What We’ve Learned from a Year of Vaccine Shedding Data (4)

133 0

SARS-CoV-2 Shedding

In a significant number of the reports I looked at, after being exposed to an (asymptomatic) shedder, the person (and often multiple other unvaccinated members of the group) became ill with one or more of the following:

covid
A covid-like illness
A flu which may have been covid
A severe covid infection that hospitalized and sometimes killed them.

Yet in contrast, before the vaccine rollout, they never had this issue (e.g., normally they never got sick, even around those they knew got covid). This in turn, means either that a remarkable coincidence keeps on happening, or that the vaccine increases your risk of transmitting covid.

As it so occurs, there are a few aspects that argue for the latter such as:

The design of the vaccine does not create mucosal IgA immunity. This means it does not prevent covid from colonizing the respiratory tract and hence makes one still able to spread covid.
The vaccine’s design primarily reduces reactivity to the spike protein (i.e., covid symptoms). As such, vaccinated people can be infected with covid but not show symptoms of infection.
The vaccine is immune suppressing. On one hand, this results in people who have a latent covid infection becoming severely ill (which as I show here is a common but forgotten problem with vaccines). On the other hand, it causes people who have been vaccinated to be unable to develop permanent immunity and, hence, continually catch it.
Note: I have received many reports of vaccination causing an existing minor covid infection to become life threatening,

In short, for some reason, people who do not get covid will come down with it in the presence of a shedder, and in my assessment, this occurs frequently enough for it not to be a simple coincidence.

Based on all of this, it seems plausible that vaccinated people with covid infections either excrete higher concentrations of the spike protein than those with natural immunity, or have chronic infections they never clear (but show minimal symptoms of). However, the existing data on the length of infectiousness and viral counts in the noses of those infected with covid (which may be biased) shows minimal differences between the vaccinated and unvaccinated. As such, while it seems that vaccination causes certain people to give others covid, to the best of my knowledge data does not exist to support that claim and there may be some other process concurrently occurring which makes those around a shedder more susceptible to catching covid from them.

Plasmid Contamination

The third potential shedding vector are its DNA contaminants. Briefly, to mass produce the vaccine, a process (that was never tested for safety) was utilized to create synthetic bacterial DNA (plasmids), mass produced bacteria with those plasmids, and then used those plasmids to synthesize the vaccine mRNA. The problem with this approach was that the synthetic DNA was not fully removed from the vaccines, so many were injected not only with mRNA but also foreign DNA (which was uniquely suited to enter the nucleus and potentially integrate with the human genome due to its having the SV-40 promoter).

These plasmids in turn, made it possible for something to be “shed” from the vaccines that could then infect the recipient and reproduce in them (thereby making the minuscule amount shed have clinical consequences). This in turn, could either occur by:

Exhaled exosomes containing the plasmids, which then found they way into the cells after they were inhaled and then were able to enter the nucleus of cells and cause them to become spike protein factories (which I feel is fairly unlikely).
The plasmids transfecting the microbiome of the vaccine recipient, those bacteria reproducing the plasmid (which can then transfect other bacteria), and then those bacteria being shed to others (either causing them to produce the spike protein or to simply be dysfunctional).

This theory is compelling as it:

Allows for self-replicating pathogen to be “shed” (hence fulfilling the classic requirement for a vaccine to be able to “shed”).
Can easily allow transmission to occur both by touch (as bacteria are on the skin), by simply being in the presence of the shedder (as humans are surrounded by a cloud of their microbiome).
Makes secondary shedding possible as the transfected bacteria could linger on someone who’d been shedded on, in the air shedders had breathed, or the surfaces they’d touched (e.g., sheets).

The major problem with this theory is that to the best of my knowledge, there is no published data to support or refute it (as doing so would be expensive and require specialized technology). Rather, the closest elements I know of were:

A study of 34 people which found that before vaccination, bifidobacteria composed 13% of their gut microbiome, whereas 1 month after vaccination, it was 0.64% of their microbiome (a 43.36% decrease).
A study of 4 people found that this decrease increased with time, dropping by 73% at 6-9 months out.

These results are both important due to the importance of bifidobacteria for general health and susceptibility to covid (as this highlights another danger of covid vaccination) and because it shows that the vaccine can create long-term alterations in the gut microbiome—which could potentially be attributed to plasmid alternations of it.

Note: it is now known that the most dangerous vaccine lots also had higher amounts of the plasmid contaminants.

Other Mechanisms

Of the three previously listed mechanisms, based on all the available information (including what could account for the 1,500 reports I read through) I believe exosome mediated shedding is the most probably culprit, while spike protein expressing bacteria best addresses the unanswered questions about shedding (but still lacks the evidence to corroborate it).

Additionally, I have also come across three other potential mechanisms (which for a variety of reasons I believe to be less likely):

Exhalation of toxic lipid nanoparticle breakdown products (e.g., PEG).
Pheromone mediated “shedding” (as women’s menstrual cycles can be quite sensitive to the pheromones of those around them).
An energetic quality (likely mitogenic radiation—which I discussed in detail here) is emitted by shedders directly affecting the physiology and cellular activity of those around them.

The Cost of Shedding

This has been one of the more challenging articles here to write, in part because of how much data needed to be synthesized but also because many of these stories (especially the cancer ones) are quite heart wrenching and challenging to bear witness to.

Furthermore, given how inexplicable many of these symptoms appear, the selectivity in which they affect only certain people and the belief mRNA shedding is “mechanistically impossible” it naturally leads to those suffering from it to be relentlessly gaslighted.

For a moment, consider what some of these people are going through:

“My wife also experienced some reproductive difficulties as well. Neither one of us is vaccinated. The doctor told her it was in her head, so we both stopped talking about it.”

“[I experienced] shedding from a massage therapist who, while I was on the table, told me I was ‘safe’ because she just had her booster. I got terribly sick.”

“It occurred to me. This is why I haven’t gone out since 2021, even after I had covid in 2022 I still stay home. Nothing non-essential is worth disrupting my menstrual cycle again.”

“I never got sick throughout the covid madness. Now every time I’m around the vaxxed in social gatherings I get sick.”

“My unvaxed friend had to stop going to church because the entire congregation was vaxed and she got sick every time she went.”

Note: in 2021, a Miami school generated significant controversy by prohibiting students from attending the school within 30 days of vaccination.

At the same time, we also should consider an even more uncomfortable question. Has shedding inflicted large scale harm on the population? Given the controversial nature of this topic, it is understandable that it would rarely if ever be studied. However:

One research paper (which, given its content has been indefinitely stuck in pre-print limbo) discovered in multiple countries that when adults received the covid vaccine but no one under 18 was being vaccinated, death rates significantly increased in children.
That same pattern was also detected by another researcher in the Phillipines.
To evaluate the effects of shedding on the unvaccinated, one researcher analyzed England’s data (as it is one of the most comprehensive available datasources). In it, she found that during vaccine campaigns, the ratio between non-covid to covid deaths significantly increased (suggesting the vaccine was causing people to die) and that this increase was also seen in the unvaccinated—to the point it was arguable shedding killed more unvaccinated than covid did.

In short, while it is grossly unethical to mislead or force people into taking an unsafe and ineffective pharmaceutical, it is even more unethical to harm those who did not consent to it in the first place (e.g., this is why I’ve felt compelled to speak out about SSRI antidepressants causing psychotic violence and mass shootings).

As such, my hope is that I have made the case that mRNA technology needs to be subject to the same shedding evaluation requirements other gene therapies are, and that robust data on any potential shedding risks should be made publicly available before any new mRNA injection can come to market.

Furthermore, reestablishing the importance of this is now more critical than ever as the widespread opposition to vaccination we are now seeing has paralleled an increasing disregard for ethical principles by the medical profession (e.g., numerous recent publications have argued for the “ethics” of vaccine mandates). In turn, since mandates are becoming politically unviable, the medical field is looking into other ways to “bypass” vaccine hesitancy, such as self-spreading vaccines, which rapidly disseminate throughout the population (including those who did not want to vaccinate).

Moving Forward

While all of this is extremely sad, in my eyes, there are three major bright sides to it.

First, I am almost certain that in any previous era, covid vaccine shedding would have been dismissed as a fringe conspiracy theory and entirely forgotten by anyone not permanently affected by it. Due to the new era of media we are in and platforms like Substack making it possible to collate and share large volumes of information, many people now recognize that shedding is real, and articles like this can gain significant traction. I cannot understate how profound of a shift this is as nothing like that has ever been possible. Likewise, it will be much more difficult for the pharmaceutical industry to enact its predatory tactics in the future.

Note: due to the blitzkrieg used to sell the covid vaccines, a few years ago, being covid vaccine injured was taboo, whereas in just a few years it remarkably has become an open topic of discussion. At that time, it was impossible to publish anything about vaccine injuries, so I decided to compile an extensive log of injuries within my personal circle and later anonymously publish it so the injured could see they were not alone and help start the ball rolling towards acknowledging vaccine injuries. A year ago, I felt shedding injuries were in the same place covid vaccine injuries were a few years prior (hence why I took this project on), and while it has not come as far as vaccine injuries, a year later it is no longer a taboo topic to discuss—which is a truly remarkable speed of social transformation.

Second, the effects of shedding generally decrease the further one is from vaccination. Since the covid vaccine program is dying, this will be less of an issue as time progresses.

Third, shedding provides one of the strongest arguments against future mRNA vaccination campaigns (which is why it should be exposed). All other gene therapies are given in limited contexts, and maximum precautions are taken to ensure they are not shed on unintended recipients. We need to do everything possible to ensure this same standard applies to mRNA vaccines, and ideally to stop producing them altogether.

Author: A Midwestern Doctor

yogaesoteric
February 8, 2025