Covid 19 – Evidence of global fraud (I)
Covid 19, and the subsequent governmental responses, appear to be part of an international conspiracy to commit fraud. It seems there is no evidence that a virus called SARS-CoV-2 causes a disease called covid 19.
(Article by Iain Davis republished Off-Guardian.org)
Sometimes you have to go with your gut. We are not experts in genetics and, as ever, stand to be corrected. However the attention was drawn to some research published by the Spanish medical journal D-Salud-Discovery. Their advisory board of eminently qualified physicians and scientists lends further credibility to their research. Their claim is astounding. The genetic primers and probes used in RT-PCR tests to identify SARS-CoV-2 do not target anything specific. Following the search techniques outlined in the English translation of their report, anyone can corroborate the accuracy of their claims about the nucleotide sequences listed in the World Health Organisations protocols. D-Salud-Discovery state there are no tests capable of identifying SARS-CoV-2. Consequently, all claims about the alleged impact of covid 19 on population health are groundless.
The entire official covid 19 narrative is a deception. Ostensibly, there is no scientific foundation for any part of it. If these claims are accurate anyone can state that there is no evidence of a pandemic, merely the illusion of one. People have suffered incalculable loss for no evident reason, other than the ambitions of unscrupulous despots who wish to transform the global economy and the society to suit their purposes. In doing so this “parasite class” have potentially committed countless crimes. These crimes can and should be investigated and prosecuted in a court of law.
Identification of what exactly?
The World Health Organisation (WHO) classified covid 19 (COronaVIrus Disease 2019). They declared a global covid 19 pandemic on March 11th 2019.
The WHO’s Laboratory testing guidance states: “The etiologic agent [causation for the disease] responsible for the cluster of pneumonia cases in Wuhan has been identified as a novel betacoronavirus, (in the same family as SARS-CoV and MERS-CoV) via next generation sequencing (NGS) from cultured virus or directly from samples received from several pneumonia patients.”
The WHO’s claim is that the SARS-CoV-2 virus “causes” the “disease” covid 19. They also allege this virus has been clearly identified by researchers in Wuhan. In the WHO’s Novel Coronavirus 2019-nCov Situation Report 1, they state: “The Chinese authorities identified a new type of coronavirus, which was isolated on 7 January 2020… On 12 January 2020, China shared the genetic sequence of the novel coronavirus for countries to use in developing specific diagnostic kits.”
These two statements from the WHO clearly suggest the SARS-CoV-2 virus was isolated (meaning purified for study) and then genetic sequences were “identified” from the isolated sample. From this, diagnostic kits were developed and distributed globally to test for the virus in towns, cities and communities around the world. According to the WHO and Chinese researchers, these tests will find the virus that “causes” covid 19. Yet the WHO also state: “Working directly from sequence information, the team developed a series of genetic amplification (PCR) assays used by laboratories.”
The Wuhan scientists developed their genetic amplification assays from “sequence information” because there was no isolated, purified sample of the so called SARS-CoV-2 virus. They also showed electron microscope images of the newly discovered virions (the spiky protein ball containing the viral RNA.) However, such protein structures are not unique. They look just like other round vesicles, such as endocytic vesicles and exosomes. Virologists claim that it is not possible to “isolate” a virus because they only replicate inside host cells. They add that Koch’s postulates do not apply because they relate to bacteria (which are living organisms). Instead, virologists observe the virus’ cytopathogenic effects (CPE), causing cell shape modifications and degradation, in cell cultures.
When Chinese researchers first sequenced the full SARS-CoV-2 genome they observed CPE in Vero E6 and Huh7 cells. Vero E6 is the name of an immortalised monkey cell line and Huh7 of an immortalised cancer (tumorigenic) cell line. Meaning these cell lines have been maintained in vitro (in petri dish cultures) and in refrigerators (in specific conditions for cell preservation) for many years. Central to the official SARS-CoV-2 story is the idea that it is a zoonotic virus, capable of bridging the species gap from animals to humans.
When scientists from the US CDC “infected” various cells with the novel virus they noted the following: “We examined the capacity of SARS-CoV-2 to infect and replicate in several common primate and human cell lines, including human adenocarcinoma cells (A549) [lung cells], human liver cells (HUH7.0), and human embryonic kidney cells (HEK-293T), in addition to Vero E6 and Vero CCL81 [monkey cells]… No cytopathic effect was observed in any of the cell lines except in Vero cells [monkey cells]… HUH7.0 and 293T cells showed only modest viral replication and A549 cells [human lung tissue cells] were incompatible with SARS-CoV-2 infection.” The CDC did not observe any CPE in human cells and the human lung cells “were incompatible” with the virus. They saw no evidence that this alleged virus caused any human illness. Nor did this supposed human virus show any notable replication in human cells, suggesting human to human infection would be impossible.
Noting this problem, a team of Polish scientists introduced this sequenced “virus” to human airway epithelial (HAE) cells. They observed the effects on these HAE cultures for 5 days. They noted much greater replication than the CDC scientists but ultimately stated: “We did not observe any release of the virus from the basolateral side of the HAE culture.” Meaning they did not see any evidence of the supposed virions breaching the cell wall membrane. Again suggesting this so called virus isn’t infectious in human beings.
It is not clear that SARS-CoV-2 is a human virus capable of causing illness. It may not even physically exist. Is it nothing more than a concept based upon predictive genetic sequences?
Voyage of discovery
The Wuhan Center for Disease Control and Prevention and the Shanghai Public Health Clinical Centre published the first full SARS-CoV-2 genome (MN908947.1). This has been updated many times. However, MN908947.1 was the first genetic sequence describing the alleged covid 19 “etiologic agent” (SARS-CoV-2).
All subsequent claims, tests, treatments, statistics, vaccine development and resultant policies are based upon this sequence. If the tests for this “novel” virus don’t identify anything capable of causing illness in human beings, the whole covid 19 narrative is nothing but a charade.
The WUHAN researchers stated that they had effectively pieced the SARS-CoV-2 genetic sequence together by matching fragments found in samples with other, previously discovered, genetic sequences. From the gathered material they found an 87.1% match with SARS coronavirus (SARS-Cov). They used de novo assembly and targeted PCR and found 29,891-base-pair which shared a 79.6% sequence match to SARS-CoV.
They had to use “de novo assembly” because they had no priori knowledge of the correct sequence or order of those fragments. Quite simply, the WHO’s statement that Chinese researchers “isolated” the virus on the 7th January is false.
The Wuhan team used 40 rounds of RT-qPCR amplification to match fragments of cDNA (complimentary DNA constructed from sampled RNA fragments) with the published SARS coronavirus genome (SARS-CoV). Unfortunately it isn’t clear how accurate the original SARS-CoV genome is either.
In 2003 a team of researchers from Hong Kong studied 50 patients with severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS). They took samples from 2 of these patients and developed a culture in fetal monkey liver cells. They created 30 clones of the genetic material they found. Unable to find evidence of any other known virus, in just one of these cloned samples they found genetic sequences of “unknown origin.” Examining these unknown RNA sequences they found 57% match to bovine coronavirus and murine hepatitis virus and deduced it was of the family Coronaviridae. Considering these sequences to suggest a newly discovered SARS-CoV virus (new discoveries being ambrosia for scientists), they designed RT-PCR primers to test for this novel virus. The researchers stated: “Primers for detecting the new virus were designed for RT-PCR detection of this human pneumonia-associated coronavirus genome in clinical samples. Of the 44 nasopharyngeal samples available from the 50 SARS patients, 22 had evidence of human pneumonia-associated coronavirus RNA.”
Half of the tested patients, who all had the same symptoms, tested positive for this new alleged virus. No one knows why the other half tested negative for this novel SARS-CoV virus. The question wasn’t asked.
This supposed virus had just a 57% sequence match to allegedly known coronavirus. The other 43% was just “there”. Sequenced data was produced and recorded as a new genome as GenBank Accession No. AY274119.
The Wuhan researchers subsequently found an 79.6% sequence match to AY274119 and therefore called it a novel strain of SARS-CoV (2019-nCoV – eventually renamed SARS-CoV-2). No one, at any stage of this process, had produced any isolated, purified sample of any virus. All they had were percentage sequence matches to other percentage sequence matches.
Isolate nothing
Scientists are very annoyed because they keep saying the virus has been isolated but no one believes them. This is because, as yet, no one has provided a single purified sample of the SARS-CoV-2 virus. What we have instead is a completed genome and, as we are about to discover, it isn’t particularly convincing.
Investigative journalists Torsten Engelbrecht and Konstantin Demeter asked some of the scientists who said they had images of SARS-C0V-2 virions to confirm these were images of an isolated, purified, virus. None of them could.
In Australia scientists from the Doherty Institute, announced that they had “isolated” the SARS-CoV-2 virus. When asked to clarify the scientists said: “We have short (RNA) sequences from the diagnostic test that can be used in the diagnostic tests.”
This explains why the Australian government state: “The reliability of covid-19 tests is uncertain due to the limited evidence base… There is limited evidence available to assess the accuracy and clinical utility of available covid-19 tests.”
In the UK, in July 2020, a group of concerned academics wrote a letter to the UK Prime Minister Boris Johnson in which they asked him to: “Produce independently peer reviewed scientific evidence proving that the Covid-19 virus has been isolated.” To date they have not received a reply.
Similarly, UK researcher Andrew Johnson made a Freedom of Information Request to Public Health England (PHE). He asked them to provide him with their records describing the isolation of a SARS-COV-2 virus. To which they responded: “PHE can confirm it does not hold information in the way suggested by your request.”
Canadian researcher Christine Massey made a similar freedom of information request, asking the Canadian government the same. To which the Canadian government replied: “Having completed a thorough search, we regret to inform you that we were unable to locate any records responsive to your request.”
In the U.S. the Centre For Disease Control (CDC) RT-PCR Diagnostic Panel state: “…No quantified virus isolates of the 2019-nCoV are currently available… Detection of viral RNA may not indicate the presence of infectious virus or that 2019-nCoV is the causative agent for clinical symptoms.”
The updated on 13th July 2020, the CDC are yet to obtain any pure viral sample from any patient said to have the disease of covid 19. They openly admit their tests don’t necessarily show if SARS-CoV-2 is either present or causes covid 19.
People are told that none of this matters. That people are ignorant and just don’t understand virology. Therefore, people must accept pictures of aspects that could be something else and genetic sequences (which could be anything else) as conclusive proof that this virus, and the disease it is supposed to cause, are real.
Read the second part of the article
yogaesoteric
April 12, 2021