Systemic Pedophilia (3)

 

by Adam Riva

Read the second part of the article
 

California University Encourages Parents to Let Children as Young as Four Watch Pornography

On June 14, 2018, the Daily Wire broke a story revolving around University of California Santa Barbara where administrators encouraged parents to allow children as young as four to watch pornography because it is “generally harmless” for children to explore each other’s genitals.

“The SexInfo Online website, operated by UCSB students specializing in human sexuality, offers a variety of topics regarding sex. One such topic, according to The College Fix, discusses a little something called ‘Childhood Sexuality,’ which advises parents on how they should react to seeing their kids engaging in masturbation and ‘sexual play.’

The topic focuses on pre-pubescent children.
It is important for caregivers and parents to keep their reactions to children’s consensual sexual activity and play positive, the site says, arguing that the alternative could create feelings of guilt within the child.

Even parents who witness their children ‘touching each others genitals’ should be unafraid because ‘children are just exploring.’

‘It is important that children understand that viewing pornography is a normal habit, and that they do not need to be ashamed of it.’ They argue only that parents should ensure their kids use porn in moderation.”

The New York Times Continues Attempts to Destigmatize Pedophilia

The New York Times push to destigmatize pedophilia with their article Pedophilia: A Disorder, Not a Crime published on October 5, 2014.

We discussed the shady ties between the BBC and the New York Times covering up for the satanic serial child molester Jimmy Savile. Mark Thompson, who was BBC’s Director General, allegedly knew about Savile’s abuses during the 8 years he worked there, and has faced harsh criticism for the way he directed BBC’s flippant, lax, and often dismissive coverage the Savile scandal.

Mark Thompson left the BBC to work as CEO of The New York Times. Since he began at The Times, the media giant’s attitude towards pedophilia has shifted to portraying it as “a disorder, not a crime.”

Since then, the New York Times has only doubled down on its efforts to destigmatize pedophilia with an article entitled Why I Admire Anthony Weiner, published after Weiner was arrested and sentenced for sending and soliciting naked pictures from a minor.

Child Sex Doll Industry Continues to Grow Amid Legal Obstruction

There is a trend of sex dolls resembling children made for pedophiles, a market that has been growing since roughly 2015.

On April 27, 2018, NBC New York’s I-Team broke the story that YouTube, Instagram, Twitter, and Pinterest featured ads for child sex dolls.

New York Congressman Dan Donavon introduced bill H.R. 4655 that would prohibit the importation of child sex dolls that come from foreign countries, predominantly China.

The bill has 32 cosponsors at the time of this writing (July 2019). The United Kingdom has already outlawed child sex dolls. In June of 2017, a British man was arrested for smuggling a child sex doll from Hong Kong. Two months later, a judge presiding over a similar case ruled that sex dolls resembling children are “obscene.” According to the BBC, 123 child sex dolls have been seized at border control points by British authorities from March 2016 to July 2017.

Miley Cyrus Sexualizes Babies

There are various ways the mainstream media and the entertainment industry are sexualizing children.

On December 11, 2015, Miley Cyrus released a music video called BB Talk in which the pop star performed sexually provocative dance moves and explicit gestures dressed as a baby. Throughout the video, she switches back and forth from a baby on the floor to an attractive woman in a baby’s crib. This juxtaposition blurs the lines between what is obviously intended to be sexual and what is not. There are several scenes where the camera focuses on Miley’s crotch while she is spreading her legs as a baby and her face isn’t even in frame, causing the viewer to focus on her crotch while she is wearing a diaper and sucking on a pacifier in a seductive way.

At the end of the song, Miley repeats “f*** me so you stop baby talking” as she is lying on her back humping the air. Moreover, the song’s lyrics contain adult themed content and the backup dancers were also dressed as babies. Although the music video has received more than 28 million views, it is perhaps the most disliked video of her career. On YouTube, the music video has 405,000 likes and more than 436,000 dislikes.

Netflix Hosts Disturbing Content

On June 27, 2018, an Argentinian movie called Desire, hosted on the popular streaming platform Netflix, came under fire for a disturbing scene containing theatrical child porn.

As PJ Media summarizes:
“In the opening scene, two little girls who look to be about seven and nine are playing ‘horse’ on pillows. The older girl begins to obviously masturbate as the younger child watches. The camera even takes this scene into a close-up of the child’s face in slow motion, moving up and down and panting like a porn star. The scene is graphic and includes an orgasm.

Netflix is now distributing child porn for profit. This is not surprising to anyone who read my expose on Netflix’s original series, Big Mouth, which is nothing but a cartoon that grooms kids for child abuse. It is a hideous and outrageous piece of garbage that includes talking genitalia of children, children telling jokes about blow jobs, and constant, unending masturbation.”

Netflix has again been criticized more recently for showing underage nudity in a film called Girl about a transgender girl training to be a ballerina. On November 20, 2018, the Hollywood Reporter reported:
“Now the film, Belgium’s official entry in the foreign-language Oscar race, is the subject of controversy following Dhont’s comments in a European newspaper that the streamer had plans to edit out a scene with full frontal nudity of its star, then 15.”

BBC Promotes Families Watching Pornography Together

On March 10, 2019, the Mirror reported on a 3-part documentary series to be aired on BBC’s Channel 4 called Mums Make Porn wherein five real mothers produced an adult film that they want their children to see. The idea is that the parents in the series are disgusted by the types of pornography that their children have access to online, described as “toxic masculinity,” so they want to demonstrate “healthy” forms of pornography so their children are not traumatized.

Not only is the premise of this show vile and borderline illegal, the act of parents showing their children footage of them having sex is in itself extremely traumatizing.

As expected, the five mothers behind the series conducted a series of interviews on morning talk shows and the like, some of them admitting having showed their own film to their children and explaining how it should be normal for parents to guide their children’s pornography preferences.

This deplorable piece of reality television received quite a fair amount of outrage from British audiences as many criticized the motives and the methods of the project. Additionally, many viewers joked that this series was infinitely more disturbing than most pornography available on the internet.

Trans Movement Opening the Door to Pedophilia

In November of 2015, the trans-movement began advocating for trans-aged individuals where grown adults claimed to identify as children. For instance, when 52 year old Paul Wolscht first came out identifying as a 6 year old girl, he was lionized by the Left as a champion of the trans-movement, while many conservatives said this would open the door to pedophilia.

Sure enough, two years later, 38 year old Joseph Roman, a pedophile who pleaded guilty to molesting three young girls told police officers that he “was a 9 year old trapped in an adult’s body.”

For more on this topic, please see the video entitled How the Trans Movement Revealed the Absurdity of Political Correctness.

We will now extrapolate on the “transgenderism for kids” trend that is growing in size and momentum as it serves to sexualize prepubescent children and introduce them to “drag culture” as a gateway to sexual promiscuity.

On November 22, 2017,the Daily Wire reported on new legislation proposed by the Delaware Department of Education that would permit students to “self-identify” their gender and race while encouraging schools not to seek parental consent if the children believe their parents will not be “supportive” enough. Additionally, the bill would permit students to use whatever bathrooms and locker rooms that correspond with their self-professed “gender identity or expression.”

Regulation 225 states:
“All students enrolled in a Delaware public school may self-identify gender or race which is maintained in eSchoolPLUS. A school may request permission from the parent or legal guardian of a minor student before a self- identified gender or race is accepted; provided, however, that prior to requesting the permission from a parent or legal guardian, the school should consult and work closely with the student to assess the degree to which, if any, the parent or legal guardian is aware of the Protected Characteristic and is supportive of the student, and the school shall take into consideration the safety, health and well-being of the student in deciding whether to request permission from the parent or legal guardian.”

On October 19, 2017, 10-year-old Desmond Napoles of Brooklyn, NY founded Haus of Amazing, a drag club for children 20 and under. Napoles is characterized by the media as an LGBTQ activist despite his young age.

On February 5, 2018, the Associated Press reported on 2016 study published in the Pediatrics that looked at 81,000 Minnesota students in the 9th and 11th grade and estimated that 2,200 students – nearly three percent – are transgender or “nonconforming.”

The article referenced another study by UCLA that estimated 0.7 percent of teens aged 13 to 17 are transgender. It is important to reiterate that these studies evaluated teenagers and preteens. Why are children increasingly rejecting traditional biological gender identities? What could be influencing them?

(to be continued)

 

yogaesoteric
October 31, 2019

 

Leave A Reply

Your email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish. Accept Read More