Who Or What Produced The Anti-Vaccine Movement?
Without a doubt, and unequivocally, the answer has to be Big Pharma with the unwavering help of the U.S. CDC and FDA, plus an assist from the U.S. military, which apparently subsidizes research for “weaponized” vaccines.
Perhaps this Forbes article, The Biopharmaceutical Industry Provides 75% Of The FDA’s Drug Review Budget. Is This A Problem?, may explain: “And, as would be expected, user fees have gone up over the years, from $208,000 per NDA in 1995 to a whopping $2,421,495 for fiscal year 2018.”
Big Pharma “researches”, manufactures, markets, including fraud with deceptive practices, in pushing “herd immunity” with patented neurotoxic and highly toxic excipients, which usually do not receive the same testing protocols OR time-sensitive trial studies as regular prescription pharmaceuticals, since vaccines are considered biologicals subject to a 75-cent tax!
How does FDA-hands-on-testing-malfeasance (breach of Fiduciary Duty Law?) exempt vaccines from proper safety studies, when almost every vaccine package insert boldly publishes the vaccine has not been tested to cause cancer, birth defects or interfere with human reproductive fertility. Is that safe? Actually, some of the vaccine’s ingredients can and do cause adverse health issues. Please check Section 13.1 Carcinogenesis, Mutagenesis, Impairment of Fertility on any vaccine package insert.
FDA states that: “FDA tests and approves vaccines prior to release and shipment.”
How can that be, when CDC/FDA further publish this: “Prelicensure: Vaccine Safety Testing – The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) must license (approve) a vaccine before it can be used in the United States. FDA regulations for the development of vaccines ensure their safety, purity, potency, and effectiveness. Before a vaccine is approved by FDA for use by the public, results of studies on safety and effectiveness of the vaccine are evaluated by highly trained FDA scientists and doctors. FDA also inspects the vaccine manufacturing sites to make sure they comply with current Good Manufacturing Practice (cGMP) regulations. Vaccine Development – Vaccine development begins in the laboratory”?
How can “Before a vaccine is approved by FDA for use by the public, results of studies on safety and effectiveness of the vaccine are evaluated by highly trained FDA scientists and doctors” be considered “FDA tests and approves vaccines prior to release and shipment”? Or is that another apparent deceptive practice from CDC/FDA?
If CDC/FDA really performed physical, actual hands-on tests, and not rely upon Big Pharma’s safety testing results – would Pharma tell anything adverse about their vaccines? Then there ought to be archived digital CDC/FDA – performed lab tests results that so called anti-vaxxers – or ex-vaxxers whose children experienced harms after vaccinations – can obtain by filing FOIA requests.
How about forming an Ex-Vaxxers FOIA Requests campaign?
Furthermore, shouldn’t there be congressional investigations into whether actual physical FDA testing occurs? Hasn’t Florida Congressman Bill Posey, since August of 2015, been requesting Congress to investigate vaccines based upon CDC whistleblower William Thompson’s factual story of how he participated in autism research fraud?
How much longer will healthcare consumers have to live with CDC/FDA obfuscations regarding actual vaccine safety and efficacy?
Why the anti-vaccine movement?
Because previously uninformed consumers, who avidly believed in vaccination ‘efficacy’, i.e., pro-vaxxers, dutifully had CDC/FDA mandated vaccines administered to their children who then suffered adverse health reactions ranging from mild to severe (and even to death), including autism – now one in 59 kids in the USA suddenly became ex-vaxxers NOT anti-vaxxers, as the common pejorative goes.
The REASON for the anti-vaccine movement
An unparalleled lack of empathy at federal, state and local health administration agencies about vaccine-caused-injury forced ex-vaxxers to tell their vaccine horror stories via the Internet and social media networks in order to educate and, hopefully, prevent other families from experiencing utter devastation when a child suddenly is no longer communicative, but has become sickly and burdensome financially to families.
The article from August 2012 titled Guidelines to Autopsy Medical Tests: Parents Immediately Should Require an Autopsy That Includes Certain Tests shows that many parents and child caregivers were being charged with “Shaken Baby Syndrome” brought on by hospital medical staff alerting police to what they thought was excessive child abuse. However, the parent(s) knew the facts: No child abuse, but their child received a recent series of vaccines, which apparently precipitated severe encephalopathy mimicking trauma. However, since then, authorities filing SBS charges seems to have disappeared.
Why are questioning, refusing, plus any discussion about vaccine safety and efficacy, forbidden under penalty of law, or provoke police-state-like actions? Every other topic, no matter how bizarre, is not forbidden nor banned from public discourse or memes, but enthusiastically encouraged. Transhumanism; gender-identify preferences; sexuality; pedophilia; leftist and socialist party geopolitical propaganda; civil rights; women’s rights; satanism, police brutality – you name it – are not subject to the jackboot treatment inadvertently stemming from obsolete 1905 vaccine case law, i.e., Jacobson v. Massachusetts in the United States, which is “cherry picked” for certain enforcement provisions while not enforcing a $5 monetary fine and allowing the refuser to go free and not be vaccinated.
All the above groups, plus others, enjoy unfettered favorable time in multimedia venues, but ex-vaxxers and vaccine safety advocates are deprived their First Amendment rights. Blatant discrimination?
Australia has a gestapo-like vaccine policy; is the U.K. on its way there? Is the USA there now?
What is it about the politics of vaccinology that has the media’s, vaccine acolytes’, medical professions’ and Big Pharma’s britches so twisted? Could it be there may be too many vested-interest individuals who could be held legally at fault if only the truth were known about the real science often known only to the vaccine’s manufacturer? Is Bayer-Monsanto’s Roundup legal debacle of close to 1,000 pending lawsuits something to replicate?
March 10, 2020