The oxygen content in the air drops? What is the cause?
What do the urge for people to eat worms, the dystopian 15 minutes cities, the push for inefficient and very expensive energy sources, for electric cars, for huge taxes and so on all have in common? The climate change narrative.
The Swiss, because of their grassroots democratic state system, could prevent all climate control measures in their sky and thus block the artificial tropospheric flow through European airspace altogether. However, all the other nations are still clueless regarding this subject.
According to certain scientific evaluations, there has always been an increase of CO2 in the air in the history of the earth. However, there has not been such a high level of CO2 since the existence of man has been paleontologically proven.
What effects it has on humans, we do not know exactly. However, CO2 has been shown to be good for plant growth. While CO2 levels are correlated with temperature increases, it has not been proven that CO2 is responsible for them. Rather, there is evidence that it is the other way around. A temperature increase in connection with CO2 has only been proven in the environment of a greenhouse. In other words, a largely closed, ground-level system.
The biggest CO2 producer is nature. A volcanic eruption, for example, ejects more CO2 into the atmosphere than the human impact of a year. It is therefore questionable whether the planned reduction of CO2 makes sense or whether it is even causal for the rise in temperature. In my opinion, more attention should be paid to what we can concretely do for the affected areas and inhabitants instead of focusing on the global climate unless we know more. In Europe, too, we should prepare for longer periods of drought in the future and generally be more careful with natural water patterns.
The two responses towards to climate change narrative include the position of those who “believe in climate change” as well as the supposed “skeptics”, illustrating that the main line of geoengineering marketing is not damaged. Despite some correct approaches, the overall responses remain ambivalent, unclear, or outright wrong.
What is the natural cause of the variation of the CO2 content in the air? The increase in CO2 is an indicator of the decrease in O2, i.e. breathable oxygen, because plants produce as much O2 from water through photosynthesis as they have absorbed in C-O2 from the air!
There is no correlation of CO2 increase and temperature increase, but a sequence of the two. When the temperature rises, the oceans emit some CO2 as well as water vapor. As the temperature decreases, the oceans absorb the water as precipitation and in the process also absorb CO2 from the air, or less CO2 is emitted.
Apart from that, the efficiency of photosynthesis is crucial for the amount of CO2. Since the current CO2 level is quite low, about 0.04%, its increase leads to increased photosynthesis and growth of plants, thus binding the excess CO2, as long as there is enough sunlight and water.
The amount of CO2 and H2O in the air is basically determined by the mass of the earth and consequently, the density of the atmosphere. The absolute humidity of 4% corresponds to 100% relative humidity! The absolute CO2 amount of 0.04% corresponds to 100% relative CO2 content in the atmosphere.
The atmosphere cannot permanently absorb more CO2 and H2O. Anything above 100% relative is returned to the oceans, lakes, rivers and soil.
Atmospheres with higher CO2 content (at constant pressure) do not get warmer, but colder, because CO2 is not good at absorbing energy.
There are nevertheless heat waves and regional and selective statistical increases in CO2 in recent decades. The reason for this is CLIMATE CONTROL!
The so-called greenhouse effect did not exist, does not exist and will not exist in a greenhouse or anywhere else in the universe. The greenhouse effect is a cleverly pseudo-scientifically packaged bare lie, without any real basis.
The senseless assertion about the greenhouse effect by the unscientist Svante Arrhenius was experimentally refuted by Dr. Wood already in 1909. The greenhouse effect has never existed and will never exist. It is a lie!
What is the unnatural cause of the increase in CO2?
If the changes do not correspond to natural cycles, then there should be an unnatural cause. Since the amounts of CO2 and O2 are determined by photosynthesis, human activity should be preventing plants, especially algae, from photosynthesizing.
Plants need 3 main conditions for photosynthesis:
- CO2 in the air,
- sunlight and
- water at the roots.
Since CO2 is sufficient, it is necessary to see if the plants get enough sunlight and water. In the case of algae, the lack of water can be excluded. Consequently, the conclusion should be drawn that the algae do not get enough sunlight or do not get the quality of sunlight they depend on to perform photosynthesis.
The algae of the oceans are responsible for 70% of the oxygen in the air. They feed the corals, mussels, krill and other animals, which in turn are the base of the food chain.
Each alga is adapted to a specific range of light waves. Without the appropriate sunlight, the algae die or fail to develop. All animals that depend on their symbiotic algae starve and suffocate without them. Thus, both the oxygen-carbon cycle and the food chain break down at their origin, because both begin in the oceans.
If the oxygen level drops from the current 21% to 20%, then the feeling of lack of air begins, and from 19%, that of suffocation. Below that, any animal will pass out and die from suffocation, which can already be seen in and around the oceans.
CO2 levels are artificially increased by climate control. So the climate controllers warn about what they themselves cause and blame the victims! Therefore I want to formulate and answer another question.
How is the CO2 content in the atmosphere and on the surfaces of the oceans artificially increased?
The unnatural increase in CO2 is done by preventing photosynthesis both in the oceans and on land by blocking sunlight.
Under natural conditions, the amount of CO2 changes throughout the day. In a forest, it is 0.085% in the morning. Over the day, CO2 is consumed by photosynthesis, leaving only 0.015% in the evening.
However, when fine dust is spread in layers for climate control to form artificial smog veils and from them smog clouds, the sunlight is shielded, which is why photosynthesis is weakened and thus the decomposition of CO2 and buildup of O2 is prevented.
While in optimal conditions the measurement should be 0.04% at 12 noon solar time sharp, instead it is much higher, e.g. 0.05%. If the shielding of sunlight is maintained over a larger region for several days, then the CO2 content may increase even further locally. However, on a global average, it will level off at 0.04% because the increased CO2 is broken down elsewhere by unimpeded photosynthesis or reabsorbed by the ocean. The statistically constant global average, however, does not change the fact that regionally masses of animals suffocate because they cannot survive short-lived oxygen deficiencies.
On overfishing, plastic waste, deforestation and desertification
Plastic waste accounts for only 0.17% of all garbage, of which only a fraction ends up in the oceans. Where plastic islands are created, many creatures find an unexpected breeding ground for their offspring.
In the From resource extraction to outflows of wastes and emissions: The socioeconomic metabolism of the global economy, 1900–2015 study there are some statistics on the global garbage volume!
The SAFETY INSTRUCTIONS Oxygen deficiency answers the oxygen deficiency question:
“If the natural composition of the air (approx. 21% oxygen by volume and 79% nitrogen by volume) is changed, disturbances or even damage to the human organism can occur. If gases other than oxygen are added to the air we breathe, the oxygen content drops. If the oxygen content falls below 15% by volume, physical and psychical performance is increasingly reduced. If the oxygen deficiency is caused by inert gases (e.g. by nitrogen, argon, helium), the drop in performance is not noticeable to the person affected. He may become unconscious without warning at about 10% oxygen by volume in the air. Below 6 to 8% vol. oxygen, death by suffocation can occur after only a few minutes if resuscitation attempts are not initiated immediately.”
Studies on the effect of anesthesia by carbon dioxide in castration of male suckling piglets:
“Because of the risk of inducing convulsions or anesthesia when CO2 concentrations higher than 20% are administered, inhalation should be limited to one to two minutes. SECHZER et al. (1960) studied in twelve male subjects the effect of inhalation of 7 to 14% CO2 (in O2) for 10 to 20 minutes on arterial blood pressure, heart rate, and respiratory time volume, as well as catecholamines and cortisol. During hypercapnia, all parameters are elevated in all subjects and arrhythmias of the heartbeat are recorded occasionally. All values normalize within the following 10 min of oxygen inhalation. While the inhalation of CO2/O2 mixtures is used in human medicine for the treatment of neurotic anxiety, the anxiogenic effect of CO2 is known. In persons prone to anxiety or otherwise psychologically ill, CO2 inhalation can induce panic attacks even more frequently (GORMAN et al., 2001; GRIEZ and VAN DEN HOUT, 1983; LATIMER, 1977; SANDERSON et al., 1989; SINHA et al., 1999; VALENÇA et al., 2002; VAN DEN HOUT and GRIEZ, 1984). LATIMER (1977) than it treats panic attacks by means of systematic desensitization through multiple inhalations of CO2/O2 mixtures. GORMAN et al. (1988) observed an exaggerated ventilation and an increase of the diastolic blood pressure as well as the noradrenaline content in the plasma during panic attacks caused by CO2. Furthermore, sensations of suffocation, fear of death, and numerous other perceptual impairments are reported (PERNA et al., 1993; SINHA et al., 1999).”
On deforestation and desertification: Please remember that the total amount of CO2 in the atmosphere is 0.04%. 90% of it is produced by volcanism, especially along the continental fissures under the oceans. Therefore, the CO2 content of all living organisms in the air is only 0.004%.
The entire human race, with all its very existence and industrial activities, contributes 10 times less to this than ants. This is simply because ants represent 10 times greater biomass than all humans.
The burning of biomass, for example by forest fires has no measurable effect on this proportion and the CO2 released is quickly reabsorbed by the regrowth of fresh trees, herbs and grasses.
Climate control shifts more water to desert areas for oil and gas fracking and large-scale industrial agriculture. But this also benefits all the desert’s fauna and flora. Everything grows and blooms more than under natural desert conditions.
MaxPlanckResearch: The desert turns green:
“Southern Europe is very likely to become much drier with climate change. But in the Sahara, of all places, plants could spread in the event of moderate global warming – as has occured from time to time in the past. Martin Claußen, director at the Max Planck Institute for Meteorology, simulates the interplay between climate and vegetation. In this way, he predicts a greener future for northern Africa.”
Climate change: Sahara is greening up – a bit:
“Scientists believe that man-made climate change is pushing back the Sahara Desert in Africa – if only for a while.
The Sahara has more than 25 times the area of Germany.
11,000 to 5,000 years ago, the desert was a green savannah with many rivers and lakes.
Because of climate change, it could soon become much wetter again in the region.”
It should be noted that with the increased air and soil moisture, the temperature falls, so the subtropical climate zone cools down strongly! Therefore it is absurd to call this still “global warming”. Consequently, “Earth cooling” would be the suitable choice of words.
It is true that the Earth as a whole can neither warm up any more nor cool down, but only by climate control a planned, desired, intentional and for some profitable vertical and horizontal shift of humidity and temperature takes place!
What is the exact explanation of the weakening of photosynthesis in algae?
Corals, mollusks and jellyfish that live symbiotically with algae give them a habitat in their bodies, CO2 as fertilizer and a place in the sun. In return, they get sugar compounds from the algae as food and oxygen to breathe.
As the corals attach themselves to the rock, the algae adapt to the specific light spectrum, which reaches them through the sea.
In the process of climate control, more UVB light penetrates the ocean surface with the formation of artificial ozone holes. All algae that cannot absorb this spectrum “burn” and die from it.
In the next step of climate control, when artificial aerosol clouds are formed over a long period of time, the algae die from lack of sunlight.
But even before the algae die, they are expelled by the corals as soon as they cannot photosynthesize and feed the corals, or even produce toxins. This event is called coral bleaching because the corals are colorless without algae.
If the corals remain without algae for several days, then they starve and suffocate on their own exhaled air (CO2). This region also becomes an oxygen-free death zone for all other animals.
Since the algae of the oceans are responsible for about 70% of the oxygen, the oxygen content in the air also decreases, which immediately drives the whales to flee to the beaches, since they can no longer find enough oxygen directly at the water surface.
As for mass death by asphyxiation, I have collected many examples in the following articles:
No acidification! Intentional mass extinction of all life!
Oxygen deprivation! Global suffocation!
The articles cite a large number of scientific studies, the statements of which are intended to facilitate the introduction to the complex of topics. The generally available studies substantiate the knowledge. Publications were also used, which even though they offer a wrong explanation, correctly attribute everything to “man-made climate change”, but still explain the symbiosis well.
The knowledge about the symbiosis between algae and molluscs belongs to the basics of biology. This symbiosis can be verified very easily elsewhere. This is the beginning of the global oxygen cycle and the food chain. On both literally depends our entire life.
Decryption of climate control
When the term “climate change” is exchanged for “climate control,” the contents in all pseudoscientific publication decode themselves.
The topic is quite extensive because the application is global and affects all habitats. Therefore, what is occurring should be viewed from diverse perspectives.
The education of prospective biologists and meteorologists is reduced to professionally isolated single aspects, so that they do not learn to understand and recognize connections. I know this specifically from personal conversations with students and already graduated academics with Dr. and Prof. titles. They are rewarded and promoted as long as they stay in the given intellectual death loop and punished as soon as they doubt or even professionally refute the given narrative.
As for photosynthesis, the explanation should be easy for anyone to understand. Just as plants in the garden, in the forest, and in the home specialize in different light spectra, so do algae in mollusks adapt to the spectrum corresponding to the depth of their location. Drastic deviations, and especially the lack of sunlight, lead to their death, just as a houseplant withers and dies without light.
Without algae, the corals have no color, so this condition is called “coral bleaching”.
The geoengineering propaganda correlates this with “global warming” and this in turn with the CO2 increase, the latter being completely absurd as the CO2 level only increases after the death of the algae because photosynthesis no longer takes place.
The coral bleaching and mass death is then followed by the algae bloom, as now the blue-green algae can gorge themselves on the high CO2 levels and grow extremely fast and without competition. These fresh algae make up for the lack of oxygen, but the dead animals cannot be revived.
The statisticians determine that on an annual average “no statistical change” in the proportion of atmospheric gases could be observed! With this the graduated idiots are completely satisfied, become the biggest pests of their guild and unwillingly stooges of the criminal globalists and eugenicists who run and profit from this fraud agenda!
The extremes are therefore the effects of the extreme technical interventions.
What was described here for the algae and corals applies analogously to plants and animals in all habitats!
Summary
The amount of CO2 in the atmosphere is determined by the density of the atmosphere!
The density of the atmosphere is the result of the mass of the Earth!
CO2 amount of 0,04% corresponds to 100% relative amount, which the atmosphere can absorb on average!
90% of CO2 is released by volcanoes, especially under the oceans!
The portion of all living beings amounts to maximally 0,004%!
The share of humans, including agriculture and industry is 0.00012%!
Unnatural increase of the CO2 is the effect of the shielding of the sunlight!
The shielding of the sunlight occurs by artificial dusting of the troposphere!
The artificial dusting (Pinatubo effect) is a component of the climate control!
The higher the CO2 proportion rises, the less O2 (oxygen) is produced!
Heat waves are the result of the active spraying of chlorine into the ozone layer!
Mass extinction is already underway and is a result of climate control!
Author: Enkidu Gilgamesh
yogaesoteric
July 14, 2023