15, 6 remained in custody. Of course it’s equally unfair to the wrongfully arrested, whether it’s just one or 6 or 15. However, we can deduce, if we use logic and common sense, that the large-scale operation was not based on very solid evidence when they picked these people up and also announced in the press that they had destroyed a “criminal network”. Who knows, maybe they expected the evidence to be provided by the “victims” they were going to “free from slavery”. Malchance, as they say in the Hexagon.
We already know, from direct experience, that there will always be people (disgruntled for who knows what, frustrated, motivated by some personal vendetta or simply hungry for attention and/or money) who will pose as victims or make false statements against whomever they need to. What does it matter if the facts happened 3 or 5 or 7 years ago, and you’ve only now realised you were a victim? The fabricated human trafficking case in Romania, which was trialed for 17 years (and ended with the acquittal, four times in a row, of those wrongly accused, but some of you already know that) showed us in spades what people are capable of. That is why we are not surprised that former so-called victims of that case are now coming to the fore once again, as they say here. They didn’t get compensation for damages then, at least they got free publicity. And the press is giving them water to the mill, instead of asking them, for example, why they did not come forward when they were summoned before the court in Cluj [n.tr: city in Romania where of the court case was judged], with arguments and proof that they had been trafficked or abused, as they claimed, not just with tabloid stories.
In the meantime, we stand by those now wrongly accused and hope that the French justice system will also establish the absurdity of these accusations.
Source: misa.yoga
yogaesoteric
December 7, 2023
