Edit this page
Modify this page
Edit this string
         
You are here: Home >Health >Articles >
Hiding vaccine-related deaths with semantic sleight-of-hand

Vaccine scientists and the public health community cautiously and occasionally will admit that vaccines can cause adverse reactions just like “any other medication or biological product”. Although experts are less willing to openly disclose the fact that adverse reactions can and do include death, one has only to look at reports to the U.S. Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) to see that mortality is a possible outcome. From 1990 through 2010, for example, VAERS received 1,881 reports of infant deaths following vaccination, representing a 4.8% mortality rate. Moreover, analysts acknowledge that VAERS, as a passive surveillance system, is subject to substantial underreporting. A federal government report from 2010 affirms that VAERS captures only about 1% of vaccine adverse reports.

On the international frontier, the public health community – with the World Health Organization (WHO) in the vanguard – previously used a six-category framework to investigate and categorize serious adverse events following immunization (AEFI), including death. Guided by this tool, public health teams examined temporal criteria and possible alternative explanations to determine whether the relationship of an AEFI to vaccine administration was “very likely/certain”, “probable”, “possible”, “unlikely”, “unrelated” or “unclassifiable”.

In 2013, the WHO’s Global Advisory Committee on Vaccine Safety discarded the prior tool, ostensibly because users “sometimes [found it] difficult to differentiate between ‘probable’, ‘possible’, and ‘unlikely’ categories.” The WHO enlisted vaccine experts to develop a “simpler” algorithm that would be more readily “applicable” to vaccines. The resulting four-category system now invites public health teams to classify an AEFI as either “consistent”, “inconsistent” or “indeterminate” with a vaccine-related causal association or as “unclassifiable”. Despite the patina of logic suggested by the use of an algorithm, “the final outcome of the case investigation depends on the personal judgment of the assessor”, especially (according to the tool’s proponents) when the process “yields answers that are both consistent and inconsistent with a causal association to immunization”.

In a 2017 letter in the Indian Journal of Medical Ethics, Drs. Jacob Puliyel (an India-based pediatrician and member of India’s National Technical Advisory Group on Immunization) and Anant Phadke (an executive member of the All India Drug Action Network) raise important questions about the revised tool. They describe an Orwellian catch-22 situation (a paradoxical situation from which an individual cannot escape because of contradictory rules) wherein it is nearly impossible to categorize post-vaccine deaths as vaccine-related. This is because the revised algorithm does not allow users to classify an AEFI as “consistent with causal association with vaccine” unless there is evidence showing that the vaccine caused a statistically significant increase in deaths during Phase III clinical trials. By definition, however, any vaccine not found to “retain safety” in Phase III trials cannot proceed to Phase IV (licensure and post-marketing surveillance). The result of the algorithm’s convoluted requirements is that any deaths that occur post-licensure become “coincidental” or “unclassifiable”.

Drs. Puliyel and Phadke describe what happened in India when the country’s National AEFI committee assessed 132 serious adverse events following immunization cases reported between 2012 and 2016, including 54 infant deaths that followed administration of a pentavalent all-in-one vaccine intended to protect recipients against diphtheria, tetanus, pertussis, hepatitis B, and Haemophilus influenza type b infections. For babies who survived hospitalization, the committee classified three-fifths (47/78) of the AEFI as causally related to vaccines (with 47% of the incidents viewed as “product-related” and 13% as “error-related”), but they rated nearly all (52/54) of the deaths as either coincidental (54%) or unclassifiable (43%) despite mounting evidence that pentavalent and hexavalent vaccines are increasing the risk of sudden unexpected death in infants. 

The absurdity and negligence inherent in the ultimately subjective WHO checklist have not escaped the attention of others in India and beyond. In a series of comments published in the journal Vaccine in response to the 2013 publication of the revised tool, commenters issued the following scathing remarks:
- “Even if a healthy child dies within minutes following vaccination and there is no alternate explanation for the AEFI, even then the powers that be could easily declare that death as coincidental and not due to the vaccine, thanks to the new AEFI. This is dangerous ‘science’.
- “Amongst the 20 items of their checklist, no less than 15 (75%) are devoted to refute a vaccine-induced causality. After all and as the authors confess with an astonishing ingenuousness, the main point is to ‘maintain public confidence in immunization programs’.”
- “People understand that there are no true coincidences – only events that have been made to appear to be coincidental by either a genuine lack of understanding of the overall facts leading to the ‘coincidence’ reported or by the deliberate suppression of the facts, including when AEFIs that result in death are made to ‘disappear’.”
- “It seems that huge business in the vaccine industry is affecting the science of vaccines and we are developing various ways to promote the business at the cost of human lives. Going for a less sensitive tool for safety concerns is not only illogical but risky for the children of the world.”

Unfortunately, many vaccine proponents appear to be more concerned with forestalling “misconceptions” and “erroneous conclusions about cause and effect” than they are about preventing and identifying adverse events following vaccination. The result, as Dr. Puliyel argues, is that doctors who “naively” accept biased reports on vaccine safety “are losing the trust of the public and in the process… endangering public health”.



yogaesoteric
February 5, 2018 
 

Articles published recently

> 24 SeptemberFlu vaccine found to be completely ineffective because of how it is made, new study finds

> 24 September6 Health Benefits of Cinnamon And Honey

> 24 SeptemberFasting is the new frontier in longevity research

> 24 SeptemberToxic Exposure: Chemicals are in Our Water, Food, Air and Furniture

> 23 SeptemberHow Technology Fatigues The Brain & What We Can Do About It

> 23 SeptemberHomemade probiotic toothpaste

> 23 September8 Reasons To Add Lime Juice To Your Water

> 23 SeptemberWhich gives you cancer sooner: Cigarettes or deli meats? New research reveals they’re both Class 1-A carcinogens

> 22 SeptemberMen can boost brain health and enhance performance with ginkgo

> 22 SeptemberHow to create a healthy (low-EMF) home

> 22 September21 Signs Parasites Are Living In Your Body – Use These Medicinal Plants to Help Kill Them

> 21 September31 Super Foods That Burn Fat and Help You Lose Weight (2)

> 21 SeptemberSleep Your Way to Better Health: Three Little-Known Sleep Hacks for Deep Rejuvenation and Rest

> 21 SeptemberPollution and stress at home combine to spur more hyperactivity

> 20 SeptemberThis Tea Contains 100 Times More Cancer-Fighting Antioxidants than Any Other

> 20 SeptemberWellness Encyclopedia: The Benefits of Raw Honey

> 19 SeptemberAncient Chinese Ink Could Hold a Surprising New Way to Kill Cancer Cells

> 19 SeptemberNow Is the Time to Prep Your Immune System for winter

> 18 SeptemberThis Is What Happens When You Stop Eating Bread

> 18 SeptemberThe 5 Main Cultural Influences Controlling Your Subconscious Mind

> 18 September3 Plant Remedies For Anxiety

> 17 SeptemberHow to Bring More Joy into Your Life and Why This is Paramount to Longevity

> 17 SeptemberWhat’s Happening In The Brains of Autistic Children, According To The ‘Edgar Cayce of our Time’

> 17 September9 Health Benefits Of Hibiscus

> 17 SeptemberThe Documentary That Major Health & Food Corporations Don’t Want You To See

> 16 SeptemberThe Powerful Lemon-Ginger Juice That Helps Eliminate Uric Acid Crystalization and Prevents Gout

> 16 SeptemberHow TV Affects Your Brain Chemistry For The Worst

> 15 SeptemberThis Is What Happens To Your Body 10 Hours After Applying The Nail Polish!

> 15 SeptemberVitamin C found to sharply reduce cardiovascular mortality in latest study

> 14 SeptemberThe awesome connection between our brain chemistry and human behavior

> 13 September31 Super Foods That Burn Fat and Help You Lose Weight (1)

> 13 SeptemberGive Love Not Tech: No ‘Safe’ Level of Cell Phone or Wireless (WiFi) Radiation…

> 12 SeptemberStudy: lauric acid from coconut oil inhibits cancer cell growth without affecting healthy cells

> 12 SeptemberShifting Timelines: Implanted Thoughts and Mind Control Implants (2)

> 11 SeptemberUncovering Why Playing a Musical Instrument Can Protect Brain Health